![]() |
|
|
Vol. 30, Issue 12, 1441-1445, December 2002
Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Tufts University School of Medicine and New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (T.H.T., L.L.v.M., J.S.H., D.J.G.); and Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut (K.V., M.A.G., R.S.O.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effect of microsomal protein concentration on the inhibitory potency of a series of CYP3A inhibitors was assessed in vitro using diazepam 3-hydroxylation (yielding temazepam) as an index of CYP3A activity. With diazepam concentrations fixed at 100 µM, inhibition of temazepam formation by fixed concentrations of ritonavir, ketoconazole, itraconazole, OH-itraconazole, norfluoxetine, and fluvoxamine decreased substantially as active protein concentrations increased from 0.0625 to 3.0 mg/ml. However protein concentration had only a small effect on the inhibitory activity of fluconazole. Equilibrium dialysis indicated extensive microsomal binding of all inhibitors except fluconazole; binding increased with higher protein concentrations. Based on the CYP3A content of liver microsomes, decrements in inhibitory potency of stronger inhibitors (ketoconazole and ritonavir) could be explained by specific binding, whereas nonspecific binding is anticipated to account for the effect on weaker inhibitors (norfluoxetine and fluvoxamine). Thus, microsomal binding (specific, nonspecific, or a combination of both) may have a major effect on estimation of inhibitory potency of P450 inhibitors and may contribute to variations among laboratories. The effect can be minimized by use of the lowest possible microsomal protein concentration for in vitro studies of metabolic inhibition.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microsomal binding of drug substrates and/or
metabolic inhibitors is increasingly recognized as a potential source
of artifact arising in the course of in vitro studies of drug
metabolism. Nonspecific binding of substrate to microsomal protein can
influence availability of the substrate to the metabolizing enzyme or
enzymes in vitro, and thereby yield biased estimates of enzyme kinetic parameters. These, in turn, may produce inaccurate predictions when in
vitro data are used to estimate in vivo pharmacokinetics (Obach, 1996
,
1997
; Obach et al., 1997
; McLure et al., 2000
; Venkatakrishnan et al.,
2000c
, 2001
; Kalvass et al., 2001
). Inhibitor binding to microsomal
systems may likewise influence estimation of potency of metabolic
inhibitors (Gibbs et al., 1999a
). The influence of binding has been
termed "inhibitor depletion" when the inhibitor interacts with the
active site (Gibbs et al., 1999a
). However, inhibitor depletion could
also refer to nonspecific inhibitor binding to microsomal preparations,
as well as to actual microsomal consumption of the inhibitor itself
through biotransformation.
The present study evaluated the influence of microsomal protein concentration on the inhibitory capacity of known CYP3A inhibitors. In vitro 3-hydroxylation of diazepam to temazepam was used as an index reaction to profile CYP3A activity. Two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluvoxamine and norfluoxetine), three antifungal azole agents (itraconazole, ketoconazole, and fluconazole), a metabolite of itraconazole (OH-itraconazole), and the human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor ritonavir were used as representative CYP3A inhibitors. These agents have different intrinsic inhibitory capacities and different binding affinities.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Incubation Procedures and Index Reaction Characteristics.
Liver samples from individual human donors with no known liver disease
were provided by the International Institute for the Advancement of
Medicine (Exton, PA), the Liver Tissue Procurement and Distribution
System (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN), or the National
Disease Research Interchange (Philadelphia, PA). All samples were of
the CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 normal metabolizer phenotype based on prior in
vitro phenotyping studies. Microsomes were prepared by
ultracentrifugation; microsomal pellets were suspended in 0.1 M
potassium phosphate buffer containing 20% glycerol and stored at
80°C until use. Chemical reagents and drug entities were purchased
from commercial sources or kindly provided by their pharmaceutical
manufacturers (von Moltke et al., 1993
, 1994a
,b
, 1996a
,b
;
Venkatakrishnan et al., 2000a
,b
,c
, 2001a
,b
).
Metabolic Inhibitors.
Incubations were performed with diazepam alone (no inhibitor), and with
coaddition with fixed concentrations of the following established CYP3A
inhibitors: ketoconazole, 0.05 µM; itraconazole, 1.0 µM;
OH-itraconazole, 0.25 µM; fluconazole, 10 µM; ritonavir, 0.05 µM;
norfluoxetine, 25 µM; and fluvoxamine, 50 µM (von Moltke et al.,
1994b
, 1995
, 1996a
,b
, 1998a
,b
; Venkatakrishnan et al., 2000b
).
Influence of Active Protein Concentration.
Reactions were initiated by addition of varying amounts of microsomal
protein (0, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, and 3 mg/ml) with
final volume of 250 µl, and incubated for 10 min. Previous studies
had demonstrated time-dependent linearity of temazepam formation up to
20 min. After the incubation period, 100 µl of 2% butylated
hydroxytoluene in acetonitrile was added to stop the reactions. A
benzodiazepine analog (U31485, 100 ng) (Greenblatt et al., 1981
) was
added as internal standard. Samples were then extracted by addition of
1.2 ml of toluene/isoamyl alcohol (98.5:1.5), vortexing vigorously for
approximately 60 s, and centrifuging at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The
organic phase was then transferred into 2-ml autosampling vials for gas
chromatographic (GC1)
analysis. All reactions were performed in duplicate, and all studies
were performed using microsomal preparations from four different human livers.
Influence of Inactive Protein Concentration. Diazepam (100 µM) with or without ketoconazole (0.05 µM), OH-itraconazole (0.25 µM), or fluconazole (10 µM) was added into 2-ml microcentrifuge tubes and dried under mild vacuum at 40°C. Buffer containing isocitrate/isocitric dehydrogenase system (as described above) was added and the tubes were incubated at 37°C for 5 min. Reactions were initiated by addition of varying amounts of heat-inactivated microsomal protein (0, 0.25, 0.75, 1.75, and 2.75 mg/ml), with a constant amount of active microsomal protein (0.25 mg/ml). The final volume was 250 µl. After 10 min of incubation, 100 µl of 2% butylated hydroxytoluene in acetonitrile was added to stop the reactions. U31485 was added as internal standard, and samples were extracted with toluene/isoamyl alcohol for GC analysis as described above.
Analytical Conditions for Gas Chromatography. The GC (model 6890A; Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA) was equipped with an electron-capture detector, automatic sampler, and data processor integrator The column was 6 feet in length, 2 mm in internal diameter, and packed with 3% SP-2250 on 80/100 Supelcoport (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). The chromatographic conditions were oven temperature, 275°C; injection port temperature, 310°C; and detector temperature, 310°C. The carrier gas was argon/methane (95:5) at a flow rate of 30 ml/min. The retention times for diazepam (substrate), desmethyldiazepam (N-demethylated metabolite), temazepam (3-hydroxylated metabolite), and U31485 (internal standard) were 2.6, 3.7, 5.4, and 8.5 min, respectively.
Studies of Inhibitor Consumption. Ketoconazole (5 µM), with or without diazepam (100 µM), was added into 2-ml microcentrifuge tubes and dried under mild vacuum at 40°C. Reactions were initiated by addition of microsomal protein, and stopped by addition of 100 µl of acetonitrile. Terfenadine (15 µg) was added as internal standard. The samples were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. Twenty-five microliters of the supernatant was injected for HPLC analysis of remaining ketoconazole.
Equilibrium Dialysis Studies.
Ketoconazole or fluconazole (initial added concentration, 100 µM) was
added to 2-ml microcentrifuge tubes and dried under mild vacuum
conditions at 40°C. Varying concentrations of microsomal protein (0, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/ml) were added into tubes along with buffer A
(50 mM phosphate buffer and 5 mM MgCl2 without cofactors) to a final volume of 1.0 ml. Then 400 µl of mixtures from
each tube was injected into membrane bags (Spectra/Por Biotech Regenerated Cellulose membrane tubing, molecular weight cutoff 15 kDa;
Spectrum, Inc., Los Angeles, CA). The membrane bags were immersed in 6 ml of buffer A in 15-ml centrifuge tubes and incubated at
37°C for 6 h (Venkatakrishnan et al., 2000c
). Dialysates, along with calibration standards, were mixed with microsomal protein at a
final concentration of 1.5 mg/ml in 0.4 ml.
20°C until analysis. Drugs in the microsomal matrix were
incubated at 37oC for the dialysis period to
ensure stability of the analytes through the dialysis process.
For analysis of ketoconazole, terfenadine (25 µg) was added as
internal standard. Acetonitrile (100 µl) was added to precipitate microsomal protein. Mixtures were centrifuged for 10 min. Twenty-five microliters of the supernatant was injected for HPLC analysis. For
analysis of fluconazole, the dialysate and calibration standards with
phenacetin (0.5 µg) as internal standard were alkalinized with 150 µl of 1 N NaOH and extracted twice with 2 ml of ethyl acetate. The
organic extract was evaporated to dryness and reconstituted with 250 µl of mobile phase. Fifty microliters was injected for HPLC analysis.
For fluvoxamine, norfluoxetine, ritonavir, and hydroxyitraconazole,
dialyzed microsomal samples were diluted with buffer, and buffer
samples were diluted with microsomes to ensure an identical matrix for
each sample, at a given microsomal protein concentration. The volume of
retentate or dialysate used in analysis was varied according to the
microsomal protein concentration. This was necessary to ensure that the
detector responses in the liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry assay
were in the linear range for all samples. For fluvoxamine and
norfluoxetine samples, microsomal proteins were precipitated using two
volumes of acetonitrile containing the internal standard (150 pmol/ml
fluvoxamine for norfluoxetine samples, and 250 pmol/ml norfluoxetine
for fluvoxamine samples) followed by centrifugation, and supernatants
were injected on the column for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry
analysis. For ritonavir and hydroxyitraconazole samples, ketoconazole
(10 ng in 20 µl of methanol) was added as an internal standard
followed by extraction with 3 ml of methyl t-butyl ether.
The extracts were evaporated (N2, 35°C) and
reconstituted in 0.025 ml of HPLC mobile phase.
Due to poor recovery from the dialysis system, equilibrium dialysis
studies of itraconazole could not be performed.
HPLC Conditions: Analysis of Ketoconazole and Fluconazole. The analytical column was 30 cm in length containing C18 µBondapak (10-µm particle size). The mobile phase for ketoconazole was 50 mM NH4H2PO4/CH3CN/CH3OH (55:40:5) at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. The ultraviolet absorbance detector was set at 206 nm. The retention times for ketoconazole and terfenadine were approximately 13 and 19.5 min, respectively. For fluconazole analysis, the mobile phase was methanol/10 mM sodium acetate (40:60) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min, and UV detection was at 261 nm. The retention times for fluconazole and phenacetin were approximately 8 and 12.5 min, respectively.
HPLC-Mass Spectrometry Conditions: Analysis of Hydroxyitraconazole, Fluoxetine, Fluvoxamine, and Ritonavir. Samples were injected onto a Phenomenex Luna C18 column (2.0 × 50 mm, 5 µm) equilibrated in 20 mM acetic acid (pH adjusted to 4 with NH4OH) containing 23% CH3CN at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The system consisted of a CTC PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Carrboro, NC), model 1100 quaternary gradient pump and solvent degasser (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA), and an API100 mass spectrometer (PE Sciex, Thornhill, ON, Cananda) fitted with a TurboIonspray interface. The initial mobile phase conditions were maintained for 1 min followed by a linear gradient to 77% CH3CN at 6 min and held for 3 min. The flow was split approximately 50:50 into the mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer was operated in the positive ion mode with an orifice voltage of 20 V and a source temperature of 400°C. The monitored ions and their respective retention times (Rt) were m/z 296 (norfluoxetine, Rt = 4.0 min); m/z 319 (fluvoxamine, Rt = 3.7 min); m/z 531 (ketoconazole, Rt = 4.4 min); m/z 721 (hydroxyitraconazole, Rt = 6.1 min); and m/z 721 (ritonavir, Rt = 6.1 min).
Data Analysis.
At each microsomal protein concentration, rates of formation of
temazepam from diazepam with inhibitor present were expressed as a
fraction (Rv) of the control velocity without
inhibitor, as follows:
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
|
(5) |
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CYP3A Inhibition Studies: Effect of Active Protein Concentration. Temazepam formation in the absence of inhibitors increased as microsomal protein concentration increased to 3 mg/ml. This was accompanied by some degree of substrate consumption, based on GC analysis of diazepam remaining in the reaction mixture (Fig. 1). The inhibitory capacity of the various CYP3A inhibitors declined as microsomal protein concentration increased (Table 1). At low concentrations of microsomal protein (0.0625 mg/ml), inhibitors reduced temazepam formation rate to 23 to 49% of control. At the highest concentration of microsomal protein (3 mg/ml), these inhibitors reduced metabolite formation to no less than 80% of control velocity. The only exception was 10 µM fluconazole, for which inhibitory capacity was less dependent on protein concentration.
|
|
|
Inhibitor Metabolism Studies. No evidence of ketoconazole consumption was observed with increasing microsomal protein concentration. Ketoconazole concentrations remaining in incubates containing no microsomal protein were essentially identical to those in incubates containing protein, regardless of the actual protein concentration. The same relationship was obtained with coaddition of diazepam to the incubation mixtures.
