DMD Large equally mixed donor pool

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, B. D.

Vol. 30, Issue 2, 191-198, February 2002


Investigation of the Mechanism of Enhancement of Central Nervous System Delivery of 2'-beta -Fluoro-2',3'-Dideoxyinosine Via a Blood-Brain Barrier Adenosine Deaminase-Activated Prodrug

Mark D. Johnson,1 Jian Chen, and Bradley D. Anderson

Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.D.J., J.C.); Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky (B.D.A.)


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Enhanced central nervous system (CNS) delivery of certain poorly penetrating 2',3'-dideoxynucleosides has been achieved by designing prodrugs that are substrates for enzymes, such as adenosine deaminase (ADA), that are present at high activities in brain tissue. In this study, the potential role of adenosine deaminase localized within the endothelial cells of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in providing enhanced intracellular and CNS delivery of an ADA-activated prodrug is assessed in vitro using cell culture models of the BBB. The kinetics of uptake and bioconversion of 2'-beta -fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyadenosine (F-ddA), a model ADA-activated prodrug of 2'-beta -fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyinosine, were determined in primary cultured bovine brain microvascular endothelial cells. Model-based simulations of CNS availability derived from in vitro estimates of parameters for simple passive diffusion and ADA-catalyzed deamination suggest that ADA that is localized within the BBB plays an important role in the conversion of F-ddA to 2'-beta -fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyinosine during its passage across the BBB. Consistent with in vivo observations, these simulations demonstrate that elevated levels of certain enzymes, such as ADA, in the brain microvascular endothelial cells of the BBB may be exploited in the design of brain-targeted prodrugs or drug-carrier conjugates, which brain tissue selectively converts.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Rational approaches for increasing blood-brain barrier (BBB2) penetration may be essential for those dideoxynucleosides that exhibit reduced efficacy in the treatment of HIV infections in the central nervous system (CNS). Theoretically, drug entry into the CNS may be enhanced through the design of lipophilic analogs that cross the BBB more rapidly by simple passive diffusion. For instance, numerous modifications of the purine and/or the sugar rings of the anti-HIV dideoxynucleosides have been explored to increase lipophilicity (Herdewijn et al., 1987, 1988; Roey et al., 1989; Masood et al., 1990; Barchi et al., 1991). However, most of these lipophilic analogs exhibit diminished anti-HIV activity or are too cytotoxic to use in humans.

A related alternate approach involves the preparation of bioconvertible derivatives (prodrugs) with increased lipophilicity, which allows the prodrug to be rapidly taken up into tissues and subsequently metabolized to release the active parent compound (Roche, 1977; Stella and Himmelstein, 1980; Anderson, 1996). Increased lipophilicity alone, however, does not ensure higher concentration of the active drug at the target tissue. Efficient targeting via the prodrug approach requires the parent drug to be formed within the target organ at a rate sufficient to compete with its elimination from the target organ (Stella and Himmelstein, 1980, 1982, 1985). This is seldom achieved for prodrugs that are brain directed (Greig, 1989). For example, a series of lipophilic 5'-ester derivatives of 2',3'-dideoxyinosine (ddI) were evaluated for their potential to improve the CNS delivery of ddI (Anderson, 1996). None of the compounds evaluated gave significantly higher CNS concentrations of ddI than when ddI was administered alone because esterase activity in plasma far exceeds that in brain tissue, resulting in premature bioconversion of the prodrug.

Recent findings that a series of lipophilic, adenosine deaminase-activated 6-halo-2',3'-dideoxypurine nucleosides (i.e., prodrugs of ddI) yielded ddI concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and brain parenchyma, which were 5- and >20-fold higher than when ddI was administered alone at the same infusion rate, provided a promising new direction for the design of prodrugs of certain anti-HIV dideoxynucleosides for CNS delivery (Anderson et al., 1992; Morgan et al., 1992). The enhanced CNS delivery of ddI achieved by ADA activation is believed to be a consequence of the relatively high activity of ADA in brain tissue, leading to a much improved selectivity in target tissue bioconversion compared with esterase activated prodrugs. These observations suggest that new enzyme-based strategies for improving the CNS delivery of anti-HIV agents are viable (Anderson et al., 1992).

A related anti-HIV dideoxynucleoside, 2'-beta -fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyadenosine (F-ddA) (Roth et al., 1998), designed as an acid stable analog of 2',3'-dideoxyadenosine (ddA) with a reduced deamination rate (Marquez et al., 1990; Masood et al., 1990), has been shown to produce 5- and 20-fold higher concentrations of F-ddATP and F-ddADP in human T-cells when compared with ddA controls (Masood et al., 1990). Its anti-HIV active deamination product, 2'-beta -fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyinosine (F-ddI), is equally acid-stable and is a purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP)-resistant isostere of ddI. The improved lipophilicity (10 times more lipophilic than F-ddI) (Barchi et al., 1991), acid stability, and reduced deamination rate of F-ddA, coupled with the PNP resistance of its deamination product, made this compound a candidate for oral formulation, which is considered to be the most practical route for chronic anti-AIDS therapy in a large patient population (Marquez et al., 1987, 1990).

