DMD Simcyp

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


0090-9556/03/3106-714-717$20.00
DMD 31:714-717, 2003

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walter, R.
Right arrow Articles by Siegmund, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walter, R.
Right arrow Articles by Siegmund, W.

INFLUENCE OF PROPIVERINE ON HEPATIC MICROSOMAL CYTOCHROME P450 ENZYMES IN MALE RATS

R. Walter, C. Ullmann, D. Thümmler, and W. Siegmund

Department of Clinical Pharmacology of the Peter Holtz Research Center of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Greifswald, Greifswald (R.W., C.U., W.S.); and Apogepha Arzneimittel GmbH, Dresden, Germany (D.T.)

(Received November 25, 2002; accepted February 19, 2003)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The bladder spasmolytics propiverine was shown to induce hepatic cytochrome P450 (P450) and aminopyrine and aniline oxidation in rats. To characterize the type of enzyme induction and its dose dependence, activities of seven hepatic microsomal P450-dependent monooxygenases were measured in 72 male LEW1A albino rats (body weight 236–295 g) after oral treatment with 0.5, 2, 6, and 60 mg/kg of propiverine hydrochloride for 5 days and compared with the effects of 40 mg/kg ß-naphthoflavone, 10 mg/kg phenobarbital, and 20 mg/kg dexamethasone (each group, n = 8). CYP2B expression was measured by Western blotting. Furthermore, the inhibitory potency of propiverine on P450 enzymes was evaluated in competition assays with three most specific monooxygenases. Results show that Propiverine induced several monooxygenases and CYP2B expression dose dependently. The effects were well comparable with a phenobarbital-type inducer with 60 mg/kg being equipotent to 10 mg/kg phenobarbital. Furthermore, propiverine in low concentrations inhibited pentylresorufin O-dealkylase (for CYP2B) in vitro. In conclusion, propiverine is a phenobarbital-type inducer on hepatic P450 enzymes in rats in doses about 100-times above the therapeutic doses in man.


The benzilic acid derivative, propiverine1 [(2,2-diphenyl-2(1-propoxy) acetic acid (1-methylpiperid-4-yl) ester] (MICTONORM, Apogepha, Dresden), has been shown in controlled clinical trials to be effective in the treatment of children, adults, and elderly suffering from detrusor hyperreflexia and symptoms of an overactive bladder. Pharmacodynamic investigations showed anticholinergic and additional effects on calcium influx and calcium homeostasis in urinary bladder preparations, thus proving the dual mode of action of propiverine in relaxing detrusor smooth muscle. The drug is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, widely distributed, and highly bound to plasma proteins. Incomplete oral bioavailability is mainly caused by intensive first-pass metabolism. Propiverine undergoes N-oxidation of the piperidine moiety and dealkylation of the propyl side chain by enzymes of the hepatic microsomal drug-oxidizing system (for review, Madersbacher and Mürtz, 2001Go).

There is evidence from former animal studies that propiverine at higher doses increases the content of cytochrome P450 (P450) and the activities of aniline hydroxylase and aminopyrine demethylase in rat liver (Borchert et al., 1986Go; Wengler et al., 1989Go; Yamashita et al., 1990Go). Since most patients suffering from symptoms of overactive bladder are over 60 years and consumers of two and more concomitant drugs, information on potential enzyme-inducing or -inhibiting properties of a drug, which is subjected for chronic treatment, is required from studies in animals and man. Therefore, the influence of repeated oral administration of propiverine on the most important hepatic microsomal P450-dependent monooxygenases was measured in rats to evaluate its influence on drug metabolism and to identify the dose without effect on P450 enzymes. Propiverine hydrochloride was given in doses of 0.6, 2.0, 6.0, and 60 mg/kg. In man, propiverine hydrochloride is used in doses between 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials and Equipment. Propiverine hydrochloride was a gift from Apogepha (Dresden, Germany). ß-Naphthoflavone was obtained from Sigma Chemicals (Steinheim, Germany), dexamethasone was obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland), and phenobarbital was purchased from Synopharm (Barsbüttel, Germany). Glucose 6-phosphate, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and NADP were purchased from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany); dextrorphan tartrate was obtained from ICN Biomedicals (Eschwege, Germany); 7-hydroxycoumarin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO); acrylamide, tetramethyl ethylendiamine, ammonium persulfate, tris-(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethan, and SDS were purchased from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany); 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate, nitroblue tetrazolium salt, and N',N'-dimethylformamide were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Schnelldorf, Germany); TWEEN 20 was purchased from BioRad (München, Germany); and formaldehyde was obtained from Riedel-de-Haen (Hannover, Germany). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemicals. Furthermore, 0.1 M phosphate buffer (KH2PO4/Na2HPO4) pH 7.4 was used.

Liver tissue was homogenized with the Ultra-Turrax T25 (IKA Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany) and centrifuged with Centrikon H-401B and Centrikon T-1170 (Kontron, Neufahrn, Germany). Gel electrophoresis and Western blot were performed with the electrophoresis apparatus and Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Transfer Cell (BioRad) on cellulose membranes Protran (Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany). The products of the enzyme assays were measured with the spectrophotometer Uvikon 931, the spectrofluorimeter SFM 25 (Kontron), and the gas chromatograph HP 5890 (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA), respectively.

Animals and Animal Treatment. Seventy-two male LEW1A albino rats (body weight 236 –295 g) were held under standard laboratory conditions in a life island box A 110, Flufrance (Wissous, France) with mass-air displacement, temperature 25°C, 12 h light/dark cycle with light on at 7:00 AM, with four rats per polycarbonate cage, bedding ssniff (Lage, Germany), and free access to R/M-H diet ssniff and acidified water. Four weeks after adaptation to the laboratory conditions, the animals were randomly allocated to the following nine treatment groups (each n = 8): 1) control-1 for oral administration of 5 ml/kg destilled water, 2) control-2 for intraperitoneal injection of 2 ml/kg corn oil, 3– 6) for oral treatments with 0.6, 2, 6, and 60 mg/kg of propiverine hydrochloride, 7) for intraperitoneal treatment with 40 mg/kg ß-naphthoflavone, 8) for oral treatment with 10 mg/kg phenobarbital, 9) for intraperitoneal treatment with 20 mg/kg dexamethasone. The administrations were done between 7:00 and 8:00 Am of 5 days. Substances for intraperitoneal administration were given in 2 ml/kg corn oil, propiverine hydrochloride was dissolved for administrations in 10 ml/kg distilled water.

Twenty-four hours after the last administration and after overnight fasting, the animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and decapitation. After bleeding, a cannula was placed into the portal vein to remove the blood by perfusion with ice-cold saline after the liver had been dissected and weighted. The animal experiment had been approved by the Local Authorities according to the German Animal Protection Act.

Preparation of Microsomes. An adequate amount of the liver was homogenized in phosphate buffer and centrifuged at 9,000g for 30 min followed by 100,000g for 60 min. The microsomal pellets were re-suspended in phosphate buffer followed by centrifugation again at 100,000g for 60 min. Then, the microsomes were stored in aliquots for enzyme assays at least at -80°C (Orishiki et al., 1994Go).