Inactive Protein Studies. Temazepam formation in the presence of a constant active protein concentration (0.25 mg/ml) decreased with increasing concentrations heat-inactivated microsomal protein (0-2.75 mg/ml). The inhibitory capacity of 0.05 µM ketoconazole and 0.25 µM OH-itraconazole also declined with increasing inactive protein concentration (Table 2; Fig. 3); however, the effect was less pronounced than that in the active protein study. Fluconazole, on the other hand, showed little change in its inhibitory capacity with increasing inactive protein concentration.
|
|
Equilibrium Dialysis Studies. The free fraction of all inhibitors except fluconazole declined as the microsomal protein concentration increased (Fig. 4). The free fraction for fluconazole, however, was close to 1.0 regardless of microsomal protein concentration.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Consistent with previous reports (Gibbs et al., 1999a
), the CYP3A
inhibitory effect of ketoconazole was substantially reduced with
increasing concentrations of active microsomal protein. Because some
substrate depletion also occurred at higher protein concentrations, the
effect of protein concentration on ketoconazole inhibition was, if
anything, underestimated. Metabolic consumption of ketoconazole in the
microsomal system was evaluated as a possible contributor to the
decrement in inhibitory action of ketoconazole. Erve et al. (2000)
reported substantial metabolic consumption of 1 µM ketoconazole by
liver microsomes at a protein concentration of 2 mg/ml and an
incubation duration of 30 min. However, we did not observe evidence of
ketoconazole consumption by microsomes at 5 µM ketoconazole, protein
concentrations up to 3 mg/ml, and an incubation duration of 10 min. In
contrast to ketoconazole, inhibition by fluconazole was minimally
dependent on microsomal protein concentration. The differences between
ketoconazole and fluconazole apparently are explained by their
differing affinity for nonspecific binding sites. Equilibrium dialysis
demonstrated decreased ketoconazole free fraction with increasing
microsomal protein concentration, whereas fluconazole free fraction was
close to 1.0 regardless of microsomal protein concentration.
A number of other established CYP3A inhibitors, including the azole
derivative itraconazole (and its principal metabolite), the selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors norfluoxetine and fluvoxamine, and the
viral protease inhibitor ritonavir, exhibited decreases in inhibitory
potency with increasing active microsomal protein in a manner similar
to that observed with ketoconazole. All of these compounds are
lipophilic agents with moderate-to-extensive binding to human plasma
proteins, and equilibrium dialysis studies indicated that microsomal
binding in vitro apparently explains the decrement in inhibitory
activity with increasing microsomal protein. The magnitude and rank
order of estimated unbound IC50 values for these
agents parallel previously reported data (Venkatakrishnan et al.,
2000b
, 2001b
; von Moltke et al., 1994b
, 1995
, 1996a
,b
, 1998a
,b
). We did
not evaluate actual inhibitor consumption by microsomes for these other inhibitors.
Previous studies using diazepam 3-hydroxylation as an index reaction
have demonstrated the functional CYP3A content of liver samples used in
the present study to be approximately 125 pmol/mg protein
(Venkatakrishnan et al., 2001a
). At 0.05 µM (50 pmol/ml) ketoconazole
and 0.5 mg/ml active protein (63 pmol/ml CYP3A), diazepam
3-hydroxylation activity was reduced to approximately 50% of control,
implying occupancy by ketoconazole of a corresponding fraction of CYP3A
binding sites (Table 1). Under the assumption of a single diazepam
active site per molecule of CYP3A, 32 pmol/ml ketoconazole is
anticipated to be bound to active sites, with the remaining 18 pmol/ml
either unbound or bound to other sites. At higher concentrations of
microsomal protein, available active binding sites would exceed the
availability of ketoconazole in the in vitro mixture, and the decrement
in inhibitory capacity could be explained mainly by specific microsomal
binding. Similar estimations would hold for ritonavir. However, for the
less potent inhibitors norfluoxetine and fluvoxamine, 50% inhibition
is achieved at concentrations that greatly exceed the availability of
specific binding sites, and the decrement in inhibition would be
explained mainly by nonspecific binding.