F-ddA has been shown to enhance the CNS delivery of F-ddI in comparison with results obtained by administering F-ddI alone in rats (Singhal et al., 1997). After a 120-min infusion of F-ddA, the total dideoxynucleoside (F-ddA plus F-ddI) brain parenchyma/plasma concentration ratio was approximately 8-fold higher than that obtained from F-ddI after an equivalent F-ddI infusion. This is consistent with the expected effect of lipophilicity in enhancing the CNS uptake of F-ddA. Furthermore, the steady-state brain parenchyma/plasma concentration ratio of F-ddI was found to be 5-fold higher than that obtained after an equivalent F-ddI infusion, suggesting that F-ddA was indeed acting as an ADA-activated prodrug of F-ddI. Although substantial levels of ADA exist in the brain tissue, with particularly high activities in endothelial cells of the BBB (Nagy et al., 1984; Mistry and Drummond, 1986; Schrader et al., 1987; Johnson and Anderson, 1996), the site of prodrug activation remains unclear. The present study was undertaken to clarify the role of the BBB in the bioconversion of F-ddA during its passage across the BBB, using uptake studies into primary cultured bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells (BBMECs). The contributions of other relevant transport mechanisms (i.e., simple passive diffusion and carrier-mediated transport) were also evaluated. Quantitation of processes, such as passive diffusion, carrier-mediated transport, and prodrug metabolism in vitro, may provide further insights into the role of the BBB in governing CNS entry and prodrug bioconversion in vivo.



    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Chemicals and Reagents. F-ddA, F-ddI, ddA, and (+)-erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-2-nonyl)adenine (EHNA) were provided by the National Cancer Institute (NIH, Bethesda, MD) and were used as received. Additional quantities of F-ddI needed for the monolayer and homogenate experiments were prepared from F-ddA using adenosine deaminase (type VII) purified from calf intestinal mucosa (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Approximately 1 mg of ADA was added to 25 ml of culture medium containing 20 mg of F-ddA at 25°C. The formation of F-ddI was monitored via HPLC, as described below. When the reaction was complete, the mixture was placed in a Centricon Amicon Bioseparations; Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA) concentrator (a 100,000-mol. wt. cut-off) and centrifuged for 15 min. ADA activity in aliquots of the ultrafiltrate was shown to be negligible. The F-ddI solution was compared with the authentic reference standard for purity and subsequently used as prepared or otherwise diluted for use in uptake studies.

Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline was purchased from Hyclone Laboratories (Logan, UT). Minimum essential medium/F-12 Ham's nutrient mixture (1:1) (Hyclone Laboratories) supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, 13 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 7.4, 100 µg/ml penicillin G (Sigma Chemical Co.), 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Sigma Chemical Co.), 100 µg/ml heparin (170 units/mg), and 10% plasma-derived horse serum (HyClone Laboratories) were used in the culture medium.

Isolation and Culture of Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Capillary segments were isolated from bovine cerebral gray matter (Dale T. Smith & Sons Meat Packing Company, Draper, UT) by a two-step enzymatic dispersion treatment followed by centrifugation over pre-established 50% Percoll density gradients, as previously described (Johnson and Anderson, 1996). Sequential filtering of the preparation through 500- and 95-µm nylon mesh filters yielded a relatively purified and homogeneous population of microcapillaries containing 5 to 20 individual endothelial cells per cluster. The isolated microvessels were cultured immediately or stored at -70°C in culture medium with 10% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide.

Rat tail collagen (type I) was derivatized to tissue culture dishes (35 × 10 mm) with a cross-linking reagent, 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinoethyl)carbodiimide-metho-p-toluenesulfonate (Aldrich Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), to provide a uniform and durable surface for cell attachment and growth that would withstand multiple media changes and the rigors of the washing procedure (Macklis et al., 1985). Brain microvessels were seeded onto the treated dishes at approximately 50,000 cells/cm2 and cultured at 37°C under 95% humidity and 5% CO2/95% air. Culture media were changed every other day. Monolayers reached confluence in 8 to 10 days after initial plating.

Metabolism of F-ddA in BBMEC Homogenate. The metabolism of F-ddA in the presence of BBMEC homogenate was monitored to obtain preliminary information concerning the nature and extent of F-ddA metabolism within the brain microvascular endothelial cells. Feeding medium was removed from several dishes, and the confluent monolayers were rinsed with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, to remove any residual protein from the culture medium. Sterile water (1 ml) was added, and the dishes were incubated at 37°C under 95% humidity and 5% CO2/95% air for 15 min to loosen the monolayer. The monolayers were then scraped from the dishes, collected in sterile 5-ml cryovials, and rapidly frozen at -70°C. Before use, thawed samples were further disintegrated by mechanical homogenization with a Potter-Elvehjem tissue grinder (0.10-0.15-mm clearance; Kimble/Kontes, Vineland, NJ) to form a homogeneous suspension.

Adenosine deaminase activity was measured using F-ddA as a reference substrate in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (8.4 mM). The reaction was initiated by adding 0.05 ml of homogenate to 0.45 ml of warm (37°C) phosphate buffer containing F-ddA (55 µM-10 mM) and incubated at 37°C. The reaction was quenched by the addition of a 0.10-ml aliquot of the reaction solution to 1 ml of ice-cold acetonitrile. The acetonitrile was then evaporated under an N2 stream. The residue was then reconstituted with 0.5 ml of phosphate buffer (8.4 mM), pH 7.4, and analyzed immediately by HPLC. Initial rates of F-ddI formation were fit to the conventional Michaelis-Menten equation via nonlinear least-squares regression analysis (Scientist; MicroMath, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) to obtain estimates of the kinetic parameters V<UP><SUB>met</SUB><SUP>max</SUP></UP> and K<UP><SUB>met</SUB><SUP>m</SUP></UP>.

Uptake, Efflux, and Metabolism in BBMEC Monolayers. Monolayer uptake experiments were conducted using a previously published method (Johnson and Anderson, 1999) to examine the relative contributions of passive diffusion, metabolism, and possible carrier-mediated transport to the kinetics of F-ddA and/or F-ddI accumulation within endothelial cells. Briefly, F-ddA uptake was initiated by the addition of 1 ml of warm culture medium, pH 7.4, or 1 ml of endothelial assay buffer (122 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM D-glucose, 3 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 0.4 mM NaHPO4, 1.4 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM HEPES adjusted to pH 7.4 with NaOH) (Shah et al., 1989) containing F-ddA (0.1-10 mM) with or without EHNA (0.7 µM), a potent and selective adenosine deaminase inhibitor (Harriman et al., 1994), followed by incubation at 37°C under 95% humidity and 5% CO2/95% air. At selected times, uptake experiments were terminated by rapidly removing donor solution followed by sequential washes (4 × 50 ml) with ice-cold Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, to remove residual extracellular- or surface-bound permeant. Cell monolayers were then solubilized with 1 N NaOH (0.5 ml for 15 min at room temperature) and neutralized with an equivalent volume of 1 N HCl. Aliquots were collected and analyzed for both permeant and protein content. Intracellular concentrations (Cmonolayer) were calculated by dividing the intracellular mass (millimoles) by the monolayer volume (~1.2 µl) based on protein content (Johnson and Anderson, 1999).

Extracellular ADA activity in the donor solution was periodically measured using F-ddA as a reference substrate in endothelial assay buffer, pH 7.4, at 37°C. In preparation for these experiments, the culture medium was removed from the monolayer and replaced with endothelial assay buffer containing F-ddA (0.4 mM) and incubated at 37°C under 95% humidity and 5% CO2/95% air. After 90 min, the donor solution was removed from monolayer contact. The rate of formation of F-ddI in the donor solution was monitored both before and after removal from the monolayer.

Both uptake and efflux experiments were also conducted for F-ddI. The uptake of F-ddI was likewise initiated by the addition of warm culture medium (1 ml), pH 7.4, containing F-ddI (0.45-4.5 mM) followed by incubation at 37°C under 95% humidity and 5% CO2/95% air. The efflux of F-ddI was initiated after incubating the cells with warm culture medium (1 ml), pH 7.4, containing F-ddI (0.45-4.5 mM) for 1 h followed by a rapid replacement of the donor solution with drug-free medium (2 ml), pH 7.4. Sequential washes (4 × 50 ml) with ice-cold Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, were used to remove most residual extracellular or surface bound permeant, and the intracellular F-ddI concentration and protein content were analyzed.

Analytical Procedures. Resolution of F-ddA and F-ddI was achieved using a modular reversed-phase HPLC system (Supelcosil LC-18-S analytical column; 25-cm × 4.6-mm i.d., 5 µm) with UV detection at 254 nm. Depending upon the experimental application, the mobile phase consisted of variable amounts of acetonitrile (typically 5-20%) in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4; I = 0.02) at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. In a typical separation at 10% acetonitrile, the retention times of F-ddI and F-ddA were 5.7 and 11.7 min, respectively. Protein content was determined by the Lowry method (Lowry et al., 1951) using protein standards prepared from bovine serum albumin (Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO).

Kinetic Model for Monolayer Uptake, Efflux, and Metabolism. The concentration versus time course for F-ddI in endothelial cells exposed to donor solutions containing only F-ddI could be described in terms of a single apparent rate constant, k<UP><SUB>p</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP>, for passive entry into and efflux from the monolayer as outlined in eq. 1:
<FR><NU>dC<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></NU><DE>dt</DE></FR> = k<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>(C<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB> − C<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB>) (1)
where C<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP> is the concentration of F-ddI in the donor solution and C<UP><SUB>monolayer</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP> is the intracellular concentration. For efflux experiments, only the second term in eq. 1 was used (C<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP> = 0).

