![]() |
|
|
Drug Metabolism Research (J.G.S., P.S., J.P.S., L.C.W.) and Clinical Pharmacokinetics (L.J.S.), Pharmacia and Upjohn
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human hepatic microsomes were used to investigate the carboxylesterase-mediated bioactivation of CPT-11 to the active metabolite, SN-38. SN-38 formation velocity was determined by HPLC over a concentration range of 0.25-200 µM CPT-11. Biphasic Eadie Hofstee plots were observed in seven donors, suggesting that two isoforms catalyzed the reaction. Analysis by nonlinear least squares regression gave KM estimates of 129-164 µM with a Vmax of 5.3-17 pmol/mg/min for the low affinity isoform. The high affinity isoform had KM estimates of 1.4-3.9 µM with Vmax of 1.2-2.6 pmol/mg/min. The low KM carboxylesterase may be the main contributor to SN-38 formation at clinically relevant hepatic concentrations of CPT-11.
Using standard incubation conditions, the effects of potential
inhibitors of carboxylesterase-mediated CPT-11 hydrolysis were evaluated at concentrations
21 µM. Positive controls
bis-nitrophenylphosphate (BNPP) and physostigmine decreased CPT-11
hydrolysis to 1.3-3.3% and 23% of control values, respectively.
Caffeine, acetylsalicylic acid, coumarin, cisplatin, ethanol,
dexamethasone, 5-fluorouracil, loperamide, and prochlorperazine had no
statistically significant effect on CPT-11 hydrolysis. Small decreases
were observed with metoclopramide (91% of control), acetaminophen
(93% of control), probenecid (87% of control), and fluoride (91% of
control). Of the compounds tested above, based on these in
vitro data, only the potent inhibitors of carboxylesterase (BNPP,
physostigmine) have the potential to inhibit CPT-11 bioactivation if
administered concurrently.
The carboxylesterase-mediated hydrolysis of
-naphthyl acetate
(
-NA) was used to determine whether CPT-11 was an inhibitor of
hydrolysis of high turnover substrates of carboxylesterases. Inhibition
of
-NA hydrolysis by CPT-11 was determined relative to positive
controls BNPP and NaF. Incubation with microsomes pretreated with
CPT-11 (80-440 µM) decreased
-naphthol formation to approximately
80% of control at
-NA concentrations of 50-800 µM. The
inhibitors BNPP (360 µM) and NaF (500 µM) inhibited
-naphthol formation to 9-10% of control and to 14-20% of control,
respectively. Therefore, CPT-11-sensitive carboxylesterase isoforms may
account for only 20% of total
-NA hydrolases. Thus, CPT-11 is
unlikely to significantly inhibit high turnover, nonselective
substrates of carboxylesterases.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Irinotecan (CPT-11,2 Camptosar, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI) is a carboxylesterase-labile, carbamate prodrug of the antineoplastic topoisomerase I inhibitor SN-38 (1-3). CPT-11 and SN-38 exist in a pH- and protein-dependent equilibrium between active lactone and inactive hydroxy acid anion forms (4). Bioactivation of CPT-11 by microsomal carboxylesterases (E.C. 3.1.1.1) occurs primarily in the liver (5, 6) and has been studied previously using purified human carboxylesterase (7, 8). In this study, an in vitro model for the assessment of CPT-11 bioactivation by carboxylesterases was developed using human liver microsomes. Michaelis-Menten kinetic constants were determined and a new high affinity isoform was discovered.
Since CPT-11 will be used clinically with a variety of other drugs, an in vitro screen for potential drug interactions involving CPT-11 bioactivation was developed.
Some chemicals were chosen based on possible clinical use and have no known carboxylesterase-inhibiting ability (e.g. 5-FU, ethanol (EtOH), caffeine, acetaminophen, coumarin, dexamethasone, cisplatin, and probenecid). Others were chosen based on previously described effects on carboxylesterases (e.g. ASA (9), fluoride (10), HMB, CMB (6), physostigmine (6, 11), bis-nitrophenylphosphate (BNPP) (7), metoclopramide (12), loperamide (8), and prochlorperazine (13)). To avoid misleading conclusions about the possible clinical significance of in vitro experiments conducted at high inhibitor concentrations, statistically significant results were discussed in the context of clinically relevant concentrations of inhibitor.
As a carbamate, CPT-11 is a relatively poor substrate for
carboxylesterases. This was proposed to be a result of slow
decarbamylation of the serine esteratic site, inferring that CPT-11 is
a slowly reversible competitive inhibitor, possibly also with an
allosteric inhibitory effect on other substrates at a modulator site of
the enzyme (8). Therefore, CPT-11 could act as an inhibitor of endogenous or xenobiotic high turnover substrates of carboxylesterases. To investigate this, CPT-11 was tested as an inhibitor of microsomal carboxylesterase-mediated hydrolysis of the model substrate,
-naphthyl acetate (
-NA) (14,15).
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents and Materials.
Irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate (CPT-11) and SN-38, were supplied
by Pharmacia and Upjohn, Inc. Camptothecin and inhibitors were obtained
from Sigma or Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Transplant quality human liver
tissue was obtained through the International Institute for the
Advancement of Medicine (Exton, PA). Microsomes were prepared by
standard methods (16) and stored in 0.25 M sucrose at
70°C. Protein
was determined by the Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) assay (Pierce Chemical,
Rockford, IL) and standardized relative to bovine serum albumin.
Kinetics and Inhibitors of CPT-11 Bioactivation. Incubations. Kinetic parameters were determined using CPT-11 that was at equilibrium in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. Under these conditions the lactone/hydroxy acid anion ratio for CPT-11 was fixed at 87/13 (4). Kinetic studies were done in 2 ml Eppendorf Safe-lock polypropylene tubes (Brinkman, Westbury, NY) tubes using human hepatic microsomes and CPT-11, incubated in a final volume of 0.25 mL sodium phosphate (0.1 M, pH 7.4) at 37°C, with 80 rpm mixing. CPT-11 solutions were pre-incubated for 5 min and incubations were initiated by the addition of pre-warmed microsomes. Reactions were quenched and analyzed for SN-38 content by HPLC as described under sample preparation. All concentrations refer to total (lactone plus hydroxy acid anion) forms of CPT-11 and SN-38. Incubation times (5-60 min) and protein concentrations (0.125-1.8 mg/ml) were tested to identify conditions that resulted in quantifiable and linear formation of SN-38.
Determination of Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters. Incubations were done in duplicate using microsomal protein (1 mg/ml) and CPT-11 (0.25-200 µM, 17 concentrations), incubated for 15 min. A 50 µM CPT-11 control in phosphate buffer (without microsomes) and a boiled microsome control were run with each experiment. The hydrolysis of CPT-11 in phosphate buffer, in the absence of microsomal protein, and in the presence of boiled microsomal protein, was negligible over the incubation time course; however, the CPT-11 stock solution contained a small amount of SN-38 (approximately 0.04%). Levels of the SN-38 impurity at other substrate concentrations were calculated by linear interpolation of a calibration line passing through the experimentally-determined 50 µM blank data point and the origin. Total SN-38 formation in the presence of microsomes was corrected for the SN-38 impurity at each substrate concentration. Substrate depletion in kinetic studies was maximally 10% at 0.25 µM CPT-11.
Determination of the effect of potential inhibitors on SN-38
formation.
Incubations were done in triplicate using pooled human liver
microsomes, as described in Incubations, at a CPT-11
concentration of 10 µM. Microsomes (25 µl) were mixed with
potential inhibitors (0-25 µl) and phosphate buffer (100-125 µl)
and pre-incubated for 5 min. Inhibitor concentrations were
21 µM and were chosen to represent clinically attainable concentrations,
with the exception of loperamide, where the 25 µM test concentration
was approximately 1000-fold higher than clinically relevant plasma
levels. Incubations were initiated by the addition of prewarmed CPT-11
solution (100 µl). In the final incubation, DMSO content was 0.0016%
and MeOH content was 0% or 1%. Reactions were quenched and analyzed
as described under sample preparation. SN-38 formation was measured as
ng/ml/15 min. Inhibition was expressed as per cent of control.
HPLC and analytical standard preparation. A Perkin-Elmer ISS-200 autoinjector and PE 410 pump were used (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT). Chromatography was done on a Zorbax SB-C8 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm particle size, Mac Mod Analytical Inc., Chadds Ford, PA) with a Brownlee Newguard RP8 guard column using a mobile phase of 74:26, v:v triethylamine buffer:acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Detection was done using a Waters Model 474 fluorescence detector (Millipore Corp., Milford, MA). Calibration standards (9-10 concentrations) were prepared in duplicate in phosphate buffer to cover a concentration range of approximately 1 to 4000 ng/ml SN-38. Quality control (QC) standards were prepared in duplicate from separately prepared stock solutions at nominal SN-38 concentrations of 23, 76, and 1900 ng/ml. The stability of stock and control solutions in MeOH and in phosphate buffer at 4°C (storage conditions) were proven by HPLC analysis after storage periods of 0, 5, 22, 28, and 41 days. SN-38 recovery from microsomes relative to phosphate buffer was determined to be complete by comparing triplicate incubations of microsome suspensions spiked with 4, 90, 300, and 1900 ng/ml SN-38 with triplicate QC samples prepared identically in phosphate buffer.
Sample preparation. A 250 µl aliquot of incubation sample, calibration standard or QC sample was mixed with 500 µl quench solution (acetonitrile/acetic acid/methanol (95.6/4.0/0.4, w/w/w) containing 24 ng/ml camptothecin (CPT) internal standard). The samples were heated in a water bath at 37°C for 20 min to convert SN-38 to the lactone form. Samples were mixed with 1.0 ml of 50 mM, pH 4.2 triethylamine/acetate buffer. Precipitated protein was separated by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 2 min. A 50 µl aliquot of supernatant was analyzed by HPLC. Retention times were sensitive to small changes in mobile phase composition. The detector was programmed to change wavelengths and detector gain. From 0-10 min the excitation and emission wavelengths were 372 and 425, respectively (gain 10, measures CPT-11). From 10-14 min the excitation and emission wavelengths were 372 and 535, respectively (gain 100, measures SN-38). From 14 min onward the excitation and emission wavelengths were 372 and 425, respectively (gain 100, measures CPT).
Data collection and analysis. Data were collected and processed using the UPACS (Upjohn) chromatography system, Version 5.2. Quantitation was done using peak height ratios of the analyte to internal standard. Calibration curves were determined by using linear regression through-the-origin best fit with a 1/concentration weighting factor. Unknown SN-38 concentrations in incubation solutions were determined by comparison of the peak height ratios with the calibration curve. Correction factors for the SN-38 impurity at each concentration/time datapoint were calculated by subtracting background SN-38 from the total SN-38 formed in the presence of microsomes. Unknown concentrations were determined as corrected (carboxylesterase-mediated) ng/ml SN-38 produced in 15 min and were converted to units of velocity (pmol/mg/min) using a formula weight of 410.4 g/Mol for SN-38 monohydrate.
Analytical validation.
Standards of CPT-11 in MeOH or in phosphate buffer, prepared in
polystyrene centrifuge tubes and stored at 4°C, were stable over a
period of 41 days. Because of a limited supply of human microsomes,
standards and QC samples prepared in phosphate buffer were used to
quantify microsomal concentrations of SN-38. Recoveries of SN-38 from
microsomes spiked in triplicate with SN-38 at concentrations of 4, 90, 300, and 1900 ng/ml were approximately 100% in both microsomes and
phosphate buffer. Correlation coefficients (r2)
for linear standard curves in kinetic assays were
0.998. QC data were typically within ± 15%. The assay lower limit of
quantitation (LLOQ) was 1.1-2.4 ng/ml SN-38.
Curve fitting methods.
KM and Vmax
were determined by nonlinear least squares regression using Systat
Version 5.2.1 for Macintosh (Version 7.0). SN-38 formation V
versus [S] curves were fit for a two enzyme system with
1/V2 weighting.
-NA hydrolysis V
versus [S] curves were best fit by a single enzyme
Michaelis-Menten equation.
Determination of inhibitor potency. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel Version 4.0a (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). Means and standard deviations of uncorrected SN-38 production in the presence and absence of inhibitors were compared with a Student's t test. Mean SN-38 production was corrected for mean SN-38 impurity measured in the presence of heat denatured (boiled) microsomes and SN-38 production was expressed as per cent of enzyme-catalyzed control. When MeOH was necessary as an aid to solution for inhibitors, an additional control containing an equal amount of MeOH was run. The carboxylesterase inhibitor BNPP and a phosphate buffer control (no protein) were used as positive control and blank, respectively.
| |
Kinetics of -naphthyl acetate hydrolysis and inhibition by
CPT-11 |
|---|
An assay for the carboxylesterase-mediated formation of
-naphthol from
-NA was developed based on the formation of an azo dye from the reaction of fast blue RR (a diazonium salt, Sigma, St.
Louis, MO) with
-naphthol (17). Enzyme kinetics were determined using modified literature methods (14, 15) on a THERMOmax Microplate
Reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) (18). Optical Density (O.D.)
was measured at 450 nm. Initial velocities were recorded in units of
mO.D./min and were corrected for background hydrolysis in buffer,
determined simultaneously. CPT-11 (80-440 µM) was tested as an
inhibitor of
-NA hydrolysis. Control carboxylesterase-mediated hydrolysis was determined on the same plate, simultaneous with each
inhibitor concentration, since preincubation effected the control
kinetics. Results were expressed as per cent of control sample
initial velocity (mO.D./min).
Reagent Preparation.
BNPP and NaF were prepared in 0.1 M, pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. Stock
solutions of
-naphthol for standard curves were prepared in acetone.
Final acetone concentration in the standard curve wells was 3.3%.
Stock CPT-11 solutions were prepared at 360 µM in phosphate/MeOH or
at 80, 140, and 440 µM in phosphate/dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) at 90/10
w/w. The co-solvent concentration in each incubation well was 0.33%.
Controls containing an equal amount of co-solvent were prepared. Stock
-NA solutions were prepared in acetone/phosphate at 50/50 (w/w). The
final acetone concentration of 1.7% in all wells does not effect
enzyme activity (14). Fast Blue RR was prepared fresh in phosphate
buffer at 0.25% v/v for each experiment and was filtered prior to use.
Preliminary Experiments.
Low protein concentrations and short reaction times at 23°C and
substrate concentrations of
40 µM were needed to avoid
substrate depletion in excess of 15-20%.
-NA concentrations
40 µM product formation was linear
for 3-4 min. Estimates of initial velocity (mO.D./min) were determined using 13 data points acquired over 2 min. Initial velocity measured over 2 min was linear from 1-10 µg/ml microsomal protein. Subsequent experiments were conducted at 5 µg/ml protein. Calibration curves of
O.D. versus concentration (µM) for the
-naphthol
(product)/dye complex were linear (r2
0.98)
over the concentration range 0-150 µM. Kinetic experiments were
conducted in quadruplicate in two male (donors 10M and 24M) and three
female (donors 14F, 17F, and 20F) donor microsomes over an
-NA
concentration range of 5-800 µM. Means of quadruplicate experiments
had percent coefficient of variation values of typically less than 15%
for each concentration
40 µM. Thereafter, in inhibitor studies, incubations were conducted in duplicate in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 0.1M). When MeOH or DMSO were used an aid to solution for CPT-11, control experiments were also conducted in parallel with
the appropriate concentration of co-solvent. In all experiments, duplicate controls were run simultaneously for each substrate concentration on the same plate.
Incubation Conditions. In a 96 well microplate, each well contained 260 µl buffer, 20 µl microsomes (0.075 mg/mL) or buffer, 10 µl fast blue RR (0.25 mg/ml), and 10 µl substrate or buffer. The total volume was 300 µl. Substrate was added last using a multi-channel pipette. Immediate automatic mixing was employed and incubations were conducted with continuous assessment of optical density within the thermostatted compartment of the plate reader. Preincubations with inhibitors were done inside the plate reader.
Kinetics of
-Naphthyl Acetate Hydrolysis.
Substrate concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 µM (12 concentrations/lane) were incubated in
quadruplicate on the same plate with a matching quadruplicate set of
enzyme-free controls. Substrate depletion, calculated from the
-naphthol standard curve, was maximally 17% at 2 min at 60 µM
-NA for donor 20F, and was 13% or less in all other donors at
-NA
40 µM. Data were fit to a single enzyme Michaelis
Menten equation using substrate concentrations of 40-60 µM to
600-800 µM. Vmax data were compared to
Vmax data for low and high
KM isoforms of the CPT-11 hydrolyzing
carboxylesterase by linear regression comparing donors 10M, 24M, 17F,
and 20F.
Inhibition by CPT-11.
Microsomes from donor 17 were preincubated with CPT-11 (360 µM), or
BNPP (360 µM), or NaF (500 µM) for 10 min before the addition of
-NA (0-120 µM, 8 concentrations/plate lane) to start the
reaction. The experiment was repeated with CPT-11 (80, 140, and 440 µM) preincubated for 1 h at 23°C over
-NA concentrations of
0-800 µM.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hydrolysis Kinetics of CPT-11 in the Presence of Human Liver Microsomal Carboxylesterases
Incubation Conditions. In pilot studies, heat denaturation (boiled microsomes) and the organophosphate esterase inhibitor, BNPP reduced SN-38 production by human hepatic microsomes to zero, providing evidence for the involvement of esterase enzymes. An optimal protein concentration of 1 mg/ml and incubation time of 15 min were chosen from the linear regions of SN-38 production. These conditions were necessary to surpass the assay limit of quantitation at low substrate concentrations and to adequately differentiate enzyme-catalyzed SN-38 formation from the SN-38 impurity.
Kinetic Results for SN-38 Formation. HPLC chromatograms showing the effect of CPT-11 concentration on the formation of SN-38 by microsomes are shown in fig. 1. In microsomes from seven different liver donors, Eadie Hofstee plots were clearly biphasic over 0.25-200 µM CPT-11 (data not shown). In accord with the linear plots, V versus [S] data, modeled using nonlinear least squares regression analysis, were best fit by a two enzyme equation. KM and Vmax estimates are presented in table 1. A representative Eadie Hofstee plot for the pooled microsomes, comparing fitted with actual data is shown in fig. 2. The actual and theoretical curves were superimposed. The calculated KM and Vmax for each carboxylesterase isoform are individually represented in the same figure by the calculated linear plots for each isoform.
|
|
|
|
Effects of Potential Inhibitors of CPT-11 Bioactivation
Results of four separate inhibition experiments are compared with their respective control values in table 2. Inhibition was expressed as per cent of control. Controls containing an equal amount of 1% MeOH were run when MeOH was used to dissolve inhibitors. MeOH decreased activity by 3.5, 6.6, and 18.2% in experiments 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Organic solvent effects on carboxylesterase activity have been documented previously (19).
|
As expected, BNPP at both 25 and 100 µM reduced CPT-11 hydrolysis to 1.3-1.6% of control values. Physostigmine, a known inhibitor of butyrylcholinesterases (E.C. 3.1.1.8, closely related to carboxylesterases) showed significant (77% decrease, (P < 0.05)) inhibition of CPT-11 hydrolysis, in accord with previous data (6, 11). Probenecid (25 µM) showed a significant (13%, P < 0.01) inhibition of CPT-11 hydrolysis, while 5-FU (25 µM) had no significant inhibitory effect (2%, P < 0.1). Sodium fluoride (NaF), a known carboxylesterase inhibitor (10, 20) inhibited hydrolysis significantly (P < 0.01) by 9% at 25 µM, 14% at 100 µM, and 35% at 481 µM.