The present study indicates that microsomal binding may have a major
impact on estimation of inhibitory potency using in vitro systems.
Decrements in inhibitory activity with increasing microsomal protein
concentration may be observed with strong as well as weak inhibitors.
The mechanism of binding may be either specific, nonspecific, or a
combination of the two. It is likely that the decrease in inhibitory
potency observed for relatively weaker inhibitors at high microsomal
concentrations is attributable mainly to nonspecific binding. The
findings suggest that large variability among laboratories in estimated
inhibitory potency of a single inhibitor versus a single substrate
(such as ketoconazole versus midazolam) could in part be explained by
variations in protein and/or enzyme concentration (Gascon and Dayer,
1991
; Hargreaves et al., 1994
; Wrighton and Ring, 1994
; Ghosal et al.,
1996
; von Moltke et al., 1996b
; Gibbs et al., 1999a
,b
; Wang et al.,
1999
; Perloff et al., 2000
; Venkatakrishnan et al., 2000b
). In general,
the impact of microsomal binding, both specific and nonspecific, may be
minimized by use of the lowest possible microsomal concentration.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by Grants MH-58435, DA-13209, DK/AI-58496, DA-05258, DA-13834, AG-17880, MH-34223, MH-01237, and RR-00054 from the Department of Health and Human Services.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 3, 2002; accepted September 11, 2002.
Address correspondence to: David J. Greenblatt, M.D., Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111. E-mail: dj.greenblatt{at}tufts.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
Abbreviations used are: GC, gas chromatography; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; Rt, retention time.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-hydroxylation by human liver microsomes in vitro: inhibition by calcium channel blockers, itraconazole and ketoconazole.
Pharmacol Toxicol
85:
157-161[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Gao, L. Yao, H. W. Mathieu, Y. Zhang, T. S. Maurer, M. D. Troutman, D. O. Scott, R. B. Ruggeri, and J. Lin In Silico Modeling of Nonspecific Binding to Human Liver Microsomes Drug Metab. Dispos., October 1, 2008; 36(10): 2130 - 2135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nakashima, H. Takama, Y. Ogasawara, T. Kawakami, T. Nishitoba, S. Hoshi, E. Uchida, and H. Tanaka Effect of Cinacalcet Hydrochloride, a New Calcimimetic Agent, on the Pharmacokinetics of Dextromethorphan: In Vitro and Clinical Studies J. Clin. Pharmacol., October 1, 2007; 47(10): 1311 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Giuliano, M. Jairaj, C. M. Zafiu, and R. Laufer DIRECT DETERMINATION OF UNBOUND INTRINSIC DRUG CLEARANCE IN THE MICROSOMAL STABILITY ASSAY Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2005; 33(9): 1319 - 1324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Venkatakrishnan and R. S. Obach IN VITRO-IN VIVO EXTRAPOLATION OF CYP2D6 INACTIVATION BY PAROXETINE: PREDICTION OF NONSTATIONARY PHARMACOKINETICS AND DRUG INTERACTION MAGNITUDE Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2005; 33(6): 845 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A Bachmann and J. D Lewis Predicting Inhibitory Drug-Drug Interactions and Evaluating Drug Interaction Reports Using Inhibition Constants Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2005; 39(6): 1064 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Isoherranen, K. L. Kunze, K. E. Allen, W. L. Nelson, and K. E. Thummel ROLE OF ITRACONAZOLE METABOLITES IN CYP3A4 INHIBITION Drug Metab. Dispos., October 1, 2004; 32(10): 1121 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Walsky and R. S. Obach VALIDATED ASSAYS FOR HUMAN CYTOCHROME P450 ACTIVITIES Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2004; 32(6): 647 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Jones, D. Hallifax, and J. B. Houston QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION OF THE IN VIVO INHIBITION OF DIAZEPAM METABOLISM BY OMEPRAZOLE USING RAT LIVER MICROSOMES AND HEPATOCYTES Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2004; 32(5): 572 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Stresser, M. I. Broudy, T. Ho, C. E. Cargill, A. P. Blanchard, R. Sharma, A. A. Dandeneau, J. J. Goodwin, S. D. Turner, J. C. L. Erve, et al. HIGHLY SELECTIVE INHIBITION OF HUMAN CYP3A IN VITRO BY AZAMULIN AND EVIDENCE THAT INHIBITION IS IRREVERSIBLE Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2004; 32(1): 105 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||