Although several models were explored in fitting the F-ddA and F-ddI concentration versus time profiles in monolayers exposed to donor solutions containing only F-ddA, the simplest model consistent with both F-ddI and F-ddA uptake data is described by eqs. 2 to 5:
<FR><NU>dC<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></NU><DE>dt</DE></FR> = k<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>(C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>−f<SUB><UP>unbound</UP></SUB>C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB>)−<FR><NU>V<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB> f<SUB><UP>unbound</UP></SUB> C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>+f<SUB><UP>unbound</UP></SUB> C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></DE></FR> (2)
where Vmax (units of molar concentration min-1) and Km (molar concentration) are the Michaelis-Menten parameters for intracellular ADA-catalyzed metabolism of F-ddA, C<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP> is the concentration of F-ddA in the donor solution, and funbound represents the apparent fraction of unbound intracellular F-ddA. The first-order rate constant for passive diffusion, k<UP><SUB>p</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP>, is related to the permeability coefficient of F-ddA across the collective cell membrane of the monolayer (P<UP><SUB>monolayer</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP>) as follows:
k<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB> = <FR><NU>p<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB> A<SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></DE></FR> (3)
where Amonolayer represents the surface area of the collective cells that constitute the monolayer and Vmonolayer represents the monolayer volume. In the absence of metabolism (i.e., in the presence of EHNA), eq. 2 reduces to the following:
<FR><NU>dC<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></NU><DE>dt</DE></FR> = k<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>(C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB> − f<SUB><UP>unbound</UP></SUB>C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB>) (4)
Likewise, a similar relationship can be derived for the rate of intracellular accumulation of the metabolite F-ddI (C<UP><SUB>monolayer</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP>) in donor solutions containing only F-ddA:
<FR><NU>dC<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></NU><DE>dt</DE></FR> = <FR><NU>V<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB> f<SUB><UP>unbound</UP></SUB> C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>+f<SUB><UP>unbound</UP></SUB>C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></DE></FR> − k<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>C<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB> (5)
The relative contributions of passive diffusion, metabolism, and nonspecific binding to the overall transfer of F-ddA into and out of BBMECs were quantified by simultaneously fitting the combined data sets (n = 7) from uptake experiments using F-ddI and F-ddA, as described below. In all cases, the monolayer uptake and/or efflux of F-ddI was described by eq. 1, whereas the monolayer uptake and metabolism of F-ddA were described by eqs. 2 to 5. Each concentration versus time profile was described by its own differential equation with shared parameter estimates for k<UP><SUB>p</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP>, k<UP><SUB>p</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP>, the metabolism parameters (Vmax and Km), and the apparent unbound fraction of F-ddA (funbound) via nonlinear least-squares regression analysis.

When the intracellular concentrations of F-ddI and F-ddA are at steady state in uptake experiments conducted with F-ddA-containing donor solutions, the total dideoxynucleoside (F-ddA plus F-ddI) intracellular/donor concentration ratio can be obtained by setting eqs. 2 and 5 equal to 0:
<FENCE>C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB> + C<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></FENCE><FENCE>C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>Donor</UP></SUB> = </FENCE> (6)

<FR><NU>V<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB> f<SUB><UP>unbound</UP></SUB> C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></NU><DE>k<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>(K<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB> + f<SUB><UP>unbound</UP></SUB> C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB>)C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB></DE></FR> + <FR><NU>C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></NU><DE>C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB></DE></FR>
where C<UP><SUB>monolayer</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP> can be expressed in terms of C<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP> by solving eq. 2 with dC<UP><SUB>monolayer</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP>/dt = 0:
C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB><UP> =</UP><FR><NU><AR><R><C>k<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB> (C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB><UP> − </UP>K<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>)<UP> − </UP>V<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB></C></R></AR></NU><DE><UP>2</UP>k<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB> f<SUB><UP>unbound</UP></SUB></DE></FR><UP> + </UP> (7)

<FR><NU><RAD><RCD>k<SUP><UP>FddA<SUP>2</SUP></UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>(C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB><UP>+2</UP>K<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>)<UP>−2</UP>k<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>C<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>D</UP></SUB>V<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB><UP>+</UP>k<SUP><UP>FddA<SUP>2</SUP></UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>K<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB><SUP><UP>2</UP></SUP><UP>+2</UP>k<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>K<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB>V<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB><UP>+</UP>V<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB><SUP><UP>2</UP></SUP></RCD></RAD></NU><DE><UP>2</UP>k<SUP><UP>FddA</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>f<SUB><UP>unbound</UP></SUB></DE></FR>
Equation 6 predicts that since the enzymatic conversion of F-ddA to F-ddI is a saturable process, the ratio of total dideoxynucleosides (F-ddA plus F-ddI) intracellular concentration versus F-ddA donor concentration should decrease with increasing F-ddA donor concentration.

