DMD Noab BioDiscoveries - Shaping Drug Discovery

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ammon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mikus, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ammon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mikus, G.

Vol. 28, Issue 10, 1149-1152, October 2000

SHORT COMMUNICATION

In Vitro Interaction of Codeine and Diclofenac

    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

There is very limited knowledge about possible pharmacokinetic interactions between opioid analgesics and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are commonly used in combination for the treatment of chronic pain. The major metabolic pathway of the weak opioid codeine is glucuronidation to codeine-6-glucuronide. Therefore we investigated the influence of the NSAID diclofenac on the formation of codeine-6-glucuronide in vitro, using human liver tissue homogenate. The formation of codeine-6-glucuronide exhibited single enzyme Michaelis-Menten kinetics with an average Vmax of 93.6 ± 35.3 pmol/mg/min. A noncompetitive inhibition of codeine-6-glucuronidation by diclofenac was observed with an average Ki of 7.9 µM. These in vitro findings suggest that a pharmacokinetic interaction occurs in vivo, which has to be confirmed by an interaction study in human subjects. It can be speculated that in case of inhibition of glucuronidation, the amount of codeine available for other pathways especially O-demethylation to morphine is increased, resulting in higher morphine serum levels and therefore higher analgesic efficacy.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

The weak opioid codeine is widely used in the management of pain. The major metabolic pathway of codeine is the formation of codeine-6-glucuronide, to a minor extent codeine is metabolized via O-demethylation to morphine and via N-demethylation to norcodeine (Yue et al., 1989; Chen et al., 1991; Vree and Verwey-van Wissen, 1992). There is good evidence that the analgesic effect of codeine is mediated by its O-demethylated metabolite morphine. This biotransformation step is catalyzed by cytochrome P450 2D6, which exhibits a genetic polymorphism. Five to 10% of the population who are designated as "poor metabolizers" do not express the functional enzyme. As a consequence after the administration of codeine no analgesia is observed since only trace amounts of morphine are formed (Poulsen et al., 1996; Eckhardt et al., 1998). The World Health Organization proposes a three-stage approach for the treatment of chronic pain, where on step two weak opioids are to be combined with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).1 There are several studies demonstrating the benefit of the combination of NSAIDs with opioids in comparison to opioids alone (Hodsman et al., 1987; Strobel, 1992; Björkman et al., 1993; Mercadante et al., 1997; Montgomery et al., 1996). The additive effect is thought to be caused by known different pharmacodynamic mechanisms as opioids displaying their analgesic activity in the central nervous system via opioid receptors, NSAIDs affecting the synthesis of inflammatory prostaglandins via inhibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase. However, pharmacokinetic interactions cannot be excluded although until now only limited knowledge about pharmacokinetic interactions between opioids and NSAIDs is available. Recently, in vitro studies with human liver microsomes revealed that glucuronidation of the structural analog dihydrocodeine was inhibited by diclofenac and naproxen (Kirkwood et al., 1998). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether codeine glucuronidation can be inhibited by diclofenac in vitro and to assess the contribution of the gut wall and the liver to the presystemic glucuronidation of codeine. Because tissue samples of liver and gut wall were obtained from the same individual, interindividual variability in expression of the UGTs involved in codeine-6-glucuronidation could be excluded.


    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

Chemicals and Reagents. Codeine phosphate-hemihydrate was purchased from Merck (Germany), codeine-6-glucuronide and codeine-6-glucuronide-d3 from Lipomed, via Inresa Arzneimittel GmbH, Freiburg, Germany; diclofenac sodium, Tris-HCl, Tris, and uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronic acid (UDPGA), pepstatin, leupeptin, and EDTA were purchased from Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany). Pefa Bloc was purchased from Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany). All other reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial sources and were of analytical reagent grade.

Human Liver and Small Intestine Tissue. Liver tissue was obtained from three male donors (age range 68-79 years) undergoing duodenopancreatectomy; in two of them, additional tissue of small intestine was obtained. The tissue sampling was approved by the local Ethics Committee and each donor gave written informed consent before study entry. The study was carried out in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Organ Procurement. After resection, liver biopsies were directly stored on ice and frozen in liquid nitrogen within 10 min. Frozen liver tissue was ground in a ball mill (Braun Biotech, Melsungen, Germany) at 2500 rpm for 2 min. Ground tissue was suspended in protein storage buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM Pefa Bloc, 1 mM EDTA, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 µg/ml pepstatin) and homogenized with a motor-driven glass Teflon homogenizer at 1000 rpm for 2 min. The homogenate was further sonicated at 12 W for 30 s (Sononplus HD 200; Bandelin, Berlin, Germany). Homogenates were stored at -80°C until further use. Enterocytes were isolated from human duodenal specimens as described (Fasco et al., 1993) and homogenized as described above. Protein concentrations were determined according to the method of Smith et al. (1985).

Enzyme Kinetic Studies. Incubations were performed using a modification of the assay described by Yue et al. (1990). Incubations were carried out in a final volume of 250 µl containing 5 µM to 10 mM codeine phosphate, 50 µg of protein homogenate, 5 mM MgCl2, and 100 mM Tris, pH 7.4. Reactions were started by the addition of 10 mM UDPGA and was stopped after 60 min by adding 1.5 ml of ice-cold ethanol. The incubation tubes were vortexed and placed on ice, 100 pmol of internal standard (codeine-6-glucuronide-d3) was added. After centrifugation (10,000 g, 10 min), supernatant was taken and evaporated under nitrogen gas at 37°C. The residue was dissolved in mobile phase containing 94% distilled water, 5% acetonitrile, and 1% acetic acid. Formation of codeine-6-glucuronide in relation to time and protein concentration was linear under given conditions. Production of codeine-6-glucuronide was not observed in negative controls, which did not contain UDPGA. The formation of codeine-6-glucuronide was calculated as picomoles formed per minute per milligram of protein.

Inhibition Studies with Diclofenac. Inhibition studies were performed on liver homogenates with a final concentration of 0.5, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM diclofenac (methanolic solution) on three different concentrations of codeine phosphate (0.1, 1, and 10 mM). In the final concentration 1% methanol produced an average inhibition of glucuronidation of less than 5%.

Analysis of Codeine-6-Glucuronide. Codeine-6-glucuronide was determined with HPLC electrospray mass spectrometry analogous to a previously published method (Schänzle et al., 1999) with minor modifications. The mobile phases used for HPLC were: A) 1% acetic acid in water and B) 1% acetic acid in acetonitrile. HPLC separation was achieved on a LiChrospher 100 RP-18 end-capped analytical column (125 × 3-mm i.d., 5 µm particle size) at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min using a linear gradient from 8% B to 40% B in 8 min. The mass spectrometer (HP 1100 MSD, Hewlett-Packard, Waldbronn, Germany) was operated in the selected ion monitoring mode using the respective MH+ ions, m/z 476 for codeine-6-glucuronide and m/z 479 for codeine-6-glucuronide-d3. Calibration points ranged from 1 to 1000 pmol of codeine-6-glucuronide. Coefficient of variation (CV) of the interassay variability (quality controls containing 10, 100, and 1000 pmol of codeine-6-glucuronide) ranged between 4.7 and 9.2% (1 pmol: CV 12%), CV of the intraassay variability ranged between 0.7 and 3.2%.

Data Analysis. The Michaelis-Menten constant Km and the maximum velocity Vmax for codeine glucuronidation and the inhibition constant Ki for diclofenac were calculated using the GRAPHIT 4.04 software (Erithacus Software Ltd., Surrey, UK, 1998). The untransformed kinetic data (mean of duplicates) were fitted to a one-enzyme Michaelis-Menten equation. The intrinsic clearance (Cli) was calculated as Vmax/Km. To determine diclofenac-Ki, the model of competitive inhibition and noncompetitive inhibition, using the equations V = VmaxS/(Km(1 + I/Ki)) + S and V = VmaxS/(Km(1 + I/Ki)) + (S(1 I/Ki)), were investigated. Goodness of fit was assessed using the chi 2 test.


    Results and Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

The formation of codeine-6-glucuronide in homogenate of human liver and enterocyte homogenate of exhibited Michaelis-Menten kinetics are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. Vmax of codeine-6-glucuronidation in liver homogenate was on average 93.6 ± 35.3 pmol/mg/min; in enterocyte homogenate, Vmax was less than 10% compared to liver (8.5 ± 3.8 pmol/mg/min). The Km values were in the millimolar range (Table 1) and not different between liver (1488 ± 253 µM) and enterocytes (1857± 413 µM). The Km values were similar to those in human liver microsomes (Km = 2.1 mM) reported by Yue et al. (1990). The calculated average intrinsic clearance of codeine-6-glucuronidation in liver homogenate was 0.062 µl/min/mg. The intrinsic clearance in enterocyte homogenates was only 7.3% of the intrinsic clearance in corresponding liver homogenate. We therefore conclude that the small intestine contributes only to a minor extent to total codeine glucuronidation.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 1
Michaelis-Menten constant (Km), maximum velocity (Vmax), inhibition constant for diclofenac (Ki), and intrinsic clearance (Cli) of codeine-6-glucuronide formation in homogenates of liver and small intestinal enterocytes

Mean Km and Vmax of codeine-6-glucuronidation in liver homogenate: 1488 µM, 93.6 pmol/min/mg; mean Km and Vmax of codeine-6-glucuronidation in enterocyte homogenate (small intestine): 1857 µM, 8.5 pmol/min/mg; mean Ki of diclofenac on codeine-6-glucuronidation in liver homogenate: 7.9 µM.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Codeine-6-glucuronide formation

A, codeine-6-glucuronide formation from codeine in liver homogenate from three different donors (mean of duplicates ±S.D.). B, codeine-6-glucuronide formation from codeine in small intestine homogenate from two different donors (donors 2 and 3) (mean of duplicates ±S.D.).

In two of the liver homogenates inhibition studies were performed with five different concentrations (0.5, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM) of diclofenac and three different concentrations of codeine (0.1, 1, and 10 mM). Diclofenac produced noncompetitive inhibition of codeine glucuronidation with Ki values of 9.1 µM (chi 2 1.91) and 6.8 µM (chi 2 2.12) (Fig. 2).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Eadie-Hofstee Plots: noncompetitive inhibition of codeine-6-glucuronide formation with diclofenac in liver homogenate from two different donors (donors 1 and 3).

V, codeine-6-glucuronide formation; S, substrate concentration. Substrate concentrations (codeine): 100, 1,000, and 10,000 µM; inhibitor concentrations (diclofenac): 0.5, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM; V (100, 1,000, and 10,000 µM) codeine/0.5 µM diclofenac (open circle ); V (100, 1,000, and 10,000 µM) codeine/5.0 µM diclofenac (); V (100, 1,000, and 10,000 µM) codeine/10.0 µM diclofenac (); V (100, 1,000, and 10,000 µM) codeine/50.0 µM diclofenac (black-square); V (100, 1,000, and 10,000 µM) codeine/100.0 µM diclofenac (triangle ).

In our studies, diclofenac was a potent noncompetitive inhibitor of codeine glucuronidation in the given concentration range with an average Ki value of 7.9 µM. Recently, it was shown that diclofenac at a concentration of 50 µM produced in vitro an inhibition >50% of dihydrocodeine glucuronidation, which is a structural analog of codeine (Kirkwood et al., 1998). In contrast, diclofenac and various other NSAIDs do not alter the formation of morphine from codeine (Dayer et al., 1992), which is mediated by the polymorphic CYP2D6. We therefore performed only glucuronidation experiments.

Interestingly, morphine, amitriptyline, diazepam, probenecid, and chloramphenicol inhibited codeine glucuronidation in human liver microsomes (Yue et al., 1990). Metabolic interactions have also been described with morphine and oxazepam at the conjugation level, as oxazepam inhibits glucuronidation of morphine in human liver microsomes (Säwe et al., 1982).

Expressed UGT2B7 has recently been shown to catalyze codeine-6-glucuronidation. In this system the rates of codeine-6-glucuronidation were about 1% of the rate of morphine glucuronidation (Coffmann et al., 1997). UGTs are expressed primarily in the liver but also in kidney, brain, skin, and the luminal surface of the intestinal epithelium. The presence of UGTs in extrahepatic tissues might be due to tissue-specific variations in UGT expression (Burchell and Coughtrie, 1989). Screening for RNA expression by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction recently exhibited the expression of UGT2B7 in all intestinal segments (jejunum, ileum, and colon) from six human subjects (Randominska-Pandya et al., 1998).

The inhibition of codeine glucuronidation might have different clinical implications: glucuronidation is the major metabolic pathway of codeine, whereas only a small amount of codeine (less than 10%) is O-demethylated to the pharmacologically active metabolite morphine. Because there is no inhibition of codeine O-demethylation to morphine by diclofenac (Dayer et al., 1992), it can be speculated that due to inhibition of codeine glucuronidation the amount of codeine available for other pathways, especially O-demethylation to morphine, is increased, resulting in higher morphine serum levels and therefore higher analgesic efficacy. This has to be verified in further pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic in vivo studies.

In summary, these data suggest a potential involvement of a pharmacokinetic interaction in the diclofenac codeine combination therapy of moderate pain suggested by the World Health Organization.

Susanne Ammon
Oliver von Richter
Ute Hofmann
Klaus-Peter Thon
Michel Eichelbaum
Gerd Mikus

Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute
of Clinical Pharmacology,
Stuttgart, Germany (S.A., O.v.R., U.H., M.E.)
Robert Bosch Hospital,
Department of Surgery,
Stuttgart, Germany (K.-P.T.)
Internal Medicine VI-Clinical
Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology,
University of Heidelberg,
Germany (G.M.)

    Acknowledgments

We appreciate the excellent technical assistance of S. Seefried and M. Pecia.

    Footnotes

Received April 25, 2000; accepted July 19, 2000.

The study was fully supported by the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Germany.

Send reprint requests to: Susanne Ammon, M.D., Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany. E-mail: susanne.ammon{at}medizin.uni-magdeburg.de

    Abbreviations

Abbreviations used are: NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; UGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase; UDPGA, uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronic acid; CV, coefficient of variation; Cli, intrinsic clearance.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References


0090-9556/00/2810-1149-1152$03.00/0
DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. Takeda, Y. Kitajima, Y. Ishii, Y. Nishimura, P. I. Mackenzie, K. Oguri, and H. Yamada
INHIBITION OF UDP-GLUCURONOSYLTRANSFERASE 2B7-CATALYZED MORPHINE GLUCURONIDATION BY KETOCONAZOLE: DUAL MECHANISMS INVOLVING A NOVEL NONCOMPETITIVE MODE
Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2006; 34(8): 1277 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
J. J. Engtrakul, R. S. Foti, T. J. Strelevitz, and M. B. Fisher
ALTERED AZT (3'-AZIDO-3'-DEOXYTHYMIDINE) GLUCURONIDATION KINETICS IN LIVER MICROSOMES AS AN EXPLANATION FOR UNDERPREDICTION OF IN VIVO CLEARANCE: COMPARISON TO HEPATOCYTES AND EFFECT OF INCUBATION ENVIRONMENT
Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1621 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
V. Uchaipichat, P. I. Mackenzie, X.-H. Guo, D. Gardner-Stephen, A. Galetin, J. B. Houston, and J. O. Miners
HUMAN UDP-GLUCURONOSYLTRANSFERASES: ISOFORM SELECTIVITY AND KINETICS OF 4-METHYLUMBELLIFERONE AND 1-NAPHTHOL GLUCURONIDATION, EFFECTS OF ORGANIC SOLVENTS, AND INHIBITION BY DICLOFENAC AND PROBENECID
Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2004; 32(4): 413 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
C. King, W. Tang, J. Ngui, T. Tephly, and M. Braun
Characterization of Rat and Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases Responsible for the in Vitro Glucuronidation of Diclofenac
Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2001; 61(1): 49 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ammon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mikus, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ammon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mikus, G.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition