![]() |
|
|
Vol. 30, Issue 6, 626-630, June 2002
Unité Mixte de Recherche, Institut National de La Recherche Agronomique de Physiopathologie et Toxicologie Expérimentales, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, France (C.M.L., P.-L.T., A.B.-M.); and Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Station de Pharmacologie et Toxicologie, France (M.A.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The transepithelial intestinal elimination of ivermectin was studied using the intestinal closed-loop model in the rat. The common bile duct was cannulated, and duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were isolated in situ with their intact blood supplies. Following administration of 100, 200, or 400 µg/kg b.wt. ivermectin via the carotid artery, the elimination of parent ivermectin into the small intestinal lumen over 90 min was approximately 5-fold higher than in bile. The major amount of secreted ivermectin was recovered in the jejunum, but the duodenum showed a higher intestinal elimination capacity than the other intestinal segments with respect to the intestinal length. Systemic coadministration of the P-glycoprotein blocker verapamil significantly reduced the elimination capacity of jejunum by 50%, which resulted in a 30% decrease of ivermectin overall elimination by the small intestine. In contrast, verapamil did not significantly affect ivermectin secretion in duodenum, ileum, or bile in the same animals. Ivermectin small intestinal and biliary clearances were estimated to account for 27 and 5.5% of the total drug clearance, which was evaluated from a parallel in vivo experiment in which rats were given 200 µg/kg b.wt. ivermectin intra-arterially. In conclusion, intestinal secretion plays a greater role than biliary secretion in the overall elimination of ivermectin in the rat, providing major amounts of active drug to the intestinal lumen and to feces. This is discussed in terms of therapeutic efficacy against intestinal parasites in humans and animals and of ecotoxicity resulting from the contamination of livestock dung with parent drug.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ivermectin is an
anthelmintic of unprecedented efficacy, currently used worldwide to
treat and control various parasitic diseases in human and veterinary
medicine. It has become the drug of choice in the treatment of a major
public disease, human onchocerciasis, and is administered to more than
18 million people each year (Burkhart, 2000
). Ivermectin is extensively
eliminated by the fecal route as parent drug and metabolites,
regardless of the species and of the route of administration, with less
than 2% excreted in the urine (Campbell, 1985
). As the biliary
concentration of ivermectin is substantially higher than that in plasma
(Bogan and McKellar, 1988
; Lifschitz et al., 2000
), it has been assumed
that biliary secretion was the major pathway of elimination of the
parent drug. The study of Hennessy et al. (2000)
, performed in sheep
with the structural analog doramectin, supported this hypothesis.
However, absolute amounts of biliary secreted ivermectin have never
been determined in human or animal species. In addition, recent
findings have shown that ivermectin was a substrate for some intestinal efflux transporters, which points toward the possible existence of
another elimination pathway, e.g., the intestinal secretion of drug
from blood into the intestinal lumen.
P-gp1 is a plasma membrane protein, which is able
to pump a broad range of structurally and functionally unrelated
compounds out of the cell in an energy-dependent manner (reviewed by
Sharom, 1997
). First identified as a factor for multidrug resistance in mammalian tumor cells (Juliano and Ling, 1976
), P-gp has been discovered to be physiologically expressed in a number of tissues including the liver, intestines, and blood-brain barrier (Thiebaut et
al., 1987
; Cordon-Cardo et al., 1989
). The strategic distribution of
P-gp on the biliary canalicular membrane of hepatocytes and on the
apical side of enterocytes provides a mechanistic support for both the
biliary and the intestinal secretion of xenobiotics (Hunter and Hirst,
1997
; Smit et al., 1998
; Van Asperen et al., 1998
).
Ivermectin was shown to be actively excreted in vitro by
multidrug-resistant tumor cells (Pouliot et al., 1997
) and by cells transfected by the gene coding for P-gp in human or in mouse, MDR1 and mdr1a, respectively (Schinkel et al.,
1995
; Smith et al., 2000
). In vivo, the kinetic disposition of
ivermectin was modified in mice lacking their P-gp I function (Schinkel
et al., 1994
; Lankas et al., 1997
; Kwei et al., 1999
), with a markedly increased accumulation in brain tissue and signs of neurotoxicity. In
the intestines, P-gps constitute a barrier against the absorption of
orally administered ivermectin (Kwei et al., 1999
), but their role in
ivermectin elimination was never documented.
