DMD Large equally mixed donor pool

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


0090-9556/03/3111-1279-1282$20.00
DMD 31:1279-1282, 2003

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joiakim, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiners, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joiakim, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiners, J. J., Jr.
SHORT COMMUNICATION

THE JUN N-TERMINAL KINASE INHIBITOR SP600125 IS A LIGAND AND ANTAGONIST OF THE ARYL HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR

(Received March 7, 2003; Accepted July 18, 2003)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Exposure of the immortalized human breast epithelial cell line MCF10A to the Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) inhibitor anthra[1,9-cd]pyrazol-6(2H)-one (SP600125) suppressed, in a concentration-dependent manner (IC50 ~2 µM), the induction of CYP1A1 by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Cotreatment with SP600125 also suppressed the accumulation of TCDD-induced nuclear aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-DNA complexes, as assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Concentrations of SP600125 <= 50 µM did not transform the AhR into a DNA-binding species when added to rat liver cytosol. However, addition of SP600125 to cytosol just before TCDD addition completely suppressed AhR transformation and DNA binding (IC50 ~7 µM). Sucrose gradient analyses using rat liver and murine hepatoma 1c1c7 extracts demonstrated that SP600125 competed with TCDD for binding to the AhR. These results suggest that SP600125 is an AhR ligand and functions as an AhR antagonist at concentrations used to pharmacologically inhibit JNK.


The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is a ligand-activated transcription factor. In its nonligand-bound form it is primarily found in the cytoplasm complexed with 90-kDa heat shock protein (hsp90), ARA9/Ah receptor-interacting protein/X-associated protein 2 and a 23-kDa cochaperone protein (Ma and Whitlock, 1997Go; Carver et al., 1998Go; Kazlauskas et al., 1999Go). Upon ligand binding, the AhR1 complex undergoes a conformational change resulting in translocation to the nucleus, complex dissociation, and subsequent AhR heterodimerization with ARNT (Heid et al., 2000Go). The resulting AhR/ARNT complexes, in conjunction with other coactivating or corepressing proteins, interact with enhancer sequences in target genes designated dioxin-responsive elements (DREs), and either stimulate (Hankinson, 1995Go; Schmidt and Bradfield, 1996Go) or suppress (Dong et al., 1997Go; Sulentic et al., 2000Go) target gene transcription. To date, several genes involved in phase I metabolism (e.g., CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1) and phase II metabolism (e.g., NQO1 and ALDH4) have been shown to contain functional DRE sequences in their promoter regions and are transcriptionally activated by a variety of AhR agonists (Schmidt and Bradfield,1996Go).

Numerous chemicals are AhR ligands (Denison et al., 2002Go). In general, all share the structural features of being small, aromatic, and planar. However, they can differ markedly in how they affect AhR function. Ligands such as ß-naphthoflavone and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) function as agonists and are potent activators of the AhR (Gasiewicz et al., 1996Go). Conversely, the flavonoid-related molecules LY294002 and 3'-methoxy-4-nitroflavone function as antagonists due to their ability to inhibit activation of the AhR (Henry et al., 1999Go; Guo et al., 2000Go). In some cases, the agonist versus antagonist function of an AhR ligand varies with its concentration. For example, at the lower end of the concentration range at which they bind to the AhR, both {alpha}-naphthoflavone and PD98059 function as AhR antagonists. At higher concentrations they function as agonists (Wilhelmsson et al., 1994Go; Reiners et al., 1998Go, 1999Go).

The anthrapyrazolone SP600125 has been reported to be a potent and selective inhibitor of JNK1, -2, and -3 (Bennett et al., 2001Go). Because of its specificity and effectiveness in both cultured cells and whole animals, SP600125 has become the pharmacological inhibitor of choice for assessing the role of JNKs in mediating biological processes (Bennett et al., 2001Go; Brint et al., 2002Go; Gee et al., 2002Go; Reuther-Madrid et al., 2002Go; Zhang et al., 2002Go). The current study was prompted by our observation that the induction of CYP1A1 by the AhR agonist TCDD in human breast MCF10A-Neo cells was suppressed by cotreatment with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, but accompanied by the activation of JNK1 and -2 (Guo et al., 2001Go; J. J. Reiners, unpublished data). Given the putative role of phosphorylation in regulating AhR function (Berghard et al., 1993Go; Li and Dougherty, 1997Go; Park et al., 2000Go), we used SP600125 to determine whether JNK activities played a role in the suppression. Unexpectedly, we learned that SP600125 by itself potently inhibited the induction of CYP1A1 by TCDD and functioned as a ligand and antagonist of the AhR.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Materials. TCDD and TCDF were purchased from Midwest Research Institute (Kansas City, MO). Trypsin/EDTA, epidermal growth factor, penicillin/streptomycin solution, and horse serum were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). [3H]TCDD was purchased from Chemsyn (Lenexa, KS). [methyl-14C]bovine serum albumin was obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA). SP600125 was obtained from BIOMOL Research Laboratories (Plymouth Meeting, PA).

Cell Culture. The MCF10A cell line was obtained from the Cell Lines Resource (Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI). Cells were cultured in supplemented Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 medium as previously described (Guo et al., 2001Go). Subconfluent cultures were treated with various concentrations of TCDD and/or SP600125 dissolved/diluted in DMSO (absolute volume of solvent <= 0.1% of medium volume).

The murine hepatoma cell line Hepa 1c1c7 was grown in modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, sodium pyruvate, L-glutamine, and sodium bicarbonate. All cell lines were grown at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2.

RNA Preparation and Northern Blot Analyses. Cultures used for RNA isolation were washed twice with calcium and magnesium-free PBS at the time of harvest and stored at -80°C. Total cellular RNA was isolated using commercially available TRIzol reagent. RNA was resolved on 1.2% agarose/formaldehyde gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes as described by Reiners et al. (1997Go). The probes used for the detection of 7S and human CYP1A1 RNAs and the conditions used for hybridization have been described in detail (Reiners et al., 1997Go).

Extract Preparation. Sprague-Dawley rats were euthanized with pentobarbital or by CO2 inhalation. Livers were removed after in situ perfusion with HEG (25 mM Hepes, pH 7.6, 1.5 mM EDTA, and 10% glycerol) and subsequently homogenized in HEDG (HEG plus 1 mM dithiothreitol) supplemented with protease inhibitors, as described by Gasiewicz and Bauman (1987Go). The homogenate was sequentially centrifuged at 10,000g for 10 min and 100,000g for 1 h. The supernatant fluid was stored at -80°C.

Cultures of Hepa 1c1c7 cells were washed with PBS, covered with HEDG supplemented with 0.3 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM leupeptin, 2 mg/ml aprotinin, and harvested by scraping with a rubber policeman. The resulting suspension was homogenized with a Dounce glass homogenizer and subsequently centrifuged at 100,000g for 45 min. Supernatant fluids were stored at -80°C.

MCF10A cells released from culture plates by trypsin/EDTA treatment were diluted with culture medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, pelleted, and washed once with PBS. After centrifugation, nuclear extracts were prepared from the cell pellets by a procedure described by Osborn et al. (1989Go).

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay. The conditions reported by Shen et al. (1991Go) were used for in vitro AhR transformation and EMSA. Nuclear extracts prepared from MCF10A cultures and in vitro transformed rat liver extracts were used in the EMSA. Complementary oligonucleotides 5'-GATCCGGCTCTTCTCACGCAACTCCGAGCTCA-3' and 5'-GATCTGAGCTCGGAGTTGCGTGAGAAGAGCG-3' (the single-core DRE recognition sequence is underlined) were annealed and used to detect activated AhR/ARNT complexes.

Velocity Sedimentation of the AhR. The specific binding of [3H]TCDD to the AhR was measured using a modification of the velocity sedimentation/sucrose gradient protocol described by Tsui and Okey (1981Go). Rat liver or Hepa 1c1c7 cytosol was incubated for 2 h at room temperature with 1 nM [3H]TCDD in the presence of DMSO, 150 nM TCDF, or varied concentrations of SP600125. Thereafter, the cytosols were incubated with 1 mg of dextran-coated charcoal for 5 min (charcoal/dextran, 10:1 w/w) per mg of protein. After removal of dextran-coated charcoal by centrifugation, cytosols were applied to 10 to 30% (w/v) sucrose gradients in Beckman Quick Seal centrifuge tubes (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA) and centrifuged for 2 h at 372,000g in a Beckman VTI-80 rotor. Fractions of 0.2 ml were collected from the top and assayed for radioactivity. [methyl-14C]bovine serum albumin (4.4S) was used as an internal sedimentation marker. The differences in dpm between the TCDD versus the TCDD + TCDF treatment group, and TCDD versus TCDD + SP600125 treatment groups were used to estimate TCDD specific binding to the AhR.


    Results and Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Effects of SP600125 on CYP1A1 Induction by TCDD. Concentrations of SP600125 >= 1 µM have been reported to potently inhibit JNK-dependent processes in a variety of cultured cell types (Bennett et al., 2001Go; Brint et al., 2002Go; Gee et al., 2002Go; Reuther-Madrid et al., 2002Go; Zhang et al., 2002Go). Concentrations of SP600125 ranging from 0.1 to 20 µM were not cytostatic/cytotoxic to MCF10A cultures (data not presented) and did not induce the accumulation of CYP1A1 mRNA (Fig. 1A). However, the induction of CYP1A1 by TCDD was strongly suppressed by cotreatment with SP600125 in a concentration-dependent fashion (Fig. 1A). Complete suppression could be achieved with 10 µM SP600125 (IC50 ~2 µM based on three experiments). To assess whether SP600125 altered the AhR activation pathway in cultured cells, we examined its effect on TCDD-elicited AhR binding to DNA. Nuclear extracts isolated from TCDD-exposed MCF10A cultures formed AhR/DNA complexes when examined by EMSA (Fig. 1B). AhR/DNA complex formation was completely suppressed in cultures cotreated with TCDD and >=10 µM SP600125 (Fig. 1B).



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Suppression of CYP1A1 induction by SP600125.

A, cultures of MCF10A cells were treated with DMSO, 10 nM TCDD, and/or varying concentrations of SP600125. SP600125 was added 0.5 h before TCDD. Cultures used for Northern blot analyses were harvested ~5 h after TCDD addition. B, cultures were treated with DMSO, SP600125, or 10 nM TCDD (± SP600125) for 2 h before the preparation of nuclear extracts, which were incubated with labeled DRE oligonucleotide and analyzed by EMSA. Data are representative of two to three independent experiments.

 

In Vitro AhR Transformation and DNA Binding. The inability of nuclear extracts isolated from cultures cotreated with TCDD and SP600125 to form AhR/DNA complexes, as assessed by EMSA, could reflect inhibitions of ligand binding, AhR translocation, AhR/ARNT complex formation, or AhR/ARNT/DNA complex formation. TCDD-mediated in vitro transformation of the AhR into a DNA-binding complex with ARNT is a well characterized process (Bank et al., 1992Go). Incubation of rat liver extracts with TCDD transformed the AhR so that it bound ARNT and formed a complex capable of binding to an oligonucleotide containing a DRE sequence (Fig. 2A). By itself, at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 50 µM, SP600125 was unable to transform the AhR into a DNA-binding species (Fig. 2A). However, DNA-complex formation mediated by TCDD exposure was suppressed in a concentration-dependent fashion by coincubation with SP600125 (Fig. 2B, IC50 ~7 µM based on three experiments).



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Analyses of SP600125 as an AhR agonist and antagonist in an in vitro transformation assay.

Rat liver extracts were incubated with varied concentrations of SP600125 in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 5 nM TCDD before being incubated with labeled DRE oligonucleotide and analyzed by EMSA. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

 

Competition by SP600125 with [3H]TCDD for the AhR. Velocity sedimentation of the AhR on sucrose gradients was used to determine whether SP600125 could suppress the specific binding of TCDD to the AhR. Incubation of rat liver extract with TCDD led to the formation of TCDD/protein complexes (Fig. 3A). The portion of bound TCDD that could be competed with a 150-fold excess of TCDF represented AhR-specific TCDD binding (Fig. 3A). Coincubation of rat liver extract with SP600125 suppressed the formation of [3H]TCDD/AhR complexes in a concentration-dependent fashion with a IC50 ~10 µM (Fig. 3B, and an additional experiment with concentrations ranging from 6-100 µM). Similar binding/competition studies were performed with extracts isolated from murine hepatoma 1c1c7 cells (Fig. 3, C and D). SP600125 also competed with TCDD for binding to the AhR in 1c1c7 extracts. However, it was less effective. Specifically, [3H]TCDD binding to the AhR, in two studies using different extract preparations, was inhibited 21 or 27%, and 51 or 58%, in extracts cotreated with 10 or 50 µM SP600125, respectively (Fig. 3D and one additional study).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Sucrose gradient analyses of SP600125 suppression of TCDD binding to the AhR.

Rat liver (A and B) or murine hepatoma 1c1c7 (C and D) extracts were incubated in vitro for 2 h with 1 nM [3H]TCDD in the absence or presence of TCDF (150 nM) or varying concentrations of SP600125. At the end of 2 h the extracts were processed and subjected to velocity sedimentation on sucrose gradients as described under Materials and Methods. A and C, total [3H]TCDD binding in the absence ({bullet}) and presence of TCDF (). B and D, specific binding of [3H]TCDD to the AhR in the absence ({circ}) and presence of 10 µM ({triangleup}) and 50 µM ({square}) SP600125. The 4.4S marker corresponds to bovine serum albumin. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

 

The ability of SP600125 to compete with TCDD for binding to the AhR, as scored by in vitro transformation/EMSA and velocity sedimentation assays, suggests that this anthrapyrazolone is an AhR ligand. Furthermore, its inability to transform the AhR found in rat liver extracts into a species capable of binding to a DRE-containing oligonucleotide suggests that it is an AhR antagonist. Given the structure of SP600125, it is not surprising that it is an AhR ligand (Fig. 4). Its dimensions are similar to TCDD, and it is aromatic and planar. Studies with synthetic flavones suggest that antagonist activity requires a substituent group with high electron density that might hydrogen-bond or have electrostatic interactions with sites in the AhR ligand-binding pocket (Henry et al., 1999Go). The pyrazole ring in SP600125 may function in this manner. Presumably, SP600125 suppressed the induction of CYP1A1 in MCF10A cultures by TCDD and eliminated the ability of nuclear extracts to form AhR/DNA complexes by functioning as an AhR antagonist. Although we have found that SP600125 can also suppress the induction of CYP1A1 in A549 cells in a human type II lung tumor cell line (J. J. Reiners, unpublished data), a recent report suggests that the efficacy of AhR antagonists may be species specific (Zhou et al., 2003Go).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Structures of TCDD and SP600125.

 

The IC50 values for SP600125 competition with [3H]TCDD for AhR binding in rat liver and 1c1c7 extracts, as assessed by velocity sedimentation analyses, differed ~5-fold. This difference may reflect our having used the same protocol for both extracts, which may not have been optimal for the murine extract. Alternatively, our data may reflect a species-specific difference in receptor affinity for SP600125. Velocity sedimentation analyses have shown subtle to marked differences in the binding of a variety of AhR ligands to the AhRs from different species (Denison et al., 1989Go; references within Denison et al., 2002Go).

The reported Ki for the in vitro interaction of SP600125 with recombinant JNK2 is 190 nM, whereas the IC50 for suppression of JNK activities in cultured cells varies between 5 and 10 µM (Bennett et al., 2001Go). A perusal of the existing literature using SP600125 for the inhibition of JNKs in cultured cells indicates that the compound is typically used at concentrations ranging from 10 to 50 µM. Based on the studies reported herein, we anticipate that concentrations of SP600125 sufficient to inhibit JNK activities in cultured cells and tissues would also suppress agonist activation of the AhR and those processes initiated by the activated AhR. The extent to which the AhR antagonist activity of SP600125 compromises its usefulness as a JNK inhibitor will be dependent on the nature of the study.

SP600125 joins the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor PD98059 (Reiners et al., 1998Go) and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor LY294002 (Guo et al., 2000Go) as another small molecule used for the pharmacological inhibition of specific kinases, which also functions as an AhR antagonist. Although important as tools in biomedical research, our studies emphasize that small molecules touted as specific inhibitors often have other, potent biological activities.


Aby Joiakim
Patricia A. Mathieu
Christine Palermo
Thomas A. Gasiewicz
John J. Reiners, Jr.

Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (A.J., P.A.M., J.J.R.) Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan and Department of Environmental Medicine (C.P., T.A.G.) University of Rochester Rochester, New York


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants CA34469 (J.J.R.), ES09392 (J.J.R.), and ES09702 (T.A.G.), Training Grant ES07026, and Center Grant ES01247, and was assisted by the services of the Cell Culture Core, which was supported by Center Grant ES06639.

1 Abbreviations used are: AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; ARNT, aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; DRE, dioxin-responsive element; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; LY294002, 2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one; JNK, Jun N-terminal kinase; PD98059, 2-(2'-amino-3'-methoxyphenyl)-oxanaphthalen-4-one; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; SP600125, anthra[1,9-cd]pyrazol-6(2H)-one; TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; TCDF, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-furan. Back

Address correspondence to: John J. Reiners, Jr., Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Wayne State University, 2727 Second Ave., Rm. 4000, Detroit, MI 48201. E-mail: john.reiners.jr{at}wayne.edu


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 


Bank PA, Yao EF, Phelps CL, Harper PA, Denison MS (1992) Species-specific binding of transformed Ah receptor to a dioxin responsive transcriptional enhancer. Eur J Pharmacol 228: 85-94.[Medline]

Bennett BL, Sasaki DT, Murray BW, O'Leary EC, Sakata ST, Xu W, Leisten JC, Motiwala A, Pierce S, Satoh Y, et al. (2001) SP600125, an anthrapyrazolone inhibitor of Jun N-terminal kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 13681-13686.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berghard A, Gradin K, Pongratz I, Whitelaw M, and Poellinger I (1993) Cross coupling of signal transduction pathways: the dioxin receptor mediated induction of cytochrome P-450 1A1 expression via a protein kinase C-dependent mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 13: 677-689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brint EK, Fitzgerald KA, Smith P, Coyle AJ, Gutierrez-Ramos J-C, Fallon PG, and O'Neill LAJ (2002) Characterization of signaling pathways activated by the interleukin (IL-1) homologue T1/ST2. J Biol Chem 277: 49205-49211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carver LA, LaPres JJ, Jain S, Dunham EE, and Bradfield CA (1998) Characterization of the Ah receptor-associated protein, ARA9. J Biol Chem 273: 33580-33587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Denison MS, Pandini A, Nagy SR, Baldwin EP, and Bonati L (2002) Ligand binding and activation of the Ah Receptor. Chem Biol Interact 141: 3-24.[CrossRef][Medline]

Denison MS, Vella LM, and Okey AB (1989) Structure and function of the Ah receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Biol Chem 261: 3987-3995.

Dong L, Ma Q, and Whitlock JP Jr (1997) Down-regulation of major histocompatibility complex Q1b gene expression by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Biol Chem 272: 29614-29619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gasiewicz TA and Bauman PA (1987) Heterogeneity of the rat hepatic Ah receptor and evidence for transformation in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem 262: 2116-2120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gasiewicz TA, Kende AS, Rucci G, Whitney B, and Willey JJ (1996) Analysis of structural requirements for Ah receptor antagonist activity: ellipticines, flavones and related compounds. Biochem Pharmacol 52: 1787-1803.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gee K, Lim W, Ma W, Nandan D, Diaz-Mitoma F, Kozlowski M, and Kumar A (2002) Differential regulation of CD44 expression by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and TNF-alpha in human monocytic cells: distinct involvement of c-Jun N-terminal kinase in LPS-induced CD44 expression. J Immunol 169: 5660-5672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guo M, Joiakim A, Dudley DT, and Reiners JJ Jr (2001) Suppression of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-mediated CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 induction by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate: role of transforming growth factor ß and mitogen-activated protein kinases. Biochem Pharmacol 62: 1449-1457.[CrossRef][Medline]

Guo M, Joiakim A, and Reiners JJ Jr (2000) Suppression of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-mediated aryl hydrocarbon receptor transformation and CYP1A1 induction by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor 2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (LY294002). Biochem Pharmacol 60: 635-642.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hankinson O (1995) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 35: 307-340.[CrossRef][Medline]

Heid SE, Pollenz RS, and Swanson HI (2000) Role of heat shock protein 90 dissociation in mediating agonist-induced activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Mol Pharmacol 57: 82-92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Henry EC, Kende AS, Rucci G, Totleben MJ, Willey JJ, Dertinger SD, Pollenz RS, Jones JP, and Gasiewicz TA (1999) Flavone antagonists bind competitively with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor but inhibit nuclear uptake and transformation. Mol Pharmacol 55: 716-725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kazlauskas A, Poellinger L, and Pongratz I (1999) Evidence that the co-chaperone p23 regulates ligand responsiveness of the dioxin (aryl hydrocarbon) receptor. J Biol Chem 274: 13519-135524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Li SY and Dougherty JJ (1997) Inhibitors of serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatases stimulate transcription by the Ah receptor/Arnt dimer by affecting a step subsequent to XRE binding. Arch Biochem Biophys 340: 73-82.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ma Q and Whitlock JP Jr (1997) A novel cytoplasmic protein that interacts with the Ah receptor, contains tetratricopeptide repeat motifs, and augments the transcriptional response to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Biol Chem. 272: 8878-8884.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Osborn L, Kinkel S, and Nabel GJ (1989) Tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 1 stimulate the human immunodeficiency virus enhancer by activation of the nuclear factor kappa B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 2336-2340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Park S, Henry EC, and Gasiewicz TA (2000) Regulation of DNA binding activity of the ligand-activated aryl hydrocarbon receptor by tyrosine phosphorylation. Arch Biochem Biophys 381: 302-312.[CrossRef][Medline]

Reiners JJ Jr, Clift R, and Mathieu P (1999) Suppression of cell cycle progression by flavonoids: dependence on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Carcinogenesis 20: 1561-1566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reiners JJ Jr, Jones CL, Hong N, Clift RE, and Elferink C (1997) Downregulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor function and cytochrome P4501A1 induction by expression of Ha-ras oncogenes. Mol Carcinog 19: 91-100.[CrossRef][Medline]

Reiners JJ Jr, Lee J-Y, Clift RE, Dudley DT, and Myrand SP (1998) PD98059 is an equipotent antagonist of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. Mol Pharmacol 53: 438-445.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reuther-Madrid JY, Kashatus D, Chen S, Li X, Westwick J, Davis RJ, Earp HS, Wang C-Y, and Baldwin AS Jr (2002) The p65/RelA subunit of NF-{kappa}B suppresses the sustained antiapoptotic activity of Jun kinases induced by tumor necrosis factor. Mol Cell Biol 22: 8175-8183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmidt JV and Bradfield CA (1996) Ah receptor signaling pathways. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12: 55-89.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shen ES, Elferink CJ, and Whitlock JP Jr (1991) The use of gel retardation to analyze protein-DNA interactions upstream of CYP1A1 gene. Methods Enzymol 206: 403-408.[Medline]

Sulentic CEW, Holsapple MP, and Kaminski NE (2000) Putative link between transcriptional regulation of IgM expression by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor/dioxin-responsive enhancer signaling pathway. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295: 705-716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tsui HW and Okey AB (1981) Rapid vertical tube rotor gradient assay for binding of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin to the Ah receptor. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 59: 927-931.[Medline]

Wilhelmsson A, Whitelaw ML, Gustafsson J-A, and Poellinger L (1994) Agonistic and antagonistic effects of {alpha}-naphthoflavone on dioxin receptor function. J Biol Chem 269: 389-394.

Zhang H, Shi X, Zhang Q-J, Hampong M, Paddon H, Wahyuningsih D, and Pelech S (2002) Nocodazole-induced p53-dependent c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation reduced apoptosis in human colon carcinoma HCT116 cells. J Biol Chem 277: 43648-43658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhou JG, Henry EC, Palermo CM, Dertinger SD, and Gasiewicz TA (2003) Species-specific transcriptional activity of synthetic flavonoids in guinea pig and mouse cells as a result of differential activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor to interact with dioxin-responsive elements. Mol Pharmacol 63: 915-924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
A. Braeuning and A. Buchmann
The Glycogen Synthase Kinase Inhibitor 3-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (SB216763) Is a Partial Agonist of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2009; 37(8): 1576 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
P. Monteiro, D. Gilot, S. Langouet, and O. Fardel
Activation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor by the Calcium/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Kinase Inhibitor 7-Oxo-7H-benzimidazo[2,1-a]benz[de]isoquinoline-3-carboxylic Acid (STO-609)
Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2008; 36(12): 2556 - 2563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
Wenjing Zhong, Yufen Xie, Yingchun Wang, J. Lewis, A. Trostinskaia, Fangfei Wang, E. E. Puscheck, and D. A. Rappolee
Use of Hyperosmolar Stress to Measure Stress-Activated Protein Kinase Activation and Function in Human HTR Cells and Mouse Trophoblast Stem Cells
Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2007; 14(6): 534 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. LaRosa and S. M. Downs
Meiotic Induction by Heat Stress in Mouse Oocytes: Involvement of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase and MAPK Family Members
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2007; 76(3): 476 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
Y. Xie, E.E. Puscheck, and D.A. Rappolee
Effects of SAPK/JNK inhibitors on preimplantation mouse embryo development are influenced greatly by the amount of stress induced by the media
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 12(4): 217 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Chen, T. Operana, J. Bonzo, N. Nguyen, and R. H. Tukey
ERK Kinase Inhibition Stabilizes the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION AND PROTEIN DEGRADATION
J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4350 - 4359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
Z. Tan, M. Huang, A. Puga, and Y. Xia
A Critical Role For MAP Kinases in the Control of Ah Receptor Complex Activity
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2004; 82(1): 80 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joiakim, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiners, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joiakim, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiners, J. J., Jr.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition