![]() |
|
|
Vol. 27, Issue 10, 1157-1164, October 1999
Division of Microbiology (J.D.M., C.E.C.) and Division of Chemistry (J.P.F.), National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A filamentous fungus, Cunninghamella elegans ATCC 9245, was used as a microbial model of mammalian metabolism to biotransform doxepin, a tricyclic antidepressant drug. Doxepin is produced as an 85:15% mixture of the trans- (E) and cis- (Z) forms. After 96 h of incubation in Sabouraud dextrose broth, 28% of the drug was metabolized to 16 metabolites. No change in the trans- (E) and cis- (Z) ratio of doxepin was observed. Metabolites were isolated by reversed phase HPLC and identified by 1H NMR and mass spectroscopic analysis. The major metabolites were (E)-2-hydroxydoxepin, (E)-3-hydroxydoxepin, (Z)-8-hydroxydoxepin, (E)-2-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (E)-3-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (E)-4-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (Z)- and (E)-8-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (E)-N-acetyl-N-desmethyldoxepin, (E)-N-desmethyl-N-formyldoxepin, (E)-N-acetyldidesmethyldoxepin, (E)-and (Z)-doxepin-N-oxide, and (E)- and (Z)-N-desmethyldoxepin. Six of the metabolites produced by C. elegans were essentially similar to those obtained in human metabolism studies, although nine novel metabolites were identified.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Doxepin,
(3-(6H-dibenzo[c,f]oxepin-11-ylidene)propyl)dimethylamine
(Fig. 1), is a tricyclic
antidepressant drug with a structure similar to those of
cyclobenzaprine, amitriptyline, imipramine, and protriptyline. Doxepin
is marketed as an 85:15% mixture of the trans-
(E) to cis- (Z) form with the
cis form being more active pharmacologically (Pinder et al.,
1977
). It is marketed under the names Sinequan, Adapin, Aponal,
Curatin, Quitaxon, or Zonalon cream (Budavari et al., 1997
). Doxepin is
used for treatment of depression and anxiety (Pinder et al.,
1977
), pruritus (Smith and Corelli, 1997
), and fibromyalgia and
chronic pain syndromes (Godfrey, 1996
). Doxepin has fewer side effects
than imipramine or amitriptyline and is more sedative than imipramine.
It is, therefore, more useful than imipramine in treating sleep
disturbances in depressed patients and in depression associated with
anxiety. Doxepin is well tolerated by the elderly and by persons with
cardiovascular disease. The common side effects, including dry mouth,
drowsiness or sedation, and constipation, are usually mild (Pinder et
al., 1977
).
|
The precise mechanism of action is not known. It is neither a central
nervous system stimulant nor a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. The current
hypothesis is that the clinical effects are due, at least in part, to
influences on the adrenergic activity at the synapses so that
deactivation of norepinephrine by reuptake into the nerve terminals is
prevented (Physicians' Desk Reference, 1997
). Animal studies
suggest that doxepin does not appreciably antagonize the
antihypertensive action of guanethidine to the extent of some other
tricyclic antidepressants. In animal studies, anticholinergic,
antiserotonin, and antihistamine effects have been demonstrated (Pinder
et al., 1977
).
Metabolic studies of doxepin have been performed on animals
and humans. Absorption of the drug is rapid and metabolism appears to
take place mainly in the liver (Pinder et al., 1997
). Phase I and phase
II metabolites have been identified in plasma, urine, and cerebrospinal
fluid. The urinary metabolites in humans are (E)-2-hydroxydoxepin,
(E)-2-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (Z)-
and (E)-N-desmethyldoxepin, (Z)- and
(E)-doxepin-N-oxide (Shu et al., 1990a
),
(E)-2-O-glucuronyldoxepin (Shu et al., 1990b
),
and a quaternary ammonium-linked glucuronide (Luo et al., 1991
).
(E)- and (Z)-N-Didesmethyldoxepin and
N-desmethyldoxepin have been reported in the cerebrospinal fluid of humans (Deuschle et al., 1997
). Rat bile metabolites include
(E)-2-O-glucuronyldoxepin and
(E)-3-O-glucuronyldoxepin (Shu et al., 1990b
).
The concept of using microorganisms, and in particular
Cunninghamella elegans, as models of mammalian metabolism
has been well documented (Zhang et al., 1995
, 1996
; Cerniglia, 1997
).
C. elegans can metabolize a wide variety of xenobiotics in a
regio- and stereoselective manner similar to mammalian enzyme systems (Rao and Davis, 1997
). This fungus was chosen for this investigation because the metabolism of doxepin in human volunteers and various animal species indicated that the E/Z ratio of doxepin
metabolites could affect the therapeutic activity of doxepin (Yan et
al., 1997
). Therefore, the aim of the present investigation was to use
C. elegans to generate a large amount of metabolites from doxepin for toxicological evaluation and to determine whether there is
stereoselective metabolism of the isomers of doxepin.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemicals. Doxepin hydrochloride (99%, E/Z ratio 83:16%) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals were reagent grade and the highest purity available. NMR solvents were purchased from Isotec, Inc. (Miamisburg, OH). All other solvents were of HPLC grade.
Microbial Culture and Biotransformation Conditions. Cultures of C. elegans ATCC 9245 were maintained on potato dextrose agar slants (Remel, Lenexa, KS) and stored at 4°C. The spores and/or mycelia were aseptically transferred to potato dextrose agar plates (Remel) and allowed to grow for at least 48 h at room temperature. The mycelia from five plates were then transferred to a sterile blender cup containing 90 ml of sterile physiological saline solution and homogenized for 5 min. Approximately 13-ml aliquots of the homogenate were used to inoculate 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 30 ml of Sabouraud dextrose broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI). The cultures were incubated for 48 h at 26°C on a rotary shaker operating at 125 rpm and then 10 mg of doxepin hydrochloride (31.75 µmol) dissolved in 0.5 ml of sterile physiological saline solution was added. Control experiments consisted of cultures without doxepin and sterile flasks containing only media and doxepin.
Extraction, Isolation, and Identification of Metabolites. After 96 h of incubation, the contents of each flask, including the controls, were filtered through glass wool into a separatory funnel and extracted with three equal volumes of ethyl acetate. The organic extracts were dried over sodium sulfate and evaporated to dryness in vacuo at 34°C using a Buchi 011 rotary evaporator (Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY). The residue was dissolved in 5 ml of methanol, transferred to a 13 × 100 mm test tube, and concentrated to approximately 100 µl in a model SS21 Savant Speed-vac system (Savant Instruments, Holbrook, NY) for analysis by HPLC.
Doxepin and its metabolites were resolved using reversed phase HPLC. The analyses were performed with a Hewlett-Packard series 1050 pump system (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a Hewlett-Packard diode array model 1040A detector at 233 nm. The compounds were eluted using a linear gradient of 30 to 75% methanol-buffer (v/v) over 30 min at 1.0 ml/min with a 4.6 × 250 mm 5-µm C18 Inertsil ODS-3 column (MetaChem Technologies, Torrance, CA). The buffer was 25 mM ammonium acetate, pH 7.2. The controls were subjected to the same analysis. The chromatograms of the cultures without doxepin showed no metabolites or substrate present; those of the flasks containing media and doxepin showed only the presence of the substrate. To isolate the major metabolites in sufficient quantities for structural identification, the extract was injected repeatedly into a semipreparative scale HPLC system consisting of a Beckman model 100A pump (Beckman Instruments, Inc., Fullerton, CA), a Waters 486 tunable UV absorbance detector (Waters Corp., Milford, MA), and a Shimadzu model CR601 Chromatopac integrator (Kyoto, Japan). The mobile phase, gradient, and type of column used were the same as above, but the column was 10.0 × 250 mm and the flow rate was 5 ml/min. Compounds with similar retention times were pooled, evaporated to dryness, and stored at 4°C before structural analysis. Each metabolite was dissolved in 0.5 ml methanol-d4 (99.96 atom % 2H) or dimethyl-d6-sulfoxide (99.96 atom % 2H) for 1H NMR (NMR) analysis. The NMR measurements were carried out at 500.13 MHz on an AM500 spectrometer (Bruker Instruments, Billerica, MA). Chemical shifts are reported on the
scale (ppm) by assigning the residual solvent
peak to 3.30 or 2.49 ppm for methanol or dimethyl sulfoxide,
respectively. Typical data acquisition parameters were: data size,
32,000; sweep width, 7042 Hz, filter width, 8900 Hz; acquisition time,
2.33 s; flip angle, 90°; relaxation delay, 0 s;
temperature, 298.5 K. For spectra recorded under quantitative conditions, a 10- to 20-s relaxation delay was used. At 298.5 K, the
resonances of the H6 methylene protons appear as a broad singlet
because their exchange rate is close to the coalescence temperature.
Therefore, spectra of all metabolites were also recorded at 255 K (data
not shown) to slow the exchange enough to observe them as two doublets
and to perform nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE)1 experiments
on them. For measurement of coupling constants, the free induction
decay was zero-filled to 64,000 resulting in a final data point
resolution of 0.215 Hz/point. Coupling constants reported are first
order. Those that are nonfirst order and those of overlapping
resonances are omitted. The data were processed with a
Lorentzian-to-Gaussian resolution enhancement with Bruker parameters of
0.5 and 0.17, except for the NOE measurements, where exponential
filtering that produced line broadening of 2 Hz was used. Assignments
were made via homonuclear decoupling experiments, NOE experiments,
integration, and analysis of substituent effects.
The mass spectral analyses were performed on a TSQ 700 mass
spectrometer (Finnigan Corp., San Jose, CA) with a direct exposure probe (DEP). The DEP was heated linearly at 5 mA/s while the first quadrupole analyzer was scanned from m/z 40 to 440 with a
0.5-s cycle time. The ion source temperature was 150°C. Electron
ionization (EI) mass spectrometry was performed at 70 V electron
energy. Positive ion chemical ionization (PICI) used 10% ammonia in
nitrogen as the reagent gas, and the ion source pressure was 5.2 Torr. The samples were dissolved in methanol, applied to the rhenium wire of
the DEP, and the solvent was allowed to evaporate in air before analysis.
Quantification of Metabolites.
In a separate study for quantitative analysis of doxepin metabolites,
three flasks of 48-h cultures of C. elegans ATCC 9245 in
30-ml Sabouraud dextrose broth were dosed with approximately 10 mg of
doxepin, incubated for 96 h, and extracted as above. HPLC with UV
detection was used to separate the fungal metabolites produced by
doxepin, as described previously. Each metabolite was dried completely
and dissolved in methanol-d4 for NMR
analysis. A known amount of 1,4-dioxane was used as an internal
standard and the amount of each metabolite was determined based on the integration of the dioxane resonance and the
-proton resonance of
the metabolites. For comparison with the NMR method, the amounts of
metabolites were also estimated by integration of the HPLC peaks. The
UV spectra of the metabolites were similar to those of doxepin,
indicating that their extinction coefficient at 233 nm was not
significantly different from that of doxepin.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The HPLC chromatogram (Fig. 2) shows
fourteen peaks representing metabolites produced from the
biotransformation of doxepin by C. elegans. The metabolites
and unmetabolized doxepin are designated as peaks I through XIV. Peak
VIII was not collected in a sufficient amount for complete
identification, and peak XI was unmetabolized doxepin. HPLC retention
times, molecular weights, UV/visible
max values, and mass spectral data are given in Table
1. 1H NMR
parameters are given in Table 2. The
amount of each metabolite metabolized, as determined by NMR and
HPLC analysis, is shown in Table 3.
|
|
|
|
The major metabolite, peak IX, eluted at 26.7 min. The EI mass spectrum
had a base peak ion at m/z 44, presumed to be
[CH2 = NH
CH3]+ and the molecular
ion at m/z 265 [M+.]. The
corresponding PICI mass spectrum (Fig.
3B) contained a base peak ion at
m/z 266 [M + H]+ and a significant
fragment ion at m/z 44. The aromatic region of the
1H NMR spectrum (Fig.
4B) was nearly identical with that of
authentic doxepin (data not shown). Homonuclear decoupling experiments
were performed to determine the connectivity between the four
resonances on each six-membered ring. The
- and
-resonances were
present and had chemical shifts similar to those of doxepin. The
-methylene resonance of the metabolite was shifted downfield 0.19 ppm from that of doxepin and the methyl resonance was shifted downfield 0.11 ppm. The methyl resonance integrated as three, indicating demethylation. Based on this evidence, the principle component was
identified as N-desmethyldoxepin. Additional NMR analysis revealed a subspectrum in a 15:85% ratio to the larger component, as
in authentic doxepin. We believed that the larger component was
(E)-N-desmethyldoxepin. To verify this, several
NOE experiments were conducted. At 255 K, the H6 methylenes appeared as
two distinct doublets rather than a broad singlet, as they did at 298.5 K. Irradiation of each doublet at 255 K produced an NOE at 7.42 ppm, H7. The decoupling experiments already completed led to the subsequent assignment of the other protons on the B ring. When the
-resonance was irradiated, an NOE was produced at 7.31 ppm. Because that doublet
was not part of the B ring, it was assigned as H1 and so the larger
component of the metabolite was proven to be in the
(E)-isomeric form. A rigorous proof of structure was not
performed on the smaller component due to resonance overlap. The
smaller component was assumed to be
(Z)-N-desmethyldoxepin because of its similarity
to the one present in authentic doxepin and its 15:85% ratio with the
major component. Based on this evidence, peak IX was identified as a
mixture of (E)- and
(Z)-N-desmethyldoxepin.
|
|
The EI mass spectra of peaks V through VII each contained an intense
base peak ion at m/z 58 [CH2 = N
(CH3)2]+
and the base peak ion at m/z 295 [M+.]. The corresponding PICI mass spectra
contained a base peak ion at m/z 296, the [M + H]+ ion and a significant fragment ion at
m/z 58 (Table 1). The UV-visible spectra of peaks V through
VIII were so similar that NMR became the key analytical technique for
unambiguously identifying the metabolites.
The NMR analyses of metabolite peaks V through VII were similar (Table 2). All exhibited seven aromatic resonances, two of them shifted upfield from those of doxepin and having the ABX pattern characteristic of a single substitution on one of the 6-membered rings. NOE experiments provided the (E)- or (Z)- designation, as described above. Homonuclear decoupling experiments were used to provide information about the connectivity between the resonances on a particular ring and ultimately led to the determination of the sites of substitution for these metabolites. The three metabolites were identified as (E)-3-hydroxydoxepin [peak V], (E)-2-hydroxydoxepin [peak VI], and (Z)-8-hydroxydoxepin [peak VII].
Peaks I through IV produced similar EI and PICI mass spectra (Table 1).
The EI base peak ion was at m/z 44, probably
[CH2 = NH
CH3]+, and the molecular
ion at m/z 281 [M+.]; the PICI base
peak ion was at m/z 282 [M + H]+,
with a significant fragment ion at m/z 44 (Fig. 3, C and D). Although peak III appeared to be a single compound in the HPLC chromatogram, the NMR spectrum (Fig. 4C) revealed two similar components. One had a NMR spectrum almost identical with that of
metabolite VII; the other had a NMR spectrum similar to that of
metabolite VI. The only differences were that the methyl resonance of
each metabolite integrated as three instead of six, indicating N-demethylation. The (E)- or
(Z)- designation as well as the site of
substitution was determined by NOE experiments, as described above. The
metabolites were identified as
(Z)-8-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin and
(E)-2-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin.
The NMR spectra of peaks I (Fig. 4D) and IV were similar to those of
metabolites V and VII with a single substitution on one of the rings
and demethylation. The techniques described above identified them as
(E)-3-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin [peak I] and (E)-8-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin [peak IV].
Metabolite II was also demethylated, but the splitting pattern of the
proton resonances on the substituted ring was consistent with that
substitution being at either the H1 or H4 position. Selective
saturation of the
-proton and H6 produced NOEs that proved the site
of substitution. The metabolite was identified as
(E)-4-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin.
The NMR spectrum of peak VIII showed eight aromatic protons, indicating
that the ring system was intact. However, the usually prominent
-proton resonance was missing. The
- and
-methylene resonances
were not obvious due to impurities and sample quantity limitations.
Therefore, this metabolite has not been identified.
The aromatic region of the 1H NMR spectrum of
peak X (Table 2) was similar to that of authentic doxepin; the only
difference was a slight (0.01-0.05 ppm) downfield shift of those
resonances. However, the methyl and
-methylene resonances were
shifted downfield considerably more, 0.63 and 0.24 ppm, respectively.
The
-methylene resonance was visible only as a broad hump in the
298.5 K spectrum. At 255 K, the spectrum revealed two separate
-methylene resonances, each integrating as one. The methyl
resonances were also moved apart enough for the two of them to be
resolved at that temperature. These observations are consistent with
N-oxide compounds. Selective saturation of the
-methylene
resonance produced an NOE at H1 consistent with the
(E)- isomeric form. However, a subspectrum was
observed in a 15:85% ratio with the major spectrum, indicating that
this metabolite was in the same isomeric ratio as doxepin. The EI mass
spectral data were inconclusive due to the lack of certain
characteristic ions, but the PICI data showed the presence of an
additional oxygen atom (Table 1). The major component of peak X
was identified as (E)-doxepin N-oxide and the
minor as (Z)-doxepin-N-oxide.
The NMR spectrum of authentic doxepin (Fig. 4E) appeared to show two compounds in an 85:15% ratio, as did the gas chromatography mass spectra (data not shown). NOE experiments proved that the larger of the two was in the (E)- conformation. Rigorous proof that the smaller component was present in the (Z)- form was not conducted, because doxepin is known to be marketed as an 85:15% ratio of (E)- to (Z)- isomers. The NMR spectrum (Fig. 4E), mass spectral data (molecular ion at m/z 280, Fig. 3E), and HPLC retention time of peak XI were the same as those of authentic doxepin, thus confirming that it was unmetabolized (E)- and (Z)-doxepin.
The EI mass spectra of peaks XII and XIII were similar, with molecular ions at m/z 293 and base peak ions at m/z 234. The intense ion at m/z 234 is presumed to be formed from the loss of the substituted amine (C2H5NO) from the molecular ion. The PICI mass spectra (Fig. 3A) were also virtually identical, with ions at m/z 311, 294, and 234. The ion at m/z 311 is presumed to be the ammoniated molecule, [M + NH4]+ and the ion at m/z 294 is presumed to be the protonated molecule, [M + H]+.
The aromatic areas of the NMR spectra of XII and XIII indicated
demethylation and no ring substitution (Fig. 4A). The mass spectral
data indicated that an exchangeable proton might be present on each
metabolite, so XII and XIII were dissolved in
dimethyl-d6-sulfoxide. The NMR spectrum of
peak XII revealed a singlet at 8.53 ppm, the formyl proton resonance
(Table 2). The NMR spectrum of peak XIII showed a broadened triplet
resonance at 7.91 ppm (the N-H proton) that was coupled to the
-methylene resonance at 3.13 ppm. The other proton resonances were
assigned by techniques already described. These metabolites were
identified as
(E)-N-desmethyl-N-formyldoxepin [peak
XII] and (E)-N-acetyldidesmethyldoxepin [peak
XIII].
The EI mass spectrum of peak XIV had a base peak at m/z 44, again presumed to be [CH2 = NH
CH3]+, and the molecular
ion was at m/z 307 [M+.]. The
corresponding PICI mass spectrum contained a base peak ion at
m/z 308 [M + H]+ (Table 1). The
1H NMR spectrum of peak XIV shows all the
resonances doubled with an extra set of singlets at 2.64 and 2.89 ppm
(Table 2). Thus the data are consistent with N-acetylation
(Zhang et al., 1996
). The metabolite was identified as
(E)-N-acetyl-N-desmethyldoxepin.
Table 3 shows the percentages of metabolites formed from cultures dosed with 10 mg doxepin per flask using NMR and HPLC peak area analysis for quantitation. Approximately 28% of the doxepin was metabolized to N-demethylated, ring-hydroxylated, N-oxide, N-acetylated, or N-formylated derivatives. The residual doxepin and/or metabolites that adhered to cellular material were not extracted. The mono-N-demethylated metabolites, including (E)-and (Z)-N-desmethyldoxepin, were the major metabolites.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present investigation has shown that C. elegans transformed doxepin to the following major metabolites: (E)-2-hydroxydoxepin, (E)-3-hydroxydoxepin, (Z)-8-hydroxydoxepin, (E)-2-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (E)-3-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (E)-4-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (Z)- and (E)-8-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (E)-N-acetyl-N-desmethyldoxepin, (E)-N-desmethyl-N-formyldoxepin, (E)-N-acetyldidesmethyldoxepin, (E)-and (Z)-doxepin-N-oxide, and (E)- and (Z)-N-desmethyldoxepin. The structures of these compounds and the proposed biotransformation pathways are presented in Fig. 5.
|
The formation of (E)-2-hydroxydoxepin,
(E)-3-hydroxydoxepin, and (Z)-8-hydroxydoxepin by
C. elegans can be explained by a National Institutes of
Health shift mechanism through doxepin 2,3- and doxepin
8,9-epoxide intermediates by the action of a cytochrome P-450
monooxygenase (Duhart et al., 1999
).
(E)-4-Hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin could have been
formed from a doxepin 3,4-epoxide intermediate producing
(E)-4-hydroxydoxepin that was subsequently demethylated. Several N-demethylated products were formed. This was not
unexpected, because N-desmethyldoxepin was the most abundant
metabolite. The hydroxy-N-desmethyl metabolites were
presumably produced from a 2,3-, 8,9-, or 3,4-epoxide intermediate with
concurrent demethylation. It is not clear which occurred first, the
ring oxidation or the N-demethylation. Demethylation was
probably required before acetylation or formylation, but ring oxidation
never occurred in the N-acetyl or N-formyl
products. It is interesting that neither
7-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin nor
9-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin was formed, although
(E)-4-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin and
2-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin were formed on the A ring. This could be due to steric hindrance by the H6-methylene and the
-methylene protons, respectively.
The (E)- isomer of doxepin gave predominately hydroxylation
on the A ring and (Z)- isomer primarily on the B ring. This
could be due to the steric hindrance of the
- and
-carbons on the ring cis to them causing the ring trans to them
being more open to enzymatic attack.
(E)-8-Hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin does not conform
to this explanation, but it is possible that if demethylation occurred
first, then the ring cis to the
- and
-carbons might be more vulnerable to enzymatic attack.
(E)- and (Z)-Desmethyldoxepin,
(E)-2-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin,
(E)-2-hydroxydoxepin, (Z)- and
(E)-doxepin-N-oxide, a hydroxy doxepin
glucuronide and a hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin glucuronide have been reported as human and animal metabolites (Shu et al., 1990a
;
Hobbs, 1969
). However, (E)-3-hydroxydoxepin,
(Z)-8-hydroxydoxepin, (E)- and
(Z)-8-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin,
(E)-3hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (E)-4-hydroxy-N-desmethyldoxepin, (E)-N-desmethyl-N-formyldoxepin,
(E)-N-acetyldidesmethyldoxepin, and
(E)-N-acetyl-N-desmethyldoxepin formed
by C. elegans are novel metabolites not previously reported
in animals or humans.
The phase I metabolism and stereoselectivity of the fungal metabolism
of doxepin correspond to that reported in humans (Shu et al., 1990a
).
C. elegans produced (E)- and
(Z)-doxepin N-oxide and (E)- and
(Z)-N-desmethyldoxepin. These metabolites,
present in both isomeric forms, retained the same 15:85%
(Z)- to (E)- ratio as in human metabolism. Yan et
al. (1997)
state that more rapid metabolism of
(E)-N-desmethyldoxepin accounts for distortion of
the (Z)/(E) ratio over time. The present
investigation shows twelve metabolites in the (E)- form but
only three in the (Z)- form. Perhaps the microbial system
also metabolizes the (E)-form of the drug faster, but
instead of making a larger amount of a particular metabolite, it makes
a larger variety of them.
Previous studies using C. elegans as a model for mammalian metabolism have indicated that the fungus is highly efficient in its production of metabolites from tricyclic antidepressants and related drugs. C. elegans produced six metabolites from doxepin that were similar to those obtained in human metabolism studies, as well as nine previously unreported metabolites. The ability of C. elegans to mimic mammalian metabolism and to perform novel biotransformations clearly demonstrates that microbial systems represent an attractive alternative to the use of actual mammalian systems or chemical synthesis of metabolites. The quantities of doxepin metabolites produced were sufficient not only for complete structural characterization, but also for future use in neurotoxicology studies at NCTR.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Bruce D. Erickson, Thomas M. Heinze, and John B. Sutherland for critical reading of this manuscript, and Kim Cooney for illustrations.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 3, 1999; accepted June 10, 1999.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Carl E. Cerniglia, Division of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079-7341. E-mail: CCerniglia{at}nctr.fda.gov
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
Abbreviations used are: NOE, nuclear Overhauser effect; DEP, direct exposure probe; EI, electron ionization; PICI, positive ion chemical ionization.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Li, J. L. Josephs, G. L. Skiles, and W. G. Humphreys Metabolite Generation via Microbial Biotransformations with Actinomycetes: Rapid Screening for Active Strains and Biosynthesis of Important Human Metabolites of Two Development-Stage Compounds, 5-[(5S,9R)-9-(4-Cyanophenyl)-3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-1-methyl-2,4-dioxo-1,3,7-triazaspiro[4.4]non7-yl-methyl]-3-thiophenecarboxylic Acid (BMS-587101) and Dasatinib Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2008; 36(4): 721 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Sun, H.-H. Huang, L. Liu, and D.-F. Zhong Transformation of Verapamil by Cunninghamella blakesleeana Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 1, 2004; 70(5): 2722 - 2727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Moody, J. P. Freeman, P. P. Fu, and C. E. Cerniglia Biotransformation of Mirtazapine by Cunninghamella Elegans Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2002; 30(11): 1274 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Moody, D. Zhang, T. M. Heinze, and C. E. Cerniglia Transformation of Amoxapine by Cunninghamella elegans Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2000; 66(8): 3646 - 3649. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||