The purpose of the current study was to investigate in vivo the
existence, and the extent, of a nonbiliary intestinal elimination pathway with direct secretion of ivermectin from systemic blood through
the gut wall. The involvement of P-gp in ivermectin elimination was
assessed by coadministration of verapamil, a prototypic P-gp substrate
and inhibitor (Ford and Hait, 1990
), which was already shown to affect
the in vivo disposition of ivermectin in the rat following topical
application (Alvinerie et al., 1999
).
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. Ivermectin (IVOMEC; injectable ovin) was purchased from Merial (Lyon, France). Verapamil hydrochloride was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Quentin Fallavier, France), and [14C]inulin (62.5 µCi/ml) was obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA). All other chemicals used were of the highest grade available.
Animals. Male Wistar rats (Iffa Credo, L'Arbresle, France) weighing 323 ± 30 g were used in the experiments. All the investigations were performed in accordance with the European regulations for the use of laboratory animals.
Pilot Experiments (Open-Perfusion Model).
Two rats were prepared as described below for the closed-loop model
(Trial 1), but the intestinal elimination was investigated from a 20-cm
jejunal loop only, following systemic administration with 200 or 400 µg/kg b.wt. ivermectin. The jejunal segment was isolated 2 cm distal
to the ligament of Treitz and perfused continuously with thermostated
saline at the constant flow rate of 0.6 ml/min determined as optimal by
Savina et al. (1981)
. A catheter was placed at the distal end of the
segment, allowing serial recuperation of intestinal perfusates into
tubes at 8-min intervals, up to 184 min. The rats were sacrificed at
the end of the experiments. The 20-cm segment was excised, opened
lengthwise, and the residual content was scraped. Acetonitrile was
added to the perfusate samples to achieve an acetonitrile/water 4:5 v/v
mixture, and all samples were stored at
20°C until analysis.
Trial 1 (Intestinal Closed-Loop Model).
After an overnight fast with free access to water, animals were
anesthetized by i.p. administration of 1.5 g/kg b.wt. urethane and 40 mg/kg b.wt.
-chloralose. Rats were tracheotomized for a facilitated
respiration under anesthesia and placed under a heating lamp. The left
carotid artery was cannulated with a polyethylene tube (i.d., 0.58 mm)
and perfused using an electric syringe with thermostated (37°C)
saline at the constant flow rate of 1 ml/h. A midline abdominal
incision was made, and a polyethylene tube (i.d., 0.3 mm) was inserted
into the common bile duct, near the hilum of the liver, for bile
collection. The segments of the small intestine were exposed in situ
with their blood supply intact. A polyethylene catheter (25 × 0.9 mm; BD Biosciences, Meylan, France) was placed at the proximal end of
the duodeno-jejunum (starting from the pylorus and ending 30 cm above
the ileocecal junction), and the intestinal contents were washed out by
perfusing thermostated (37°C) saline for 20 min at the constant rate
of 0.6 ml/min. A small incision was made at the distal end of the duodeno-jejunum to allow collection of intestinal contents and effluents. Five minutes before the end of intestinal perfusion, the
segment was gently ligated at its distal end and filled with perfusion
liquid. The proximal end of the segment was ligated, and one additional
ligature was placed 1 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz to separate
the duodenum from the jejunum. The two segments were carefully returned
to the abdominal cavity. The ileal segment (30 cm) was prepared
following the same procedure. Care was taken not to interrupt the
normal blood supply of the segments during their preparation. The
abdominal cavity was then covered with a compress soaked with saline to
prevent heat loss and evaporation. The perfusion of the carotid artery
with saline was interrupted, and ivermectin was injected rapidly (1 min) via the catheter at the dose of 100, 200, or 400 µg/kg b.wt.
(ivermectin was diluted in polyethylene glycol 400 to fit low dose
rates). Saline was perfused again during 90 min.
20°C until analysis. Five to six
rats were used to test each dose level of ivermectin in the
noncompetition experiments, and seven rats were used in the competition experiments.
Another group of animals (n = 8) was taken for an
accurate estimation of the area under the plasma concentration-time
curve between 0 and 90 min postadministration. Rats were anesthetized as described above, but no other surgical procedure was performed. Blood was sampled at 2, 5, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after i.a.
administration of 200 µg/kg b.wt. ivermectin.
Validation of the Study Model of Intestinal Elimination. To determine the extent of nonspecific paracellular transport, three rats were prepared as described for the closed-loop model. They were injected with 9 µCi of [14C]inulin via the carotid artery. At 90 min postadministration, the intestinal content was collected from duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, and radioactivity was measured in a beta scintillation counter (Kontron Beta V, Montigny Le Bretonneux, France).
Trial 2: Determination of Ivermectin Total (Plasma) Clearance. Forty-two rats were used to evaluate ivermectin total clearance. Rapid anesthesia was achieved by i.p. injection of 87 mg/kg b.wt. xylazine and 13 mg/kg b.wt. ketamine. The left carotid artery was cannulated, and ivermectin was injected via the catheter at the dose of 200 µg/kg b.wt.. The rats began to recover 30 min after the beginning of anesthesia. At 2, 5, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min, 4, 8, and 24 h, and 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, and 18 days postadministration, two to three rats were taken for terminal blood sampling performed by cardiac puncture under anesthesia (xylazine and ketamine, i.p.).
Analytical Assay.
Ivermectin was analyzed using a high-performance liquid
chromatography method with automated solid phase extraction and
fluorescence detection, as previously described by Alvinerie et al.
(1987)
. Minor modifications were made to fit analysis of low plasma and bile volumes (extraction of 100 µl of plasma or bile).
Pharmacokinetic and Statistical Analysis.
The plasma concentrations were fitted using nonlinear regression
analysis (SYSTAT 8.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The areas under the mean
plasma concentration-time curve, AUC
(0-tlast) (from 0 to the last
quantifiable sample) and AUC (0-90) (from 0 to 90 min), were
calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Ivermectin total clearance was
obtained by dividing the administered dose (200 µg/kg) by AUC
(0-tlast). Biliary and intestinal
clearances were computed as the ratio of the total amount of drug
(H2B1a) eliminated within 90 min into bile and in
the small intestinal lumen, respectively, divided by the corresponding
plasma AUC (0-90) obtained in Trial 1. The mean residence time (MRT),
the plasma terminal half-life
(t1/2
z), and the steady-state
volume of distribution (Vss) were
calculated according to the classical pharmacokinetic equations
associated with noncompartmental analysis (Gibaldi and Perrier, 1982
).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Validation of the Study Model. Less than 0.1% of the administered radioactivity was detected in any of the intestinal segments of rats receiving labeled inulin, indicating that the integrity of intestinal epithelium was preserved under the described experimental conditions.
Pilot Experiments (Open-Perfusion Model). The perfusion of the 20-cm jejunal segment with saline resulted in low basal concentrations of parent ivermectin in most perfusate samples. However, very high concentrations of parent ivermectin were observed in intestinal effluents each time some intestinal mucus had leaked accidentally via the distal catheter into the sample. These results indicate that ivermectin was largely associated with mucus. Following systemic administration of 200 and 400 µg/kg ivermectin, 111 and 163 ng of ivermectin were eliminated unchanged from the 20-cm loop, respectively. About 65 and 74% of these amounts were obtained from perfusate samples, and 35 and 26% by collection of residual mucus in the lumen of the loop.
Trial 1 (Closed-Loop Model). At the end of the 90-min experiments, the contents of the closed intestinal loops consisted almost exclusively of mucus containing high amounts of ivermectin as parent drug. The total amount of ivermectin recovered in the small intestinal lumen exceeded systematically (from 3.2 to 8.8 times) that eliminated in bile over the same 90-min period in the same animal (Table 1). The ratio of intestinal to biliary elimination did not show any significant difference between the tested doses (Table 1). The cumulative amount of ivermectin excreted into bile and in the small intestinal lumen within 90 min following i.a. administration of ivermectin accounted for approximately 1% of the administered dose, independently of the dose level. The bile flow rate was homogenous among the rats and equal to 0.84 ± 0.13 ml/h.
|
|
|
Trial 2.
The plasma data were best fitted with a triexponential
concentration-time curve (Fig. 3). The
values of AUC (0-tlast) and AUC
(0-90) were 2233 and 355 ng · h/ml, respectively. The MRT, t1/2
z, and
Vss were 1.09 days, 2.51 days, and
2.34 l/kg, respectively. Ivermectin total clearance was found to be
equal to 2.15 l/day/kg. Trial 2 was referred to as an in vivo
situation, considering that xylazine and ketamine produced a
short-duration surgical anesthesia with moderate side effects.
|
-chloralose, albeit required by the model, most likely influenced the plasma disposition of ivermectin. This was taken into account for
the assessment of ivermectin total (plasma) clearance in the rats used
in Trial 1. Assuming the homogeneity of the rats used in Trials 1 and
2, the total plasma clearance of ivermectin in Trial 1 (in situ) was
estimated from that obtained in Trial 2 (in vivo) corrected by the
ratio of the AUCs (0-90), e.g., 1.02 l/day/kg. It results that the
small intestinal clearance of ivermectin accounted for 27% of the
corrected total (plasma) clearance versus 5.5% for the biliary clearance.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At all three different ivermectin dose rates, the amount of parent
ivermectin eliminated in the small intestinal lumen was 5 times higher
than in bile. Since conjugates of parent ivermectin have never been
detected in bile, this study clearly demonstrates that the major route
for the elimination of parent ivermectin in the rat intestine is not
biliary but intestinal secretion. Such a difference between intestinal
and biliary elimination has been already observed for other drugs such
as roxithromycin (Arimori et al., 1998
), ciprofloxacin (Dautrey et al.,
1999
), and vinblastine (Van Asperen et al., 2000
).