Enzyme Assays. Microsomal protein content was measured with the biuret method and total microsomal P450 content according to Greim (1970Go). The enzyme activities of the following monooxygenases have been measured with methods adapted to our laboratory conditions: ethylresorufin O-dealkylase (EROD) and pentylresorufin O-dealkylase (PROD; Burke and Mayer, 1983Go), ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase (ECOD; Greenlee and Poland, 1978Go), diazepam N-demethylase (DNDM; Andersson et al., 1994Go), dextromethorphan O-demethylase (DXDM; Schmid et al., 1985Go), nitrophenolhydroxylase (NPH; Reinke and Moyer, 1985Go), erythromycin N-demethylase (ERDM; Wrighton et al., 1985Go). In a final volume of 1.0 ml, microsomal protein (0.1 to 2 mg), the respective substrates (5 µM 7-ethylresorufin and 7-pentylresorufin, 0.5 mM 7-ethoxycumarin, 0.2 mM dextromethorphan and diazepam, 0.1 M 4-nitrophenol and erythromycin) were incubated with an NADPH-regenerating system consisting of 0.25 to 1.0 mM NADP, 1.5 mM glucose 6-phosphate, 0.6 to 1.3 units glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (final concentrations) at 37°C for 5 to 20 min. After stopping the reaction with trichloroacetic acid, methanol, or sodium hydroxide, the metabolites were measured with photometric (DNDM, NPH, ERDM), fluorimetric (EROD, ECOD, PROD) or gaschromatographic (DXDM) methods. Blank samples with microsomes inactivated by denaturation before starting the reaction and samples for calibration were prepared by the same procedure and measured in one run with the samples obtained from the animal study.

Western Blot of CYP2B. Microsomal CYP2B content was determined by Western blot analysis; in the case of three control rats, animals were treated with 60 mg/kg of propiverine hydrochloride and 10 mg/kg of phenobarbital. Rat CYP2B1 (Daiichi Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan) and goat anti-rat IgG (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) were used as antibodies.

Competition Assay with EROD, PROD, and ERDM. Competition assays with propiverine (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 µM) were performed with EROD obtained from rats pretreated with ß-naphthoflavone, with PROD from rats after phenobarbital treatment, and with ERDM from rats after dexamethasone treatment. The assays were performed with varying substrate concentrations to assess Km and Vmax of the enzyme kinetics.

Biometrical and Statistical Analysis. Means ± standard deviations (S.D.) are given. The statistical comparison was done with the U test according to Mann and Whitney with P < 0.05 as level of significance. Km and Vmax were assessed by nonlinear fitting of Michaelis-Menten plots using the computer program ORIGIN (OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
As expected, the activity of the following monooxygenases was increased after administration of standard enzyme inducers: PROD (36-fold), EROD (6-fold), ERDM (5-fold), and ECOD (3.4-fold) after phenobarbital; EROD (15-fold), ECOD (7-fold), and PROD (3.5-fold) after ß-naphthoflavone; and ERDM (8-fold) after dexamethasone. Propiverine hydrochloride in doses of 0.6 and 2 mg/kg was without any significant influence on the P450 enzymes under investigation. After 6 mg/kg of propiverine hydrochloride, only the activities of EROD and ECOD were found to be marginally but significantly increased. At the highest dose of 60 mg/kg, however, the activities of DNDM, ECOD, EROD, and PROD were increased 1.5-, 4-, 5.4-, and 33-fold, respectively. The patterns of the changes in monooxygenase activities after 60 mg/kg of propiverine hydrochloride were similar to the situation after enzyme induction with 10 mg/kg of phenobarbital (Fig. 1). Furthermore, Western blot analysis showed bands of microsomal CYP2B, which were comparable in density to the bands after phenobarbital induction (Fig. 2).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Pattern of seven hepatic microsomal P450 monooxygenases after treatment of rats with 60 mg/kg of propiverine hydrochloride (Prop), 10 mg/kg of phenobarbital (PB), 40 mg/kg of ß-naphthoflavone (BNF), and 20 mg/kg of dexamethasone (DEX) to show that propiverine in high oral doses is a phenobarbital-like enzyme inducer.

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Western blot of CYP2B of rat liver microsomes of rats.

Lane 1, rainbow standard; lane 2, assay standard positive of CYP2B of phenobarbital-treated rats; lanes 3, microsomes of control-1 animals; lanes 4, microsomes of rats treated with 60 mg/kg of propiverine hydrochloride; lanes 5, microsomes of rats treated with 10 mg/kg of phenobarbital.

 

In competition assays with selected monooxygenases, it could be shown, that propiverine in concentrations up to 2.0 µM did not influence EROD and ERDM (data are not shown). PROD was inhibited in a mixed competitive/noncompetitive manner as shown in Fig. 3. The apparent Km values were 6.17 ± 4.02 µM for the controls versus 2.44 ± 1.04 µM (p < 0.028) after incubation with 0.2 µM propiverine. The respective Vmax were 1.00 ± 0.49 nmol/min x mg versus 0.19 ± 0.04 nmol/min x mg (p < 0.05).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Influence of propiverine (2 µM) on hepatic microsomal pentylresorufin O-depentylase activity of male rats.

Microsomes were pooled from three animals which were induced with 80 mg/kg phenobarbital for 5 days. Given are means ± S.D. of six enzyme kinetic assays.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The experimental study to evaluate potential enzyme-inducing effects of propiverine were performed in rats which responded to standard enzyme inducers as expected: rifampicin/glucocorticoid type induction (pregnane X receptor induction) by dexamethasone resulted in manifold increase of the ERDM as described by Cooper et al. (1993Go). Induction according to the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon type (Ah receptor induction) by ß-naphtoflavone was associated with marked elevation of EROD and ECOD and phenobarbital type induction (constitutive androstane receptor induction) yielded exaggerated response of PROD, less of ERDM, EROD, and ECOD (Edwards et al., 1984Go; Alterman et al., 1994Go; Burke et al., 1994Go; Zhang and Thomas, 1996Go).

Chronic treatment of male rats with propiverine hydrochloride induced dose dependently several microsomal P450-dependent monooxygenases. Since the pattern of changes after administration of the highest dose of 60 mg/kg was very similar to the changes caused by phenobarbital, propiverine belongs obviously to the group of the phenobarbital-type enzyme inducers, which influence about 50 genes (Frueh et al., 1997Go). With regard to cytochrome P450 enzymes, the most pronounced effect is exerted on CYP2B6. Marked effects were also found for CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP1A2, and some UGTs. Human CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 are not influenced (for review, Fuhr, 2000Go).

The results of our study are in line with the changes expected after administration of a phenobarbital-type inducer. PROD and EROD, which are dependent after phenobarbital induction mainly on CYP2B activity, were 33-fold, respectively 5.4-fold induced (Alterman et al., 1994Go; Burke et al., 1994Go). The erythromycin demethylation (ERDM), which is catalyzed by CYP3A, was 5-fold elevated (Zhang and Thomas, 1996Go) and ECOD, an monooxygenase dependent on CYP1A1, CYP2A, CYP2B, CYP2C, CYP3A, was about 4-times enhanced (Edwards et al., 1984Go). However, DNDM, which is mainly catalyzed by enzymes of the CYP2C families was only marginally (1.5-fold) changed (Yasumori et al., 1993Go). Furthermore, as expected for a phenobarbital-type inducer, the demethylation of dextromethorphan (DXDM), a substrate of CYP2D (Kronbach et al., 1987Go) and the hydroxylation of 4-nitrophenol (NPH), a substrate of CYP2E1 (Tassaneeyakul et al., 1993Go; Amato et al., 1998Go), were not influenced by propiverine.

