![]() |
|
|
Vol. 26, Issue 7, 623-630, July 1998
Departments of Pharmacology (A.M.-L., M.D., R.B.) and Kinetics and Metabolism (H.M., E.H., A.T.), Astra Draco AB
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A high airway concentration might be required for the antiasthmatic efficacy of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCS). The topical uptake and retention of GCS in airway tissue were compared for GCS of the inhaled type [budesonide (BUD), fluticasone propionate (FP), and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP)] and of the noninhaled type (dexamethasone and hydrocortisone). 3H-labeled GCS solutions were administered into rat airways by either perfusion of trachea in vivo, intratracheal instillation, or inhalation. Radioactivity was determined in the airway tissue, lung parenchyma, and plasma 20 min to 24 hr after exposure. Ethanol extracts of exposed tracheas were analyzed by HPLC. Exposed tracheas were also incubated in vitro in buffer, and the released radioactivity was analyzed by HPLC. BUD, FP, and BDP were equally well taken up into the airway tissue; their uptake was 25-130 times greater than that of dexamethasone and hydrocortisone. BUD was shown to form very lipophilic intracellular fatty acid esters (at carbon 21) in the airway and lung tissue after topical application. In large airways 20 min after administration, approximately 70-80% of retained BUD was conjugated. BUD stored in esterified form in the tissue was retained in large airways for a prolonged time, compared with FP and BDP, which do not form such conjugates. The fatty acid conjugation of BUD is reversible in vivo; BUD conjugates are gradually hydrolyzed and free BUD is regenerated. This reversible conjugation may improve airway selectivity, as well as prolong the local anti-inflammatory action of BUD in the airways and might be one explanation for why BUD is efficacious in the treatment of mild asthma when inhaled once daily.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GCS1
used in asthma therapy are today primarily
administered by inhalation, with the aim of achieving high local
concentrations in the airway mucosa and limiting the increase of
steroid concentrations in the rest of the body. The inhaled GCS can
also ameliorate bronchial hyperresponsiveness, which is much less
affected by oral GCS therapy (Jenkins and Woolcock, 1988
). It seems
that, in addition to high receptor affinity and high first-pass liver
and gut inactivation, prolonged high local concentrations in the
airways are necessary for the high antiasthmatic efficacy and airway
selectivity of inhaled GCS (Brattsand, 1989
).
GCS receptor affinity and the preferential inactivation of inhaled GCS
by liver metabolism have been studied extensively (Barnes and Pedersen,
1993
). In contrast, there are few kinetic data on peak tissue levels
and retention of topically applied GCS in the airway and lung tissue
(Van den Bosch et al., 1993
; Esmailpour et al.,
1997
). We reported earlier (Miller-Larsson et al., 1994
) a
prolonged retention of BUD in rat airway tissue in vivo,
compared with FP and BDP. These findings seemed to contradict the
general positive correlation between the lipophilicity of the GCS and their tissue binding ability, because BUD is less lipophilic than FP
and BDP.
In the present study, the prolonged dwell-time of BUD in airway tissue has been confirmed and explained in mechanistic terms. Radiolabeled GCS, at clinically relevant doses, were administered in vivo to rat airways by various methods. In addition, the release of GCS from the exposed airway tissue into the surrounding fluid in vitro was investigated. GCS of the inhaled type (BUD, FP, and BDP), as well as systemic GCS lacking airway efficacy (HC) or airway selectivity (DEX), were studied.
We report here that BUD is conjugated extensively with fatty acids
within airway tissue and lung in vivo, resulting in the formation of BUD esters at the C21-hydroxyl group. The results are in
agreement with the previously reported formation of BUD esters in
vitro in human lung and liver microsomes, where oleate, linoleate,
palmitate, palmitoleate, and arachidonate esters of BUD were identified
(fig. 1) (Tunek et al., 1997
).
Fatty acid esters were not detected for FP or BDP. Fatty acid esters of
BUD are much more lipophilic than FP or BDP, which explains the
prolonged retention of BUD in airway tissue, compared with FP and BDP.
These new findings describe a novel mechanism for attaining a high
topical selectivity and prolonged activity of GCS at airway levels.
|
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were supplied by Møllegaard Breeding Center Ltd. (Skensved, Denmark). Unlabeled BUD was supplied by Astra Draco AB (Lund, Sweden). 3H-labeled GCS (radiochemical purity, >97.0%) were supplied in 99.5% ethanol by Astra Draco AB or by the Radiochemical Center (Amersham, UK). The following 3H-GCS were used: [1,2-3H]BUD, [1,2-3H]FP, [1,2-3H]BDP, [1,2,6,7-3H]HC, and [1,2,4-3H]DEX. Specific radioactivity was 80 Ci/mmol for HC and 30-40 Ci/mmol for the other GCS used (1 tritium atom/molecule yields 29.6 Ci/mmol). One batch of BUD with a specific radioactivity of 17 Ci/mmol was also used.
Study Design.
Solutions of 3H-labeled GCS at concentrations
between 10
8 and 10
5 M
were administered into the rat airways by 1) perfusion of a tracheal
segment in vivo, 2) intratracheal instillation, or 3) inhalation. The total radioactivity was measured in tissue and plasma
at different times after administration. GCS were extracted from the
exposed airways and lungs with ethanol, and the extracts were analyzed
by HPLC. The release of GCS from the tracheal segments during
incubation in vitro in buffer was studied, and buffer
extracts were analyzed by HPLC.
Tracheal Perfusion.
Before administration, 3H-GCS stock solutions
were diluted in 0.9% saline solution in glass vials (final
concentration of ethanol, 0.1-0.5%). For concentrations of >3 × 10
7 M, ethanol solutions of labeled and
unlabeled compounds were prepared and stored at
20°C. Dilution in
0.9% saline solution to the final concentration (0.5% ethanol) was
performed before each application. Rats (300-400 g) were anesthetized
ip with a mixture of fluanisone/fentanyl (Hypnorm veterinary
preparation; Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium), midazolam
(Dormicum; Roche, Basel, Switzerland), and water (1:1:2), at a dose of
3.3 ml/kg. Anesthesia was maintained by im injections of
fluanisone/fentanyl and occasional iv administration of the initial
mixture. A section of trachea between the larynx and sternum was
exposed in vivo and cannulated at both ends with two
polyethylene catheters, to allow perfusion (Miller-Larsson and
Brattsand, 1990
). An additional catheter was inserted into the section
of trachea connected to the lungs, to allow spontaneous respiration.
For blood sampling and anesthesia, the jugular vein was catheterized. A
thermostat and heated pad maintained the rat temperatures at 37.5 ± 0.5°C. H-GCS solutions were perfused (0.1 ml/min) for 10 min (t = 0-10 min), followed by
continuous perfusion with 0.9% saline solution. All draining perfusate
was continuously collected, and its radioactivity was measured. Rats
were killed 20, 70, or 120 min after the start of perfusion. The
following 3H-GCS were tested: BUD at various
concentrations from 7.5 × 10
8 to 3.0 × 10
6 M, FP at 2.0 × 10
8 and 1.5 × 10
7
M, BDP at 7.2 × 10
8 M, DEX at 2.8 × 10
6 M, and HC at 3.4 × 10
6 M.
Binding of GCS to Plastic Material.
To calculate the dose reaching the trachea (perfused dose), the binding
of GCS to polyethylene inflow catheters was determined in separate
experiments in which 3H-GCS solutions were
perfused only through the system of inflow catheters. The binding of FP
to inflow catheters was 41.2 ± 3.9% (mean ± SD); hence, FP
applied at a concentration of 2.0 × 10
8 M
reached the trachea at a concentration of 1.2 × 10
8 M. The binding of BDP was 18.9 ± 5.8%, whereas the binding of the other steroids used was below 5%.
Intratracheal Instillation.
Ethanol was removed from 3H-GCS stock solutions
by evaporation under a N2 stream, 0.9% saline
solution was added to yield the desired concentration, and the solution
was sonicated in a glass vial for 1-2 min on ice. Rats (290-410 g)
were lightly anesthetized with inhaled enfluran (Efrane; Abbot,
Scandinavia AB, Kista, Sweden), which was delivered by vaporizer
together with N2O/O2, and
were placed in the supine position on a board tilted at 30°, with the head uppermost. A solution of either [3H]BUD
(1.4 × 10
5 or 4.8 × 10
7 M) or [3H]FP
(1.5 × 10
7 M) was instilled
intratracheally, in 250 µl, through a metal cannula mounted on a
plastic syringe. The amount of radioactive label remaining in the
solution after instillation was used for calculation of the
administered dose (therefore, there was no need to monitor the binding
of GCS to the plastic material of the syringe). After instillation,
rats were kept on the tilted board until they awoke (approximately 30 sec). The rats were killed 20 min, 2 hr, 6 hr, or 24 hr after
intratracheal instillation.
Inhalation.
Rats (210-330 g) were anesthetized with inhaled enfluran as for
intratracheal instillation and were intubated with an endotracheal tube
(PE-200 tubing) connected to an inhalation chamber (Eirefelt et
al., 1992
). After intubation, rats breathed spontaneously and inhaled 3H-GCS aerosol (table
1), together with anesthetic gases
(delivered to the chamber at 2.6 liters/min), for 5 min. Rats were
killed 20 min, 2 hr, or 6 hr after the start of aerosol exposure.
|
Generation of GCS Aerosol.
3H-GCS stock solutions were diluted 10-fold in
99.5% ethanol, to the concentrations given in table 1. GCS aerosol was
generated from the ethanol solutions with a MA2S nebulizer (flow rate,
4 liters/min; Viasol, Malmö, Sweden) connected to the inhalation chamber (chamber pressure, 0.4 kPa; total chamber flow, 6.6 liters/min). Ethanol evaporated during inhalation, and amorphous
particles were deposited on the airway mucosa. To estimate the
concentrations of 3H-GCS during exposure, samples
were drawn from the exposure chamber, at a flow rate of 0.2 liter/min,
through a filter with a pore size of 1 µm (FALP02500 filter;
Millipore, Bedford, MA). 3H-GCS were then
extracted from the filter with ethanol (99.5%), and radioactivity was
measured. The inhaled doses of the 3H-GCS were
calculated according to the formula ID = CC × ET × RMV
(Dahlbäck and Eirefelt, 1994
), where ID is the inhaled
dose (in nanomoles), CC is the chamber concentration (in
nanomoles per liter), ET is the exposure time (in minutes),
and RMV is the respiratory minute volume (in liters per
minute) [RMV = 4.19 × 10
3 × (body weight, in
grams)0.66] (McMahon et al., 1977
).
Tissue and Blood Sampling.
At the end of each experiment, rats were killed by heart puncture after
administration of sodium pentobarbital (60 mg/ml Mebumal veterinary
preparation; Pherrovet, Malmö, Sweden) iv (0.1 ml) or ip (1 ml).
Blood from the right ventricle was collected, and plasma was separated
after centrifugation. After intratracheal instillation and inhalation,
the lung vascular system was perfused with two 60-ml aliquots of
heparinized (50 IU/ml heparin) 0.9% saline solution, to reduce the
impact of the blood contents of the lung. Tissue samples were rinsed
briefly in 0.9% saline solution, dried on blotting paper, weighed, and
frozen at
70°C.
In Vitro Release of GCS.
