![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Bioscience & Biotechnology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (P.A., M.P.O., J.B.); Preclinical Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (P.A., H.E.), Preclinical Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (J.W.P.); and Preclinical Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, GlaxoSmithKline, Welwyn, England (A.A.)
A robust screen for compound interaction with P-glycoprotein (P-gp) has some obvious requirements, such as a cell line expressing P-gp and a probe substrate that is transported solely by P-gp and passive permeability. It is actually difficult to prove that a particular probe substrate interacts only with P-gp in the chosen cell line. Using a confluent monolayer of MDCKII-hMDR1 cells, we have determined the elementary rate constants for the P-gp efflux of amprenavir, digoxin, loperamide, and quinidine. For amprenavir and quinidine, transport was fitted with just P-gp and passive permeability. For digoxin and loperamide, fitting required a basolateral transporter (p < 0.01), which was inhibited by the P-gp inhibitor N-(4-[2-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6,7-dimethoxy-2-isoquinolinyl)ethyl]-phenyl)-9,10-dihydro-5-methoxy-9-oxo-4-acridine carboxamide (GF120918). This means that when digoxin is used as a probe substrate and a compound is shown to inhibit digoxin flux, it could be that the inhibition occurs at the basolateral transporter rather than at P-gp. Digoxin basolateral>apical efflux also required an apical importer (p < 0.05). We propose that amprenavir and quinidine are robust probe substrates for assessing P-gp interactions using the MDCKII-hMDR1 confluent cell monolayer. Usage of another cell line, e.g., LLC-hMDR1 or Caco-2, would require the same kinetic validation to ensure that the probe substrate interacts only with P-gp. Attempts to identify the additional digoxin and loperamide transporters using a wide range of substrates/inhibitors of known epithelial transporters (organic cation transporters, organic anion transporters, organic ion-transporting polypeptide, uric acid transporter, or multidrug resistance-associated protein) failed to inhibit the digoxin or loperamide transport through their basolateral transporter.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Kamiyama, D. Sugiyama, D. Nakai, S.-i. Miura, and O. Okazaki Culture Period-Dependent Change of Function and Expression of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters in Caco-2 Cells Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2009; 37(9): 1956 - 1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wang, M. Leggas, M. Goswami, P. E. Empey, and P. J. McNamara N-(4-[2-(1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-6,7-dimethoxy-2-isoquinolinyl)ethyl]-phenyl)-9,10-dihydro-5-methoxy-9-oxo-4-acridine Carboxamide (GF120918) As a Chemical ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Family G Member 2 (Abcg2) Knockout Model to Study Nitrofurantoin Transfer into Milk Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2008; 36(12): 2591 - 2596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||