![]() |
|
|
Vol. 30, Issue 12, 1352-1356, December 2002
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To explore the mechanism of the interaction between gemfibrozil and
cerivastatin, the enzyme mapping of the oxidative metabolism of
cerivastatin and the effect of gemfibrozil on cerivastatin metabolism
were studied using human liver microsomes and expressed cytochrome P450
(P450) CYP2C8 and 3A4 isoforms. Based on studies with
isoform-selective chemical inhibitors and expressed enzymes, CYP2C8 and
CYP3A4 were equally important in the formation of desmethylcerivastatin (M-1), whereas the formation of the quantitatively most important hydroxy metabolite (M-23) was predominantly mediated via CYP2C8; other
P450 isoforms played a negligible role. In human liver microsomes, gemfibrozil markedly inhibited M-23 formation, with a
Ki (IC50) value of 69 (95) µM,
whereas inhibition of M-1 formation was weaker with a
Ki (IC50) value of 273 (>250)
µM. The inhibitory effect of gemfibrozil was attributable to
inhibition of CYP2C8 rather than CYP3A4, as evidenced by potent
inhibition of the formation of M-23 (IC50 = 68 µM)
and M-1 (IC50 = 78 µM) in recombinant CYP2C8 but not
in recombinant CYP3A4. Additionally, gemfibrozil inhibited paclitaxel
6
-hydroxylation [Ki
(IC50) = 75 µM (91 µM)], a CYP2C8 marker
reaction, but did not inhibit testosterone 6
-hydroxylation (CYP3A4).
The present in vitro findings suggest that inhibition of CYP2C8
activity by gemfibrozil at least partially explains the interaction
between gemfibrozil and cerivastatin. The formation of M-23 acid from
cerivastatin is mediated mainly by CYP2C8 and thus may be a suitable
CYP2C8 probe reaction. Inhibition of CYP2C8-mediated metabolism by
gemfibrozil warrants further in vivo exploration.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cerivastatin, a cholesterol lowering drug, was
recently withdrawn from the market due to its high risk of the
life-threatening adverse effect, rhabdomyolysis (Charatan, 2001
). Fatal
rhabdomyolysis after cerivastatin treatment was reported most
frequently when the drug was combined with the lipid lowering fibrate
gemfibrozil (Pogson et al., 1999
; Farmer, 2001
; Staffa et al., 2002
).
Gemfibrozil increases the risk of myopathy associated with simvastatin
and lovastatin, too. It was recently found to increase plasma
concentrations of the active acid forms of simvastatin and lovastatin,
suggesting a pharmacokinetic basis as a mechanism of gemfibrozil-statin
interactions (Backman et al., 2000
; Kyrklund et al., 2001
).
Cerivastatin is administered as the pharmacologically active hydroxy
acid form. It is cleared exclusively via biotransformation and
subsequent biliary (70%) or renal (30%) excretion of the formed metabolites; no unchanged drug is excreted in humans (Mück,
1998a
). According to the manufacturer of cerivastatin, in vitro studies in human liver microsomes have indicated that the biotransformation of
cerivastatin is catalyzed by cytochrome P450
(P4501
) CYP2C8 and 3A4,
forming two major metabolites, desmethylcerivastatin (M-1) and the
hydroxylated metabolite (M-23) (Mück, 1998a
). The same P450
isoforms also mediate the biotransformation of M-1 and M-23 to a
tertiary minor metabolite M-24. The in vitro study of Boberg et
al. (1997)
suggested that CYP3A4 plays a major role in the metabolism
of cerivastatin. However, in vivo investigations have revealed that
potent CYP3A4-inhibitors, such as erythromycin and itraconazole,
increase only slightly plasma concentrations of cerivastatin
(Mück et al., 1998b
; Kantola et al., 1999
). In contrast,
gemfibrozil markedly increases the plasma concentrations of
cerivastatin and M-1 acid and reduces the concentrations of M-23 acid
(Backman et al., 2002
).
In a recent in vitro study, gemfibrozil strongly inhibited CYP2C9
activity (Ki = 5.8 µM) and
moderately inhibited CYP2C19 (Ki = 24 µM) and CYP1A2 (Ki = 82 µM)
activity, with no appreciable effect on CYP2A6, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and
CYP3A4 activities (Wen et al., 2002
). However, there seem to be no
published studies on the effect of gemfibrozil on CYP2C8 activity in
vitro. Therefore, we have studied the effects of gemfibrozil on the
oxidative metabolism of cerivastatin in vitro, to clarify the mechanism
of the gemfibrozil-cerivastatin interaction.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
Ketoconazole was obtained from Orion Pharma (Espoo, Finland).
Sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, tranylcypromine, sulfaphenazole, quinidine, pyridine, paclitaxel, testosterone, and NADPH were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). S-mephenytoin,
6
-hydroxytestosterone, and 6
-hydroxypaclitaxel were purchased
from Ultrafine Chemicals Ltd. (Manchester, UK). Erythromycin and
cerivastatin were obtained from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany) and Bayer
AG (Leverkusen, Germany), respectively. Pooled human liver microsomes
(prepared from five male, and five female human liver microsomal
samples) were obtained from BD Gentest (Woburn, MA). Microsomes from
baculovirus-infected cells engineered to express the cDNA encoding
human CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 were also purchased from BD Gentest. Other
chemicals and reagents were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
Assays for the Oxidative Metabolism of Cerivastatin. The incubation mixture, in a final volume of 200 µl, contained 1 mg/ml microsomal protein, 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 1.0 mM NADPH, 5 mM MgCl2, and various concentrations of cerivastatin (substrate stock solution dissolved in water and subsequently diluted using the 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer) in the presence or absence of one of the putative inhibitors. After incubation in a shaking water bath (37°C) for 5 to 30 min, the reactions were terminated by adding 200 µl ice-cold acetonitrile, and the samples were cooled on ice for 15 min. The samples were then removed to glass tubes containing 1 ml sodium acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.5). Lovastatin acid (50 µl of 1 µg/ml) was subsequently added as an internal standard (ISTD). The samples were then extracted with 6 ml of methyl-tert-butyl ether for 20 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was evaporated to dryness. The residue was then reconstituted with 75 µl of a solution (50:50, v/v) containing acetonitrile and 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH = 5). Thereafter 5 to 20 µl of the sample was subjected to LC-MS-MS analysis. The formation rates of M-1 and M-23 were confirmed to be linear with respect to the microsomal protein concentration (up to 1 mg/ml) and incubation time (up to 30 min) used. All human liver microsomal incubations were performed in duplicate.
Incubations with the recombinant P450 isoforms were performed using the same conditions as described for human liver microsomes, except that the mixture contained 5 pmol of P450 (CYP2C8 or CYP3A4) and was incubated for 15 min (CYP3A4) or 20 min (CYP2C8). The formation rates of M-1 and M-23 were linear over this period of time. The incubations in the expressed enzymes were performed in duplicate.Inhibition Studies.
The effects of 11 isoform-selective P450 inhibitors as well as
gemfibrozil (1-250 µM) on the P450-mediated oxidative metabolism of
cerivastatin were studied. Furafylline (20 µM) was used as a
selective inhibitor of CYP1A2, tranylcypromine (1 µM) for CYP2A6, trimethoprim (100 µM) for CYP2C8, sulfaphenazole (10 µM), and sulfamethoxazole (500 µM) for CYP2C9, S-mephenytoin (300 µM) for CYP2C19, quinidine (10 µM) for CYP2D6, pyridine (100 µM)
for CYP2E1, ketoconazole (1 µM), troleandomycin (100 µM), and
erythromycin (100 µM) for CYP3A4 (Hargreaves et al., 1994
; Newton et
al., 1995
; Eagling et al., 1998
; Hickman et al., 1998
; Taavitsainen et
al., 2001
; Wen et al., 2002
). The stock solutions of the inhibitors were prepared in the 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) with, in
some cases, minimal use of methanol (final concentration less than
1%). Gemfibrozil was dissolved in acetonitrile. After evaporation of
acetonitrile to dryness, gemfibrozil was reconstituted in the incubation medium. All the inhibitors and their matched controls (containing an equal volume of methanol in the case that it was used)
were preincubated with the incubation medium at 37°C for 15 min,
either in the presence or absence of 1.0 mM NADPH. After the
preincubation, cerivastatin (final concentration 0.01-1 µM) was
added either with or without 1.0 mM NADPH.
Effects of Gemfibrozil on P450 Activities.
Activities of CYP3A4 (testosterone 6
-hydroxylation) and CYP2C8
(paclitaxel 6
-hydroxylation) were determined as described elsewhere
(Wen et al., 2002
). The marker substrate concentrations used, 25 µM
testosterone and 1 to 5 µM paclitaxel, were comparable with or around
the Km values of the reactions.
Gemfibrozil was either coincubated at 37°C for 15 min with the marker
substrate and NADPH (1 mM) before the reaction was initiated with human liver microsomes (0.1 mg/ml) or preincubated with human liver microsomes and NADPH for 15 min before adding the marker substrate.
Analytical Procedures.
The concentrations of cerivastatin and its major metabolites in
incubations were measured by use of liquid chromatography-ionspray tandem mass spectrometry with use of the PE SCIEX API 3000 LC-MS-MS system (MDS Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada) as described previously, with minor modifications (Jemal et al., 1999
). The ion transitions monitored were m/z 460 to 356 for cerivastatin
(acid), m/z 442 to 354 for cerivastatin lactone,
m/z 446 to 342 for M-1 acid, a sum of
m/z 476 to 280 and m/z 476 to 278 for M-23 acid, m/z 462 to 340 for M-24
acid, and m/z 423 to 285 for lovastatin acid. The
limit of quantification for cerivastatin was 0.001 µM, and the
day-to-day coefficient of variation was below 15% at relevant concentrations (n = 5). The cerivastatin metabolites
were produced by incubating a high concentration of cerivastatin with
human liver microsomes in standard incubation conditions, and the
metabolites formed were used for optimization of the assay. A
signal/noise ratio of 10:1 was used as the limit of detection for
cerivastatin metabolites. Assays for gemfibrozil, 6
-paclitaxel, and
6
-testosterone were carried out using high-performance liquid
chromatography as described previously (Hsu et al., 1991
; Wen et
al., 2002
). The day-to-day coefficients of variation (CV) were <7% at
relevant concentrations (n = 6).
Binding Studies.
Various concentrations of cerivastatin (six concentrations, 0.01-10
µM) and gemfibrozil (six concentrations, 10-250 µM) in incubation
buffers containing microsomal protein (1 mg/ml) were prepared in
duplicate. Unbound fractions of cerivastatin and gemfibrozil were
separated by ultrafiltration (Sallustio et al., 1997
; Wang et al.,
2002
). The unbound concentrations of gemfibrozil in the filtrates were
measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (Hsu et al., 1991
),
and those of cerivastatin by LC-MS-MS as described above.
Data Analysis. In the determination of the IC50 (concentration of inhibitor to cause 50% inhibition of original enzyme activity) values, the analyte/ISTD peak area ratios were converted to percentage of control, using the control peak area ratio value as 100%. The apparent inhibitory constant (Ki) values of gemfibrozil for M-1 and M-23 were calculated using secondary plots of slopes taken from double-reciprocal plots of cerivastatin concentrations versus the analyte/ISTD peak area ratios.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies with Human Liver Microsomes. Two major metabolites, M-23 acid and M-1 acid, were found after incubation of clinically relevant concentrations of cerivastatin (0.01-0.04 µM) in human liver microsomes. The metabolite M-24 acid was also detectable, but its formation was much lower compared with the formation of M-1 and M-23, and its concentrations were around the detection limit of the LC-MS-MS assay. The formation of lactones of parent cerivastatin, M-1, M-23, and M-24 acid was negligible.
Trimethoprim and gemfibrozil considerably inhibited both M-23 and M-1 formation, whereas ketoconazole, troleandomycin, and erythromycin inhibited only the formation of M-1 (Fig. 1). Gemfibrozil competitively inhibited the formation of M-23 and M-1, with Ki (IC50) values of 69 µM (95 µM) and 273 µM (>250 µM), respectively (Fig. 2). Preincubation of gemfibrozil with NADPH for 15 min did not enhance the inhibitory effects of gemfibrozil (data not shown).
|
|
Studies with Recombinant CYP2C8 and CYP3A4. Both recombinant CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 catalyzed the formation of M-23 and M-1. However, when 0.01 µM cerivastatin was used, the formation rates of M-23 were about 14-fold lower in recombinant CYP3A4 than in recombinant CYP2C8, whereas recombinant CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 catalyzed equally the formation of M-1. Gemfibrozil dose dependently inhibited the formation of M-23 (IC50 = 68 µM) and M-1 (IC50 = 78 µM) in recombinant CYP2C8 but did not show appreciable effect on the formation of these metabolites in recombinant CYP3A4 (Fig. 3).
|
Effects of Gemfibrozil on CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 Activities.
With concentrations up to 250 µM, gemfibrozil showed practically no
inhibitory effect on the formation of 6
-hydroxytestosterone in human
liver microsomes (data not shown). However, gemfibrozil competitively
inhibited the biotransformation of paclitaxel to 6
-hydroxypaclitaxel, with an estimated
Ki (IC50) value
of 75 µM (91 µM) (Fig. 4).
|
Binding Studies. At spiked concentrations of 0.01 to 10 µM cerivastatin, and 10 to 250 µM of gemfibrozil, both compounds showed essentially no binding with the incubation medium containing 1 mg/ml microsomal protein (data not shown).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present in vitro studies showed that the formation of the
major metabolite of cerivastatin, M-23, was markedly inhibited by
gemfibrozil at clinically relevant concentrations (150 µM
approximates the peak plasma concentrations of gemfibrozil after normal
therapeutic doses; Backman et al., 2000
). The formation of metabolite
M-1 was also inhibited by gemfibrozil but to a much smaller extent. The
formation of M-23 was predominantly mediated by CYP2C8, whereas both
CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 catalyzed the formation of M-1. The inhibition of
both metabolites formation by gemfibrozil was due to inhibition of
CYP2C8 activity rather than CYP3A4.
Gemfibrozil is a nonselective inhibitor of several P450 isoforms
(Ki values for CYP2C9, 2C19, 2C8, and
1A2 are 5.8, 24, 69, and 82 µM, respectively) (Wen et al., 2001
) and
uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (Prueksaritanont et al.,
2002b
). The formation of M-23 was susceptible to inhibition by
trimethoprim, which is a selective inhibitor of CYP2C8 (Wen et al.,
2002
), and the formation rate of M-23 was 14-fold higher in CYP2C8 than
in CYP3A4. Moreover, the extent of inhibition of the formation of M-23
by gemfibrozil (Ki = 69 µM) was
comparable with that of the formation of 6
-hydroxypaclitaxel (a
known probe reaction for CYP2C8, Ki = 75 µM). Thus, the present results indicate that the formation of M-23
is mediated mainly via CYP2C8 and that the formation of M-23 may be a
suitable probe for CYP2C8 activity. However, the limited availability
of cerivastatin and its metabolites may limit the usefulness of this assay.
CYP2C8 is expressed at relatively high levels (6-7% of total P450
content) in human liver (Romkes et al., 1991
), and its importance in
drug metabolism has recently been recognized (Ong et al., 2000
). It is
primarily responsible for the metabolism of e.g., taxol, cerivastatin,
rosiglitazone, and troglitazone and also involved in the metabolism of
zopiclone, carbamazepine, verapamil, and amiodarone (Ohyama et al.,
2000
; Ong et al., 2000
). The current results suggest that the metabolic
activity of CYP2C8 in the liver can be inhibited markedly by
administration of therapeutic doses of gemfibrozil. Thus, significant
drug-drug interactions can be expected when gemfibrozil is
coadministered with substrates of CYP2C8, in particular, if the
substrates have narrow therapeutic ranges. Similarly, a significant
inhibition of cerivastatin metabolism may also be expected when other
CYP2C8 inhibitors [e.g., trimethoprim (Wen et al., 2002
)] are
coadministered with cerivastatin.
Lactonization is another important metabolic pathway of
cerivastatin in humans, as evidenced by the approximate plasma levels of cerivastatin lactone and those of the M-1 and M-23 acid in vivo in
humans (Kantola et al., 1999
). However, lactonization of parent
cerivastatin acid, M-1, and M-23 was negligible in the current in vitro
conditions. Quite recently, during the final preparation of this
manuscript, formation of the acyl glucuronide of cerivastatin was
reported to be a significant metabolic pathway for cerivastatin in
vitro (Prueksaritanont et al., 2002a
,b
). It was therefore assumed that
cerivastatin glucuronide, and some other metabolic intermediates of
cerivastatin [e.g., acyl-CoA thioester intermediates (Boberg et al.,
1998
)] may contribute to the formation of cerivastatin lactone in vivo
(Prueksaritanont et al., 2002a
). This would explain the different
levels of cerivastatin lactonization observed in different in vitro
conditions and in vivo.
Prueksaritanont et al. (2002b)
also reported that gemfibrozil inhibited
the formation of M-23 with an IC50 value of 87 µM. Although the exact mechanism of inhibition was not explored in their study, this result is in good agreement with our findings. In
addition, they reported that the potency of inhibition of the formation
of cerivastatin glucuronide (IC50 = 82 µM) was
comparable with inhibition of the formation of M-23 (Prueksaritanont et
al., 2002b
). Coadministration of gemfibrozil and cerivastatin acid in
vivo may inhibit not only the oxidative metabolism of cerivastatin acid
but also the formation of cerivastatin glucuronide or the further
metabolism of cerivastatin lactone. This may result in a more prominent
inhibition of cerivastatin acid metabolism in vivo than that seen in
the in vitro incubations.
To conclude, the present findings indicate that the inhibition of CYP2C8-mediated cerivastatin metabolism may contribute to the interaction between gemfibrozil and cerivastatin. Formation of M-23 acid from cerivastatin may be a useful tool for probing CYP2C8 activity both in vivo and in vitro. The in vivo interaction potential of gemfibrozil with other substrates of CYP2C8 warrants further exploration.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 17, 2002; accepted August 27, 2002.
This study was supported by grants from the Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund and the National Technology Agency of Finland (Tekes).
Address correspondence to: Dr. Janne T. Backman, M.D., Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, FIN-00290 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: janne.backman{at}hus.fi
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
Abbreviations used are: P450, cytochrome P450; ISTD, internal standard; LC-MS-MS, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; M-1, desmethylcerivastatin; M-23, hydroxylated metabolite of cerivastatin; M-24, hydroxylated desmethylcerivastatin.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Bhindi, O. Ormerod, J. Newton, A.P. Banning, and L. Testa Interaction between statins and clopidogrel: is there anything clinically relevant? QJM, December 1, 2008; 101(12): 915 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Noe, R. Portmann, M.-E. Brun, and C. Funk Substrate-Dependent Drug-Drug Interactions between Gemfibrozil, Fluvastatin and Other Organic Anion-Transporting Peptide (OATP) Substrates on OATP1B1, OATP2B1, and OATP1B3 Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2007; 35(8): 1308 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Zhang, L. Wang, G. Chandrasena, L. Ma, M. Zhu, H. Zhang, C. D. Davis, and W. G. Humphreys Involvement of Multiple Cytochrome P450 and UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Enzymes in the in Vitro Metabolism of Muraglitazar Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2007; 35(1): 139 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Gardiner and E. J. Begg Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Clinical Practice Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 521 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Ogilvie, D. Zhang, W. Li, A. D. Rodrigues, A. E. Gipson, J. Holsapple, P. Toren, and A. Parkinson GLUCURONIDATION CONVERTS GEMFIBROZIL TO A POTENT, METABOLISM-DEPENDENT INHIBITOR OF CYP2C8: IMPLICATIONS FOR DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2006; 34(1): 191 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R Shah Pharmacogenetics in drug regulation: promise, potential and pitfalls Phil Trans R Soc B, August 29, 2005; 360(1460): 1617 - 1638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Staels and J.-C. Fruchart Therapeutic Roles of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Agonists Diabetes, August 1, 2005; 54(8): 2460 - 2470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-A. Kim, P.-W. Park, H.-K. Kim, J.-M. Ha, and J.-Y. Park Effect of Quercetin on the Pharmacokinetics of Rosiglitazone, a CYP2C8 Substrate, in Healthy Subjects J. Clin. Pharmacol., August 1, 2005; 45(8): 941 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shitara, M. Hirano, Y. Adachi, T. Itoh, H. Sato, and Y. Sugiyama IN VITRO AND IN VIVO CORRELATION OF THE INHIBITORY EFFECT OF CYCLOSPORIN A ON THE TRANSPORTER-MEDIATED HEPATIC UPTAKE OF CERIVASTATIN IN RATS Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2004; 32(12): 1468 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shitara, M. Hirano, H. Sato, and Y. Sugiyama Gemfibrozil and Its Glucuronide Inhibit the Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 2 (OATP2/OATP1B1:SLC21A6)-Mediated Hepatic Uptake and CYP2C8-Mediated Metabolism of Cerivastatin: Analysis of the Mechanism of the Clinically Relevant Drug-Drug Interaction between Cerivastatin and Gemfibrozil J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2004; 311(1): 228 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ma, R. Subramanian, M. L. Schrag, A. D. Rodrigues, and C. Tang CYTOCHROME P450 2C8 (CYP2C8)-MEDIATED HYDROXYLATION OF AN ENDOTHELIN ETA RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST IN HUMAN LIVER MICROSOMES Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2004; 32(5): 473 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Schoch, J. K. Yano, M. R. Wester, K. J. Griffin, C. D. Stout, and E. F. Johnson Structure of Human Microsomal Cytochrome P450 2C8: EVIDENCE FOR A PERIPHERAL FATTY ACID BINDING SITE J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 9497 - 9503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||