Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medical Laboratory
Science and Technology, Huddinge University Hospital, S-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden (G.A., L.B., M.-L.D., F.S.); and Division of Molecular
Toxicology, Department of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska
Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (M.I.-S.)
 |
Introduction |
The topic of genetic profiling
in patient care was recently reviewed in Nature
Biotechnology under the title "Laying the foundations for
personalised medicines" (Marshall, 1997
). The prevailing principle of
gathering statistical information about the general patient population
and then applying the knowledge to treat the individuals is no longer
sufficient. Providing "personalised medicines" should be based on a
detailed knowledge at the genetic and molecular levels about disease
traits and individual factors governing pharmacodynamic and
pharmacokinetic variability. Only a few decades ago, pharmacotherapy was conceived as giving generally agreed doses of drugs of choice to
the patients in a rather stereotypical manner. The need for individualization has since then been recognized, and much effort has
been invested in a number of medical research fields to establish a
scientific basis for individualization taking into account mechanisms of action, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism,
pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships, therapeutic drug
monitoring, treatment follow-up, and evaluation of adverse drug
effects. The individual components of all these aspects on rational use
of drugs are important and should be studied with the aim of improving
drug therapy.
Genetic variability and selection directed toward the characters of the
individuals are considered to be the fundament of the evolution and
adaptation of living organisms to all environments where they are able
to exist. The interplay between genetic constitution and other factors
has consistently been emphasized. The true meaning of "heritage" is
sometimes misunderstood. The fact that a character is inherited or has
a genetic predisposition does not mean that it has to penetrate into
the phenotype of the next generation or that parents necessarily need
to share a quality that is obvious in their children.
Many characters may be conceived as continuous variables, and among
these are diverse physical and intellectual capacities, talents for
art, etc. However, they all go back to the genetic code and will only
appear as continuous or even gaussian variables if a large enough
number of factors is involved in their control and a large enough
number of individuals is studied. When investigated in detail, however,
most characters will show skewness or separation into different modes.
This can be explained by the influence of particularly strong factors
such as monogenic or oligogenic coding systems or the influence of
singular environmental factors.
Many examples of characteristics such as eye color, blood groups,
tissue antigens, etc. show discrete variation into separate groups.
This is also true for certain drug-metabolizing enzymes. An early
observation was that isoniazid might be slowly or rapidly acetylated
(Evans et al., 1960
). The acetylation polymorphism is important for a
number of drugs, which include the sulfa compounds dapsone and
sulfapyridine, the antihypertensive hydralazine, and the antiarrhythmic
procainamide. It has been shown that dosage requirement, treatment
efficacy, and the risk of adverse drug reactions are related to the
genetic profile of being a slow or a rapid acetylator.
The most important drug-metabolizing enzyme family is the
cytochrome P450 system. It comprises several enzymes that show
distinct but partially overlapping substrate specificity
(Ingelman-Sundberg et al., 1999
). The individuality of the
P4501 enzymes,
including their regulation, is the basis of enzyme-specific drug
metabolism, interindividual variability in drug
pharmacokinetics, and metabolic drug interactions.
Tricyclic antidepressants were early found to display vast
interindividual variability in steady-state plasma concentrations. Figure 1 shows the plasma concentrations
obtained in two extreme patients and in nine intermediates who
participated in a small study of the pharmacokinetics of
desmethylimipramine after multiple oral doses. Subject GD who had
36-fold higher plasma concentration of desmethylimipramine than the
patient KD with the lowest concentration was phenotyped 18 years later
and found to be a poor metabolizer of the pharmacogenetic probe drug
debrisoquine (Sjöqvist and Bertilsson, 1984
).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Plasma concentrations of desmethylimipramine
after dosing 25 mg t.i.d. to 11 patients (from Sjöqvist et al.,
1967 ).
|
|
 |
The Debrisoquine/Sparteine Hydroxylation Polymorphism (CYP2D6) |
Debrisoquine was launched as an antihypertensive agent but is no
longer on the market. It was found to induce orthostatic hypotension in
a small percentage of healthy volunteers who took the drug for
investigational purposes. The reason for the exaggerated effect in
these subjects was found to be the lack of an enzyme almost exclusively
responsible for the metabolic elimination of debrisoquine, and the
affected subjects were classified as poor metabolizers of debrisoquine
(Mahgoub et al., 1977
). The enzyme was operationally named
"debrisoquine hydroxylase" but is now known as CYP2D6. Independent
studies showed that the oxidation of sparteine is catalyzed by the same
enzyme (Eichelbaum et al., 1975
, 1979
). Very soon many drugs were shown
to be metabolized by CYP2D6 (Table 1).
