DMD Large equally mixed donor pool

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on May 14, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.014852


0090-9556/07/3508-1393-1399$20.00
DMD 35:1393-1399, 2007

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.107.014852v1
35/8/1393    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, M. E.

The Role of Monocarboxylate Transporter 2 and 4 in the Transport of {gamma}-Hydroxybutyric Acid in Mammalian Cells

Qi Wang, and Marilyn E. Morris

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York

Monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) is an important determinant of the renal transport of the drug of abuse, {gamma}-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB). The objective of this study was to investigate the role of MCT2 and MCT4, present in tissues including intestine, kidney, skeletal muscle, and brain, in the membrane transport of GHB and the MCT substrate L-lactate. mRNA and protein of MCT2 and MCT4 were expressed in MDA-MB231 cells, as detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis; MCT1 and MCT3 were not detected. The uptake of GHB or L-lactate by MDA-MB231 cells was pH-dependent but not sodium-dependent. The concentration-dependent uptake of GHB was best fitted to a single-transporter model with a diffusional clearance component (Km of 17.6 ± 1.5 mM, Vmax of 50.6 ± 9.0 nmol · mg–1 min–1 and diffusional clearance of 0.20 ± 0.07 µl · mg–1 min–1). On the other hand, the concentration-dependent uptake of L-lactate was best fitted to a two-transporter model (Km of 21 ± 2.5 and 3.0 ± 1.5 mM, and Vmax of 268 ± 72 and 62.9 ± 42.2 nmol · mg–1min–1, respectively). The uptake of GHB and L-lactate was inhibited by MCT inhibitors {alpha}-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamate (CHC), phloretin, and p-chloromercuribenzoic acid; CHC inhibited GHB and L-lactate uptake with IC50 values of 1.71 ± 0.39 and 0.71 ± 0.11 mM, respectively. Small interfering RNA treatment to silence MCT2 or MCT4 significantly decreased their protein expression and the uptake of L-lactate and GHB; however, the decrease in GHB uptake with MCT2 inhibition was smaller than that for MCT4. This investigation demonstrated that GHB is a substrate for both MCT2 and MCT4; these transporters may be important in the nonlinear disposition of GHB, as well as influencing its tissue distribution.


Address correspondence to: Dr. Marilyn E. Morris, 517 Hochstetter Hall, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Amherst, NY 14260. E-mail: memorris{at}buffalo.edu







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.