DMD Simcyp

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on September 22, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.108.020750


0090-9556/08/3612-2434-2444$20.00
DMD 36:2434-2444, 2008

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.108.020750v1
36/12/2434    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poirier, A.
Right arrow Articles by Funk, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poirier, A.
Right arrow Articles by Funk, C.

Design, Data Analysis, and Simulation of in Vitro Drug Transport Kinetic Experiments Using a Mechanistic in Vitro Model

Agnès Poirier, Thierry Lavé, Renée Portmann, Marie-Elise Brun, Frank Senner, Manfred Kansy, Hans-Peter Grimm, and Christoph Funk

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Non-Clinical Development, Drug Safety, Basel, Switzerland

The use of in vitro data for quantitative predictions of transporter-mediated elimination in vivo requires an accurate estimation of the transporter Michaelis-Menten parameters, Vmax and Km, as a first step. Therefore, the experimental conditions of in vitro studies used to assess hepatic uptake transport were optimized regarding active transport processes, nonspecific binding, and passive diffusion (Pdif). A mechanistic model was developed to analyze and accurately describe these active and passive processes. This two-compartmental model was parameterized to account for nonspecific binding, bidirectional passive diffusion, and active uptake processes based on the physiology of the cells. The model was used to estimate kinetic parameters of in vitro transport data from organic anion-transporting peptide model substrates (e.g., cholecystokinin octapeptide deltorphin II, fexofenadine, and pitavastatin). Data analysis by this mechanistic model significantly improved the accuracy and precision in all derived parameters [mean coefficient of variations (CVs) for Vmax and Km were 19 and 23%, respectively] compared with the conventional kinetic method of transport data analysis (mean CVs were 58 and 115%, respectively, using this method). Furthermore, permeability was found to be highly temperature-dependent in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) control cells and artificial membranes (parallel artificial membrane permeability assay). Whereas for some compounds (taurocholate, estrone-3-sulfate, and propranolol) the effect was moderate (1.5–6-fold higher permeability at 37°C compared with that at 4°C), for fexofenadine a 16-fold higher passive permeability was seen at 37°C. Therefore, Pdif was better predicted if it was evaluated under the same experimental conditions as Vmax and Km, i.e., in a single incubation of CHO overexpressed cells or rat hepatocytes at 37°C, instead of a parallel control evaluation at 4°C.


Address correspondence to: Dr. Christoph Funk, F. Hoffmann La Roche A.G., Non-Clinical Drug Safety, 69/154, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail: christoph.funk{at}roche.com







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.