In Vivo Simulations of CNS Delivery Based on in Vitro Observations in BBMECs. To assess the significance of various BBB metabolic processes in the CNS availability of F-ddA, the kinetic model illustrated in Fig. 1 provides useful insight. In this simplified model, the initial rate of F-ddA uptake from blood into the brain parenchyma is assumed to be governed by simple passive diffusion (kp) and metabolic clearance within the endothelial cells of the BBB (kmet). Allowing the F-ddA concentration within the BBB to be at steady state and assuming the backflux of F-ddA into the BBB from the brain parenchyma to be negligible (initial uptake region), the fraction of F-ddA leaving the plasma that enters the brain parenchyma intact can be expressed as an availability estimate.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Compartmental diagram illustrating the kinetic determinants of F-ddA and F-ddI entry into the central nervous system (i.e., brain parenchymal tissue) across BBB.

Quantitatively, the CNS availability of F-ddA is defined as the ratio of its rate of appearance in the brain parenchyma (dXbr/dt) to its rate of loss from plasma attributable to passage across the blood-brain barrier, (-dXpl/dt), where the rates of entry into brain and loss from plasma can be expressed in terms of the BBB permeability coefficient (PBBB), BBB surface area (ABBB), Michaelis-Menten kinetic constants (Vmax and Km), and BBB and plasma concentrations (CBBB and Cpl), respectively:
(dX<SUB><UP>br</UP></SUB>/dt) = P<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>A<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>C<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB> (8)

(<UP>−</UP>dX<SUB><UP>pl</UP></SUB>/dt) = P<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>A<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>(C<SUB><UP>pl</UP></SUB> − C<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>) (9)
Assuming steady state within the BBB and sink conditions within the brain parenchyma, the F-ddA concentration within the BBB (CBBB), at any given concentration in the plasma (Cpl), can be estimated via the following relationship:
(dX<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>/dt) = P<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>A<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>C<SUB><UP>pl</UP></SUB> − 2P<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>A<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>C<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB> − V<SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB> <FR><NU>V<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>C<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB> + C<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB></DE></FR> (10)
Inserting values of CBBB into eqs. 8 and 9 and then taking their ratio leads to estimates of CNS availability, as defined in eq. 11:
<UP>CNS availability</UP> = <FR><NU>(dX<SUB><UP>br</UP></SUB>/dt)</NU><DE>−(dX<SUB><UP>pl</UP></SUB>/dt)<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB></DE></FR> = <FR><NU>P<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB></NU><DE>P<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB> + <FR><NU>V<SUB><UP>monolayer</UP></SUB></NU><DE>A<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB></DE></FR><FENCE><FR><NU>V<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB></NU><DE>K<SUB><UP>m</UP></SUB> + C<SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB></DE></FR></FENCE></DE></FR> (11)
To determine whether the bioconversion of F-ddA to F-ddI within the BBB could enhance the concentration of F-ddI in the brain parenchymal tissue (i.e., the classical prodrug effect), the simulated flux of F-ddI into the brain tissue, after F-ddI infusion, was compared with that obtained after an equivalent infusion of F-ddA. In the kinetic model depicted in Fig. 1, the efflux of F-ddI is presumed to be primarily governed by passive diffusion. The flux of F-ddI into the brain (dX<UP><SUB>br</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP>/dt) is assumed to be equivalent to the intracellular efflux and can therefore be expressed in terms of the permeability-area product (P<UP><SUB>BBB</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP> A<UP><SUB>BBB</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP>) and BBB concentration (C<UP><SUB>BBB</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP>):
dX<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>br</UP></SUB>/dt = P<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>A<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>C<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB> (12)
Assuming steady state within the BBB and sink conditions within the brain parenchyma, the F-ddI concentration within the BBB, at any given F-ddI concentration in the plasma (Cpl), can be evaluated by the following relationship by setting dX<UP><SUB>BBB</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP>/dt =0:
<FR><NU>dX<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB></NU><DE>dt</DE></FR>=P<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>A<SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB> (C<SUB>pl</SUB>−2C <SUP><UP>FddI</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>BBB</UP></SUB>) (13)
Inserting values of C<UP><SUB>BBB</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP> into eq. 12 then provides an estimate of F-ddI flux into the brain. In a similar fashion, the flux of F-ddI after an equivalent infusion of F-ddA can be estimated from the kinetic considerations of the model presented in Fig. 1 and the previously derived relationships with their accompanying assumptions.

Statistical and Regression Analysis. Statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed Student's t test for unpaired data. Values were determined to be significantly different at P <=  0.05. Nonlinear least-squares regression analysis was performed using a computer and commercially available software (SCIENTIST; MicroMath, Inc.). The model selection criterion of SCIENTIST, a modification of the Akaike information criterion (Akaike, 1976), was used to select the most appropriate model (highest model selection criterion).



    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Metabolism of F-ddA in BBMEC Homogenate and Extracellular Media. Illustrated in Fig. 2 are the initial rates of F-ddI formation from various concentrations of F-ddA at 37°C in BBMEC homogenates from primary cultures. Michaelis-Menten behavior was observed over the entire range of the F-ddA concentration. The kinetic parameters Km (mean ± S.D.) and Vmax (mean ± S.D.) obtained from the best fits of the initial velocity versus F-ddA concentration data to the Michaelis-Menten equation were 1505 ± 153 µM and 39 ± 1 µM min-1 mg-1 of protein, respectively. The rate of F-ddI formation from F-ddA added to medium after 90 min of exposure of the medium to cell monolayers followed by separation from the cells was ~15% of the rate obtained in the monolayer's presence (data not shown).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Initial rates of F-ddI formation from varying concentrations of F-ddA at 37°C in cellular homogenate obtained from primary cultures of bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells.

Uptake, Efflux, and Metabolism in BBMEC Monolayers. The BBMEC permeability characteristics of F-ddA were assessed in the presence of the potent ADA inhibitor EHNA. An EHNA concentration of 0.7 µM was sufficient to completely suppress the intracellular formation of F-ddI. Profiles of the intracellular uptake of F-ddA, in the presence of EHNA, are displayed in Fig. 3. The solid lines represent computer fits of the individual data sets to eq. 4 (V<UP><SUB>met</SUB><SUP>max</SUP></UP> = 0). The rates of influx and efflux of F-ddA are both rapid and concentration-independent over a >10-fold concentration range. At steady state, the intracellular F-ddA concentrations exceeded the donor concentration by nearly 40%.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Percentage of F-ddA uptake (100 · Cmonolayer/CD) versus time profiles in primary cultures of BBMECs in the presence of EHNA (0.7 µM).

Each point represents an individual monolayer (n = 1) incubated at pH 7 and 37°C in the presence of culture medium containing 0.1 mM F-ddA (black-square), 0.6 mM F-ddA (black-triangle), and 6.3 mM F-ddA (). The single value obtained at 0.1 mM F-ddA (mean ± S.D.) represents duplicate measurements at the respective time point.

In the absence of EHNA, intracellular degradation of F-ddA occurred to form F-ddI. The concentration dependence of F-ddA uptake and F-ddI accumulation in cells incubated in F-ddA containing donor solutions is displayed in Fig. 4. The solid lines represent the best fit when all data sets were fit simultaneously to a model containing simple passive diffusion, metabolism, and nonspecific binding of F-ddA and passive efflux of F-ddI as expressed in eqs. 2 and 5. The parameters generated from these fits are listed in Table 1. Rates of F-ddI uptake and efflux were also determined in separate experiments in the presence of donor concentrations of F-ddI ranging from 0.45 to 4.5 mM (curves not shown). The value of k<UP><SUB>p</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP> generated from regression analyses of the combined data from these experiments is also listed in Table 1. The uptake data obtained at 60 min in the presence of F-ddA-containing donor solutions were used to plot (C<UP><SUB>monolayer</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP> C<UP><SUB>monolayer</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP>)/C<UP><SUB>donor</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP>versus C<UP><SUB>donor</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP> as shown in Fig. 5.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   F-ddA (black-square) and F-ddI (black-triangle) monolayer concentration versus time profiles in primary cultures of BBMECs.

Each point represents an individual monolayer (n = 1) incubated at pH 7.4 and 37°C in the presence of endothelial assay buffer containing 0.3 mM F-ddA (A), 3 mM F-ddA (B), or 9.8 mM F-ddA (C).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 1
Kinetic parameters obtained from nonlinear regression analyses of the concentration versus time data for F-ddA uptake (0.3-10 mM) and F-ddI accumulation in monolayers exposed to F-ddA-containing donor solutions and F-ddI uptake/efflux in monolayers exposed to F-ddI (3 mM)-containing donor solutions

Mean ± S.D. obtained from computer fits of the data.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The intracellular total dideoxynucleoside (F-ddA + F-ddI)/donor F-ddA concentration ratio at steady state versus the donor concentration of F-ddA.

The solid line is the fitted line using eq. 6 and Table 1 parameters.

The concentration-dependent profiles of F-ddI intracellular accumulation in monolayers exposed to donor solutions containing either F-ddA (at 0.3, 3, or 9.8 mM) or F-ddI (3 mM) are highlighted in Fig. 6. Nearly equal intracellular levels of F-ddI were obtained from a 3 mM F-ddI donor concentration or from a 10-fold lower donor concentration of F-ddA (0.3 mM). Identical half-lives (t1/2 = 8 min) for the various fitted curves representing F-ddI accumulation despite a nearly 10-fold change in intracellular concentration of F-ddI reflect the model assumption that k<UP><SUB>p</SUB><SUP>FddI</SUP></UP> is concentration-independent.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   F-ddI monolayer concentration verus time profiles in primary BBMECs.

Each point represents an individual monolayer (n = 1) incubated at pH 7.4 an 37°C in the presence of 0.3 mM F-ddA (), 3 mM F-ddA (black-triangle), 9.8 mM F-ddA (black-square), or 3 mM F-ddI (*).

Kinetic parameters obtained from in vitro monolayer uptake experiments were used in conjunction with eqs. 8 to 11 to conduct in vivo simulations of CNS availability of F-ddA as a function of F-ddA concentration in plasma. The permeability-surface area product [PBBBABBB = (k<UP><SUB>p</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP> Vdmonolayer)/2] was estimated to be 7.9 × 10-4 ml min-1 based on the k<UP><SUB>p</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP> listed in Table 1 and Vdmonolayer, the apparent BBMEC distribution volume in the monolayer (i.e., Vmonolayer/funbound approx  2 × 10-3 ml). A simulation of the CNS availability of F-ddA versus its plasma concentration is shown in Fig. 7.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Simulation of in vivo CNS availability (percentage) versus F-ddA concentration in the plasma.

Figure 8 displays the results of simulations of F-ddA and F-ddI flux into brain parenchyma normalized to the plasma concentration of dideoxynucleoside versus the steady-state plasma concentrations of either F-ddA or F-ddI. As shown in Fig. 8, F-ddA provides ~15-fold higher flux of total dideoxynucleoside into the brain when compared with equivalent infusions of F-ddI. In the lower concentration regions, deamination of F-ddA by ADA located within the BBB reduces brain levels of intact F-ddA but provides nearly 10-fold higher brain concentrations of F-ddI relative to F-ddI controls.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Simulation of in vivo dideoxynucleoside fluxes into brain parenchymal tissue, normalized to steady-state plasma concentration, versus steady-state plasma concentrations after i.v. infusions to steady state.

F-ddI after F-ddI infusion (solid line), F-ddI after F-ddA infusion (short-dashed line), F-ddA after F-ddA infusion (long-dashed line), and total dideoxynucleoside (F-ddI and F-ddA) after F-ddA infusion (medium-dashed line).



    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Role of the BBB in the Enhanced CNS Delivery of ADA-Activated Prodrugs---Evidence from Monolayer Experiments. The brain microvascular endothelial cells of the cerebral microvasculature seem to be enriched in a number of enzymes that may play an important role in governing the entry of many chemicals from the blood into CNS (Pardridge, 1983). In a recent report, we quantified the activity of two key purine-metabolizing enzymes, PNP and ADA, and found their activities to be significantly higher in brain microvascular endothelial cells relative to whole cerebral gray matter (Johnson and Anderson, 1996). As a key enzyme in purine metabolism, adenosine deaminase catalyzes the irreversible hydrolytic deamination of adenosine to produce inosine and ammonia (Zielke and Suelter, 1971). In addition, this enzyme also catalyzes the hydrolysis of many analogs of adenosine altered in either the purine ring or sugar moiety (Chassy and Suhadolnik, 1967; Barchi et al., 1991; Shirasaka et al., 1991; Ford et al., 1995). Previous studies conducted in these laboratories have confirmed that adenosine deaminase-activated prodrugs, such as 6-chloro-2',3'-dideoxypurine and F-ddA significantly enhance the CNS delivery of ddI and F-ddI, respectively, due to higher brain tissue activities of ADA compared with plasma (Morgan et al., 1992; Singhal et al., 1997). However, the site of prodrug activation (i.e., the brain microvascular endothelial cells versus the brain parenchymal tissue) is yet to be determined. The results provided here demonstrate that dideoxynucleoside uptake in the CNS can be enhanced not only through the design of prodrugs that are activated in brain parenchyma, the classical prodrug approach, but also via prodrugs that are activated by enzymes localized within brain microvascular endothelial cells.

Figure 2 confirms previous findings of substantial ADA activity in blood-brain barrier endothelial cells (Johnson and Anderson, 1996). This activity is completely inhibited by EHNA at a donor concentration of 0.7 µM. As shown in Fig. 3, in the absence of metabolism catalyzed by ADA, the F-ddA intracellular concentration versus time profiles are superimposable over a concentration range of 0.1 to 6.3 mM. This observation is highly suggestive of a membrane permeation mechanism that is governed primarily by passive diffusion, as supported by numerous studies indicating that passive diffusion seems to be the major mechanism for membrane transport of ddA and F-ddA (Ahluwalia et al., 1987; Agarwal et al., 1989; Plagemann and Woffendin, 1989; Masood et al., 1990; Domin et al., 1993). The finding that the intracellular concentration of F-ddA at steady state exceeds the donor concentration by approximately 40% was taken as evidence for nonspecific (i.e., nonsaturable) binding to intracellular components and was accounted for in the model equations by the parameter funbound. However, other nonsaturable processes that produced unequal clearances into and out of the cells cannot be ruled out based on these data.

The fitted curves in Figs. 3 to 6 representing parameter values from Table 1 are close to the experimental data, consistent with the model assumptions. The total dideoxynucleoside (F-ddA + F-ddI) intracellular/donor concentration ratio at steady state decreases with increasing donor F-ddA concentration (Fig. 5), consistent with eq. 6. Since the ratio C<UP><SUB>monolayer</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP>/C<UP><SUB>D</SUB><SUP>FddA</SUP></UP> at steady state was nearly the same with the increasing donor concentration in the presence of EHNA (Fig. 3), saturation of ADA at high F-ddA concentrations in the absence of EHNA seems to be the primary factor leading to the reduced ratio of total intracellular/extracellular dideoxynucleoside.

The rate of F-ddI formation in media to which F-ddA was added after the medium was incubated with cell monolayers for 90 min and then removed was ~15% of that obtained in the monolayer's presence. These results suggest that although some conversion of F-ddA to F-ddI occurs in the donor solution after extended exposure to cells, presumably due to ADA that has been released from damaged cells, this rate of hydrolysis is negligible over the time of a typical uptake experiment (30-60 min) and cannot account for the intracellular accumulation of F-ddI.

Figure 6 illustrates the advantage of the prodrug approach for increasing intracellular delivery of F-ddI. The intracellular concentration of F-ddI attained from the incubation of cells with 0.3 mM F-ddA is comparable to that obtained from a 3 mM donor concentration of F-ddI itself. As shown in subsequent computer simulations, higher CNS delivery of F-ddI would also be expected due to conversion of F-ddA by ADA localized within the endothelial cells of the BBB.

In Vivo Simulations of the Role of BBB Bioconversion in Enhancing CNS Delivery. The availability estimates obtained from computer simulations plotted in Fig. 7 predict a wide variety of possible in vivo outcomes. Of particular interest is the very notable effect of BBB metabolism catalyzed by ADA. At low plasma concentrations similar to those explored in vivo (6.4 × 10-5 M) (Singhal et al., 1997), the solid line in Fig. 7 indicates that the percentage of F-ddA arriving intact in brain tissue is approximately 20% of that absorbed across the BBB, a prediction consistent with the low CNS availability of F-ddA observed in vivo in rats. In vivo, the CNS uptake of F-ddA after a 120-min i.v. infusion was low, with only 5% of the plasma concentration of F-ddA present in the brain tissue at steady state (Singhal et al., 1997).

The simulations of F-ddA and F-ddI brain fluxes normalized to the plasma dideoxynucleoside concentration (Fig. 8) also seem to agree remarkably well with in vivo observations (Singhal et al., 1997), suggesting that F-ddA may function in part as a BBB-activated prodrug of F-ddI due to the localization of ADA within the endothelial cells of the BBB. In vivo, Singhal et al. (1997) found that after a 120-min i.v. infusion of F-ddA, the concentration of total dideoxynucleoside (F-ddA and F-ddI) in rat brains was ~8-fold higher when compared with an equivalent infusion of F-ddI. Furthermore, deamination of F-ddA by brain tissue ADA to form F-ddI reduced CNS levels of intact F-ddA but provided higher brain parenchymal (5-fold) ratios of F-ddI relative to F-ddI controls.

In the kinetic model depicted in Figure 1, which served as the basis for the simulations in Figs. 7 and 8, the CNS availability of F-ddA (eq. 11) is determined in large part by the relative contributions of BBB permeability (PBBB) and intracellular conversion catalyzed by ADA. In the absence of ADA-catalyzed metabolism, however, eq. 11 predicts that the CNS availability of F-ddA should be 100%. It is interesting to note that although the brain tissue/plasma concentration ratios of F-ddA in rats pretreated with the ADA inhibitor 2'-deoxycoformycin increased 1.4-fold in comparison to rats infused with only F-ddA (Singhal et al., 1997), this enhanced ratio was still 10-fold lower than that for a nonmetabolizable polar permeant, urea (Morgan et al., 1996). Furthermore, the apparent kout/kin ratios obtained in vivo for both F-ddA and F-ddI (12 and 111, respectively) were nearly 8- and 70-fold greater than that of urea, respectively. These observations suggest that active transport processes that were not evident in the monolayer experiments may also be operative in vivo.

In conclusion, this study has demonstrated the versatility of the monolayer uptake model for probing the relative contributions of biological processes governing prodrug transport and bioconversion. Simulations of brain availability have helped clarify the role of ADA localized within the BBB in the overall efficiency of targeting the ADA-activated prodrug F-ddA to the brain. Consistent with in vivo observations, these simulations, based upon in vitro parameter estimations, have demonstrated that elevated levels of certain enzymes, such as ADA, in the brain microvascular endothelial cells may be exploited in the design of brain-targeted prodrugs or drug-carrier conjugates that undergo brain tissue-selective bioconversion.

    Footnotes

Received August 9, 2001; accepted November 9, 2001.

1 Present address: Whitehall-Robbins Healthcare, Richmond, Virginia.

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI-34133 and NS-39178. Mark Johnson also received support as a recipient of an Advanced Predoctoral Fellowship in Pharmaceutics from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation.

Dr. Bradley D. Anderson, Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, 907 Rose Street, Room 327G, Lexington, KY 40536. E-mail: bande2{at}pop.uky.edu

    Abbreviations

Abbreviations used are: BBB, blood-brain barrier; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; CNS, central nervous system; ddI, 2',3'-dideoxyinosine; ADA, adenosine deaminase; F-ddA, 2'-beta -fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyadenosine; ddA, 2',3'-dideoxyadenosine; F-ddI, 2'-beta -fluoro-2',3'-dideoxyinosine; PNP, purine nucleoside phosphorylase; BBMEC, bovine brain microvascular endothelial cell; EHNA, (+)-erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-2-nonyl)adenine; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography.


    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References


0090-9556/02/3002-191-198
DMD, 30:191-198, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, B. D.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition