![]() |
|
|
Vol. 26, Issue 12, 1179-1184, December 1998
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (J.R.H.), and Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, West Virginia University (G.D.S.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three-dimensional homology models of cytochromes P450 (P450) 2B1 and P450 3A4 have been utilized along with site-directed mutagenesis to elucidate the molecular determinants of substrate specificity. Most of the key residues identified in 2B enzymes fall within five substrate recognition sites (SRSs) and have counterparts in bacterial P450 residues that regulate substrate binding or access. Docking of inhibitors into 2B models has provided a plausible explanation for changes in susceptibility to mechanism-based inactivation that accompany particular amino acid side-chain replacements. These studies provide a basis for predicting drug interactions due to P450 inhibition and for rational inhibitor design. In addition, the location of P450 3A4 residues capable of influencing homotropic stimulation by substrates and heterotropic stimulation by flavonoids has been identified. Steroid hydroxylation by the wild-type enzyme exhibits sigmoidal kinetics, indicative of positive cooperativity. Based on the 3A4 model and single-site mutants, a double mutant in SRS-2 has been constructed that exhibits normal Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Results of modeling and mutagenesis studies suggest that the substrate and effector bind at adjacent sites within a single large cavity in P450 3A4. A thorough understanding of the location and structural requirements of the substrate-binding and effector sites in cytochrome P450 3A4 should prove valuable in rationalizing and predicting interactions among the multitude of drugs and other compounds that bind to the enzyme.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There
is considerable interest in the function of
cytochromes P450 (P450)1 because of their involvement in
drug metabolism as well as carcinogen bioactivation. Based on their
structure, P450 enzymes are classified into gene families and
subfamilies, with members of the same family exhibiting at least 40%
amino acid sequence identity, and the members of the same subfamily
>55% identity (Nelson et al., 1996
). The main xenobiotic
metabolizing enzymes belong to families 1 through 4 (Wrighton and
Stevens, 1992
). Many forms of P450 display broad substrate
specificities, but individual isoforms often exhibit strict regio- and
stereospecificity toward a particular compound. The elucidation of the
structural basis for such specificity is of great importance in
understanding enzyme function and mechanism. It may also help to
predict the possible metabolic fate of drugs and carcinogens, as well
as provide a foundation for the rational design of drugs and inhibitors.
In recent years, site-directed mutagenesis has become an important tool
to study the structure-function relationships of
mammalian cytochromes P450. The concept of
substrate recognition sites (SRSs) was introduced by Gotoh (Gotoh,
1992
) for the P450 2 family, based on the alignment of mammalian P450s
with a bacterial enzyme, P450cam. This was the only enzyme at
the time for which the crystal structure was solved. The SRS concept
has provided an excellent guide in exploring the basis for P450
specificity, and a number of key amino acid residues responsible for
substrate specificity in various mammalian P450s have been determined
(von Wachenfeldt and Johnson, 1995
). However, further advances in
understanding enzyme function require information about the
three-dimensional (3D) structure. To date, four bacterial P450
structures solved by X-ray crystallography have been published: namely,
P450cam (Poulos et al., 1985
and 1987
), P450 BM-3
(Ravichandran et al., 1993
), P450terp (Hasemann et
al., 1994
) and P450eryF (Cupp-Vickery and Poulos, 1995
).
Therefore, molecular models of various mammalian enzymes have been
constructed in order to explain substrate specificity and to relate
enzyme function to structure. However, because of inaccuracies inherent in homology modeling, all modeling predictions must be verified experimentally. A recent review summarizes the state of the art in the
field of homology modeling with an emphasis on the utilization of
models in conjunction with site-directed mutagenesis studies to
investigate mammalian P450s (Szklarz and Halpert, 1997
). This article
will describe our recent studies in which models of cytochromes P450 2B1 and 3A4 have been utilized to study enzyme function. The
models have been used to identify key residues, to explain changes in
regio- and stereospecificity of substrate oxidation upon site-directed
mutagenesis, and to aid in the analysis of P450 inhibition and activation.
| |
Homology Modeling of Mammalian Cytochromes P450 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Homology Modeling Methods.
In homology modeling, a 3D model of the protein is constructed based on
its amino acid sequence and the crystal structure of one or more
reference proteins. The model can be built using molecular replacement
or consensus methods. In both methods, the first step involves a
sequence alignment between the protein to be modeled and the
template(s). In regions of low homology, secondary structure
predictions, as well as additional information, such as site-directed
mutagenesis data (Szklarz et al., 1995
), can be invaluable.
In the next step, the structurally conserved regions (SCRs) of the
modeled protein are determined. When the model is built using molecular
replacement methods, the coordinates for SCRs are copied directly from
those of the reference protein(s). The coordinates for the variable
regions, such as loops, are calculated or obtained from those for the
similar loops in known protein structures. The initial model is then
refined using minimization and molecular dynamics methods.
Limitations of Homology Modeling.
The basic assumption in homology modeling is that a modeled protein
resembles the structure(s) used as templates; therefore, the choice of
the template(s) is of crucial importance. The final 3D homology
structure is highly dependent upon the modeling procedure and is
influenced by a number factors. The most important of them is sequence
alignment, which may lead to differences in the location of some
residues and thus result in different models. For example, in P450 2B1
models, the identity of active site residues depended upon the
alignment (Szklarz et al., 1994
). Thus the accuracy of the
alignment is of crucial importance for the final structure. Another
important factor is the choice of the modeling method. In molecular
replacement methods, the coordinates of the SCRs are identical to those
of a given reference protein, while in consensus models, they are
averages of those of several templates. In the case of cytochromes
P450, a model based on structures of several known enzymes should be
more accurate than one based on the crystal structure of only a single
protein, especially in view of the low sequence identity between
mammalian and bacterial P450s. Moreover, the choice of coordinates for
loops can alter the location of key residues, as shown in the case of
P450 2B1 models (Szklarz et al., 1994
).
Docking of Substrates/Inhibitors Into the Active Site of P450
Models.
Docking of enzyme substrates or inhibitors into the active site of the
homology model can help to explain enzyme-substrate interactions as
well as the role of particular residues in catalysis. An important
issue is the orientation of the substrate bound in the active site.
Several choices are possible: (1) docking a compound based solely on
steric considerations, (2) docking a compound based on steric
considerations but orienting the site of metabolism toward heme and
ferryl oxygen, and (3) docking a compound in a reactive (productive)
binding orientation. The first choice can be appropriate for the
docking of competitive inhibitors that are not metabolized by the
enzyme. It may also reflect the preferred binding orientation of the
substrate in the initial enzyme-substrate complex. Approach 2, based on
the orientation of camphor in the crystallized P450cam, has frequently
been used in docking P450 substrates. That orientation may also reflect
the enzyme-substrate complex. In contrast, approach 3 represents an
orientation of the substrate that is necessary for the first oxidative
event in the P450 catalytic cycle. Thus the substrate is oriented in the active site to allow for the initial hydrogen or electron abstraction. The latter approach has been successfully utilized to
interpret changes in regiospecificity of substrate oxidation and
susceptibility to inactivation upon residue replacement by site-directed mutagenesis (e.g. Szklarz et al.,
1995
; Kent et al., 1997
; Kobayashi et al., 1998
).
Additional methods, such as molecular dynamics and evaluation of
enzyme-substrate interaction energies, may further increase our
understanding of P450 catalysis and the motion of the substrate in the
active site.
| |
Application of Homology Models to Study P450 Function |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of Key Amino Acid Residues. With a 3D P450 model, the location of amino acid residues of interest can readily be visualized. Key residues should be present in the active site and be able to interact with a substrate. Docking of the substrate in the active site of the model should also make it possible to determine the prevalent enzyme-substrate interactions. Moreover, the model should be in agreement with experimental results.
In a consensus model of P450 2B1 (Szklarz et al., 1995
- or 16
-binding orientation. The
analysis of enzyme-substrate interactions indicated that hydrophobic
interactions are mainly responsible for the binding of steroids in P450
2B1 (Szklarz et al., 1995
-binding
orientation can interact with a number of active site residues, such as
114, 119, 301, 304, 305, 309, 370, 373, and 479, through hydrophobic
interactions. In the case of erythromycin, the substrate contacts these
and a number of additional residues in the active site. The results from docking of the substrates into the 3A4 model made it possible to
pinpoint residues that might be important for enzyme function and to
target them for site-directed mutagenesis. Residues 370 and 373 from
SRS-5 were indeed found to be of key importance in progesterone
hydroxylation (He et al., 1997
|
Interpretation of Alterations in Substrate Specificity Upon Site-Directed Mutagenesis. Site-directed mutagenesis can pinpoint key amino acid residues, but the interpretation of changes in regio- and stereospecificity of substrate oxidation upon residue replacement is uncertain. However, these difficulties can be overcome with the help of 3D molecular models, which may also give some insights into structural basis of enzyme function. The usual procedure involves the replacement in the model of a given amino acid to mimic the mutant, and docking of the substrate in an orientation leading to the expected product. The binding of the substrate in the active site of the mutant is then compared with that of the wild-type enzyme. In general, the loss of activity upon mutation of a key residue can be a result of (1) van der Waals overlaps that hinder substrate binding, or (2) increased substrate mobility when enzyme-substrate interactions become too weak. In contrast, an increase in activity can be related to the stabilization of a given binding orientation through an increase in van der Waals contacts and decreased substrate mobility. Changes in substrate mobility may alter the coupling efficiency of the mutant.3
In our recent studies on the metabolism of 7-alkoxycoumarins by P450 2B1 wild-type and mutant enzymes, quantitative and qualitative changes in activity were observed (Kobayashi et al., 1998
and (
-1) hydroxylation of the alkoxy chain, in agreement with
experimental data. Figure 4 shows
7-butoxycoumarin docked into the active site of the P450 2B1 V363L
mutant in an orientation allowing for its (
-1) hydroxylation
(Kobayashi et al., 1998
|
|
|
Utilization of Models in Inhibition Studies. Homology models can be of great help in the analysis of P450 inhibition or inactivation. The models can be used to explain changes in enzyme inhibition upon residue replacement, provide additional information on the mechanisms of P450 inhibition or inactivation, and aid in the design of better inhibitors.
A model of P450 2B1 has been utilized to explain changes in enzyme inactivation by N-benzyl-1-aminobenzotriazole (BBT) upon the mutation of Gly-478 to Ala (Kent et al., 1997
|
Stimulation of P450 3A4 by
-Naphthoflavone.
P450 3A4 is known to catalyze the oxidation of a number of substrates
in a cooperative manner. Metabolic activities of the enzyme are also
modulated by naturally occurring phenolic compounds known as
flavonoids, resulting in either stimulation or inhibition of activity.
An allosteric mechanism is usually invoked to explain cooperativity.
Recent studies in our laboratory provided the first evidence for the
location of residues that influence flavonoid stimulation of P450 3A4
(Harlow and Halpert, 1997
; He et al., 1997
). These residues
are proposed to constitute part of the active site of the enzyme
(Szklarz and Halpert, 1997
; He et al., 1997
). In addition to
bound progesterone, up to two molecules of
-naphthoflavone (
-NF)
can be fitted in the model (fig. 6).
Instead of
-NF, the active site of P450 3A4 is able to accommodate a
second molecule of progesterone, which may explain the homotropic
enzyme stimulation observed with steroids (Harlow and Halpert, 1997
).
|
-hydroxylation at low substrate concentrations and
a decreased level of heterotropic stimulation elicited by
-NF.
Kinetic analyses of the double mutant revealed the absence of
homotropic cooperativity with either steroid substrate. At low
substrate concentrations the steroid 6
-hydroxylase activity of the
wild-type enzyme was stimulated by a second steroid, whereas
L211F/D214E displayed simple substrate inhibition. Moreover, based on
spectral binding studies, testosterone binding by the wild-type enzyme
displayed homotropic cooperativity, whereas substrate binding by
L211F/D214E displayed hyperbolic behavior.
As illustrated above, the 3D enzyme model suggested a plausible
explanation of P450 3A4 activation by flavonoids and the choice of
residues to be targeted for site-directed mutagenesis. Experimental evidence supported the initial idea and gave additional insight into
the mechanism of enzyme activation. However, more questions concerning
that mechanism arise. If both substrate and effector are present in the
active site and can interact with each other, it may be difficult to
distinguish residues that directly affect effector binding from
residues that indirectly affect effector action. For example,
alteration of a residue in the substrate binding site can change the
binding orientation of the substrate. This, in turn, can affect
substrate-effector interactions and lead to apparent altered response
to the effector. Further analysis of 3A4 mutants using additional
substrates and effectors will be required in order to fully map the
effector site. Detailed knowledge of the structural requirements of the
substrate binding and effector sites should allow prediction of
interactions among compounds that bind to P450 3A4.
| |
Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The combination of homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis
has provided an important insight into P450 structure-function relationships. The simplest application of the homology models involves
the determination of the "hot spots," or key residues. The location
of key residues in the active site and their interactions with docked
enzyme substrates can be readily ascertained. Moreover, additional
residues that may be important for enzymatic activity can be
pinpointed. However, we should keep in mind that the identity of
residues able to contact the substrate depends upon the structure of
the compound and the specific binding orientations it assumes in
the active site. P450 models have been successfully utilized to
explain changes in regio- and stereospecificity of substrate oxidation, as well as alterations in susceptibility toward inactivation upon site-directed mutagenesis. These changes can be related to the
removal or appearance of van der Waals overlaps in the mutant proteins
and changes in substrate/inhibitor mobility. With P450 models, we can
postulate plausible mechanisms for enzyme catalysis, inhibition, and
activation, based on the 3D structure. In the last case, the model of
P450 3A4 suggested a plausible hypothesis concerning the location of
the effector site, which has been supported experimentally. In summary,
homology modeling allows for a mechanistic interpretation of various
aspects of P450 function and, in conjunction with experimental methods,
is likely to continue as an important tool in studies of mammalian
P450s. We can expect further development of homology modeling methods,
as well as methods for structural verification of the models. The
improvement of forcefields for protein modeling and generation of
better parameters for heme will allow for the introduction of molecular
dynamics methods to analyze substrate or inhibitor motion in the active
site and to calculate binding free energies, as has been done for
P450cam (Paulsen and Ornstein, 1992
and 1996
, Paulsen et
al., 1993
). When the structure of a eukaryotic enzyme is solved,
the methodology established and verified in studies utilizing homology
models can be easily adapted and refined for use with the "real" structures.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
2 Fabienne Roussel, unpublished data.
3 These explanations refer to proteins that are folded properly and exhibit unaltered interactions with NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase and/or cytochrome b5.
This work was supported by grants ES03619, ES04995, and GM54995, and Center grant ES06694 from the National Institutes of Health. Molecular modeling studies were performed at the Molecular Modeling Facility of the Southwest Environmental Health Sciences Center (SWEHSC) at the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. James R. Halpert, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-1031. e-mail: jhalpert{at}utmb.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
Abbreviations used are:
P450, cytochrome(s)
P450;
SRS, substrate recognition site;
3D, three-dimensional;
SCR, structurally conserved region;
BBT, N-benzyl-1-aminobenzotriazole;
-NF,
-naphthoflavone.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-naphthoflavone stimulation.
Arch Biochem Biophys
350:
223-232[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. A. Usmani, T. M. Cho, R. L. Rose, and E. Hodgson Inhibition of the Human Liver Microsomal and Human Cytochrome P450 1A2 and 3A4 Metabolism of Estradiol by Deployment-Related and Other Chemicals Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2006; 34(9): 1606 - 1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Isin and F. P. Guengerich Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Ligand Binding by Cytochrome P450 3A4 J. Biol. Chem., April 7, 2006; 281(14): 9127 - 9136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Usmani, R. L. Rose, and E. Hodgson Inhibition and Activation of the Human Liver Microsomal and Human Cytochrome P450 3A4 Metabolism of Testosterone by Deployment-Related Chemicals Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2003; 31(4): 384 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Liu, S. S. Ericksen, D. Besspiata, C. W. Fisher, and G. D. Szklarz Characterization of Substrate Binding to Cytochrome P450 1A1 Using Molecular Modeling and Kinetic Analyses: Case of Residue 382 Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2003; 31(4): 412 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Hutzler and T. S. Tracy Atypical Kinetic Profiles in Drug Metabolism Reactions Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2002; 30(4): 355 - 362. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Usmani, R. L. Rose, J. A. Goldstein, W. G. Taylor, A. A. Brimfield, and E. Hodgson In Vitro Human Metabolism and Interactions of Repellent N,N-Diethyl-m-Toluamide Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2002; 30(3): 289 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ekins, M. J. de Groot, and J. P. Jones Pharmacophore and Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship Methods for Modeling Cytochrome P450 Active Sites Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2001; 29(7): 936 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Ngui, Q. Chen, M. Shou, R. W. Wang, R. A. Stearns, T. A. Baillie, and W. Tang In Vitro Stimulation of Warfarin Metabolism by Quinidine: Increases in the Formation of 4'- and 10-Hydroxywarfarin Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2001; 29(6): 877 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. Jacobsen, B. Kuhn, A. Soldner, G. Kirchner, K.-Fr. Sewing, P. A. Kollman, L. Z. Benet, and U. Christians Lactonization Is the Critical First Step in the Disposition of the 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Coa Reductase Inhibitor Atorvastatin Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2000; 28(11): 1369 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Ngui, W. Tang, R. A. Stearns, M. Shou, R. R. Miller, Y. Zhang, J. H. Lin, and T. A. Baillie Cytochrome P450 3A4-Mediated Interaction of Diclofenac and Quinidine Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2000; 28(9): 1043 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||