![]() |
|
|
Vol. 30, Issue 5, 608-612, May 2002
Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (P.B.D., S.C.N., R.S.S., D.J.B., A.R.B.); and Departments of High-Throughput Biology and Systems Research, GlaxoSmithKline Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (L.B.M., B.J.G.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tamoxifen is a widely utilized antiestrogen in the treatment and
chemoprevention of breast cancer. Clinical studies document that
tamoxifen administration markedly enhances the systemic elimination of
other drugs. Additionally, tamoxifen enhances its own clearance following repeated dosing. The mechanisms that underlie these clinically important events remain unresolved. Here, we report that
tamoxifen and its metabolite 4-hydroxytamoxifen markedly induce
cytochrome P450 3A4, a drug-metabolizing enzyme of central importance, in primary cultures of human hepatocytes. Tamoxifen and
4-hydroxytamoxifen (1-10 µM) significantly increased the CYP3A4 expression and activity (measured as the rate of testosterone 6
-hydroxylation). Maximal induction was achieved at the 5 µM level. At this level, tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen caused a 1.5- to
3.3-fold (mean, 2.1-fold) and 3.4- to 17-fold (mean, 7.5-fold) increase
in the CYP3A4 activity, respectively. In comparison, rifampicin
treatment resulted in a 6- to 16-fold (mean, 10.5-fold) increase. We
also observed corresponding increase in the CYP3A4 immunoreactive
protein and mRNA levels. Furthermore, tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen
efficaciously activated the human pregnane X receptor (hPXR; also known
as the steroid xenobiotic receptor), a key regulator of
CYP3A4 expression. The efficacy of tamoxifen and
4-hydroxytamoxifen relative to rifampicin for hPXR activation was ~30
and 60%, respectively. Our results indicate that the mechanism of
tamoxifen-mediated alteration in drug clearance pathways in humans may
involve CYP3A4 induction by the parent drug and/or its
metabolite. Furthermore, the CYP3A4 induction may be a result of hPXR
activation. These findings have important implications for optimizing
the use of tamoxifen and in the development of newer antiestrogens.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tamoxifen,
a nonsteroidal triphenylethylene, is currently the endocrine
therapeutic agent of choice for all stages of breast cancer. It was
also recently approved for use as a chemopreventive agent in women with
high risk of contracting this disease in the future. Despite its well
documented beneficial effects, tamoxifen use is associated with several
major problems including serious drug-drug interactions. Several
clinical trials indicate that tamoxifen has the propensity to alter the
drug elimination pathway(s), resulting in markedly reduced plasma
levels of coadministered compounds. In this regard, recently completed
clinical trials indicate that tamoxifen reduced the plasma levels of
aromatase inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole by 37 and 27%,
respectively (Dowsett et al., 1999
; ATAC Trialists' Group, 2001
). Such
drug-drug interactions are of special concern with tamoxifen since
numerous women are required to take tamoxifen daily for an extended
time period and as such are likely to be simultaneously exposed to many
drugs and nutraceuticals. Another consequence of tamoxifen-induced changes in drug disposition is that tamoxifen pharmacokinetics exhibit
time-dependent changes. There are marked differences in the single dose
versus steady-state (when multiple doses have been taken)
pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen (Etienne et al., 1989
). The relative
abundance of tamoxifen (as a fraction of the combined levels of
tamoxifen and its metabolites) is lower at steady state compared with
that following single dose. This is accompanied with increased relative
abundance of tamoxifen metabolites at steady state. The extent of
tamoxifen conversion to its metabolites has serious implications for
its efficacy and toxicity since some of its metabolites are potent
antiestrogens whereas some others are implicated as causative in the
process of endometrial carcinogenesis associated with long-term
tamoxifen use (Clarke et al., 2001
). Taken together, these clinical
studies suggest that tamoxifen increases its own systemic clearance as
well as that of other drugs in humans.
The mechanisms that underlie the above-indicated tamoxifen-mediated
changes in drug clearance in humans are poorly understood. In humans,
tamoxifen is extensively metabolized to several active and inactive
products primarily by the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4; a minor role
is played by CYP2B6, CYP2D6, and CYP2C8/9 (Crewe et al., 1997
).
Tamoxifen metabolites include 4-hydroxytamoxifen, which is a potent
antiestrogen (~100-fold more active than tamoxifen). CYP3A4 is a
drug-metabolizing enzyme of central importance since it participates in
the metabolism of numerous xenobiotics. Induction of CYP3A4 activity by
xenobiotics has profound clinical implications. For example, known
P450 inducers such as rifampicin, phenobarbital, dexamethasone,
and hyperforin (the putative active ingredient in St. John's Wort)
enhance the clearance of coadministered drugs, thereby reducing their
efficacy (Pichard et al., 1990
; Moore et al., 2000
; Relling et al.,
2000
). Also, an enzyme inducer may serve as a substrate for the induced
enzyme, stimulating its own metabolism. Such compounds exhibit altered
pharmacokinetics under the conditions of a repeated drug administration
schedule, requiring careful optimization of drug dosing regimens.
Recent studies have identified the human pregnane X receptor (hPXR,
also known as steroid xenobiotic receptor) as a key
transcriptional regulator of the CYP3A4 gene (Bertilsson et
al., 1998
; Blumberg et al., 1998
; Lehmann et al., 1998
). It is
activated by a diverse array of xenobiotics, most notably rifampicin,
phenobarbital, clotrimazole, RU486 (mifepristone), and hyperforin
(Bertilsson et al., 1998
; Blumberg et al., 1998
; Lehmann et al., 1998
;
Jones et al., 2000
). As a heterodimer with the 9-cis
retinoic acid X receptor, hPXR binds its cognate recognition elements
within the 5'-flanking region of the CYP3A4 gene. The
CYP3A4 promoter harbors an everted repeat with a six
nucleotide spacer (ER6) of the AT(G/T)TCA hexad, which serves as a
binding site for hPXR-9-cis retinoic acid X receptor
heterodimers. In transient transfection experiments, heterologous
reporter gene constructs containing multimerized copies of this element
are activated in a hPXR-dependent manner (Goodwin et al., 1999
). In
this study, we show that tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen markedly
induce CYP3A4 activity and expression in primary human hepatocytes.
4-hydroxytamoxifen in particular appears to have induction magnitude
comparable with that of rifampicin. Furthermore, both antiestrogens
efficaciously activated hPXR in cell-based reporter assays.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemicals and Reagents.
Tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, rifampicin, phenobarbital, testosterone,
and 6
-hydroxytestosterone were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St.
Louis, MO).
Hepatocyte Culture and Drug Treatment.
Human hepatocytes, isolated from lobes of liver from five separate
donors, were provided by Dr. Stephen Strom, Department of Pathology,
University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA), under the auspices of the
liver tissue procurement and distribution system (LTPADS). Table
1 summarizes the medical history of the donors and the medications they received prior to organ donation. Hepatocytes were grown in Williams' E medium (BioWhittaker,
Walkersville, MD) as described previously (Kostrubsky et al., 1998
).
For the determination of CYP3A4 activity and immunoreactive protein
levels, hepatocytes were plated in collagen-coated six-well plates
(1 × 106 cells/well). In parallel, cells
were plated in T-25 cm2 flasks for Northern blot
analysis of CYP3A4-specific mRNA. Drug solutions (1000×) were prepared
in DMSO and diluted prior to use. Forty-eight hours after isolation and
plating, hepatocytes were treated with vehicle, which contained the
same amount of DMSO (0.1%), tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (1-10
µM), rifampicin (10 µM), or phenobarbital (2 mM). Previously
reported studies from our laboratory and those of others (Kostrubsky et
al., 1998
; Nallani et al., 2001
) have shown that DMSO at levels twice
as high as those used here do not alter the expression of CYP3A
enzymes. Drug-containing medium was removed 72 h later, and the
cells were then incubated for 30 min in drug-free medium to facilitate
drug elimination. Cells were then washed with buffer and exposed to testosterone-containing (250 µM) medium. The medium was then
collected for HPLC analysis, and the cells processed for protein
isolation.
|
Measurement of CYP3A Activity.
The rate of testosterone conversion to 6
-hydroxytestosterone, a
reaction catalyzed by CYP3A4 (and by CYP3A5), by intact hepatocytes was
used to assess the enzyme activity. 6
-hydroxytestosterone levels
were measured using a HPLC method published previously (Waxman et al.,
1983
).
Immunodetection of CYP3A4 Protein. Protein fractions (3 µg) were resolved employing SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12% acrylamide) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were then blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with Tween 20 (0.1 M, pH 7.4, 0.1% Tween 20) for 45 min and then treated with primary anti-CYP3A4 antibody (Gentest, Woburn, MA), which cross-reacts with CYP3A5, followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody. The protein bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) and quantitated by photodensitometry.
Northern Blot Analysis of CYP3A4 mRNA.
Total cellular RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
CA). A 10-µg aliquot was fractionated by electrophoresis in 1%
agarose gels containing formaldehyde (2.2 M) and transferred onto a
nylon membrane (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Equal loading per lane
was verified by ethidium bromide staining of 18S and 28S rRNA, which
was visualized and photographed under UV illumination. The membranes
were hybridized as described earlier (Church and Gilbert, 1984
) with
CYP3A4 cDNA probe (780-base pair; Oxford Biomedical Research, Inc.,
Oxford, MI) labeled with [
32-P]dCTP
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA) using the random primer method.
Transient Transfection Assays.
Human liver-derived HuH7 cells (20,000 per well) were inoculated into a
96-well plate in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 nutrient
mixture supplemented with 10% charcoal/dextran-treated fetal bovine
serum (Hyclone Laboratories Inc., Logan, UT) and transfected 24 h
later with LipofectAMINE Plus reagent (Invitrogen). Transfection mixes
contained 8 ng of XREM-CYP3A4-luciferase reporter gene construct
(Goodwin et al., 1999
), 2 ng of hPXR expression vector pSG5-ATG-hPXR
(Lehmann et al., 1998
), 8 ng of p
-actin-serum placental alkaline
phosphatase, and 52 ng of pBluescript (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
Transfection was allowed to proceed for 3 h. Cells were maintained
for a further 24 h in the presence of drug in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium/F12 nutrient mixture supplemented with 10%
heat-inactivated, charcoal-stripped, delipidated fetal bovine serum.
Luciferase activities were normalized to serum placental alkaline
phosphatase expression used as a control for transfection efficiency.
Statistical and Data Analysis.
The differences in the CYP3A4 activity, immunoreactive protein content,
and in the hPXR activation between control versus treated groups were
analyzed employing a one-factor analysis of variance, followed by
Tukey's test to compare the mean values at
= 0.05.
| |
Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We first examined the influence of tamoxifen and
4-hydroxytamoxifen on the CYP3A4 activity (6
-hydroxytestosterone
formed per minute per milligram of protein) as well as CYP3A4
immunoprotein and mRNA levels in drug-treated hepatocytes, relative to
the untreated controls. The net increase in the testosterone
6
-hydroxylase activity in the hepatocytes treated with the
antiestrogens and well known CYP3A4 inducers, rifampicin and
phenobarbital, are tabulated in Table 2.
Both tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen significantly (p < 0.05, n = 4) increased
the CYP3A4 activity at concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 µM. The
maximal response was generally observed at antiestrogen levels of 5 µM. At this level, tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen caused a 1.5- to
3.3-fold (mean, 2.1-fold) and 3.4- to 17-fold (mean, 7.5-fold) increase
in the CYP3A4 activity, respectively. The differences in the response
between 5 and 10 µM were not statistically significant
(p > 0.05). In comparison, rifampicin
treatment resulted in a 6- to 16-fold (mean, 10.5-fold) increase. The
effect of the antiestrogens on the amount of CYP3A4-specific
immunoreactive protein and mRNA levels is shown in Fig.
1. The fold increase relative to
untreated control is tabulated in Table 2. In general, a good agreement
was observed between the CYP3A4 activity and immunoreactive protein
levels (R2 = 0.84; plot not shown) and
between the CYP3A4 immunoreactive protein and mRNA levels
(R2 = 0.86; plot not shown).
|
|
It is important to note that CYP3A5 is also capable of metabolizing
testosterone to 6
-hydroxytestosterone and the antibody used for
immunodetection of CYP3A4 cross-reacts with CYP3A5. Generally, however,
the expression of CYP3A5 relative to CYP3A4 is low (except when
expressed polymorphically), and the rate of testosterone
-hydroxylation is much slower for CYP3A4 than CYP3A5 (Wrighton and
Thummel, 2000
). Therefore, it is possible that our assessment of the
activity and expression of CYP3A4 may include a potential, albeit
minor, contribution by CYP3A5.
We next evaluated whether these compounds activated hPXR in HuH7 cells
cotransfected with a hPXR expression vector and a reporter plasmid
containing CYP3A4 proximal promoter region (bases
362 to
+53) linked to the distal XREM region. In parallel transfection experiments, we compared the hPXR activation profiles of the
antiestrogens and rifampicin (Fig. 2).
Tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (5 µM each) were ~30 and 60%,
respectively, as efficacious as rifampicin in hPXR activation.
|
It is apparent from the above results that tamoxifen and
4-hydroxytamoxifen markedly induce CYP3A4, resulting in
significant increase in the enzymatic activity. Here, two observations
are noteworthy. First, the CYP3A4 induction in human hepatocytes by tamoxifen is comparable with other established inducers including hyperforin and paclitaxel (Kostrubsky et al., 1998
; Moore et al., 2000
). Second, the magnitude of CYP3A4 induction by 4-hydroxytamoxifen is comparable with that of rifampicin, one of the most potent CYP3A4
inducers. These results provide important insight into mechanisms by
which tamoxifen administration results in altered drug elimination
pathways in humans. Although previous studies have shown that tamoxifen
induces P450 enzymes in rats (White et al., 1993
), to our knowledge the
influence of tamoxifen on human CYP3A4 expression has not been
reported. In fact, the lack of this information has been indicated as a
significant deficiency in recent publications that documented tamoxifen
interactions with the aromatase inhibitors (Dowsett et al., 1999
; Ingle
et al., 1999
; ATAC Trialists' Group, 2001
). It is well known that the
induction of P450 enzymes is species-specific. For instance, although
rifampicin is a potent P450 inducer in humans, it is a poor inducer of
these enzymes in rodents. In fact, tamoxifen also exhibits interspecies
variability in enzyme induction, and as such, it is not an inducer of
CYP3A enzymes in mice (White et al., 1993
). Therefore, the observations
made in this study regarding tamoxifen-mediated CYP3A4 induction in
human hepatocytes could not have been extrapolated from the animal
studies. Accordingly, this study serves to provide clinically relevant
information. Moreover, our novel finding includes the observation that
4-hydroxytamoxifen is a potent CYP3A inducer.
The extrapolation of data from our in vitro study to the in vivo
situation should be done with a consideration of several factors. At a
typically used tamoxifen regimen (20 mg b.i.d.), the steady-state
tamoxifen plasma concentrations range between 0.1 and 1 µM.
Furthermore, tamoxifen is highly bound to plasma proteins (>90%). In
the case of 4-hydroxytamoxifen, a minor metabolite, the plasma
concentrations are only in the range of 0.01 to 0.1 µM. However, both
these compounds are highly lipophilic with extensive tissue
distribution. The apparent distribution volume of tamoxifen is about 50 to 60 l/kg, which indicates that most of the administered drug (99.9%)
is present in peripheral compartments (Lien et al., 1989
). In humans,
the liver uptake is particularly high with the hepatic levels of these
compounds being ~60-fold higher than that in serum (Lien et al.,
1991
). This suggests that tamoxifen has much higher affinity for
hepatic tissue than for the plasma proteins. Given that the equilibrium
of drug binding to plasma proteins and tissues is dynamic in nature for
drugs with high partitioning into lipids, the overall process favors
tissue binding and accumulation. Therefore, it is conceivable that the
intrahepatocyte tamoxifen levels achieved in vivo may be in the range
used in our study. Also, since the tamoxifen elimination half-life in
humans is extremely long (~7 days), the relative fluctuations between
peak and trough levels during steady state is minimal. An important
point to consider here is that tamoxifen is required to be taken
continuously for many years. Therefore, in vivo exposure of hepatocytes
to tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen occurs for an extremely long time
period. As such, it is likely that tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen may induce CYP3A4 at concentrations lower than those used here. Finally, it
is noteworthy that frequently 40-mg b.i.d. doses of tamoxifen are used
and clinical trials employing high doses of tamoxifen (120 mg/m2 b.i.d.) for the treatment of brain tumor
are also in progress (Ducharme et al., 1997
). In these studies, the
plasma tamoxifen levels ranged from ~1 to 8 µM.
Tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen are well known mixed antagonists or
partial agonists of estrogen receptors, which are complex ligand-induced transcriptional factors belonging to the hormone nuclear
receptor superfamily. In this study, we show that these agents also
interact with hPXR (NR1I2), a recently cloned member of this family
(Bertilsson et al., 1998
; Blumberg et al., 1998
). We used cell-based
reporter assays to demonstrate that antiestrogens activate hPXR. In
general, there was good agreement between the CYP3A4 induction and hPXR
activation, which suggests that CYP3A4 induction may be a result of
hPXR activation by the antiestrogens. Further studies are in progress
to assess whether the antiestrogens are bona fide ligands for hPXR. In
addition to hPXR, other nuclear receptors such as the constitutive
androstane receptor (NR1I3) may also play a role in CYP3A4
regulation (Xie et al., 2000
). The identification of hPXR and/or other
receptors as key transcriptional regulators of CYP3A4
expression by tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen has important
implications for the development of newer antiestrogens. High-throughput screening methods based on nuclear receptor binding and
activation can be utilized to evaluate the potential of a range of
investigational compounds to induce CYP3A4. These methods are likely to accelerate the development of antiestrogens, which is a
global priority since these compounds target a myriad of female-specific diseases, including breast cancer.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received January 2, 2002; accepted February 7, 2002.
Supported by a grant from the American Cancer Society (Ohio Division), Women's Health Program, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, the National Institutes of Health (DK53452), and the American Institute for Cancer Research.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Pankaj B. Desai, Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 3223 Eden Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0004. E-mail: Pankaj.desai{at}uc.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
Abbreviations used are: P450, cytochrome P450; hPXR, human pregnane X receptor; XREM, xenobiotic response element module; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; HuH7, human hepatocellular carcinoma; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. M. Tompkins, T. L. Sit, and A. D. Wallace Unique Transcription Start Sites and Distinct Promoter Regions Differentiate the Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) Isoforms PXR 1 and PXR 2 Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 923 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Sane, D. J. Buckley, A. R. Buckley, S. C. Nallani, and P. B. Desai Role of Human Pregnane X Receptor in Tamoxifen- and 4-Hydroxytamoxifen-Mediated CYP3A4 Induction in Primary Human Hepatocytes and LS174T Cells Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 946 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Callaghan, E. Crowley, S. Potter, and I. D. Kerr P-glycoprotein: So Many Ways to Turn It On J. Clin. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 48(3): 365 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-S. Lim, H. Ju Lee, K. Seok Lee, E. Sook Lee, I.-J. Jang, and J. Ro Clinical Implications of CYP2D6 Genotypes Predictive of Tamoxifen Pharmacokinetics in Metastatic Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3837 - 3845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-L. Low, A. M. Dunning, M. Dowsett, E. Folkerd, D. Doody, J. Taylor, A. Bhaniani, R. Luben, K.-T. Khaw, N. J. Wareham, et al. Phytoestrogen Exposure Is Associated with Circulating Sex Hormone Levels in Postmenopausal Women and Interact with ESR1 and NR1I2 Gene Variants Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 1009 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ekins, S. Andreyev, A. Ryabov, E. Kirillov, E. A. Rakhmatulin, S. Sorokina, A. Bugrim, and T. Nikolskaya A COMBINED APPROACH TO DRUG METABOLISM AND TOXICITY ASSESSMENT Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2006; 34(3): 495 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Miki, T. Suzuki, K. Kitada, N. Yabuki, R. Shibuya, T. Moriya, T. Ishida, N. Ohuchi, B. Blumberg, and H. Sasano Expression of the Steroid and Xenobiotic Receptor and Its Possible Target Gene, Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide-A, in Human Breast Carcinoma Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 535 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Orans, D. G. Teotico, and M. R. Redinbo The Nuclear Xenobiotic Receptor Pregnane X Receptor: Recent Insights and New Challenges Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 19(12): 2891 - 2900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Katoh, T. Matsui, M. Nakajima, C. Tateno, Y. Soeno, T. Horie, K. Iwasaki, K. Yoshizato, and T. Yokoi IN VIVO INDUCTION OF HUMAN CYTOCHROME P450 ENZYMES EXPRESSED IN CHIMERIC MICE WITH HUMANIZED LIVER Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2005; 33(6): 754 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ekins, E. Kirillov, E. A. Rakhmatulin, and T. Nikolskaya A NOVEL METHOD FOR VISUALIZING NUCLEAR HORMONE RECEPTOR NETWORKS RELEVANT TO DRUG METABOLISM Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2005; 33(3): 474 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hariparsad, S. C. Nallani, R. S. Sane, D. J. Buckley, A. R. Buckley, and P. B. Desai Induction of CYP3A4 by Efavirenz in Primary Human Hepatocytes: Comparison With Rifampin and Phenobarbital J. Clin. Pharmacol., November 1, 2004; 44(11): 1273 - 1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.E. Heres-Pulido, I. Duenas-Garcia, L. Castaneda-Partida, A. Sanchez-Garcia, M. Contreras-Sousa, A. Duran-Diaz, and U. Graf Genotoxicity of tamoxifen citrate and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster Mutagenesis, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 187 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Kisanga, J. Gjerde, A. Guerrieri-Gonzaga, F. Pigatto, A. Pesci-Feltri, C. Robertson, D. Serrano, G. Pelosi, A. Decensi, and E. A. Lien Tamoxifen and Metabolite Concentrations in Serum and Breast Cancer Tissue during Three Dose Regimens in a Randomized Preoperative Trial Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 10(7): 2336 - 2343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lai, D. C. Harnish, and M. J. Evans Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Regulates Expression of the Orphan Receptor Small Heterodimer Partner J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 36418 - 36429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Kliewer, B. Goodwin, and T. M. Willson The Nuclear Pregnane X Receptor: A Key Regulator of Xenobiotic Metabolism Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2002; 23(5): 687 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Raucy, L. Warfe, M.-F. Yueh, and S. W. Allen A Cell-Based Reporter Gene Assay for Determining Induction of CYP3A4 in a High-Volume System J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2002; 303(1): 412 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||