QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dmd.108.020545v1 36/6/1016    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Bauman, J. N. Articles by Kalgutkar, A. S. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bauman, J. N. Articles by Kalgutkar, A. S.

Comparison of the Bioactivation Potential of the Antidepressant and Hepatotoxin Nefazodone with Aripiprazole, a Structural Analog and Marketed Drug

Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics, and Metabolism, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut

In vitro metabolism/bioactivation of structurally related central nervous system agents nefazodone (hepatotoxin) and aripiprazole (nonhepatotoxin) were undertaken in human liver microsomes in an attempt to understand the differences in toxicological profile. NADPH-supplemented microsomal incubations of nefazodone and glutathione generated conjugates derived from addition of thiol to quinonoid intermediates. Inclusion of cyanide afforded cyano conjugates to iminium ions derived from -carbon oxidation of the piperazine ring in nefazodone and downstream metabolites. Although the arylpiperazine motif in aripiprazole did not succumb to bioactivation, the dihydroquinolinone group was bioactivated via an intermediate monohydroxy metabolite to a reactive species, which was trapped by glutathione. Studies with synthetic dehydroaripiprazole metabolite revealed an analogous glutathione conjugate with molecular weight 2 Da lower. Based on the proposed structure of the glutathione conjugate(s), a bioactivation sequence involving aromatic ortho-or para-hydroxylation on the quinolinone followed by oxidation to a quinone-imine was proposed. P4503A4 inactivation studies in microsomes indicated that, unlike nefazodone, aripiprazole was not a time- and concentration-dependent inactivator of the enzyme. Overall, these studies reinforce the notion that not all drugs that are bioactivated in vitro elicit a toxicological response in vivo. A likely explanation for the markedly improved safety profile of aripiprazole (versus nefazodone) despite the accompanying bioactivation liability is the vastly improved pharmacokinetics (enhanced oral bioavailability, longer elimination half-life) due to reduced P4503A4-mediated metabolism/bioactivation, which result in a lower daily dose (5–20 mg/day) compared with nefazodone (200–400 mg/day). This attribute probably reduces the total body burden to reactive metabolite exposure and may not exceed a threshold needed for toxicity.