DMD Simcyp

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on October 20, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.108.023119


0090-9556/09/3701-137-142$20.00
DMD 37:137-142, 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.108.023119v1
37/1/137    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kielbasa, W.
Right arrow Articles by Stratford, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kielbasa, W.
Right arrow Articles by Stratford, R.

Microdialysis Evaluation of Atomoxetine Brain Penetration and Central Nervous System Pharmacokinetics in Rats

William Kielbasa, J. Cory Kalvass, and Robert Stratford

Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana

A comprehensive in vivo evaluation of brain penetrability and central nervous system (CNS) pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine in rats was conducted using brain microdialysis. We sought to determine the nature and extent of transport at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCB) and to characterize brain extracellular and cellular disposition. The steady-state extracellular fluid (ECF) to plasma unbound (uP) concentration ratio (CECF/CuP = 0.7) and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to plasma unbound concentration ratio (CCSF/CuP = 1.7) were both near unity, indicating that atomoxetine transport across the BBB and BCB is primarily passive. On the basis of the ratios of whole brain concentration to CECF (CB/CECF = 170), brain cell (BC) concentration to CECF (CBC/CECF = 219), and unbound brain cell concentration to CECF (CuBC/CECF = 2.9), we conclude that whole brain concentration does not represent the concentration in the biophase and atomoxetine primarily partitions into brain cells. The distributional clearance at the BBB (QBBB = 0.00110 l/h) was estimated to be 12 times more rapid than that at the BCB (QBCB = 0.0000909 l/h) and similar to the clearances across brain parenchyma (CLECF-BC = 0.00216 l/h; CLBC-ECF = 0.000934 l/h). In summary, the first detailed examination using a quantitative microdialysis technique to understand the brain disposition of atomoxetine was conducted. We determined that atomoxetine brain penetration is high, movements across the BBB and BCB occur predominantly by a passive mechanism, and rapid equilibration of ECF and CSF with plasma occurs.


Address correspondence to: Dr. William Kielbasa, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285. E-mail: kielbasa_william{at}lilly.com







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.