The character of being a poor (PM) or an extensive metabolizer
(EM) of debrisoquine is controlled as an autosomal, recessive monogenic trait with the PM phenotype being the recessive
alternative. The genetic heritability of the debrisoquine hydroxylation
phenotype is very high (79%), while only 6% of all variability of the
debrisoquine metabolic ratio could be ascribed to environmental or
cultural factors (Steiner et al., 1985
). The frequency of PMs of
debrisoquine, based on a pooled European material of 8800 subjects, was
7.4% (Alván et al., 1990
).
There are now many examples of great influence of the CYP2D6
polymorphism on the disposition of drugs e.g., as illustrated by the
antipsychotic haloperidol. This review is an account of our own
experience. When a single oral dose of haloperidol was given to six EMs
and six PMs of debrisoquine, a significantly slower elimination of the
drug was found in PMs compared with EMs (Llerena et al., 1992
) (Fig.
2).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Plasma concentrations per dose unit (mean,
S.D.) versus time curves in six extensive metabolizers (filled circles)
who received a single oral 4-mg dose of haloperidol and six poor
metabolizers (open circles) who received 4- or 2-mg oral doses of
haloperidol (from Llerena et al., 1992 ).
|
|
Eight schizophrenic patients treated chronically with intramuscular
injections of haloperidol decanoate every 4th week were studied (Nyberg
et al., 1995
). Plasma concentrations of haloperidol were much higher in
one patient than in the other seven patients (Fig.
3A). This patient had the genotype
CYP2D6*4/*4 and was thus a PM of debrisoquine, while the others were
EMs. A positron emission tomography scan using the dopamine 2 receptor antagonist 11C-raclopride as a ligand was performed twice, 7 and 28 days after injection (Fig. 3B). The D2 receptor occupancy was
very high, almost 80% in the PM patient at both 1 and 4 weeks. The EMs
also had a high receptor occupancy 1 week after injection, but this
decreased 4 weeks after injection. This study thus shows a relationship between the CYP2D6 genotype, the plasma concentration of haloperidol, and the effect on dopamine 2 receptors in the brain. In fact, the PM
was the only patient to show extrapyramidal side effects of
haloperidol.
It was early recognized that some rare subjects were outliers also to
the left of the main distribution, i.e., displaying considerably more
efficient metabolism of debrisoquine than the majority of EMs. The
explanation for this finding was the existence of duplications and
multiplications of the functional gene controlling the activity of
CYP2D6 (Bertilsson et al., 1993
; Johansson et al., 1993
; Dahl et al.,
1995
). The distribution of CYP2D6 genotypes in relation to the
debrisoquine metabolic ratio is shown in Fig. 4. The concept of the gene dose
influencing the disposition of the parent drug and its hydroxylated was
recently amply demonstrated for the tricyclic antidepressant
nortriptyline (Dalén et al., 1998
) (Fig.
5).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Schematic presentation of the relationship
between the debrisoquine metabolic ratio (MR) and the major cytochrome
P450 (CYP) 2D6 genotypes causing altered CYP2D6 activity in healthy
volunteers (from Bertilsson and Dahl, 1996 ).
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Mean plasma concentrations of nortriptyline
and 10-hydroxynortriptyline in different genotype groups after a single
oral dose of nortriptyline.
The numerals close to the curves represent the numbers of functional
CYP2D6 genes in each genotype group (from Dalén et
al., 1998 ).
|
|
The first clinically useful method for analysis of the common CYP2D6
genotypes was developed by Heim and Meyer in 1990. The determination of
the most abundant CYP2D6 mutations predicts the PMs'
phenotype in European Caucasian volunteers with 92 to 99% accuracy
(Broly et al., 1991
; Dahl et al., 1992
). The indications for genotyping
methods as a complement to traditional therapeutic drug monitoring of
antidepressants include identification of patients who are PMs to
prevent supratherapeutic dosage regimen and concentration-dependent side effects, to differentiate between ultrarapid metabolism and poor
compliance with the drug regimen, and to differentiate between pharmacogenetic and environmental determinants of drug metabolism by
comparing genotype and phenotype (Dahl and Sjöqvist, 2000
).
 |
Genetic Profiling of a New Drug |
The recently introduced antimuscarinic drug tolterodine, which is
used to treat urinary bladder over activity, can serve as an
instructive example of genetic profiling of a new drug. Tolterodine is
a high-clearance drug with high first-pass metabolism. Its disposition
was found (Brynne et al., 1998
) to be highly dependent on the
debrisoquine metabolic phenotype as shown in Fig.
6.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Serum concentration-time profiles of
tolterodine (left) and 5HM (right) during a dosage interval after 4 mg
were given b.i.d. for 7 days in extensive (n = 8) and poor (n = 8) metabolizers of debrisoquine (from Brynne et al., 1998 ).
|
|
Interestingly, the metabolite 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5HM) was
detected in the EMs, but not in PMs. The strong association between
tolterodine metabolism and CYP2D6 activity may appear as a great threat
against a new drug candidate but fortunately in this case, the main
metabolite is equipotent with the parent compound and considerably less
protein bound. Consequently, there was no difference in the inhibition
of salivation over 8 h between EMs and PMs (Fig.
7). Similar doses can thus be given to
both phenotypes with seemingly equal clinical benefit.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Regression analysis and 95% confidence
intervals of the median salivation effect (0-8 h) versus unbound serum
tolterodine and 5HM combined (A) and tolterodine (B) concentration
after oral doses, single, multiple, and during i.v. infusion of
tolterodine L-tartrate in extensive and poor metabolizers
of debrisoquine (from Brynne et al., 1998 ).
|
|
 |
S-Mephenytoin Hydroxylation Polymorphism (CYP2C19) |
Another well investigated drug metabolic polymorphism, CYP2C19,
may also serve as a good example of the potential of genetic profiling.
This polymorphic enzyme is of great importance for the metabolism of
the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole. Plasma concentrations after the
first and the eighth daily doses of 20 mg to subjects with different
genotypes are shown in Fig. 8.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Mean plasma concentrations of omeprazole in
rapid extensive metabolizers, heterozygous extensive metabolizers, and
poor metabolizers of S-mephenytoin after administration of the
first (left) and the eighth (right) daily dose of 20 mg of
omeprazole (from Chang et al., 1995 ).
|
|
The pharmacological response to omeprazole regarding gastrin secretion
was evaluated in healthy subjects (Chang et al., 1995
). There was no
significant change in the gastrin secretion in any of the three
different CYP2C19 genotype/phenotype groups after a single dose of
omeprazole. The meal-stimulated gastrin plasma, however, were
significantly increased in PMs of mephenytoin and in heterozygous EMs
on the 8th day of omeprazole administration (Fig.
9). Similarly, in patients (Sagar, 1999
)
the intragastric pH did not differ between three genotypic groups
(homozygous EMs, heterozygous EMs, and PMs) before treatment with
omeprazole (day 0), while after 8 days of treatment with omeprazole the
pH was significantly higher in heterozygous EMs and PMs compared with
homozygous EM. Thus, the CYP2C19 genotype seems to influence the
pharmacological effects of treatment for 8 days with omeprazole (Table
2).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Mean plasma gastrin levels in three
phenotypic groups of CYP2C19 activity following a single 20-mg dose of
omeprazole (A) and after the eighth daily dose of omeprazole (from
Chang et al., 1995 ).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
Median intragastric pH (95% confidence interval) in the three CYP2C19
genotype groups before (day 0) and during (day 8) treatment with 20 mg
of omeprazole daily
Data from Sagar (1999) .
|
|
 |
Interethnic Variations |
Realizing that the drug metabolic polymorphisms are part of and
contribute to the interindividual variability seen in drug concentrations, one would like to assess any relevant differences between ethnic groups to consider adjustments of recommended standard doses (so called bridging studies). It is understood that differences within an ethnic group exceed those observed between ethnic groups. However, the mean population dose (starting dose) may differ between different ethnic groups. As an example, the activity of CYP2D6 as
expressed by the debrisoquine metabolic ratio is higher in Swedish than
in Chinese populations (Bertilsson et al., 1992
) (Fig.
10). Differences between ethnic groups
can also be seen in Table 3.
Interestingly, the frequency of PMs (using the Caucasian antimode) is
much lower among Chinese and other Oriental populations than among
Swedes, while the overall capacity to metabolize debrisoquine and
related compounds is lower among the Chinese. The reason for the low
frequency of PM among Asians is the almost absence of the detrimental
CYP2D6*4 allele, which is very frequent among Caucasians
(Table 3). The reason for the generally lower capacity to metabolize
debrisoquine is the high frequency of the CYP2D6*10 allele
in the Chinese, 51% compared with only 1 to 2% in the European Caucasians (Table 3). This allele gives rise to an unstable enzyme and
a much lower capacity to metabolize debrisoquine and other CYP2D6
substrates. This finding should in principle lead to a consideration to
decrease the suitable starting or standard doses in Orientals, of all
drugs that are to a large extent metabolized by CYP2D6.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Distribution of the urinary
debrisoquine/4-hydroxy-debrisoquine metabolic ratio in Chinese and
Swedish Caucasian healthy individuals.
The arrows indicate a metabolic ratio of 12.6, the antimode between
extensive metabolizers and poor metabolizers as established in
Caucasian populations. A thick line is drawn at a metabolic ratio of
1.0. Most Chinese extensive metabolizers have a ratio >1, while most
Swedish extensive metabolizers have a ratio <1 (from Bertilsson et
al., 1992 ).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3
Interethnic differences in the frequency of the major variant alleles
of CYP2D6
Modified from Ingelman-Sundberg et al. (1999) .
|
|
A marked interethnic difference has also been noted between Caucasians
and Orientals with regard to the distribution of the capacity to
metabolize mephenytoin, the probe drug of CYP2C19, with an
approximately 7-fold higher frequency of PMs in Orientals than in
Caucasians (Bertilsson and Dahl, 1996
) The conclusion is that Oriental
patients obtain a functionally higher dose of omeprazole than do
Caucasians if the same starting dose of 20 mg per day is applied.
However, this does not seem to pose a problem as 20 mg daily is not
therapeutically sufficient in many Caucasian patients, and the drug has
a very wide safety margin, which allows a dose increase.
Genetic profiling has thus a great potential concerning the drug
metabolic polymorphisms, as the PM may accumulate higher than expected plasma concentrations of parent
compound and thus suffer exaggerated effect/toxicity. If the
action of the drug is mediated by an active metabolite, there is a risk for therapeutic failure. The extensive/ultrarapid
metabolizer may on the other hand get insufficient drug
concentrations because a standard dose is too low compared with
individual needs.
 |
P450-Specific Drug Metabolic Interactions |
As there is a rather strong specificity for different P450s among
drugs viewed as chemical substrates, there is also an opportunity for
competition for the active sites on the enzymes. Another aspect of
genetic profiling is thus to predict and unravel this kind of
interaction. Numerous such interactions have been described and listed
in drug prescription reference sources. Figure
11 shows a systematic collection of
investigated possible interactions of drugs with CYP2D6 (Brynne et al.,
1999
). With the exception of the
-blocker metoprolol and
tolterodine, the other six drugs inhibited the metabolism of
debrisoquine as indicated by an increased debrisoquine metabolic ratio.
This approach can be used to systematically investigate the potential
for clinically important enzyme-specific drug metabolic interactions.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Metabolic ratio of debrisoquine as a
predictor of CYP2D6 interaction.
Each drug was given alone (left point in the pair) and together with
debrisoquine (right point in the pair). The geometric mean values of
concomitant administration (drug and debrisoquine) divided by the
corresponding values in absence of drug is given within brackets under
the daily dose of each drug (from Brynne et al., 1994).
|
|
 |
Heterogeneity of Diseases |
Genetic profiling offers a higher degree of understanding and
resolution of many diseases that are traditionally regarded as
diagnostic entities. However, conditions such as hypertension and
affective and schizophrenic disorders are probably caused by
numerous different genetic factors, and there is presently intense
research trying to resolve the molecular background of these and other
major diseases. An instructive example is the inherited lung and
gastrointestinal disease cystic fibrosis, which was considered fairly
homogeneous two decades ago. More than 900 mutations in a gene coding
for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator have now been described
as the genetic cause of the disease. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane
regulator is a chloride channel, and its impaired function is dependent
on the individual mutations, which may call for individualized therapy.
Functional polymorphisms have also been found for receptors that may be
used as drug targets such as the dopamine D1-D5 receptors and six
different serotonin receptors.
Work is done to improve the selection of antihypertensive therapy, and
all the determinants of ischemic heart disease certainly offer new and
more selective treatment options. Most hypertension is probably
multifactorial, but in principal hypertension can also be caused by
monogenic traits. Such hypertensive syndromes are Liddle's syndrome,
apparent mineralocorticoid excess, and glucocorticoid-remediable
aldosteronism. These hypertensive diseases have different genetic and
molecular causes and should have different and specific
treatment. Future research will likely discover more discrete and
specifically treatable causes of hypertension and ischemic heart
disease. The interplay between genes and environment certainly deserves
attention since the superposition of environmental factors on genes
that increase the risk of morbidity is often needed to precipitate
overt disease.
Genetic profiling also offers a possibility for in depth analysis of
some health hazards related to the use of drugs and other chemicals.
For example, it has been suggested that patients who are deficient in
CYP2C9, which is of main importance for the metabolic elimination of
the anticoagulant warfarin, would be at an increased risk for
warfarin-induced bleedings (Aithal et al., 1999
). The authors wisely
suggest genotyping in patients treated with warfarin to decrease the
risk of this serious and sometimes fatal adverse drug effect. Awareness
of such a specific risk factor would alert the drug prescriber to pay
extra attention to the risk of warfarin overdosage.
In conclusion, genetic profiling increases the information about the
individual patient. This information can be used to select proper
treatment, to find a proper dose, and to explain and avoid drug
interactions and adverse drug reactions.
This review was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical
Research Council (12590, 3902, and 5949).
Abbreviations used are:
P450, cytochrome P450;
PM, poor metabolizer;
EM, extensive metabolizer;
D2, dopamine 2;
5HM, 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine.