![]() |
|
|
Vol. 29, Issue 4, Part 2, 489-494, April 2001
Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent advances in neuroscience and genetics have enabled a better
understanding of genetically influenced differences in ethanol
("alcohol")-related responses and differential vulnerability to
alcohol dependence at the cellular and molecular levels. Heritability studies reveal that the role of genetic factors in alcoholism is
largely substance-specific, with the exception of nicotine. One focus
of genetic research in alcoholism is the study of functional polymorphisms influencing alcohol metabolism, such as the aldehyde dehydrogenase type 2 Glu487Lys and alcohol dehydrogenase type 2 His47Arg polymorphisms, which affect vulnerability to alcoholism via
pharmacokinetic mechanisms, and cross-population studies have begun to
reveal important gene-environment interactions. The other focus is on
functional genetic variants of proteins involved in the neuronal
response to alcohol, including alcohol sensitivity, reward, tolerance,
and withdrawal. Studies on the roles of GABAA
6-amino
acid substitutions in rodents in alcohol and benzodiazepine sensitivity, and potential roles in human alcohol and benzodiazepine sensitivity are reviewed. These studies, together with recently developed knowledge on a GABAA receptor gene cluster
at a quantitative trait loci for alcohol withdrawal on mouse chromosome
11, indicate that research investigation of variation at
GABAA neurotransmission is a promising area in the
pharmacodynamics of alcohol and in differential susceptibility to
alcoholism. Genes for proteins involved in alcohol-mediated reward
include genes for transporters and receptors for dopamine, serotonin,
opioids, and GABA. These genes and their functional variants also
represent important targets for understanding alcohol's effects in
humans. Identification of genes for alcoholism vulnerability is
important in the near future, not only for prevention, but also for
development and targeting treatments.
| |
Heritability and Gene-Environment Interaction in Alcoholism |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alcohol dependence ("alcoholism") is a common
etiologically complex disorder, affecting about 10% of males and 4%
of females in the United States (Kessler et al., 1994
). An estimated 40 to 60% of the individual variation in alcohol preference and
vulnerability to alcoholism is genetic in origin as revealed by
adoption studies (e.g., Goodwin et al., 1977
; Bohman et al., 1981
;
Cloninger et al., 1981
) and by studies on large samples of
cross-sectionally ascertained twin pairs (e.g., Heath et al., 1997
;
Kendler et al., 1997
).
The largest portion of the genetic vulnerability to alcoholism is
substance-specific; vulnerability is largely unshared with other drugs
except for nicotine (Goldman and Bergen, 1998
). Relatives of probands
with other substance dependence disorders are not at substantial
increased risk for alcoholism (Merikangas et al., 1998
). On the other
hand, alcoholism and nicotine addiction are frequently comorbid and
tend to be coinherited. According to Patten and collaborators (1996)
,
approximately 80% of alcoholics, as compared with 30% of
nonalcoholics, smoke. A genetic correlation was detected in several
large twin studies (Swan et al., 1997
; Hettema et al., 1999
).
For example, in 3356 Vietnam veteran twin pairs, heritabilities for
nicotine addiction and alcoholism were 0.60 and 0.55, respectively, and
the genetic correlation between the two disorders was 0.68 (True et
al., 1999
). These studies point directly to the need to identify
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic vulnerability factors specific to
alcohol, as well as factors shared with other substances, particularly
nicotine (Goldman and Bergen, 1998
).
Although alcoholism is substantially heritable across cultures and in
both males and females, thresholds for disease expression vary across
time, across different cultures, and between the two sexes. The
lifetime prevalence of alcoholism differs dramatically between
cultures, as well as between the two sexes within the same culture. In
the United States and other Western societies where alcohol is
available to both sexes and the prevalence of alcoholism is high, the
lifetime risk for alcohol dependence is 2 to 3 times higher in men than
in women. However, the male:female ratio is considerably higher in
Japan, where alcoholism is less common and females' access to alcohol
is more restricted (Schuckit, 1995
). Meanwhile, in a Southwestern
American Indian tribe the male:female ratio is only 1.7, whereas in
this population the lifetime prevalence of alcoholism is approximately
85% in males and 50% in females (Robin et al., 1998
). Consistent with
varying environmental liability thresholds, genotype at aldehyde
dehydrogenase type 2 differentially impacts the risk for alcoholism
between populations (Tu and Israel, 1995
). In the United States,
prevalence of alcoholism and associated problems diminished during the
Prohibition years and substantially rose thereafter.
| |
Physiology of Specific and Nonspecific Alcoholism Vulnerability |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Factors involved in the substance-specific inheritance of
alcoholism include both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genetic variation. The specific behavioral and physiologic effects of ethanol
(alcohol) depend on dose, distribution, and metabolism of alcohol,
prior drinking experience, mood, concurrent use of other drugs, and the
presence of other medical problems (Schuckit, 1995
). Although some of
these factors may be largely environmentally determined, several are
genetically influenced (e.g., alcohol metabolism).
The body adapts metabolically and neurally to repeated alcohol
exposure, compensating in at least three ways to increase tolerance. First, after 1 to 2 weeks of daily drinking, the rate of hepatic ethanol metabolism increases by as much as 30%. This is metabolic or
pharmacokinetic tolerance. Second, pharmacodynamic tolerance occurs via
neuroadaptation, forming the primary basis for dependence and
withdrawal. Neuroadaptation may in part provide the mechanism for
craving and rapid reinstatement to high levels of alcohol consumption
after relapse. Some components of the neuroadaptation to alcohol are
long lasting if not permanent (Schuckit, 1995
).
| |
Pharmacogenetics of Alcohol Metabolism |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although there is a great deal of evidence for genetic
predisposition in alcoholism, the only well established genetic factors for differential susceptibility are polymorphisms of two major enzymes
of alcohol metabolism. These are
ALDH21 Glu487Lys,
and following in importance, ADH2 Arg47His. Quantitatively, the most
important component of alcohol metabolism occurs in the stomach (class
IV subunits, ADH6-7), and in hepatocytes (class I subunits,
ADH1-ADH3). Alcohol is oxidized to a toxic intermediate, acetaldehyde,
by homodimeric and heterodimeric ADH isozymes (Bosron and Li, 1986
).
Under normal conditions, acetaldehyde is rapidly oxidized to acetate,
primarily by tetrameric aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymes located in the
cytosol (ALDH1) and in mitochondria (ALDH2). Other enzymes that play a
quantitatively much smaller role in alcohol and acetaldehyde metabolism
are P450 2E1 and catalase.
Functional polymorphisms in two alcohol metabolic enzymes (i.e., ADH2
and ALDH2) are found in about half the population of Southeast
Asian countries including China, Japan, and Korea. These variants are
rare in Caucasian and African populations (Enomoto et al., 1991
;
Yoshida et al., 1991
; Goedde et al., 1992
; Bosron et al., 1993
) except
for ADH2 Arg47His, for which the His47 allele is abundantly present in
the Jewish population of Israel (Monteiro et al., 1991
). The ADH2 His47
allele increases the rate of acetaldehyde formation, and the ALDH2
Lys487 allele decreases the rate of removal of acetaldehyde, so that
the altered enzymatic functions due to these polymorphisms lead to an
accumulation of acetaldehyde after alcohol intake. The acetaldehyde
causes a flushing reaction very similar to that produced if alcohol is
consumed following drugs that block aldehyde dehydrogenase (for
example, disulfiram
used for alcoholism treatment
and the
antiprotozoal drug metronidazole and congeners).
Because the ALDH2 Lys487 and ADH2 His47 alleles are common and aversive
for alcohol intake, several studies have investigated their
relationship to alcoholism (Harada et al., 1982
; Shibuya and Yoshida,
1988
; Thomasson et al., 1994
; Osier et al., 1999
).