The open-perfusion model is commonly used to study the intestinal
secretion of drugs as it enables measurement of an overall intestinal
elimination by keeping the reabsorption phenomenon negligible (Dautrey
et al., 1999
). The use of this model was, however, not desirable in the
present study given the extensive binding of ivermectin to intestinal
mucus. Indeed, the random leakage of mucus in perfusate samples
observed in pilot experiments impairs a reliable and reproducible
quantification of the drug intestinal elimination. Consequently, we
used the alternative closed-loop model, of which the advantage was to
extend the investigation from 20-cm loops (open-perfusion model) to the
totality of the small intestine, allowing thereby a more reliable
prediction of the in vivo state. The resulting drawback was, however, a
possible reabsorption into blood of the ivermectin secreted in the
intestinal lumen and thus the measurement of the net intestinal
elimination of drug compared with the overall biliary secretion. It is
therefore possible that the intestine-to-bile elimination ratio might
be slightly underestimated.
On the other hand, it cannot be excluded that the gentle scraping procedure for collection of intestinal contents resulted in a slight overestimation of ivermectin intestinal elimination. This procedure was necessary to ensure collection of the totality of the mucus present in the lumen as it is known to be partly bound to the glycocalyx layer of enterocytes. However, this technique implies that some intestinal mucosa tissue might be scraped as well. In pilot experiments (open-perfusion model), up to 74% of the drug eliminated by a 20-cm loop was already obtained from perfusate samples and not by scraping. Thus, even if the contribution of intestinal mucosa tissue to the total collection of ivermectin cannot be excluded, this would not affect the conclusions of the study. The experiments were terminated 90 min after ivermectin administration, before a deterioration of animal condition and depletion of bile salts could have been able to affect the bile flow and thus the extent of ivermectin elimination in bile.
Compared with the other intestinal segments, the jejunum provided the
major source of parent ivermectin regardless of the administered dose.
However, the intestinal elimination capacity (expressed per unit of
intestinal length) appeared to decrease gradually from
proximal-to-distal small intestine, with maximal values in the
duodenum. Regional differences could possibly be attributed to
differences in passive diffusion, expression levels of efflux
transporters, or carrier affinity (Makhey et al., 1998
), but other
factors should be considered as well in interpretation of data such as
a different proportion of villi in the intestinal segments (Olivier et
al., 1998
). Data were expressed per unit of intestinal length and not
of intestinal area, since the loop diameter along the segments was too
variable to be properly assessed.
In duodenum and jejunum, increasing the dose from 200 to 400 µg/kg
did not result in a significantly higher absolute elimination of
ivermectin, which is consistent with the involvement of an active
(saturable) transport mechanism. As the P-gp substrate and inhibitor
verapamil significantly inhibited the elimination of ivermectin into
the jejunum by 50%, the involvement of a P-gp carrier-mediated process
in the jejunum can be assumed. In contrast, neither the i.a. perfusion
of verapamil nor an i.a. bolus administration of 5 mg/kg verapamil
(data not shown) could significantly affect ivermectin elimination in
bile, duodenum, or ileum in the same animals. It is likely that, at the
applied low (nontoxic) dosages, verapamil did not completely block the
P-gp function. However, these results also suggest that other efflux
mechanisms might play a significant role in the secretion process. This
would be in agreement with the observations of Kwei et al. (1999)
who
systemically administered 200 µg/kg b.wt. ivermectin to
mdr1a-P-gp-deficient mice with a noncannulated gallbladder and reported
only a partial 30% reduction (from 3.4 to 2.4% of the administered
dose) of the cumulative ivermectin excreted in bile plus intestinal
contents compared with wild-type mice. Additional in vitro or ex vivo
studies should clarify the potential role of P-gp and/or other carriers without the drawbacks related to the use of P-gp inhibitors in vivo and
highlight the differences between intestinal segments.
Finally, qualitative analysis of chromatograms indicated the ability of the intestinal epithelium to excrete ivermectin-derived metabolites (data not shown). As for the parent drug, this should be further investigated in vitro.
