![]() |
|
|
Vol. 29, Issue 11, 1473-1479, November 2001
Department of Drug Metabolism, Merck Research Laboratories, West
Point, Pennsylvania
Testosterone, 7-benzyloxyquinoline, and
7-benzyloxy-4-trifluoromethyl-coumarin, marker substrates for
cytochrome P450 3A4 are commonly used within the pharmaceutical
industry to screen new chemical entities as inhibitors of CYP3A4 in a
high-throughput manner to predict the potential for drug-drug
interactions. However, it has been observed that inhibition data
obtained with a given CYP3A4 probe substrate may not correlate well
with results from a different probe. As a consequence, the choice of
the probe compound becomes an important consideration in such screens.
In the present study, kinetic interactions between either two of the
above three substrates were evaluated, and three-dimensional nonlinear
regression analysis was performed to understand the kinetic mechanisms
of drug interaction. Our results demonstrate that the kinetic
interaction between each pair of substrates does not appear to be
competitive and that the interactions are characterized by an unchanged
or a decrease in both apparent Km (a = 0.21
0.72, a change of Km in the absence of
the effector) and Vmax (
and
= 0.09
0.75, changes of
Vmax in the absence of the effector). These
data suggest that 1) the three substrates bind to different domains; 2)
at least two substrates can coexist in the active site of CYP3A4; and
3) the two bound substrates interact kinetically with each other (e.g.,
through steric hindrance), thereby leading to a change in both apparent
kinetic parameters and partial inhibition. Selection of multiple
substrates, which are shown not to be competitive, is necessary to
accurately predict CYP3A4 inhibition and the potential for drug-drug interaction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Bell, S. Bickford, P. H. Nguyen, J. Wang, T. He, B. Zhang, Y. Friche, A. Zimmerlin, L. Urban, and D. Bojanic Evaluation of Fluorescence- and Mass Spectrometry--Based CYP Inhibition Assays for Use in Drug Discovery J Biomol Screen, June 1, 2008; 13(5): 343 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-C. Egnell, J. B. Houston, and C. S. Boyer Predictive Models of CYP3A4 Heteroactivation: In Vitro-in Vivo Scaling and Pharmacophore Modeling J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2005; 312(3): 926 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Williams, J. Cosme, D. M. Vinkovic, A. Ward, H. C. Angove, P. J. Day, C. Vonrhein, I. J. Tickle, and H. Jhoti Crystal Structures of Human Cytochrome P450 3A4 Bound to Metyrapone and Progesterone Science, July 30, 2004; 305(5684): 683 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Sridar, T. C. Goosen, U. M. Kent, J. A. Williams, and P. F. Hollenberg SILYBIN INACTIVATES CYTOCHROMES P450 3A4 AND 2C9 AND INHIBITS MAJOR HEPATIC GLUCURONOSYLTRANSFERASES Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2004; 32(6): 587 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Galetin, S. E. Clarke, and J. B. Houston MULTISITE KINETIC ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PROTOTYPICAL CYP3A4 SUBGROUP SUBSTRATES: MIDAZOLAM, TESTOSTERONE, AND NIFEDIPINE Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2003; 31(9): 1108 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sahi, M. A. Milad, X. Zheng, K. A. Rose, H. Wang, L. Stilgenbauer, D. Gilbert, S. Jolley, R. H. Stern, and E. L. LeCluyse Avasimibe Induces CYP3A4 and Multiple Drug Resistance Protein 1 Gene Expression through Activation of the Pregnane X Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2003; 306(3): 1027 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Galetin, S. E. Clarke, and J. B. Houston Quinidine and Haloperidol as Modifiers of CYP3A4 Activity: Multisite Kinetic Model Approach Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2002; 30(12): 1512 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Hutzler and T. S. Tracy Atypical Kinetic Profiles in Drug Metabolism Reactions Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2002; 30(4): 355 - 362. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||