In the epidemiology of alcoholism, the ALDH2 Glu487Lys polymorphism
plays the most important role. ALDH2 is responsible for most
acetaldehyde metabolism in hepatocytes, and the inactive allele Lys487
acts dominantly. Glu487/Lys487 heterozygotes have little residual
enzyme activity because one Lys487 subunit is sufficient to largely
inactivate the ALDH2 tetramer. The flushing reaction is evident in
Glu487/Lys487 heterozygotes after consumption of even a single drink of
alcohol with several aversive symptoms, including vasodilation,
headache, nausea, and palpitations (Harada et al., 1982
) and is most
severe in Lys487/Lys487 homozygous individuals. While about 10% of
Japanese are homozygous for the Lys487 allele, there has so far been
only one reported case of an alcoholic Lys487/Lys487 homozygote, and
this individual had an unusual drinking pattern in which small amounts
of alcohol were imbibed throughout the day (Chen et al., 1999b
).
Lys487 has an abundance of approximately 0.30 in Japanese and Chinese
(Bosron and Li, 1986
; Thomasson et al., 1994
; Higuchi et al., 1995
;
Chen et al., 1996
). Therefore, approximately half the Japanese and
Chinese populations experience flushing after alcohol consumption. In
these Lys487/Glu487 heterozygotes, the risk of alcoholism is reduced 4- to 10-fold (Thomasson et al., 1994
).
The action of the ALDH2 Lys487 allele is additive with the ADH2 His47
allele (Chen et al., 1996
), a catalytically more active ADH2 allele
that is independently associated with higher acetaldehyde levels and
flushing (Impraim et al., 1982
; Hsu et al., 1988
). The His47 allele is
also found in non-Oriental populations. Monteiro et al. (1991)
estimated that His47 accounts for 20 to 30% of the variance in alcohol
intake variance between two groups of light drinking and heavy drinking
Israeli Jews, and proposed that the relatively high frequency of the
His47 allele in that population might contribute to lower levels of
alcohol consumption among Jews.
An ADH3 polymorphism Ile271Val also produces a difference in enzyme
activity, and the superactive allele (Val271) is again more abundant in
East Asia (Tanaka et al., 1992
; Edenberg and Bosron, 1997
). However,
findings of association of ADH3 to alcoholism vulnerability appear to
be entirely attributable to linkage disequilibrium with ADH2, which is
located in the same gene cluster on chromosome 4q, and at a distance of
only 15 kb (Chen et al., 1999a
; Osier et al., 1999
).
It is of great interest that the protective effect of alcohol metabolic
gene polymorphisms may be expressed differentially against varying
environmental backgrounds, or thresholds (Goldman, 1993
). Tu and Israel
(1995)
found that the ALDH2-specific odds ratio for alcoholism was only
about 2:1 among individuals of Korean and Taiwanese ancestry born in
North America. Acculturation accounted for 7 to 11% of the variance in
alcohol consumption, and the ALDH2 polymorphism predicted two-thirds of
the vulnerability to alcohol consumption and excessive alcohol use.
Furthermore, in Southeast Asian populations with similar ALDH2
Glu487Lys allele frequencies there are large differences in the
prevalence of alcohol dependence (i.e., 2.9% in Taiwan and 17.2% in Korea).
| |
Genetics of Alcohol Sensitivity and Other Alcohol-Related Behaviors |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alcohol Sensitivity in Rodents.
Alcoholism is a behavior uniquely defined in the human. However, animal
genetic and pharmacobehavioral models offer new insights and convergent
information on mechanisms and gene targets for alcohol-seeking behavior
and response in the human. For example, the long-sleep and short-sleep
lines of mice were initially selected for differential response to the
acute sedative effects of alcohol (McClearn and Kakihana, 1981
). They
differ markedly in their genetic sensitivity to alcohol and
intercrosses reveal that the difference is polygenic in origin. The LS
and SS mice have also been found to differ in response to a variety of
hypnotics and anesthetics (Miller et al., 1988
).
6-subunit gene
of ANT rats. The
6-subunit is specifically expressed in cerebellar
granule cells and forms a GABAA receptor complex
that is benzodiazepine-insensitive but selectively responsive to the
benzodiazepine derivative Rol5-4513. Rol5-4513 antagonizes
alcohol-induced motor incoordination (Luddens et al., 1990
6-subunit to
benzodiazepines, since its replacement with a histidine (His100) resulted in high-affinity benzodiazepine binding (Wieland et al., 1992
6(Gln100)
2
2 and
6(Arg100)
2
2
GABAA receptors were expressed in a mammalian
cell line, and the Gln100
6-receptor was indeed potentiated by
benzodiazepines as well as by alcohol, and in contrast with the Arg100
6-receptor (Korpi et al., 1993Human Alcohol Response.
The detection of genetic influences in susceptibility to alcoholism has
stimulated a search for intermediate phenotypes that can serve as
indicators of vulnerability before the development of the disease.
Detection of intermediate phenotypes may identify alcoholism subgroups
and direct genetic analyses toward particular physiology. For example,
relatively alcohol-naïve offspring of alcoholics tend to be
less sensitive to the motor, endocrine, and subjective effects of
alcohol, and a 10-year follow-up of 453 men revealed that low level of
response to alcohol at age 20 was a powerful predictor of later
alcoholism (Schuckit 1985
, 1994
). Low response to modest doses of
alcohol predicted a 4-fold increase in subsequent development of
alcoholism, irrespective of family history (Schuckit, 1994
). Selective
genotyping was performed in a portion of this sample for candidate
genes for alcohol response, including the GABAA
6-receptor (Schuckit et al., 1999
). Two polymorphisms, a common
functional polymorphism of the serotonin transporter promoter, and a
GABAA
6-amino acid substitution polymorphism Pro385Ser (Iwata et al., 1999
), were associated with alcohol
sensitivity (Schuckit et al., 1999
). In a separate study, the
GABAA
6-polymorphism was also associated with
benzodiazepine sensitivity (Iwata et al., 1999
).
| |
Alcohol-Related QTL Mapping in Rodents |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genes for complex genetically influenced traits may be detectable
as quantitative trait loci. QTL mapping in rodents has identified candidate genes for alcohol-related behavior for further investigation in humans (e.g., Buck et al., 1997
; Buck and Hood, 1998
). Approximately 68% of the genetic variability influencing acute alcohol withdrawal severity may be attributable to QTLs on mouse chromosomes 1, 4, and 11.
The role of a GABAA gene cluster in the
chromosome 11 QTL accounting for 12% of the genetic variance in
withdrawal has been further investigated (Buck et al., 1998
). Genes in
this cluster encode
1-,
6-,
2-, and
2-GABAA subunits. There is an Ala11Thr sequence difference in the
2-GABAA subunit
gene between C57BL/6J (B6) mice, which has high acute withdrawal
severity, and DBA/2J (D2) mice, which have low withdrawal severity. In
recombinant inbred strains, the
2-subunit polymorphism correlates
with alcohol withdrawal severity. The mouse chromosome 11 GABAA cluster is thus a potential example of a
genetic pharmacodynamic difference in alcohol response.
Mouse QTLs for other alcohol-associated behaviors, such as alcohol
consumption and alcohol-associated hypothermia, have also been
identified (Crabbe et al., 1994
, 1996a
). Chromosome 9 QTLs for
alcohol-induced hypothermia, alcohol consumption, and certain responses
to morphine and amphetamines coincide with each other and with the
location of the serotonin 5-HT1B and DRD2 receptor genes (Crabbe et
al., 1996a
). The convergence in locations of genes influencing
different alcohol-related traits and traits related to other drugs
suggests that the same genes may influence these several behaviors.