Biliary and small intestinal clearances of ivermectin were found to
account for 5.5 and 27% of ivermectin total (plasma) clearance, respectively. Intestinal clearance was calculated solely from the small
intestine, but other regions of the digestive tract may participate as
well in the elimination process. Ivermectin elimination by distal parts
of the digestive tract has never been investigated thus far, but colon
has been reported to display high levels of P-gp expression (Thiebaut
et al., 1987
) and therefore could provide a significant contribution to
the absolute intestinal elimination of ivermectin as for other
xenobiotics (Mayer et al., 1996
; Ramon et al., 1996
; Makhey et al.,
1998
; Van Asperen et al., 2000
). Besides these considerations, our
findings suggest an important metabolism of ivermectin in rat. The
proportion of metabolites in fecal drug residues has never been
documented in rat following systemic administration but is known to
represent approximately 60 and 70% in cattle and swine,
respectively (Halley et al., 1989
), which would be consistent with our results.
Our study suggests the existence of an intestinal route of elimination
of ivermectin in human and in target animal species. The observations
reported in cattle by Bogan and McKellar (1988)
support this
hypothesis. Following subcutaneous administration, ivermectin was found
at rather high concentrations in small intestinal mucus with no
significant difference between mucus distal and proximal to the bile
duct opening. Furthermore, ileal fluid showed three times higher
concentrations of ivermectin than in intestinal fluids sampled proximal
to the bile duct. In contrast, following systemic administration with
the structural analog doramectin to sheep, Hennessy et al. (2000)
recovered 130% of the administered dose in bile. This would imply that
bile was the major elimination pathway, which is difficult to
conciliate with our results apart from interspecies differences.
The characterization of an intestinal elimination pathway in human and
target animal species would be of therapeutic significance. Not all
parasites feed on plasma, and the compartmental distribution of drugs
out of the plasma in secondary compartments (bile, intestinal secretions) needs to be taken into consideration to discuss and optimize the efficacy of antiparasitic drugs. It has been suggested that ivermectin could be available to parasites in intestinal mucus
(Bogan and McKellar, 1988
). Consequently, an extensive elimination of
ivermectin along the digestive tract following systemic absorption or
parenteral administration would provide high concentrations of drug at
the site of action. It is also possible that the mucus functions as a
reservoir for exchange of drug into intestinal fluid.
Besides clinical considerations, it is noteworthy that a large part of
the ivermectin excreted in cattle dung (38% of the dose after systemic
administration; Laffont et al., 2001
) may arise from intestinal
secretion. The presence of parent (active) ivermectin in feces can have
deleterious effects on nontarget organisms such as some dung-degrading
and dung-breeding insects (Wall and Strong, 1987
; Sommer et al., 1993
).
Although the issue of environmental impact of ivermectin used in large
scale in cattle is still under debate, our study provides new
directions into the pharmacokinetic behavior of endectocides to reduce
the fecal excretion of parent drug. The therapeutically desirable
intestinal secretion should be then evaluated against the undesirable
exposure of the environment with feces containing ivermectin.
In conclusion, we have provided evidence that the major route for the elimination of parent ivermectin in the rat intestine is not biliary but intestinal secretion, which enforces the role of the intestines in the elimination of xenobiotics. In vitro studies are now underway to clarify the mechanisms involved in ivermectin intestinal elimination. A better understanding of these mechanisms is of interest for the further development of endectocides to optimize their safety and efficacy.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Pr. Johanna Fink-Gremmels for carefully reading the manuscript and fruitful discussion.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 25, 2001; accepted February 13, 2002.
Address correspondence to: Alain Bousquet-Mélou, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Institut National de La Recherche Agronomique de Physiopathologie et Toxicologie Expérimentales, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 Chemin des Capelles, 31076 Toulouse cedex 03 France. E-mail: a.bousquet-melou{at}envt.fr
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
Abbreviations used are: P-gp(s), P-glycoprotein(s); AUC, area under the curve.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Ballent, A. Lifschitz, G. Virkel, J. Sallovitz, and C. Lanusse MODULATION OF THE P-GLYCOPROTEIN-MEDIATED INTESTINAL SECRETION OF IVERMECTIN: IN VITRO AND IN VIVO ASSESSMENTS Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2006; 34(3): 457 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Morck, H. Hakk, U. Orn, and E. K. Wehler DECABROMODIPHENYL ETHER IN THE RAT: ABSORPTION, DISTRIBUTION, METABOLISM, AND EXCRETION Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2003; 31(7): 900 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||