Segments of trachea were perfused for 10 min with either
[3H]BUD (7.1 × 10
8 M),
[3H]FP (1.2 × 10
7
M), [3H]BDP (9.9 × 10
8 M), or [3H]HC
(7.4 × 10
8 M), followed by perfusion with
0.9% saline solution for the next 10 min. Because FP and BDP markedly
bound to inflow catheters, the concentration reaching the trachea was
7.1 × 10
8 M for FP and 8.0 × 10
8 M for BDP (see Binding of GCS to
Plastic Material). Immediately after perfusion, the tracheal
segments were excised and cut lengthwise into two halves, which were
weighed. One half was incubated (37°C) in a glass vessel containing
10 ml of oxygenated (95% O2/5%
CO2) standard Krebs buffer with 0.2% glucose and
10% rat plasma (to mimic extracellular fluid). The total radioactivity
released into the buffer was monitored for 8 hr; 200-µl samples were
withdrawn at various time points, and the volume was replaced with
fresh incubation medium. After 8 hr, buffer extracts were analyzed by HPLC. The incubated tracheal segment was combusted in a sample oxidizer
for determination of total radioactivity or was extracted with ethanol
and analyzed by HPLC. The radioactivity present in the nonincubated
segment of trachea was measured after combustion, to ensure that during
the incubation procedure there was no loss of steroid resulting from
binding to the glass vessels.
Extraction of GCS and Conjugates from Tissue.
The exposed trachea or the lung (with intrapulmonary bronchi) was
frozen in liquid nitrogen and pulverized with a mortar. Ethanol
(99.5%) was added (1 ml for the tracheal samples and 5 or 10 ml for
the lung samples), and the mixtures were shaken for at least 6 hr,
followed by centrifugation for 10 min at 8000g. Supernatants
were stored at
70°C until HPLC analysis. Combustion of duplicate
samples of either trachea or powdered lung (described below)
demonstrated conclusively that complete extraction was achieved with
this method.
Measurement of Radioactivity. Tissue samples were weighed, dried overnight at room temperature, and combusted in a sample oxidizer (Packard 307; Packard, Groningen, The Netherlands). Recovery of sample label was >96%. Monophase-S (15 ml) and Ultimagold (10 ml) scintillation cocktails (Packard) were used for oxidized tissue samples and liquid samples, respectively. Radioactivity was measured in a liquid scintillation counter (Packard 460 CD or 300 CD).
The GCS concentration in the samples (picomoles per gram or picomoles per milliliter) was calculated from the following equation: Q = DPM/(C × SA × W), where Q is the GCS concentration (in picomoles per gram or picomoles per milliliter), DPM is the mean number of disintegrations per minute in the measured sample, C = 2.22 × 106 dpm/µCi, SA is the specific activity of GCS (microcuries per picomoles), and W is the weight (grams) of tissue samples or the volume (milliliters) of plasma. This equation assumes that measured radioactivity represents unchanged GCS; the total radioactivity measured in 1 g of tissue or 1 ml of plasma is converted to the concentration of intact GCS equivalents.HPLC. Sample Preparation. Ethanol extracts of trachea and lung and buffer extracts of trachea (incubation buffer from in vitro experiments) were analyzed using two different HPLC systems. Aliquots (1 ml) of the incubation buffer were extracted with 2 × 2 ml of ethyl acetate, with virtually complete extraction of radioactivity. The pooled extracts were evaporated to dryness and redissolved in ethanol.
LC System 1. Equipment consisted of a 9012 pump, 9010 solvent delivery system, 9100 autosampler, and 9050 variable-wavelength UV/visible detector (all from Varian, Walnut Creek, CA). Mobile phase A was water and mobile phase B was methanol; the gradient was as follows: 0-20 min, 40% A/60% B; at 20 min, stepwise change to 100% B; at 35 min, stepwise change back to the initial conditions. Ethanol extracts were made 60% water/40% ethanol before injection. The flow rate was 1.0 ml/min, and the column was a LiChrosphere® 100 (RP-18) column (125 × 4 mm, 5 µm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Fractions were collected (0.5 min/fraction, for 50 min) and counted in a liquid scintillation counter (Packard Tri Carb 2200CA). Approximate retention times in this system were 17 min for the R-epimer of BUD, 18 min for the S-epimer of BUD, and 28-34 min for fatty acid esters of BUD.
LC System 2. The equipment was as for LC system 1, but with radioactivity detected on-line with a FLO-ONE detector (Radiomatic, C-525-TRX, version 3.01), using Ultima FLO AP scintillation cocktail (HPLC flow/scintillation flow ratio, 1:4; Packard). Ethanol solutions were diluted to 20% water before injection. The column (Supelcosil LC-18-DB, 3.3 cm × 4.6 mm, 3 µm; Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA) was operated at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. A three-phase gradient was used, as follows: phase A, 5% ethanol and 0.1% acetic acid; phase B, 95% ethanol and 0.1% acetic acid; phase C, 0.1% acetic acid. Phase C (0.4 ml/min) was added to the HPLC flow, through a T-connection between the injector and the column, during the injection phase and the first 1 min of the gradient. The total flow rate of phases A and B was 0.6 ml/min for the first 1 min and 1 ml/min thereafter. The initial conditions (60% A/40% B) were maintained for 5.5 min and were then changed stepwise to 15% A/85% B. Between 5.5 min and 11.5 min, the conditions were changed linearly to 100% B; at 13.5 min, the system was returned to the initial conditions. In this system, approximate retention times were 5 min for BUD (with a separation between the two epimers of 0.5 min), 10.5 min for BUD palmitoleate, and 11.3 min for both BUD palmitate and BUD oleate.
Data Analysis. The total radioactivity measured in the tissue and plasma was converted to the concentration of GCS according to the equation given above and was expressed as GCS equivalents (picomoles per gram for tissue samples and picomoles per milliliter for plasma samples) per administered nanomole. The tissue concentrations of GCS equivalents were compared among steroids, separately for each administration method, and for each airway level (trachea with main bronchi, bronchi of generations 3 and 4, and lung parenchyma). The analysis was based on analysis of variance with two factors [factor 1, treatment (i.e. steroid) or airway level (difference between steroids or airway levels); factor 2, time]. The interaction between steroid/airway level and time was also analyzed. Comparisons among steroids were performed for concentrations at t = 20 min and for percent decreases in concentration over time. The analysis was performed with a multiplicative model, which implies that the mean values of tissue GCS concentrations discussed are geometric means (presented with 95% confidence intervals). Data for in vitro experiments and for extractions with ethanol are given as arithmetic means ± SD.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Demonstration of BUD-C21-Fatty Acid Conjugates in Airway and Lung
Tissue.
HPLC analysis of ethanol extracts of airways and lungs from rats that
had been topically treated with BUD revealed not only free BUD but also
large fractions with much higher lipophilicity than BUD (fig.
2), which had been previously shown to be
fatty acid conjugates (Tunek et al., 1997
). The fatty acid
conjugation of BUD in airway and lung tissue was rapid. Within 20 min
of topical administration, BUD conjugates represented the majority of
total tissue radioactivity, whereas 20-30% of radioactivity
represented free BUD (fig. 2A). The ratio between free BUD
and the ester fraction decreased with the time between BUD
administration and tissue excision (fig. 2); 24 hr after BUD
administration, only a small percentage of free BUD was discernible in
the HPLC radiochromatograms of tracheal extracts (fig. 2C).
However, the tracheal concentration of BUD equivalents after 24 hr was
only 3.2% of the level found after 20 min, showing that the bulk of
the initially deposited BUD had been exported from the tissue within
the 24-hr period (see fig. 6).
|
8 or 3.0 × 10
6
M, respectively), the proportion of free BUD at t = 20 min was 17 ± 5% (mean ± SD) or 27 ± 1%,
respectively. A similar relationship (20% free BUD/80% conjugate) was
found in tracheal segments in which perfusion with
[3H]BUD at 3 × 10
6 M was preceded by perfusion with unlabeled
BUD at a 10-fold higher concentration, which is estimated to yield a
tissue concentration equal to approximately 15 nmol of BUD/g of trachea
(data not shown). Lipophilic conjugates of BUD were also formed in
lung, in proportions similar to those in trachea, and there were
indications of other, as yet unidentified, metabolites (fig.
2D). Under the conditions used (topical application of BUD
to the airways), no BUD conjugates were demonstrable in plasma or in
peripheral tissue. For FP and BDP, no fatty acid conjugates were
detected in airway or lung tissue even when HPLC fractions were
collected for up to 60 min (LC system 1, maintaining 100% mobile phase
B).
GCS Release In Vitro and Regeneration of Intact BUD from C21-Esters. The rate of radioactivity release from tracheal segments into incubation buffer was lower for BUD than for FP, BDP, and HC (fig. 3). After 2 hr of incubation, approximately 80% of radioactivity was released from tracheas perfused with FP and BDP and 100% of that from tracheas perfused with HC, compared with 40% release from tracheas perfused with BUD. During the next 6 hr, no further release of FP occurred, whereas the release of BUD was increased by an additional 25% and that of BDP by approximately 15%. The area under the curve describing the radioactivity released from the trachea as a function of time (0-8 hr) was nearly 2-fold lower (p < 0.001) for tracheas perfused with BUD, compared with other steroids.
|
|
|
Uptake and Retention of GCS in the Airways and Lung. The local uptake and retention of tritiated GCS in the airways and lung were expressed as the concentration of total tissue radioactivity (picomoles of GCS equivalents per gram of tissue) related to the administered dose (nanomoles). This was possible because the concentration of radioactivity in the airway and lung tissue was always directly proportional to the administered dose of GCS, regardless of the route of administration (data not shown).
The initial concentration of GCS equivalents (at t = 20 min) per administered nanomole in the airways and lung was similar for BUD, FP, and BDP (figs. 5- 7), whereas it was 25-130 times lower for DEX and HC (fig. 5). For all GCS tested, the concentrations of radioactivity in the exposed airways and lung were much higher than those in tissues (including plasma) not directly exposed to the steroids. For BUD and FP, the ratio of the concentration of radioactivity in trachea/main bronchi to that in plasma at 20 min was 103 to 104 after tracheal perfusion, 400-500 after intratracheal instillation, and 25-75 after inhalation. Radioactivity in the sc fat, 20 min after BUD instillation, was approximately 3 times higher than the levels in soleus muscle and plasma and equal to the level detected in colon (not tested for other GCS).
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reversible BUD Conjugation with Fatty Acids.
Biosynthesis of fatty acid esters of estrogens, ecdysteroids, and, to
some extent, mineralocorticoids and GCS has been described in a variety
of tissues and species (Pahuja and Hochberg, 1989
). It has been
proposed that esters of endogenous estrogens are body reservoirs of
latent estrogens, requiring only lipase-catalyzed hydrolysis for
activation (Pahuja and Hochberg, 1989
; Hochberg et al.,
1991
).
-17
, thus allowing the build-up of a depot of
C21-fatty acid esters.
The BUD-21-conjugates are themselves inactive as a GCS (Wieslander
et al., 1998Nonspecific (Non-Receptor) Tissue Affinity.
The approximately equal initial local concentrations of BUD, FP, and
BDP in the airway and lung tissue after inhalation of doses below or at
the lower limit of the clinically relevant range (table 1) show that
topical tissue uptake of inhaled GCS is not strictly related to the
lipophilicity of the intact steroids (table 2) or to steroid receptor affinity. The
receptor affinity for BUD is approximately 2-3-fold lower than that
for FP, approximately 1.5-2-fold lower than that for 17-BMP, and
approximately 20-fold higher than that for BDP (Dahlberg et
al., 1984
; Hochberg et al., 1991
; Högger and
Rohdewald, 1994
). Although there were only minor differences among the
GCS in initial tissue uptake, BUD had a significantly longer dwell-time
in large airway tissue than did FP and BDP, in spite of the shorter
half-life ( Högger et al., 1993
; Högger and
Rohdewald, 1994
) of the BUD-receptor complex in vitro (5-6
hr), compared with the receptor complex for FP (10 hr) or 17-BMP (8 hr). Therefore, the differences among BUD, FP, and BDP in local tissue
binding are not determined at the receptor level but more likely
reflect different degrees of nonspecific binding of GCS to cellular and
subcellular membranes (directly related to the lipophilicity of the
main GCS storage forms). BUD is approximately 6-8 times less
lipophilic than FP and approximately 40 times less lipophilic than BDP
(table 2). However, BUD-21-conjugates are 2-4 orders of magnitude more
lipophilic than intact BUD, which probably explains the longer
dwell-time of BUD in airway tissue.
|
6 M). In addition, the uptake of
[3H]BUD during such perfusion was not decreased by
pretreatment with unlabeled BUD, even at a 10-fold higher concentration
(data not shown), indicating a final tissue concentration of 15 nmol/g. The finding that tracheal tissue was not saturated even at such a high
tissue concentration supports the nonspecific nature of GCS tissue
binding.
Clinical Situation.
We have shown that topically applied GCS of the inhaled type (BUD, FP,
and BDP) are markedly better taken up from the respiratory lumen and
are also better retained within airway tissue, compared with GCS of the
noninhaled type (HC and DEX), which helps to explain the relatively
poor antiasthmatic activity and selectivity of inhaled HC and DEX. The
initial (at t = 20 min) concentrations of BUD
equivalents and FP equivalents in the airway tissue were of the order
of 10 pmol/g per inhaled nanomole and 100 pmol/g per instilled
nanomole, reflecting airway deposition of approximately 10% of the
inhaled dose (Eirefelt et al., 1992
). Lung depositions of
10-15% are also achieved in human patients with the majority of
inhalers (Borgström, 1993
). Therefore, the instilled doses of
0.1-10 nmol/kg of body weight used in the present study (table 1) were
equivalent to inhaled doses of 1-100 nmol/kg of body weight. The
initial GCS equivalent tissue concentration of 10 pmol/g per inhaled
nanomole in trachea (with approximately 4-fold lower concentrations in
lung parenchyma) was obtained in the present study with rats of
approximately 300-g body weight. Allowing for the 250-fold greater body
weight and 250-fold larger alveolar surface area (Mercer et
al., 1994
) of 70-80-kg humans, one can calculate that the
inhalation of clinically relevant GCS doses of 0.2-2 mg (400-4000
nmol) would result in initial GCS concentrations of approximately
16-160 pmol/g in the airway tissue and 4-40 pmol/g in lung
parenchyma. According to our findings, these concentrations would
decrease approximately 2-4-fold in the large airways and 3-10-fold in
lung parenchyma 2-6 hr after inhalation. The tissue concentrations
obtained are in very good agreement with the results of the human study
by Van den Bosch et al. (1993)
, who reported a concentration
of BUD in human peripheral lung averaging 5.5 pmol/g of tissue 1.5-4
hr after inhalation of 1.6 mg.
Conclusion. We have shown that intracellular fatty acid esterification of BUD within airway tissue results in a local depot of latent, slowly regenerable, free BUD. This esterification prolongs the exposure of airway tissue to active GCS, compared with the exposure achieved with FP or BDP. The prolonged tissue exposure, and thus protracted receptor saturation, may explain the prolonged anti-inflammatory activity of BUD within rat large airways, compared with FP. It is tempting to speculate that the described esterification of BUD contributes to the airway selectivity and to the efficacy of BUD in asthma treatment when it is inhaled once daily.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We acknowledge Professor Ingvar Brandt for performing the autoradiographic analysis of tracheal segments. We thank Karin Sjödin for contributing to HPLC analysis and Dr. Anders Källén for statistical analysis of the data. We are also grateful to Dr. Kevin Cheeseman and to Elisabet Wieslander for valuable comments on the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 20, 1997; accepted March 4, 1998.
Send reprint requests to: Anna Miller-Larsson, Astra Draco AB, Department of Pharmacology, P.O. Box 34, S-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
Abbreviations used are: GCS, glucocorticosteroid(s); BUD, budesonide; BDP, beclomethasone dipropionate; FP, fluticasone propionate; HC, hydrocortisone; DEX, dexamethasone; BMP, beclomethasone monopropionate.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,17
-acetal substituted glucocorticoids.
Mol Pharmacol
25:
70-76[Abstract].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Lindmark Review: Differences in the pharmacodynamics of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone reflect differences in their therapeutic usefulness in asthma Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, October 1, 2008; 2(5): 279 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Yeh, H. C. Lin, C. H. Chang, T. S. Wu, B. H. Su, T. C. Li, S. Pyati, and C. H. Tsai Early Intratracheal Instillation of Budesonide Using Surfactant as a Vehicle to Prevent Chronic Lung Disease in Preterm Infants: A Pilot Study Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): e1310 - e1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lexmuller, H. Gullstrand, B.-O. Axelsson, P. Sjolin, S. H. Korn, D. S. Silberstein, and A. Miller-Larsson Differences in Endogenous Esterification and Retention in the Rat Trachea between Budesonide and Ciclesonide Active Metabolite Drug Metab. Dispos., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1788 - 1796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Derendorf Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Inhaled Ciclesonide J. Clin. Pharmacol., June 1, 2007; 47(6): 782 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Derendorf, R. Nave, A. Drollmann, F. Cerasoli, and W. Wurst Relevance of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled corticosteroids to asthma. Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2006; 28(5): 1042 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cerasoli Jr Developing the Ideal Inhaled Corticosteroid Chest, July 1, 2006; 130(1_suppl): 54S - 64S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Winkler, G. Hochhaus, and H. Derendorf How the Lung Handles Drugs: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Corticosteroids Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2004; 1(4): 356 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rohatagi, S. Appajosyula, H. Derendorf, S. Szefler, R. Nave, K. Zech, and D. Banerji Risk-Benefit Value of Inhaled Glucocorticoids: A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Perspective J. Clin. Pharmacol., January 1, 2004; 44(1): 37 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Kraft, B. Steiger, D. Beussink, J. N. Quiring, N. Fitzgerald, H. E. Greenberg, and S. A. Waldman The Pharmacokinetics of Nebulized Nanocrystal Budesonide Suspension in Healthy Volunteers J. Clin. Pharmacol., January 1, 2004; 44(1): 67 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Miller-Larsson, A. R&D, O. Selroos, D. R. Dorscheid, and S. R. White No Evidence of Glucocorticosteroid-induced Apoptosis of Airway Epithelial Cells In Vivo Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2002; 165(11): 1567 - 1568. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jendbro, C.-J. Johansson, P. Strandberg, H. Falk-Nilsson, and S. Edsbäcker Pharmacokinetics of Budesonide and Its Major Ester Metabolite after Inhalation and Intravenous Administration of Budesonide in the Rat Drug Metab. Dispos., April 13, 2001; 29(5): 769 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Xu, R. Olivenstein, J. G. Martin, and W. S. Powell Inhaled budesonide inhibits OVA-induced airway narrowing, inflammation, and cys-LT synthesis in BN rats J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2000; 89(5): 1852 - 1858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. MILLER-LARSSON, P. JANSSON, A. RUNSTROM, and R. BRATTSAND Prolonged Airway Activity and Improved Selectivity of Budesonide Possibly Due to Esterification Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2000; 162(4): 1455 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||