DMD

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on January 13, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.105.007740


0090-9556/06/3404-539-546$20.00
DMD 34:539-546, 2006

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.105.007740v1
34/4/539    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, D.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Deeley, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, D.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Deeley, R. G.

MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF POLAR AMINO ACID RESIDUES WITHIN PREDICTED TRANSMEMBRANE HELICES 10 AND 16 OF MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE PROTEIN 1 (ABCC1): EFFECT ON SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY

Da-Wei Zhang1, Kenichi Nunoya2, Monika Vasa, Hong-Mei Gu, Susan P. C. Cole, and Roger G. Deeley

Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Cancer Research Institute (D.-W.Z., K.N., M.V., S.P.C.C., R.G.D.); and Departments of Pathology & Molecular Medicine (S.P.C.C., R.G.D.), Biochemistry (R.G.D.), and Anatomy & Cell Biology (H.-M.G.), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Human multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) has a total of 17 transmembrane (TM) helices arranged in three membrane-spanning domains, MSD0, MSD1, and MSD2, with a 5 + 6 + 6 TM configuration. Photolabeling studies indicate that TMs 10 and 11 in MSD1 and 16 and 17 in MSD2 contribute to the substrate binding pocket of the protein. Previous mutational analyses of charged and polar amino acids in predicted TM helices 11, 16, and 17 support this suggestion. Mutation of Trp553 in TM10 also affects substrate specificity. To extend this analysis, we mutated six additional polar residues within TM10 and the remaining uncharacterized polar residue in TM16, Asn1208. Although mutation of Asn1208 was without effect, two of six mutations in TM10, T550A and T556A, modulated the drug resistance profile of MRP1 without affecting transport of leukotriene C4, 17ß-estradiol 17-(ß-D-glucuronide) (E217ßG), and glutathione. Mutation T550A increased vincristine resistance but decreased doxorubicin resistance, whereas mutation T556A decreased resistance to etoposide (VP-16) and doxorubicin. Although conservative mutation of Tyr568 in TM10 to Phe or Trp had no apparent effect on substrate specificity, substitution with Ala decreased the affinity of MRP1 for E217ßG without affecting drug resistance or the transport of other substrates tested. These analyses confirm that several amino acids in TM10 selectively alter the substrate specificity of MRP1, suggesting that they interact directly with certain substrates. The location of these and other functionally important residues in TM helices 11, 16, and 17 is discussed in the context of an energy-minimized model of the membrane-spanning domains of MRP1.


Address correspondence to: Roger G. Deeley, Cancer Research Institute, Suite 300, 10 Stuart St. Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada. E-mail: deeleyr{at}post.queensu.ca







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.