![]() |
|
|
AstraZeneca Research and Development, Mölndal, Sweden
In the early drug discovery process, metabolic stability and cytochrome P450 inhibition are often used as an early selection tool to identify useful compounds for further development. The reliability of the data in this process is therefore crucial. In the present study, in vitro enzyme kinetic data were used to predict the in vivo clearance and drug-drug interaction potential of four well known CYP2C9 substrates (tolbutamide, fluvastatin, ibuprofen and diclofenac) that are frequently used as benchmark substances in screening programs. Quantitative predictions of hepatic clearance using the well stirred prediction model and CLint calculated from enzyme kinetic measurements were not useful. Including and excluding protein binding resulted in under- and overestimation, respectively, of in vivo clearance. The only predicted in vivo clearance that fell into the range of reported measured values was for fluvastatin when protein binding was not included. In an open, randomized, seven-armed, crossover study in healthy volunteers, tolbutamide, ibuprofen, and fluvastatin were investigated as inhibitors of the metabolism of diclofenac, and vice versa. None of the combinations was found to interact with each other in vivo. The in vitro drug-drug interaction potential was investigated by Ki determinations of the same combinations. In contrast to clearance predictions, the interaction potential in vivo was best predicted when plasma protein binding was included in the various models used. This study points to the uncertainty in calculating in vivo kinetics from in vitro enzyme kinetic data. The in vitro metabolic screening can thus be questioned as a compound selection tool without a proven in vitro-in vivo correlation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. E. Barter, J. E. Chowdry, J. R. Harlow, J. E. Snawder, J. C. Lipscomb, and A. Rostami-Hodjegan Covariation of Human Microsomal Protein Per Gram of Liver with Age: Absence of Influence of Operator and Sample Storage May Justify Interlaboratory Data Pooling Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2008; 36(12): 2405 - 2409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-Y. Chang, W. Li, S. C. Traeger, B. Wang, D. Cui, H. Zhang, B. Wen, and A. D. Rodrigues Confirmation That Cytochrome P450 2C8 (CYP2C8) Plays a Minor Role in (S)-(+)- and (R)-(-)-Ibuprofen Hydroxylation in Vitro Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2008; 36(12): 2513 - 2522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sudsakorn, J. Skell, D. A. Williams, T. J. O'Shea, and H. Liu Evaluation of 3-O-Methylfluorescein as a Selective Fluorometric Substrate for CYP2C19 in Human Liver Microsomes Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2007; 35(6): 841 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Engtrakul, R. S. Foti, T. J. Strelevitz, and M. B. Fisher ALTERED AZT (3'-AZIDO-3'-DEOXYTHYMIDINE) GLUCURONIDATION KINETICS IN LIVER MICROSOMES AS AN EXPLANATION FOR UNDERPREDICTION OF IN VIVO CLEARANCE: COMPARISON TO HEPATOCYTES AND EFFECT OF INCUBATION ENVIRONMENT Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1621 - 1627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. McGinnity, J. Tucker, S. Trigg, and R. J. Riley PREDICTION OF CYP2C9-MEDIATED DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS: A COMPARISON USING DATA FROM RECOMBINANT ENZYMES AND HUMAN HEPATOCYTES Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1700 - 1707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Riley, D. F. McGinnity, and R. P. Austin A UNIFIED MODEL FOR PREDICTING HUMAN HEPATIC, METABOLIC CLEARANCE FROM IN VITRO INTRINSIC CLEARANCE DATA IN HEPATOCYTES AND MICROSOMES Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2005; 33(9): 1304 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A Bachmann and J. D Lewis Predicting Inhibitory Drug-Drug Interactions and Evaluating Drug Interaction Reports Using Inhibition Constants Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2005; 39(6): 1064 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Yeo, E. M. Howgate, G. T. Tucker, and A. Rostami-Hodjegan PREDICTING THE CLEARANCE OF CYP2C9 SUBSTRATES Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2004; 32(12): 1522 - 1522. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||