Aggressive therapy with loperamide is used to treat CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea (21). A small decrease (7.5%) in SN-38 formation owing to loperamide was observed; however, the difference was not significantly different from control values. Ethanol at 25 and 100 µM had no significant effect on CPT-11 hydrolysis. Two mercuribenzoate inhibitors of A-esterases (HMB and CMB) also had no significant effect. Caffeine, ASA, and coumarin all showed no significant effect on CPT-11 hydrolysis. Small, but statistically significant, decreases were observed with metoclopramide (9.1% decrease, P < 0.01) and acetaminophen (7% decrease, P < 0.05). Dexamethasone, cisplatin, and prochlorperazine were without significant effect with 3.4%, 5.6%, and 7.0% differences from control values, respectively.
Effect of CPT-11 on
-Naphthyl Acetate, a High Turnover Substrate
of Human Liver Carboxylesterase
Fig. 4 shows initial velocity
versus substrate concentration plots over 40-800 µM for
microsomes from five donors. Data were fit by nonlinear regression to a
single enzyme Michaelis Menten equation giving corrected correlation
coefficient (R2) values of 0.94-0.98.
KM estimates for
-NA hydrolysis were
115 ± 20.8 µM (range 90.6-146 µM, CV = 18%).
Vmax was estimated at 1.64 ± 0.45 µMol/mg/min (range 1.1-2.6 µMol/mg/min, CV = 27.3%). Linear
regression (forced through the origin) of
Vmax for
-NA hydrolysis
versus Vmax for low and high
KM isoforms of the CPT-11 hydrolase
afforded correlation coefficients of 0.94 with the CPT-11 high
KM isoform and a lower correlation
coefficient of 0.82 for the CPT-11 low KM
isoform in five donors. The narrow range of Vmax for the CPT-11 low
KM isoform and the limited number of
donors (N = 4, range 2.41-2.61), may be responsible
for the lower correlation coefficient. A larger sample size would be
needed to conclude that CPT-11 and
-NA carboxylesterase activities
are correlated.
|
At
-NA concentrations of 0 to 100 µM, hydrolysis was almost
completely inhibited by positive control carboxylesterase inhibitors, BNPP (360 µM) and NaF (500 µM), whereas CPT-11 preincubated for 10 min at 360 µM inhibited
-NA hydrolysis by only 9 and 20%
relative to control values, at concentrations of
-NA of 50 and 100 µM (fig. 5). In a second experiment,
CPT-11 preincubated for 1 h at 80, 140, or 440 µM inhibited
-NA hydrolysis to 69-89% (mean 80 ± 6.6%, N = 9) of control values, at concentrations of
-NA of 200, 400, and
800 µM (data not shown). It is clear from these data that inhibition
of
-NA hydrolysis by CPT-11 was maximal at approximately 80% of
control values at the lowest CPT-11 concentration tested (80 µM), and
therefore this concentration was well above the
Ki for CPT-11-sensitive carboxylesterases.
Thus, CPT-11-sensitive carboxylesterases may only account for 20% of
the turnover of the model substrate,
-NA in vitro.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CPT-11 Bioactivation
The Enzymology of Carboxylesterases. To develop a clinically-relevant perspective on the bioactivation of CPT-11, and to understand the implications of carboxylesterase inhibition on antineoplastic activity, it is necessary to understand the basic chemistry of the enzyme class. The mechanism of hydrolysis by serine hydrolases such as the carboxylesterases is well understood from kinetic studies on substrates and inhibitors (19). However, the molecular biology of carboxylesterase enzymes is only now being elucidated, in part because of technical difficulties inherent in subtle differences in sequence, structure, and substrate and inhibitor specificity (22, 23). Two highly similar human liver microsomal carboxylesterases were recently sequenced and expressed by Kroetz et al. (22), and these authors conclude, based on substrate diversity, that additional carboxylesterases must exist. Ketterman et al. have purified and characterized mid and low Pi human hepatic carboxylesterases and have proposed, based on kinetic comparison of different donors, that polymorphism occurs within each purified carboxylesterase (24, 25). Therefore, it is likely that more than one carboxylesterase isoform may contribute to CPT-11 bioactivation.
CPT-11 Hydrolysis and Antitumor Activity. Although CPT-11 has weak antineoplastic activity of its own, a 104-fold increase in cytotoxicity in vitro is realized when SN-38 is released by carboxylesterases in rat serum (26). The conversion of CPT-11 to SN-38 has been studied in a wide variety of tissues, cell lines, and purified enzyme preparations in vitro (5-8, 11, 27). The sensitivity of proliferating tissues or cell lines to the cytotoxic effects of CPT-11 may be related their carboxylesterase levels (27). Some studies indicate that tumor levels of carboxylesterases are reduced relative to peritumoral normal tissue (28).
A New CPT-11 Hydrolase. Our observation of biphasic CPT-11 kinetics in human liver microsomes suggests at least two carboxylesterase isoforms are present in our human microsomal preparation. We have observed the low KM isoform by studying much lower substrate concentrations (250 nM-200 µM) relative to the concentrations used by others (7, 8). Satoh et al. studied a purified enzyme at 25-100 µM CPT-11 giving KM = 169 µM and Vmax = 169 pmol/mg/min by Lineweaver-Burk analysis of the linear portion of the plot. Rivory et al. studied the mid Pi purified enzyme at 8-150 µM CPT-11, observing a KM of 52.9 µM by nonlinear regression analysis. Our data fit a two enzyme MM equation extremely well, and we speculate that the characterization of two or more carboxylesterase isoforms by Kroetz et al. (22) and Ketterman et al. (24, 25) may be relevant to the kinetic parameters determined in this study.
The variability in carboxylesterase content of human livers was 33.1-fold in human liver microsomes (N = 12) as shown by Hosokawa et al., using nitrophenyl acetate hydrolysis as a marker (29). Variability was shown by Kroetz et al. to be maximally 3-4 fold for the hCE isoform and 8-fold for the hCEv isoform (N = 8), as determined by mRNA quantitation (22). We observed a 2- to 3-fold difference in individual Vmax estimates for CPT-11 hydrolysis in hepatic microsomes from six donors. Regarding the possibility that carboxylesterase induction could alter CPT-11 bioactivation, little is known about the regulation of carboxylesterases in man. An array of common microsomal inducers, including dexamethasone have no inductive effect or can inhibit expression of rat hydrolases A and B (30). No clinically relevant conclusions about the induction of SN-38 production in man can be drawn from these rat data. This is additionally complicated by the fact that some inducers of carboxylesterases, such as phenobarbital, induce UDPGT isoforms that catalyze the glucuronidation of SN-38 in rats (31) and also induce CYP 3A4 which mediates the metabolism of CPT-11 to the metabolite aminopentanecarboxylic acid (APC) (32). CPT-11 bioactivation is a relatively slow and inefficient process, with Vmax in the low pmol/mg/min range. This observation is supported by low plasma SN-38/CPT-11 AUC ratios in vivo (33). In accord with the carbamate structure shared by CPT-11 with cholinesterase inhibitors such as bambuterol (34), Rivory et al. have proposed that decarbamylation of the serine esteratic site is the rate limiting step in carboxylesterase-mediated CPT-11 hydrolysis (8). Indeed, the carbamate functional group was a molecular design feature (in addition to the solubility enhancement of the outer basic piperidine ring) that allowed the slow and sustained release of SN-38. This may account for relatively superior antineoplastic activity of CPT-11 in vivo, relative to esters of SN-38. (3)Lactone/hydroxy Acid Anion Equilibria in Relation to CPT-11 Bioactivation. The lactone form of CPT-11 is stable under acidic, but not neutral, conditions with a half life in pH 7.4 phosphate buffered saline of 25.6 min. At equilibrium, the lactone/hydroxy acid anion ratio is known to be 13/87 (4). Haaz et al. have recently shown that there is an approximately 2-fold greater hydrolysis of the lactone form of CPT-11 relative to the ring-opened hydroxy acid anion form (35). Equilibrium conditions for our kinetic studies were chosen for several reasons: First, the lactone concentration would not be changing rapidly and enzyme activity would be maximal during the incubation at pH 7.4. Second, because the lactone forms of CPT-11 and SN-38 are preferentially bound to and stabilized by serum albumin, the free fraction in plasma may be dominated by the hydroxy acid anion form. Third, the hydroxy acid anion form may hypothetically be more available for extraction by the liver, as shown by the short half life of SN-38 hydroxy acid anion when given intravenously to animals as the soluble sodium salt (36).
It was not experimentally determined whether the biphasic kinetics observed in this experiment were the results of a single carboxylesterase isoform with a different KM for lactone and hydroxy acid anion forms of CPT-11. If this was the case, however, each form (lactone or hydroxy acid anion) would be a competitive reversible (with a slow off-rate) inhibitor of the turnover of the other. To investigate this possibility, we refit our data to a single enzyme/single inhibitor Michaelis-Menten equation, using a hypothetical constant 13/87 ratio of lactone to hydroxy acid anion to calculate concentrations of lactone and hydroxy acid anion at each substrate concentration. The data could not be fit, in direct contrast to the excellent fit observed for the two enzyme equation. We conclude that any difference in rates of turnover between lactone and hydroxy acid anion forms could not be extracted from our data and that two carboxylesterase isoforms were responsible for the biphasic kinetics.Effect of Potential Inhibitors of CPT-11 Bioactivation
Loperamide (24 µM) reduced SN-38 formation from 10 µM CPT-11 by approximately 7%. This difference from control was not statistically significant. Rivory et al. (8), using a purified enzyme, have shown that high concentrations of loperamide (200 µM) inhibits p-nitrophenylacetate hydrolysis, lowering Vmax from 60.0 to 41.9 nMol/min and almost doubling the KM (240 to 400 µM). Similarly, 50 µM loperamide reduced SN-38 production by approximately 50% at high CPT-11 concentrations (8). We estimate, based on single dose literature data, that when loperamide is given at 2 mg every 2 hr, that loperamide steady state plasma concentrations are approximately 34 nM in humans (37). We speculate that hepatic concentrations at this dose intensity will be much lower than the 24 µM incubation concentrations used in our study. On the basis of these data, we conclude that, even if administered at high doses at the same time as CPT-11, the likelihood of a clinically significant effect of loperamide on SN-38 production is negligible.
Sodium fluoride (NaF), a known carboxylesterase inhibitor (10, 20),
inhibited hydrolysis by 9% at 25 µM. This is a relatively high NaF
concentration. Fluoride, which is formed from the breakdown of the 5-FU
metabolite, fluoro-
-alanine (FBAL) (38), could potentially decrease
SN-38 AUC during co-therapy with 5-FU and CPT-11 (39). In a separate
study, at 5-FU doses ranging between 8 and 30 mg/kg, free fluoride was
observed in plasma in about one-fourth of patient samples that were
examined (median 5 µM, maximum 33 µM) (38). The low fluoride
concentrations observed clinically and the extent of in
vitro inhibition observed at 25 µM NaF in the present study
indicate that 5-FU-derived fluoride is not likely to result in
clinically significant decreases in metabolism of CPT-11 to SN-38. A
recent clinical report shows that co-administration of 5-FU does not
significantly effect the conversion of CPT-11 to SN-38 (40).
Relative to the potent inhibitors, BNPP and physostigmine, which are not expected to be given with CPT-11, inhibition of SN-38 formation by 5-10% in vitro by high concentrations of inhibitor is probably not clinically relevant. Furthermore, any subtle changes would be irrelevant considering the high interpatient variability normally observed in CPT-11 pharmacokinetics (41).
Co-administration of any known potent carboxylesterase inhibitor with CPT-11 is probably rare. However, if a known therapeutic carboxylesterase inhibitor, such as physostigmine or echothiophate, can be safely withheld, staggering co-therapy with CPT-11 would be the prudent and cost effective way to ensure adequate production of SN-38 in patients needing both medications.
-Naphthyl Acetate Hydrolysis: Effect of CPT-11 on a High
Turnover Substrate of Human Liver Carboxylesterases
The kinetics of
-NA hydrolysis were determined. V
max data were about 50% lower than those
determined by Huang et al. (3.89 ± 0.20 µMol/mg/min
versus 1.64 µMol/mg/min) (14). In this study Vmax varied from 1.1-2.6 µMol/mg/min.
Data from four donors demonstrated a correlation between
-NA
Vmax and the
Vmax of the high
KM component of CPT-11 hydrolysis. The
kinetic difference between ester and carbamate substrates is apparent
in the 106-fold higher
Vmax for
-NA hydrolysis
relative to CPT-11 hydrolysis.
In one liver sample, CPT-11 inhibited the carboxylesterase-mediated
hydrolysis of
-NA by only 20%. Compared with BNPP and NaF, CPT-11
was therefore a relatively weak inhibitor of
-NA hydrolysis. We did
not examine low enough CPT-11 concentrations to establish a
Ki (presumably this would equal the
KM). Since 80% of the hydrolysis of
-NA continued unabated in the presence of high concentrations of
CPT-11, we speculate that nonselective substrates of carboxylesterases
will not be appreciably inhibited by CPT-11 in vivo, owing
to the contributions of isoforms not affected by CPT-11.
Conclusions
We have characterized a new low KM
human carboxylesterase that we propose to be the major isoform
responsible for the bioactivation of CPT-11 in vivo. The
CPT-11-sensitive microsomal carboxylesterases characterized in this
paper are inhibited by potent carboxylesterase inhibitors, but are
inhibited to only an insignificant extent by high concentrations of
some selected agents that are commonly coadministered with CPT-11.
CPT-11 inhibits the carboxylesterase-mediated turnover of the model
high turnover ester substrate
-NA, but only by 20% even at the
highest CPT-11 concentrations tested. We speculate that, since there is
ample remaining activity related to carboxylesterase isoforms that are
not sensitive to CPT-11, CPT-11 should not significantly inhibit the
hydrolysis of high turnover, nonselective ester substrates of
carboxylesterases.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr. F. Kezdy for advice on curve fitting for Michaelis Menten equations, to Dr. Roger Ulrich and Jim Bacon for help in the early phases of this investigation, and to Dr. Laurent Rivory for a valuable discussion.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 28, 1997; accepted June 5, 1997.
1 Present address: Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, University of California at San Francisco.
A preliminary account of this work was given at the 4th International ISSX Meeting, Abstracts #88, 218 and 219. Seattle WA, Aug 27-31, 1995.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. J. Greg Slatter, Drug Metabolism Research, Pharmacia and Upjohn Co., 301 Henrietta St., Kalamazoo MI 49007. E-mail: john.g.slatter{at}am.pnu.com.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
Abbreviations used are:
CPT, camptothecin;
CPT-11, irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate;
EtOH, ethanol;
ASA, acetylsalicylic acid;
HMB, hydroxymercuribenzote;
CMB, chloromercuribenzoate;
HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography;
KM, Michaelis constant;
5-FU, 5-fluorouracil;
MeOH, methanol;
BNPP, bis-nitrophenylphosphate;
-NA, alpha naphthyl acetate;
SN-38, active antineoplastic metabolite of
CPT-11;
DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide;
UPACS, Upjohn Physical and Analytical
Chemistry System;
V, reaction velocity;
QC, quality
control standard;
[S], substrate concentration.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
W. J. Slichenmyer,
E. K. Rowinsky,
R. C. Donehower, and
S. H. Kaufmann:
The current status of camptothecin analogues as antitumor agents.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
85,
271-291 (1993) |
| 2. | G. J. Creemers, B. Lund, and J. Verweij: Topoisomerase I inhibitors: Topotecan and irinotecan. Cancer Treat. Rev. 20, 73-96 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 3. | S. Sawada, T. Yokokura, and T. Miyasaka: Synthesis and antitumor activity of A-ring or E-lactone modified water-soluble prodrugs of 20(s) camptothecin, including development of irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate. Curr. Pharm. Design 1, 113-132 (1995). |
| 4. | T. G. Burke and Z. Mi: The structural basis of camptothecin interactions with human serum albumin: impact on drug stability. J. Med. Chem. 37, 40-46 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 5. | A. Kono and Y. Hara: Conversion of CPT-11 into SN-38 in human tissues. Jpn. J. Cancer Chemother. 18, 2175-2178 (1991). |
| 6. | Y. Kawato, M. Aonuma, K. Matsumoto, and K. Sato: Production of SN-38, a main metabolite of the camptothecin derivative CPT-11, and its species and tissue specificities. Yakubutsu Dotai 6, 899-907 (1991). |
| 7. | T. Satoh, M. Hosokawa, R. Atsumi, W. Suzuki, H. Hakusui, and E. Nagai: Metabolic activation of CPT-11, 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin, a novel antitumor agent, by carboxylesterase. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 17, 662-664 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 8. | L. P. Rivory, M. R. Bowles, J. Robert, and S. M. Pond: Conversion of irinotecan (CPT-11) to its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), by human liver carboxylesterase. Biochem. Pharmacol. 52, 1103-1111 (1996)[Medline]. |
| 9. | T. Satoh: Role of carboxylesterases in xenobiotic metabolism. In "Reviews in Biochemical Toxicology" (E. Hodgson, J. R. Bend and R. M. Philpot, eds.), pp. 155-181. Elsevier, New York, 1987. |
| 10. |
D. A. Haugen and
J. W. Suttie:
Fluoride inhibition of rat microsomal esterase.
J. Biol. Chem.
249,
2723-2731 (1974) |
| 11. | T. Tsuji, N. Kaneda, K. Kado, T. Yokokura, T. Yoshimoto, and D. Tsuru: CPT-11 converting enzyme from rat serum: purification and some properties. J. Pharmacobiodyn. 14, 341-349 (1991)[Medline]. |
| 12. | S. S. Rao and U. Kaveeshwar: Difference in the inhibition of plasma carboxylesterase activity by metoclopramide in humans and laboratory animals. Pharmazie 47, 115 (1992)[Medline]. |
| 13. | O. T. Markovic and N. S. Markovic: Chlorpromazine induced inhibition of carboxylesterase activity. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 39, 730 (1991). |
| 14. |
T. L. Huang,
A. Székács,
T. Uematsu,
E. Kuwano,
A. Parkinson, and
B. D. Hammock:
Hydrolysis of carbonates, thiocarbonates, carbamates, and carboxylic esters of -naphthol, -naphthol, and p-nitrophenol by human, rat, and mouse liver carboxylesterases.
Pharm. Res.
10,
639-648 (1993)[Medline].
|
| 15. | D. F. Grant, D. M. Bender, and B. D. Hammock: Quantitative kinetic assays for glutathione S-transferase and general esterase in individual mosquitoes using an EIA reader. Insect Biochem. 19, 741-751 (1989). |
| 16. | A. Lu and W. Levin: Partial purification of cytochrome P-450 and cytochrome P-448 from rat liver microsomes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 46, 1334-1339 (1972)[Medline]. |
| 17. |
K. J. Johnson and
A. E. Ashford:
A simultaneous-coupling azo dye method for the quantitative assay of esterase using -naphthyl acetate as substrate.
Histochem. J.
12,
221-234 (1980)[Medline].
|
| 18. | G. M. K. Humphries: Multisample photometric biochemical analysis using VmaxTM and SoftmaxTM. Biotechniques 6, 354-360 (1988)[Medline]. |
| 19. | J. K. Stoops, D. J. Horgan, M. T. C. Runnegar, J. de Jersey, E. C. Webb, and B. Zerner: Carboxyesterases (E.C. 3.1.1): kinetic studies on carboxylesterases. Biochemistry 2026-2033 (1969). |
| 20. |
R. W. Dulac and
T. J. Yang:
Differential sodium fluoride sensitivity of -naphthyl acetate esterase in human, bovine, canine and murine monocytes and lymphocytes.
Exp. Hematol.
19,
59-62 (1991)[Medline].
|
| 21. |
D. Abigerges,
J. P. Armand,
G. G. Chabot,
L. Da Costa,
E. Fadel,
C. Cote C, et al.:
Irinotecan (CPT-11) high-dose escalation using intensive high-dose loperamide to control diarrhea.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
86,
446-449 (1994) |
| 22. | D. L. Kroetz, O. W. McBride, and F. J. Gonzalez: Glycosylation-dependent activity of baculovirus-expressed human liver carboxylesterases: cDNA cloning and characterization of two highly similar enzyme forms. Biochemistry 32, 11606-11617 (1993)[Medline]. |
| 23. | E. W. Morgan, B. Yan, D. Greenway, D. R. Petersen, and A. Parkinson: Purification and characterization of two rat liver microsomal carboxylesterases (hydrolase A and B) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 315, 495-512 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 24. | A. J. Ketterman, M. R. Bowles, and S. M. Pond: Purification and characterization of two human liver carboxylesterases. Int. J. Biochem. 21, 1303-1312 (1989)[Medline]. |
| 25. | A. J. Ketterman: Polymorphisms of human liver carboxylesterases. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 19, 306S (1991)[Medline]. |
| 26. |
P. D. Senter,
H. Marquardt,
B. A. Thomas,
B. D. Hammock,
I. S. Frank, and
H. P. Svensson:
The role of rat serum carboxylesterase in the activation of paclitaxel and camptothecin prodrugs.
Cancer Res.
56,
1471-1474 (1996) |
| 27. | H. Ogasawara, K. Nishio, F. Kanzawa, Y. S. Lee, Y. Funayama, T. Ohira, Y. Kuraishi, Y. Isogai, and N. Saijo: Intracellular carboxylesterase activity is a determinant of cellular sensitivity to the antineoplastic agent KW-2189 in cell lines resistant to cisplatin and CPT-11. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 86, 124-129 (1995)[Medline]. |
| 28. | M. Lund-Pero, B. Jeppson, and R. W. Pero: Reduced nonspecific esterase activity in human malignant tumor tissue from liver, colon and breast when compared to peritumoral and normal tissue levels. Anticancer Res. 14, 2747-2754 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 29. | M. Hosokawa, T. Endo, M. Fujisawa, S. Hara, N. Iwata, Y. Sato, and T. Satoh: Interindividual variation in carboxylesterase levels in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab. Disp. 23, 1022-1027 (1995)[Abstract]. |
| 30. | E. W. Morgan, B. Yan, D. Greenway, and A. Parkinson: Regulation of two rat liver microsomal carboxylesterase isozymes: species differences, tissue distribution, and the effects of age, sex, and xenobiotic treatment of rats. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 315, 513-526 (1994)[Medline]. |
| 31. | E. Gupta, X. Wang, J. Ramirez, and M. J. Ratain: Modulation of glucuronidation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, by valproic acid and phenobarbital. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 39, 440-444 (1997)[Medline]. |
| 32. | M. C. Haaz, L. P. Rivory, C. Richet, and J. Robert: Metabolism of CPT-11 (irinotecan) by human hepatic microsomes: Participation of cytochrome P-450 3A (CYP3A) and drug interactions. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 38, Abstract 111 (1997). |
| 33. |
A. G. Chabot,
D. Abigerges,
G. Catimel,
S. Culine,
M. de Forni,
J. Extra,
M. Mahjoubi,
P. Herait,
J. Armand,
R. Bugat,
M. Clavel, and
M. Marty:
Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and active metabolite SN-38 during phase I trials.
Ann. Oncol.
6,
141-151 (1995) |
| 34. | A. Tunek and L. A. Svensson: Bambuterol, a carbamate ester prodrug of terbutaline, as inhibitor of cholinesterases in human blood. Drug Metab. Dispos. 16, 759-764 (1988)[Abstract]. |
| 35. | M-C. Haaz, L. P. Rivory, C. Riche, and J. Robert: The transformation of irinotecan (CPT-11) to its active metabolite SN-38 by human liver microsomes: differential hydrolysis for the lactone and carboxylate forms. Nauyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. (in press). |
| 36. |
R. Atsumi,
O. Okazaki, and
H. Hakusui:
Pharmacokinetics of SN-38 [(+)-(4S)-4,11-diethyl-4,9-dihydroxy-1H-pyrano[3 ,4 :6,7]-indolizino [1,2-b]quinoline-3,14(4H,12H)-dione], an active metabolite of irinotecan, after a single intravenous dosing of 14C-SN-38 to rats.
Biol. Pharm. Bull.
18,
1114-1119 (1995)[Medline].
|
| 37. | K. Lauritsen, L. S. Laursen, and J. Rask-Madsen: Clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases (Part II). Clin. Pharmacokin. 19, 94-125 (1990)[Medline]. |
| 38. |
W. E. Hull:
et al: Metabolites of 5-FU in plasma and urine, as monitored by 19F NMR spectroscopy for patients receiving chemotherapy with or without methotrexate pretreatment.
Cancer Res.
48,
1680-1688 (1988) |
| 39. |
Y. Sasaki,
A. Ohtsu,
Y. Shimada,
K. Ono, and
K Saijo:
N.: Simultaneous administration of CPT-11 and fluorouracil: alteration of the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and SN-38 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
86,
1096-1098 (1994) |
| 40. | L. Saltz, J. Kanowitz, N. Kemeny, D. Kelsen, J. Conti, D. Baiano, L. Schaaf, D. Spriggs, B. Staton, R. Berkery, C. Steger, M. Eng, A. Dietz, and P. Locker: Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 14, 2959-2967 (1996)[Abstract]. |
| 41. |
E. Gupta,
T. Lestingi,
R. Mick,
J. Ramirez,
E Vokes, and
M. Ratain:
Metabolic fate of irinotecan in humans: Correlation of glucuronidation with diarrhea.
Cancer Res.
54,
3723-3725 (1994) |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Vredenburgh, A. Desjardins, D. A. Reardon, and H. S. Friedman Experience with irinotecan for the treatment of malignant glioma Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 80 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Ramchandani, Y. Wang, B. P. Booth, A. Ibrahim, J. R. Johnson, A. Rahman, M. Mehta, F. Innocenti, M. J. Ratain, and J. V. S. Gobburu The Role of SN-38 Exposure, UGT1A1*28 Polymorphism, and Baseline Bilirubin Level in Predicting Severe Irinotecan Toxicity J. Clin. Pharmacol., January 1, 2007; 47(1): 78 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Toffoli, E. Cecchin, G. Corona, A. Russo, A. Buonadonna, M. D'Andrea, L. M. Pasetto, S. Pessa, D. Errante, V. De Pangher, et al. The Role of UGT1A1*28 Polymorphism in the Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2006; 24(19): 3061 - 3068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Goda, D. Nagai, Y. Akiyama, K. Nishikawa, I. Ikemoto, Y. Aizawa, K. Nagata, and Y. Yamazoe DETECTION OF A NEW N-OXIDIZED METABOLITE OF FLUTAMIDE, N-[4-NITRO-3-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)PHENYL]HYDROXYLAMINE, IN HUMAN LIVER MICROSOMES AND URINE OF PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2006; 34(5): 828 - 835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yu, W. D. Shannon, M. A. Watson, and H. L. McLeod Gene Expression Profiling of the Irinotecan Pathway in Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 2053 - 2062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Michael and M.M. Doherty Tumoral Drug Metabolism: Overview and Its Implications for Cancer Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2005; 23(1): 205 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tabata, M. Katoh, S. Tokudome, M. Nakajima, and T. Yokoi IDENTIFICATION OF THE CYTOSOLIC CARBOXYLESTERASE CATALYZING THE 5'-DEOXY-5-FLUOROCYTIDINE FORMATION FROM CAPECITABINE IN HUMAN LIVER Drug Metab. Dispos., October 1, 2004; 32(10): 1103 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Prados, W.K.A. Yung, K. A. Jaeckle, H. I. Robins, M. P. Mehta, H. A. Fine, P. Y. Wen, T. F. Cloughesy, S. M. Chang, M. K. Nicholas, et al. Phase 1 trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with recurrent malignant glioma: A North American Brain Tumor Consortium study Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2004; 6(1): 44 - 54. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Raymond, V. Boige, S. Faivre, G.-J. Sanderink, O. Rixe, L. Vernillet, C. Jacques, M. Gatineau, M. Ducreux, and J.-P. Armand Dosage Adjustment and Pharmacokinetic Profile of Irinotecan in Cancer Patients With Hepatic Dysfunction J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2002; 20(21): 4303 - 4312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Tukey, C. P. Strassburg, and P. I. Mackenzie Pharmacogenomics of Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases and Irinotecan Toxicity Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2002; 62(3): 446 - 450. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Xu, W. Zhang, M. K. Ma, and H. L. McLeod Human Carboxylesterase 2 Is Commonly Expressed in Tumor Tissue and Is Correlated with Activation of Irinotecan Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 8(8): 2605 - 2611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Wu, B. Yan, R. Humerickhouse, and M. E. Dolan Irinotecan Activation by Human Carboxylesterases in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Cells Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 8(8): 2696 - 2700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Charasson, M.-C. Haaz, and J. Robert Determination of Drug Interactions Occurring with the Metabolic Pathways of Irinotecan Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2002; 30(6): 731 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bomgaars, S. L. Berg, and S. M. Blaney The Development of Camptothecin Analogs in Childhood Cancers Oncologist, December 1, 2001; 6(6): 506 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sai, N. Kaniwa, S. Ozawa, and J.-i. Sawada A New Metabolite of Irinotecan in Which Formation Is Mediated by Human Hepatic Cytochrome P-450 3a4 Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2001; 29(11): 1505 - 1513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. J. Mathijssen, R. J. van Alphen, J. Verweij, W. J. Loos, K. Nooter, G. Stoter, and A. Sparreboom Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 2182 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Pitot, R. M. Goldberg, J. M. Reid, J. A. Sloan, P. A. Skaff, C. Erlichman, J. Rubin, P. A. Burch, A. A. Adjei, S. A. Alberts, et al. Phase I Dose-finding and Pharmacokinetic Trial of Irinotecan Hydrochloride (CPT-11) Using a Once-Every-Three-Week Dosing Schedule for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancy Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2000; 6(6): 2236 - 2244. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Slatter, L. J. Schaaf, J. P. Sams, K. L. Feenstra, M. G. Johnson, P. A. Bombardt, K. S. Cathcart, M. T. Verburg, L. K. Pearson, L. D. Compton, et al. Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, and Excretion of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Following I.V. Infusion of [14C]CPT-11 in Cancer Patients Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2000; 28(4): 423 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Humerickhouse, K. Lohrbach, L. Li, W. F. Bosron, and M. E. Dolan Characterization of CPT-11 Hydrolysis by Human Liver Carboxylesterase Isoforms hCE-1 and hCE-2 Cancer Res., March 1, 2000; 60(5): 1189 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. A. de Jonge, J. Verweij, A. S. T. Planting, M. E. L. v. d. Burg, G. Stoter, M. M. d. Boer-Dennert, P. d. Bruijn, E. Brouwer, L. Vernillet, and A. Sparreboom Drug-Administration Sequence Does Not Change Pharmacodynamics and Kinetics of Irinotecan and Cisplatin Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 1999; 5(8): 2012 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Haaz, C. Riché, L. P. Rivory, and J. Robert Biosynthesis of an Aminopiperidino Metabolite of Irinotecan [7-Ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecine] by Human Hepatic Microsomes Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 1998; 26(8): 769 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||