Such convergence was also observed in mice in which the 5-HT1B gene was
knocked out. These gene knockout mice consume twice as much ethanol,
are less intoxicated, and are more aggressive compared with parental
stock (Crabbe et al., 1996b
). The 5-HT1B knockout mice also work harder
to self-administer cocaine and show an increased locomotor response, as
if already sensitized to the drug (Rocha et al., 1998
).
As a follow-up to the mouse 5-HT1B QTL and knockout findings, linkage
studies were performed in several hundred human sibling pairs from each
of two isolates, one from Finland and the other from an American-Indian
community in the Southwestern United States (Lappalainen et al., 1998
).
The linkage phenotype was antisocial alcoholism (Alcohol Dependence
plus either Antisocial Personality disorder or Intermittent Explosive
disorder) so that affected individuals had both increased alcohol
consumption and increased aggression. Linkage to the 5-HT1B gene was
observed in both populations (Lappalainen et al., 1998
). In addition,
the DRD4 dopamine receptor, which is located at the site of one of the
alcohol-related QTLs, has been knocked out in mice (Rubinstein et al.,
1997
). The DRD4 knockout mice are supersensitive to alcohol, cocaine,
and amphetamines. In a whole-genome linkage scan performed in humans,
suggestive evidence for linkage to alcohol dependence was detected
(level of detection = 3.1; nominal p = 0.00007)
near the chromosome 11p telomere, near the location of DRD4 (Long et
al., 1998
).
| |
Neurocircuitry Targets for Alcohol Reinforcement and Dependence |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The target of ethanol's actions in the brain was once thought to
be the cell membrane, but the focus of attention has now shifted to
specific brain proteins (Hoffman and Tabakoff, 1996
). These include
neurotransmitter receptors including ligand-gated ion channels that
show different sensitivities to alcohol and specific chain length
cutoffs for action of alcohols (e.g., Weight et al., 1993
; Wick et al.,
1998
). The genes encoding these proteins are a possible source of
variation in susceptibility to alcoholism.
Dopamine System.
The dopamine neuronal system that arises from the ventral tegmental
area is the major neurobiological substrate for the mediation of the
reinforcing actions of substances of abuse in the brain reward system,
which includes the nucleus accumbens, the hippocampus, and part of the
prefrontal cortex (for a review, see McBride et al., 1999
). In
reinforcement by alcohol, the ventral tegmental area has been the only
region shown to support direct alcohol administration, and increased
dopamine neuronal activity has been shown to be associated with the
reinforcement processes involved in continued alcohol consumption
(Wise, 1987
).
Opioid Receptors.
Several lines of evidence converge on the idea that endogenous opioids,
especially the delta and mu opioid receptor pathways, are involved in
both the initial sensitivity and the reinforcing effects of alcohol
(Nutt, 1996
). It seems that via the stimulation of delta and mu opioid
receptors, alcohol increases dopamine release in nucleus accumbens,
thus reinforcing its intake (Benjamin et al., 1993
).
5-HT3 Receptors.
Alcohol modulates 5-HT3 serotonin receptor ion channel function
(Lovinger, 1991
; Weight et al., 1993
). Neurochemical and
neuropharmacological studies in rodents have revealed that alcohol
increases extracellular concentrations of both dopamine and 5-HT in
nucleus accumbens and that the dopamine release can be blocked with a
5-HT3 antagonist (Campbell and McBride, 1995
). In humans, there is also
evidence that some of the pleasurable effects of alcohol are mediated
by binding to 5-HT3 receptors, as was shown when alcohol and the 5-HT3
antagonist ondansetron were coadministered to normal volunteers (Johnson et al., 1993
). Two 5-HT3 receptor genes (i.e.,
HTR3A and HTR3B) have been identified (Davies et
al., 1999
), but no sequence variants have been reported at this juncture.
Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors.
Nicotine addiction and alcoholism share common genetic determinants
(Wise, 1996
). This contrasts with the largely independent inheritance
of alcoholism and other substances (Goldman and Bergen, 1998
). These
ligand-gated ion channels are modulated by alcohol at concentrations
associated with moderate alcohol consumption (Weight et al., 1993
).
and three
) form the presumed heteropentameric ligand-gated ion
channel (Boyd, 1997GABAA Receptors.
Many of the behavioral effects (anxiolytic, ataxic, sedative/hypnotic)
of alcohol and clinically important central nervous system depressants
(e.g., benzodiazepines and barbiturates) are similar and show
cross-tolerance (Hoffman and Tabakoff, 1996
). Benzodiazepines and
barbiturates allosterically modulate the action of GABA at
GABAA receptors, leading to the investigation of
the effects of alcohol on these receptors (Hoffman and Tabakoff, 1996
). Alcohol increases GABAA receptor-mediated
chloride influx in brain tissue (Allan and Harris, 1986
; Suzdak et al.,
1986
) and in X. laevis oocytes (Wafford et al.,
1990
). The sensitivity of the GABAA receptor to
alcohol might depend on eight amino acids contained in the long-spliced
version of the
2-subunit (Wafford et al., 1991
; Harris et al.,
1995
).
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Send reprint requests to: David Goldman, M.D., 12420 Parklawn Dr., Park 5 Building, room 451, MSC-8110, Rockville, MD 20892. E-mail: dgneuro{at}box-d.nih.gov
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
Abbreviations used are: ALDH2, aldehyde dehydrogenase type 2; ADH1, -2, and -3, alcohol dehydrogenase types 1, 2, and 3; LS, long-sleep; SS, short-sleep; GABA, gamma aminobutyric acid; GABAA, GABA receptor type A; ANT, alcohol nontolerant; QTL, quantitative trait loci; 5-HT1B and -3, serotonine receptor types 1B and 3; DRD2 and -4, dopamine receptor types 2 and 4.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 subunit variant with severity of acute physiological dependence on alcohol.
Mamm Genome
9:
975-979[Medline].
6 subunit gene associates with benzodiazepine sensitivity.
Am J Psychiatry
156:
1447-1449
6 receptors and the serotonin transporter in the level of response to alcohol: A pilot study.
Biol Psychiatry
45:
647-551[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. V. Morozova, J. F. Ayroles, K. W. Jordan, L. H. Duncan, M. A. Carbone, R. F. Lyman, E. A. Stone, D. R. Govindaraju, R. C. Ellison, T. F. C. Mackay, et al. Alcohol Sensitivity in Drosophila: Translational Potential of Systems Genetics Genetics, October 1, 2009; 183(2): 733 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. F. Pomerleau, C. S. Pomerleau, S. M. Snedecor, R. Finkenauer, A. M. Mehringer, S. A. Langenecker, and E. J. Sirevaag Substance use, trait measures, and subjective response to nicotine in never-smokers stratified on parental smoking history and sex Nicotine Tob Res, September 1, 2009; 11(9): 1055 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Treutlein, S. Cichon, M. Ridinger, N. Wodarz, M. Soyka, P. Zill, W. Maier, R. Moessner, W. Gaebel, N. Dahmen, et al. Genome-wide Association Study of Alcohol Dependence Arch Gen Psychiatry, July 1, 2009; 66(7): 773 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C.Y Wong and G. Schumann Genetics of addictions: strategies for addressing heterogeneity and polygenicity of substance use disorders Phil Trans R Soc B, October 12, 2008; 363(1507): 3213 - 3222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Radel, R. L. Vallejo, N. Iwata, R. Aragon, J. C. Long, M. Virkkunen, and D. Goldman Haplotype-Based Localization of an Alcohol Dependence Gene to the 5q34 {gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Gene Cluster Arch Gen Psychiatry, January 1, 2005; 62(1): 47 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Pandey, A. Roy, H. Zhang, and T. Xu Partial Deletion of the cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein Gene Promotes Alcohol-Drinking Behaviors J. Neurosci., May 26, 2004; 24(21): 5022 - 5030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Davey Smith and S. Ebrahim 'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2003; 32(1): 1 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||