Because of that specific influence on microsomal monooxygenases, propiverine is considered to be a ligand of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), which is the biochemical mechanism behind phenobarbital induction. Similar to phenobarbital, it might translocate CAR to the nucleus where it heterodimerizes with the 9-cis-retinoic acid receptor {alpha} (RXR{alpha}). This complex binds to the phenobarbital response element in gene promoter regions and enhances gene transcríption, as initially described for CYP2B6 (Zelko and Negishi, 2000Go). However, recent experiments have shown that there is a cross talk with other nuclear receptors. CAR/RXR{alpha} may bind to distinct response elements in gene promoters [e g., to the binding site of the PXR/RXR{alpha} complex, which has been shown to mediate effects of the rifampicin/glucocorticoid type induction (Lehmann et al., 1998Go)]. Thus, CAR/RXR{alpha} can bind to PXR response elements and induce the expression of CYP3A4, which is normally regulated by PXR/RXR{alpha} (Xie et al., 2000Go). This is consistent with the observation that phenobarbital exerts a wide range of effects on enzymes of the drug biotransformation and other processes, most likely also on drug transporter proteins. According to the current knowledge on the function of the nuclear receptors PXR and CAR, inducing effects are expected on multidrug resistance gene 1 (ABCB1; Geick et al., 2001Go), organic anion transporters 2 (Slc21a5; Guo et al., 2002Go), multidrug resistance protein 2 (ABCC2; Kast et al., 2002Go), and multidrug resistance protein 3 (ABCC2; Cherrington et al., 2002Go). Compared with other types of induction, however, high molar concentrations are required to achieve phenobarbital-type induction (Lehmann et al., 1998Go). Since propiverine was very similar to phenobarbital with regard to the pattern of monooxygenase induction, the clinical significance of potential interactions with CAR- and/or PXR-regulated pharmacokinetic processes of other drugs has to be carefully evaluated in man.

The risk to induce enzymes of drug metabolism and/or transport in patients seems to be low since all effects on drug-metabolizing enzymes in rats were observed with daily doses much higher than the efficient therapeutic dose in man, which is 0.5 to 0.6 mg/kg. In rats, 60 mg/kg of propiverine hydrochloride were equipotent to 10 mg/kg of phenobarbital with regard to CYP2B (PROD) induction; 2 mg/kg had no effect but 6 mg/kg seemed to be borderline for P450 enzyme up-regulation. Furthermore, since enzyme-inducing doses of phenobarbital in man (1–3 mg/kg) are about 2- to 6-times higher than the therapeutic doses of propiverine hydrochloride, significant influence on drugs, which are given together with propiverine and which are subjected to biotransformation and/or active transport, is not necessarily to be expected.

Many inducers are also inhibitors of the enzymes they induce (Fuhr, 2000Go). We observed that propiverine is a mixed competitive/noncompetitive inhibitor of PROD in vitro in concentrations, which are spasmolytic in isolated human urinary bladder and which are reached in serum after chronic treatment with 15 mg three times daily in man (Madersbacher and Mürtz, 2001Go). The possible clinical relevance of this observation is still unknown but limited to the small number of drugs which are metabolized by CYP2B enzymes.

In conclusion, propiverine is a phenobarbital-type enzyme inducer on hepatic P450 enzymes in rats in doses about 100-times above the therapeutic doses in man.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to Edita Kaliwe, Danilo Wegner, and Sabine Bade for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by an institutional grant from APOGEPHA, Dresden, Germany.

1 Abbreviations used are: propiverine, (2,2-diphenyl-2(1-propoxy) acetic acid (1-methylpiperid-4-yl) ester; P450, cytochrome P450; EROD, ethylresorufin O-dealkylase; PROD, pentylresorufin O-dealkylase; ECOD, ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase; DNDM, diazepam N-demethylase; DXDM, dextromethorphan O-demethylase; NPH, nitrophenolhydroxylase; ERDM, erythromycin N-demethylase; CAR, constitutive androstane receptor; RXR{alpha}, 9-cis-retinoic acid receptor {alpha}. Back

Address correspondence to: Dr. Werner Siegmund, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Friedrich Loefflerstr. 23 d, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany. E-mail: siegmuw{at}uni-greifswald.de


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 


Alterman MA, Carvan MJ, and Busbee DL (1994) Ethoxyresorufin and pentoxyresorufin O-dealkylation by hepatic microsomes from female Fischer 344 rats: effects of age and diet. Mech Ageing Dev 77: 1-11.[CrossRef][Medline]

Amato G, Longo V, Mazzaccaro A, and Gervasi PG (1998) Chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylase and p-nitrophenol hydroxylase as the most suitable activities for assaying cytochrome P450 2E1 in Cynomolgus monkey liver. Drug Metab Dispos 26: 483-489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Andersson T, Miners JO, Veronese ME, and Birkett DJ (1994) Diazepam metabolism by human liver microsomes is mediated by both S-mephenytoin hydroxylase and CYP3A isoforms. Br J Clin Pharmacol 38: 131-137.[Medline]

Borchert HH, Pipping H, and Pfeiffer S (1986) Metabolische Wechselwirkungen von Propiverin und Triperiden. Pharmazie 41: 66-67.[Medline]

Burke D and Mayer RT (1983) Differential effects of phenobarbitone and 3-methylcholanthrene induction on the hepatic microsomal metabolism and cytochrome P-450-binding of phenoxazone and homologous series of its n-alkyl ethers (alkoxyresorufins). Chem Biol Interact 45: 243-258.[CrossRef][Medline]

Burke MD, Thompson S, Weaver RJ, Wolf CR, and Mayer RT (1994) Cytochrome P450 specificities of alkoxyresorufin O-dealkylation in human and rat liver. Biochem Pharmacol 48: 923-936.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cherrington NJ, Hartley DP, Li N, Johnson DR, and Klaassen CD (2002) Organ distribution of multidrug resistance proteins 1, 2, and 3 (Mrp1, 2 and 3) mRNA and hepatic induction of Mrp3 by constitutive androstane receptor activators in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 300: 97-104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cooper KO, Reik LM, Jayyosi Z, Bandiera S, Kelley M, Ryan DE, Danniel R, McCluckey SA, Levin W, and Thomas PE (1993) Regulation of two members of the steroid-inducible cytochrome P450 subfamily (3A) in rats. Arch Biochem Biophys 301: 345-354.[CrossRef][Medline]

Edwards AM, Glistak ML, Lucas CM, and Wilson PA (1984) 7-Ethoxycoumarin-deethylase activity as a convenient measure of liver drug metabolizing enzymes. Regulation in cultured rat hepatocytes. Biochem Pharmacol 33: 1537-1546.[CrossRef][Medline]

Frueh FW, Zanger UM, and Meyer UA (1997) Extent and character of phenobarbital-mediated changes in gene expression in the liver. Mol Pharmacol 51: 363-369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fuhr U (2000) Induction of drug metabolising enzymes: pharmacokinetic and toxicological consequences in humans. Clin Pharmacokinet 38: 493-504.[CrossRef][Medline]

Geick A, Eichelbaum M, and Burk O (2001) Nuclear response elements mediate induction of intestinal MDR1 by rifampin. J Biol Chem 276: 14581-14587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Greenlee WF and Poland A (1978) An improved assay of 7-ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase activity: induction of hepatic enzyme activity in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice by phenobarbital, 3-methylcholanthrene and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo p-dioxin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 205: 596-605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Greim H (1970) Synthesesteigerung und Abbauhemmung bei der Vermehrung der mikrosomalen Cytochrome P-450 und b5 durch Phenobarbital. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 266: 261-275.[CrossRef]

Guo GL, Staudinger J, Ogura K, and Klassen CD (2002) Induction of rat organic anion transporting polypeptide 2 by pregnenolone-16{alpha}-carbonitrile is via interaction with pregnane X receptor. Mol Pharmacol 61: 832-839.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kast HR, Goodwin B, Tarr PT, Jones SA, Anisfeld AM, Stoltz CM, Tontonoz P, Kliewer S, Willson TM, and Edwards PA (2002) Regulation of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (ABCC2) by the nuclear receptors pregnane X receptor, farnesoid X-activated receptor and constitutive androstane receptor. J Biol Chem 25: 2908-2915.

Kronbach T, Mathys D, Gut J, Catin T, and Meyer UA (1987) High-performance liquid chromatographic assays for bufuralol 1'-hydroxylase, debrisoquine 4-hydroxylase and dextromethorphan O-demethylase in microsomes and purified cytochrome P-450 isozymes of human liver. Anal Biochem 162: 24-32.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lehmann JM, McKee DD, Watson MA, Willson TM, Moore JT, and Kliewer SA (1998) The human orphan nuclear receptor PXR is activated by compounds that regulate CYP3A4 gene expression and cause drug interactions. J Clin Investig 102: 1016-1023.[Medline]

Madersbacher H and Mürtz G (2001) Efficacy, tolerability and safety profile of propiverine in the treatment of the overactive bladder (nonneurogenic and neurogenic). World J Urol 19: 324-335.[CrossRef][Medline]

Orishiki M, Matsuo Y, Nishioka M, and Ichikawa Y (1994) In vivo administration of H2-blockers, cimetidine and ranitidine, reduced the contents of the cytochrome P350IID (CYP2D) subfamily and their activities in rat liver microsomes. Int J Biochem 26: 751-758.[CrossRef][Medline]

Reinke LA and Moyer MJ (1985) P-nitrophenol hydroxylation. A microsomal oxidation which is highly inducible by ethanol. Drug Metab Dispos 13: 548-552.[Abstract]

Schmid B, Bircher J, Preisig R, and Küpfer A (1985) Polymorphic dextromethorphan metabolism: co-segregation of oxidative O-demethylation with debrisoquin hydroxylation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 38: 618-624.[Medline]

Tassaneeyakul W, Veronese ME, Birkett DJ, and Miners JO (1993) High-performance liquid chromatographic assay for 4-nitrophenol hydroxylation, a putative cytochrome P4502E1 activity, in human liver microsomes. J Chromatogr 616: 73-78.[Medline]

Wengler A, Siegmund W, Klebingat KJ, Schütz M, and Kaliwe E (1989) Metabolismus von Propiverin in adulten und fetalen Humanlebermikrosomen. Z Klin Med 44: 221-224.

Wrighton SA, Maurel P, Schuetz EG, Watkins PB, Whitley B, and Guzelian PS (1985) Identification of the cytochrome P-450 induced by macrolide antibiotics in rat liver as the glucocorticoid responsive cytochrome P-450p. Biochemistry 24: 2171-2178.[CrossRef][Medline]

Xie W, Barwick JL, Simon CM, Pierce AM, Safe S, Blumberg B, Guzelian PS, and Evans RM (2000) Reciprocal activation of xenobiotic response genes by nuclear receptors SXR/PXR and CAR. Genes Dev 14: 3014-3023.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamashita K, Kuwata M, Irimura K, Morinaga N, Kurokawa K, and Ashizawa M (1990) Fifty-two-week oral toxicity study of propiverine hydrochloride in rats. J Toxicol Sci 15: 107-144.[Medline]

Yasumori T, Nagata K, Yang SK, Chen LS, Murayama N, Yamazoe Y, and Kato R (1993) Cytochrome P450 mediated metabolism of diazepam in human and rat: involvement of human CYP2C in N-demethylation in the substrate concentration-dependent manner. Pharmacogenetics 3: 291-301.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zelko I and Negishi M (2000) Phenobarbital-elicited activation of nuclear receptor CAR in induction of cytochrome P450 genes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 277: 1-6.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhang XJ and Thomas PE (1996) Erythromycin as a specific substrate for cytochrome P4503A isozymes and identification of a high-affinity erythromycin N-demethylase in adult female rats. Drug Metab Dispos 24: 23-27.[Abstract]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
K. Methling, P. Reszka, M. Lalk, O. Vrana, E. Scheuch, W. Siegmund, B. Terhaag, and P. J. Bednarski
Investigation of the in Vitro Metabolism of the Analgesic Flupirtine
Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2009; 37(3): 479 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
D. Tomalik-Scharte, A. Jetter, M. Kinzig-Schippers, A. Skott, F. Sorgel, T. Klaassen, D. Kasel, S. Harlfinger, O. Doroshyenko, D. Frank, et al.
EFFECT OF PROPIVERINE ON CYTOCHROME P450 ENZYMES: A COCKTAIL INTERACTION STUDY IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS
Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2005; 33(12): 1859 - 1866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walter, R.
Right arrow Articles by Siegmund, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walter, R.
Right arrow Articles by Siegmund, W.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition