![]() |
|
|
State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, Syracuse, New York (D.H., A-K.S.); and Syracuse University, Department of Chemistry, Syracuse, New York (J.G., J.C.D.)
(Received December 29, 2002; Accepted March 29, 2003)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
7.4) and 4.62 mM NaCl. The
conditions were chosen to mimic passage of clinical concentrations of
cisplatin through the cytosol. The reactions were monitored by
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), atomic absorption spectroscopy,
and ultraviolet (UV) absorption spectroscopy. The UV data showed that several
reactions occur, the first of which does not affect the absorbance (no
Pt-sulfur bond formation). They also suggested that if [cisplatin] is large
compared with [MT], the rate of subsequent reaction is between first and
second order in [cisplatin] and between zeroth and first order in [MT]. HPLC
eluates with 24 < retention time (tR) < 27 min
contained undialyzable Pt, which increased with reaction time and corresponded
to Pt-thionein product. Eluates with 3 < tR < 7 min
corresponded to unbound cisplatin and allowed determination of second-order
rate constants (k), using the second-order rate equation. The
k value for cisplatin reacting with apo-MT was
0.14
M1 s1, Cd/Zn-MT
0.75 M1 s1,
Cd7-MT
0.53 M1
s1, and Zn7-MT
0.65
M1 s1. Thus,
cisplatin displaced Cd and Zn equally well. Leukocyte MT concentration was
1.0 mM, so that the kinetics of cisplatin binding to cellular MT is
pseudo-first order (pseudo-first-order rate constant,
0.63 x
103 s1; half-life,
18 min). With [cisplatin] = 10 µM, the rate of cisplatin reaction with
MT is
6.3 µmol s1
cm3. We conclude that cellular MT can trap
significant amounts of cisplatin and may efficiently contribute to cisplatin
resistance.
Cisplatin entering the cell also binds to endogenous thiols, e.g., MT and
glutathione (GSH), which limits the amount of the drug available for binding
to DNA (Dedon and Borch, 1987
;
Berners-Price and Kuchel,
1990a
,
b
;
Perez-Benito et al., 1995
;
Bose et al., 1997
;
Reedijk and Teuben, 1999
;
Volckova et al., 2002
).
Moreover, continued exposure to CDDP up-regulates the amount of MT, GSH, and
other cellular thiols, which increases the cell's resistance to CDDP
(Schilder et al., 1990
;
Eastman 1991
;
Godwin et al., 1992
;
Satoh et al., 1993
;
Meijer et al., 2000
). We
showed earlier that by blocking all cellular thiols with
N-ethylmaleimide, the DNA platination by CDDP increased
8-fold
(Sadowitz et al., 2002
). The
data were used to construct a kinetic model that reproduced the measured Pt
bound to DNA as a function of incubation time and CDDP and thiol
concentrations. We later measured the kinetics of the reaction of CDDP with
GSH under conditions that mimic those found in the cell
(Dabrowiak et al., 2002
).
MT is a small (
6-kDa) cellular protein that strongly binds metal ions
(Kagi and Vallee, 1960
). The
metal ion (M) binding domains of the protein consist of 20 cysteine residues
arranged in two thiol (S)-rich sites, the
-site having a stoichiometry
of M4S11 and the ß-site with a stoichiometry of
M3S9. Although the naturally occurring protein has
Zn2+ in both binding sites, the ion can be easily
displaced by metal ions that have a high affinity for thiolates. In this way,
Zn7-MT serves as a detoxifying protein for toxic metal ions that
may enter the cell (Li et al.,
1980
; Kagi et al.,
1984
; Ye et al.,
2000
).
Our goals here are to estimate the capacity of cellular MT to trap CDDP and
the potential contribution of MT to CDDP resistance. Although CDDP reaction
with MT has been studied (Kraker et al.,
1985
; Pattanaik et al.,
1992
; Zhang and Tang,
1994
), there is little kinetic data under clinically relevant
concentrations of CDDP. We used HPLC, atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS),
and UV absorption to measure the rate of CDDP binding to MT. We also measured
the concentration of MT in leukocytes. The data obtained are used to estimate
how cellular MT influences DNA platination by CDDP.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.3 mM in 154 mM NaCl) was obtained
from American Pharmaceutical Partners (Los Angeles, CA); cadmium (Cd)/zinc
(Zn)-thionein I (from rabbit liver; mol. wt.
6000; 5.0 mg containing 3%
Cd and 1% zinc), Cd atomic absorption standard (994 µg of Cd/ml in 1%
HNO3), Zn atomic absorption standard (994 µg of Zn/ml in 1%
HNO3), CdCl2, dihexylamine, glacial acetic acid, NaCl,
pH Test Strips, EDTA, and Tris were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
MO). Monobromobimane (mBBr) was purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR),
methanesulfonic acid was purchased from Fluka Chemical Corp. (Ronkonkoma, NY),
and perchloric acid was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI).
Highest purity dithiothreitol (DTT) was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego,
CA). SnakeSkin pleated dialysis tubing (mol. wt. cutoff, 3500) was purchased
from Pierce Chemical (Rockford, IL), distilled deionized water (water for
injection quality water, dH2O) was purchased from Mediatech
(Herndon, VA), and Pt atomic spectroscopy standard
(H2PtCl6, 1 mg/ml in 10% HCl) was purchased from
PerkinElmer Instruments (Norwalk, CT). The chemicals were of reagent grade or
better. All prepared solutions were stored in polyethylene tubes. The use of volunteer blood was approved by the institutional review board (State University of New York, Upstate Medical University) for the protection of human subjects. The cell count and volume were determined on the Coulter Z2 model (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA).
Solutions. Cd/Zn-thionein (5.0 mg, from Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved
in 1.0 ml of dH2O (final concentration,
0.83 mM) and stored at
20°C. Dihexylammonium acetate (2.5 mM) HPLC solvent A was prepared
in the hood by the addition of 590 µl of 4.24 M dihexylamine and 144 µl
of 17.4 M glacial acetic acid to each liter of dH2O; the pH was
adjusted to
7.0 by small additions of dihexylamine or acetic acid (the
solution was continuously stirred). The sodium methane sulfonate and mBBr
solutions were prepared and stored as described
(Souid et al., 2001
).
Preparation of Apo-thionein. The mixture contained 100 µl of
Cd/Zn-thionein (from the 5.0 mg/ml solution described above), 4.0 M HCl, and
5.0 mM EDTA (final pH ≤ 2 and final volume, 200 µl). The solution was
incubated at 37°C for
16 h. DTT (from a 0.1 M solution freshly made
in dH2O) was added to a final concentration of 10 mM, and the pH
was adjusted to
7.5 by the addition of
450 µl of 1.0 M Tris-base
(final volume, 1.0 ml with dH2O). The mixture was incubated at
37°C for
5 h, and then placed in a SnakeSkin pleated dialysis tubing
(mol. wt. cutoff, 3500) and dialyzed at 4°C for
16 h against two
changes of 2 liters of 10 mM Tris-NO3 (pH
7.4). The control
experiment contained 100 µl of Cd/Zn-thionein that had undergone the same
incubations and dialysis, but without the additions of HCl, EDTA, Tris-base,
and DTT. The UV absorbance spectrum of apo-thionein dialysate was compared
with that of the control dialysate (Cd/Zn-thionein). The acid-treated MT
lacked molecular absorbance at 240 to 300 nm, reflecting loss of the
mercaptide complex. The apo-thionein concentration was determined by the
absorbance at 220 nm (
220, 48,200
M1 cm1)
(Vasak, 1991
;
Pattanaik et al., 1992
;
Ye et al., 2000
).
Preparation of Cd7-Thionein, Zn7-Thionein and
Pt7-Thionein. The mixtures contained 100 µl of Cd/Zn-MT
(from the 5.0 mg/ml solution described above) and 1.0 mM CdCl2, 1.0
mM ZnSO4, or 1.0 mM CDDP (final volume, 1.0 ml). The reactions were
incubated at 37°C for
60 h, and then placed in a SnakeSkin pleated
dialysis tubing (mol. wt. cutoff, 3500) and dialyzed at 4°C for
16 h
against two changes of 2 liters of 10 mM Tris-NO3 (pH
7.4).
The metal contents of the dialysates were determined on the AAS. The MT
concentration was estimated using a stoichiometry of 7 g-atoms of metal per
mole.
Binding of CDDP to MT Monitored by HPLC-AAS. The reactions were
carried out at 37 ± 0.1°C in a total volume of 1.0 ml. A typical
mixture contained 970 µl of MT dialysate (containing
5083 µM
of Cd/Zn-thionein, Cd7-thionein, Zn7-thionein,
Pt7-thionein, or apo-thionein as described above), 4.62 mM NaCl
(the approximate concentration of Cl in the cytosol), 10 mM
Tris-NO3 (pH 7.4) and 33 µM CDDP. The control experiments
contained the same mixture except that 970 µl of the dialysis solution was
used instead of the MT dialysate. Fifty microliters of the reaction mixture
was loaded on the HPLC and analyzed as described below.
Preparation of Leukocyte Acid-Soluble Supernatant (Leu-AS). Five
microliters of blood were collected from a volunteer into an EDTA Vacutainer
tube (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The sample was diluted to 50 ml
with ice-cold dH2O and incubated on ice for
10 min. The
leukocytes were collected by centrifugation (
3000g for 10 min),
and the procedure was repeated twice. The final pellet was washed with 0.9%
NaCl. Leu-AS was prepared by the addition of 0.6 ml of 2.5% perchloric acid, 2
M sodium methane sulfonate. The mixture was vigorously vortexed (with three
passages of the pestle through a glass-Teflon homogenizer). The supernatant
was recovered by centrifugation and suspended in 50 mM NaOH, 1.0 mM DTT, and
10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0 (final volume, 1.0 ml). The solution was then placed in
a SnakeSkin pleated dialysis tubing (mol. wt. cutoff, 3500) and dialyzed at
4°C for
16 h against 1 liter of 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0) plus 0.1 µM
CdCl2. This step was followed by
16 h of dialysis against two
changes of 1 liter of 10 mM Tris-Cl. This dialysis procedure removes unbound
Cd and cellular GSH. The Cd content of the dialysate was determined on the
AAS. The MT concentration of the dialysate was estimated using a stoichiometry
of 7 g-atoms of Cd per mole.
mBBr Labeling. Labeling reaction contained
1.0 ml of the Leu-AS
plus 100 µl of mBBr (from 0.1 M stock in acetonitrile). The mixture was
incubated in the dark at 37°C for 30 min and then dialyzed at 4°C
against two changes of 1 liter of 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0) for
6 h (to
remove unbound mBBr). Fifty microliters of the dialysate was injected on HPLC
and analyzed as described (Souid et al.,
1998
,
1999
,
2001
).
UV Absorbance. The absorbance at 260 nm (which reflects the presence
of metal-S and disulfide bonds) as a function of time was measured using a
single-beam spectrophotometer (model DU 640B; Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Samples
were in a 1-cm path length quartz cuvet with a Teflon stopper, which was
thermostatted at 37 ± 0.1°C. The spectrophotometer was
"zeroed" immediately after adding MT, which initiated the
reaction. The reaction mixture contained variable concentrations of MT and
CDDP in 10 mM Tris-NO3 (pH 7.4) and 4.62 mM NaCl. The control
experiment for measuring the rate of disulfide formation contained MT (
50
µM), buffer, and NaCl but no CDDP. The other control experiment contained
CDDP (33 µM), buffer, and NaCl but no MT. In these experiments, the noise
was negligible. The signal drift of 20-h absorbance readings was at most
0.002 to
0.007.
HPLC-UV. Analysis was performed on a Beckman Coulter reversed-phase
HPLC system, which consisted of an automated injector (model 507e), a pump
(model 125), and an UV detector (model 166). UV detection at 260 nm was used.
Solvent A was 2.5 mM dihexylammonium acetate in dH2O (continuously
stirred), and solvent B was HPLC-grade methanol. The column, 4.6 x 250
mm Beckman Coulter Ultrasphere IP, was operated at room temperature at a flow
rate of 0.5 ml/min. The chromatography procedure employed linear gradients as
follows: 0 min, 10% B; 5 min, 10% B; 20 min, 75% B; 40 min, 100% B; 45 min,
100% B; 46 min, 10% B; 60 min, re-inject
(Dabrowiak et al., 2002
). The
injection volume was 50 µl. HPLC eluates were collected for Pt
determination by AAS as described below.
AAS. Cd, Zn, and Pt analyses were performed using the graphite
furnace of a Shimadzu AAS (model AA-6800), with an ist (Imaging and Sensing
Technology, Horseheads, NY) hollow cathode Pt lamp, deuterium arc background
correction, and pyrolytically coated graphite tubes
(Dabrowiak et al., 2002
).
Calibration curves were generated prior to each measurement and proved to be
linear from 0 to 10 pmol (r > 0.98). A background reading of
0.005 optic density (for dH2O) was subtracted from each of the
determinations. The injection volume was 5 to 20 µl.
Kinetics of CDDP Binding to MT. The kinetics of CDDP binding to MT
were analyzed using the second-order rate, eq. 1:
![]() | (1) |
The change in [CDDP] due to other processes (e.g., hydrolysis and
reaction with buffer) during the time course of the reaction (i.e., the
control condition) was subtracted from that of CDDP reaction with MT. To do
this, we considered the two processes, the control reaction and the reaction
with MT that decreased [CDDP]. Assuming these were first-order
processes with rate constants
and ß, [CDDP] obeyed
Coe(
+ ß)t. To isolate
the process of interest, measured [CDDP] was multiplied by
e
t. The intensities for each
control mixture were fit to an exponential, and the exponentials were averaged
to give
0.202e0.0276t, with
t in hours (please see Fig.
3a, curve and legend).
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
For [MT]o = 27 µM and [CDDP]o = 33 µM, the plot
of absorption versus time has
0 slope to 2 h
(Fig. 1). In other runs (not
shown), the absorption actually decreases and goes through a minimum before
increasing. The delay in the increase of absorption occurs whenever
[MT]o is greater than, or comparable to, [CDDP]o. This
suggests that the reaction leading to the increase in absorption (i.e., the
formation of Pt-S bonds) is not the first reaction to occur, and that the
first reaction, referred to as reaction 1, is rate-determining. When
[CDDP]o >> [MT]o, the absorption at 260 nm
increases with time with no delay, indicating that reaction 1 has been speeded
up so as to make the formation of Pt-S bonds rate-determining (e.g.,
Fig. 1,
[MT]o/[CDDP]o = 2.1 µM/198 µM). This second
reaction is referred to as reaction 2, although it is likely a series of
reactions.
When reaction 2 is rate-determining, one can attempt to establish its order with respect to CDDP and MT. The absorption versus time curves (not including 27 µM/33 µM) were fitted, using the Solver least-squares routine, to a constant plus two exponentials; i.e., Abs(t) = A + BeCt + DeEt.
The initial slope was calculated as (BC + DE), with results given in Table 1. If the rate of reaction 2 is proportional to [CDDP]m[MT]n, one can determine m and n by comparing initial rates with different initial concentrations of the reactants. From the last two rows of Table 1, one obtains (2.1 µM/0.83 µM) n = 2.32 (ratio of rates), or n = 0.905 ± 0.096 (errors calculated from slope errors, Table 1), i.e., close to the expected value of 1. From the first two rows of Table 1, one obtains (198 µM/33 µM)m = 13.9, or m = 1.47 ± 0.13, suggesting the reaction is first or second order in CDDP, or that several reactions occur rapidly after the first.
|
Binding of CDDP to MT As Monitored by HPLC-AAS. A typical
chromatogram of the reaction of CDDP with MT is shown in
Fig. 2. The mixture (at
37°C) contained 33 µM CDDP,
77.5 µM apo-thionein, 10 mM
Tris-NO3 (pH 7.4) and 4.62 mM NaCl (final volume, 1.0 ml). Pt
(determined by AAS) was present in eluates with 3 < tR
< 7 min (corresponding to unbound CDDP), 24 < tR
< 27 min (corresponding to Pt-thionein product), and, at a lesser extent,
27 < tR < 30 min (corresponding mostly to CDDP
hydrolysis products). Otherwise, the remaining chromatogram was free of
Pt.
|
Kinetics of CDDP Binding to MT As Monitored by HPLC-AAS. The Pt
contents of eluates with 3 < tR < 7 min (containing
unbound CDDP) diminished with reaction time and allowed determination of the
k values for CDDP binding to MT (using eq. 1). Two experiments are
shown in Fig. 3. For
Fig. 3a, the mixture (at
37°C) contained 970 µl of Cd/Zn-thionein dialysate (
50 µM MT),
33 µM CDDP, and 4.62 mM NaCl. Pt AAS intensities after various reaction
times for this mixture are shown as squares. The control mixture contained 970
µl of the dialysis solution, 33 µM CDDP, and 4.62 mM NaCl. Pt AAS
intensities after various reaction times for the control mixture are shown as
triangles. The solid curve is the average exponential fit to the control
intensities from all experiments.
For all experiments, the CDDP recovery from the eluates with 3 < tR < 7 min at reaction time 0 was (mean ± S.D.) 86 ± 18%. As the reaction proceeded, the concentration of unbound CDDP diminished. At 8 h, the concentration of unbound CDDP decreased to 29% of its value at 0 h and at 26 h decreased to 9% (Fig. 3a, squares). In the control mixture, at 27 h, the concentration of CDDP was 84% of its value at 0 h, reflecting the slow rate of CDDP hydrolysis in the absence of MT (Fig. 3a, triangles). The solid curve in Fig. 3a (the average decrease for the control mixture) was used to correct the measured AAS reaction intensities. The results of correction are shown as circles in Fig. 3a.
The experiment shown in Fig.
3b, using Cd/Zn-thionein, involved more points at shorter reaction
times, to see whether the delay observed in some of the UV absorption
measurements (see above) could be observed in the HPLC-AAS measurements.
Original CDDP and MT concentrations were 33 and 6.4 µM, respectively. The
AAS intensities have been converted to concentrations of CDDP in micromolar
concentration. The squares are measured intensities for the reaction mixture,
and the triangles are measured intensities for the control mixture. The curves
are exponential fits (R2
0.5) to the data. There
seems to be no evidence for a delay in the observed reaction.
For the control-corrected data of Fig. 3a (circles), the quantity ln(Q), eq. 1, was calculated. Divided by [CDDP]0 [MT]0 (labeled as: [C0 M0]), it is plotted versus time t in Fig. 4a. The linear fit shown (R2 = 0.953) is 0.0062 + 0.00214t, corresponding to a second-order rate constant k = 0.00214 µM1 h1 or 0.59 M1 s1. The data of Fig. 3b, treated similarly, lead to a linear fit (R2 = 0.453) of 0.000147 + 0.0000243t/min. This gives k = (0.41 ± 0.13) M1 s1. In Fig. 4b, ln(Q) divided by [CDDP]0 [MT]0 (labeled as [C0 M0]), calculated from three other sets of measurements after correction for control, is plotted versus time t. The triangles are for the reaction of CDDP with Cd/Zn-thionein, the diamonds for the reaction with Zn7-thionein, and the stars for the reaction with Cd7-thionein. The three linear fits are also shown in Fig. 4b, and their results are given in Table 2. The errors are standard errors for the linear fits, with uncertainties due to experimental errors not included. Within our estimate of overall error, all four plots have the same slope, as does the plot obtained from the data of Fig. 3b. This shows that CDDP displaces bound Cd and Zn equally well.
|
|
|
|
Kinetics of Pt-Thionein Product Formation. The amount of Pt in
eluates with 24 < tR < 27 min (representing
Pt-thionein products) increased with reaction time. A typical example is shown
in Fig. 5b. The reaction
mixture (at 37°C) contained 970 µl of apo-thionein dialysate (
77.5
µM MT), 33 µM CDDP, and 4.62 mM NaCl. The control mixture contained 970
µl of the dialysis solution, 33 µM CDDP, and 4.62 mM NaCl. In this
experiment, the recovery of Pt-thionein product was
20%, reflecting
retention of the bulk of the product on the column.
The 24 < tR < 27 min eluates of the apo-thionein
reaction (Fig. 5b, squares)
were placed in the dialysis tubing (mol. wt. cutoff, 3500) and dialyzed at
4°C for
16 h against two changes of 2 liters of 10 mM
Tris-NO3 (pH
7.4). The Pt was fully (100%) retained in the
dialysates, confirming that it was bound to MT. Otherwise, the Pt in eluates
with 24 < tR < 27 of the control mixture
(Fig. 5b, circles) was fully
dialyzable.
In Fig. 6, the reaction
mixture (at 37°C) contained 970 µl of Pt7-thionein dialysate
(
55 µM MT), 33 µM CDDP, and 4.62 mM NaCl. The control mixture
contained 970 µl of the dialysis solution, 33 µM CDDP, and 4.62 mM NaCl.
Figure 6a shows the amount of
CDDP in the reaction mixture (squares) and the amount in the control mixture
(circles) as functions of reaction time. These were measured by HPLC-AAS and
converted to Pt concentration (micromolar). The slopes of the exponential
fits, shown as lines, are the same within the experimental error.
Figure 6b shows the measured
concentration of Pt-thionein product, in micromolar concentration, as a
function of reaction time, for the reaction mixture (squares) and the control
mixture (circles). Again, the slopes (linear fits are shown) are very similar:
0.26 ± 0.33 for the reaction and 0.54 ± 0.11 for the control.
This shows that the amount of Pt-thionein product remained unchanged with
reaction time, demonstrating that the MT was saturated with Pt and no
un-platinated MT sites were available.
Accumulation of Cd in Leu-AS. Leu-AS (Fig. 7, solid line) and Cd/Zn-thionein (Fig. 7, dashed line) were labeled with mBBr, separated on HPLC, and detected by fluorescence. The predominant thiols in the Leu-AS were the two MT isoforms (peaks 5 and 6).
|
The Cd accumulation was associated with increased molecular absorbance at
240 to 300 nm (Fig. 8, solid
line), reflecting formation of the Cd-thionein (mercaptide) complex. Using a
stoichiometry of 7 g-atoms of Cd per mole, the amount of MT was
3.95 nmol
per
3.46 x 107 leukocytes or
0.1 fmol per
leukocyte. Giving the measured mean leukocyte volume of
128 ± 33
fl, cellular concentration of MT was thus
1.0 mM.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
8-fold when cellular
thiols are blocked by N-ethylmaleimide
(Sadowitz et al., 2002
The precise role of MT in trapping CDDP in the cytosol during a treatment
course is unknown. We employ here clinically relevant conditions of CDDP to
estimate its reaction rate with MT. Platinol, the formulation of CDDP given to
patients, is studied at concentrations that are close to the therapeutic range
(Corden et al., 1985
;
Souid et al., 2003
). The
reactions with MT are investigated at 37 ± 0.1°C and a pH of 7.4
with 10 mM Tris-NO3; the nitrate ion is chosen because it binds to
Pt2+ only weakly.
The UV absorptions of solutions of CDDP and Cd/Zn-thionein were monitored
as functions of time, and the absorptions of MT and CDDP alone were
subtracted. Some of these results are shown in
Fig. 1. The increase in
absorption is primarily due to the formation of Pt-S bonds. Unless [CDDP] was
much bigger than [MT], the initial slope of the absorption-versus-time curve
was close to zero (sometimes negative), indicating that the first reaction
occurring (reaction 1), which was rate-determining, did not involve Pt-S bond
formation. The subsequent reaction (reaction 2), which involves Pt-S bond
formation, is shown by the increase of absorption after a delay of
1 to 2
h.
When [CDDP] was much bigger than [MT]
(Fig. 1,
[MT]/[CDDP] = 2.1 µM/198 µM), the initial slope of the
absorption-versus-time curve was positive, and its value depended on the
concentrations of the reactants (Table
1). The rate of Pt binding to MT is proportional to the product of
[CDDP] (calculations performed with UV data show an order of
1.47 with respect to CDDP) and [MT]. With increased
concentration of CDDP, the time taken to reach plateau decreases. This implies
that reaction 2 has become rate-determining, since the rate of reaction 2 is
now smaller than that of reaction 1. Thus, the rate of reaction 1 increases
rapidly with [CDDP]0. From the dependence of initial slopes on
initial CDDP and MT concentrations, we estimate that reaction 2 is
approximately first order in [MT] and approximately second order in
[CDDP]. The latter probably means that reaction 2 actually involves
several reactions, with sequential formations of Pt-S bonds. Reaction 1 may
dominate in cells with excess MT and low CDDP concentration, allowing
effective DNA platination by the drug.
Pattanaik et al. (1992
),
studying the reaction of CDDP with MT by UV absorption, HPLC-AAS, extended
X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy, and other techniques, also
concluded that at least two reactions occurred. They proposed that, in the
first reaction, four Pt atoms became attached to MT, but without formation of
Pt-S bonds or expulsion of Zn or Cd. This reaction did not increase the UV
absorption, as was the case for our reaction 1. They reported that this
reaction was zero-order in [CDDP] and first-order in [MT].
The former conclusion differs from ours, probably because they worked at very
high (millimolar) concentrations of CDDP, so that the rate at which Pt
attached to MT was limited by the surface of MT and not by [CDDP]0.
The pseudo-first-order rate constant was
1.8 x
103 s1 (average of
results in their Table 1).
The second reaction proposed (Pattanaik
et al., 1992
) involved addition of six more Pt atoms and expulsion
of all seven Zn and Cd ions. After this reaction, each Pt atom is surrounded
by four sulfurs. It is this reaction, corresponding to our reaction 2, which
leads to an increase in UV absorption. This reaction was found to be
first-order in CDDP and first-order in MT. The second-order rate constant at
25°C was
0.22 ± 0.072 M1
s1 (average of rate constants calculated from
their Table 1), somewhat
smaller than our average k for MT at 37°C (
0.63 ±
0.08 M1 s1,
Table 2).
Zhang and Tang (1994
) also
studied the reaction of CDDP with MT, using excess concentrations of CDDP and
monitoring the reactions by UV absorption. They propose stepwise binding of
Pt. They resolve their data into three kinetic steps, each pseudo-first order
in CDDP and each leading to an increase in UV absorption. However, they report
that only 7, and not 10, moles of Pt bind per mole of thionein.
The pseudo-first-order rate constants at 15°C were reported
(Zhang and Tang, 1994
) as 8.5
x 103 min1,
1.3 x 103
min1, and 0.28 x
103 min1 when
[CDDP] was 0.124 mM. The third rate constant increased to 0.35
x 103 min1 at
37°C. The four values cited correspond to second-order rate constants of
1.14, 0.17, 0.038, and 0.047 M1
s1. Although the authors state that the first of
the three steps is first-order in [CDDP] (and the others zero-order),
a plot of ln(kI) versus ln([CDDP]) (data from
their Table 5) has a slope of 0.15 ± 0.03, showing that it is
zero-order, as found by Pattanaik et al.
(1992
).
In contrast to carboplatin and oxaliplatin, unbound cisplatin does not produce significant UV absorption at 260 nm. Therefore, the reaction was followed by Pt contents (by AAS) in the HPLC eluates, representing unbound cisplatin (3 < tR < 7) as a function of reaction or incubation time. It appeared that the Pt concentration decreased smoothly with reaction time, with no evidence of a delay like the one that sometimes appeared in the UV absorption. Since we are measuring the disappearance of free CDDP, this is not surprising: we are measuring the rate of the first reaction, in which CDDP binds to MT, whether or not it involves formation of Pt-S bonds.
The reaction was analyzed according to mixed second-order kinetics. From the measured initial concentrations of CDDP and MT, we calculated [MT] for each reaction time t, and then calculated ln(Q) (eq. 1). Plots of ln(Q) versus t, such as those shown in Fig. 4, a and b, and Fig. 5a, were almost always highly linear. From the slope of such a plot one obtains the second-order rate constant k. Values of k (at 37°C) are given in Table 2. All four MTs have the same value of k within experimental error: 0.63 ± 0.08 M1 s1. For apo-thionein, k is smaller, 0.14 M1 s1.
We also measured the concentration of Pt in the HPLC peak corresponding to the product. Only a fraction of the Pt lost from the parent peak was found in the product peak because significant amounts of Pt-thionein product were retained in the column. In general, the concentration of Pt in the product peak increases linearly with reaction time for t up to 9 h (Fig. 5b).
For the reaction of Pt7-thionein with CDDP, Pt concentrations in the product and parent peaks were measured as functions of reaction time. Linear fits of the data were performed (Fig. 6). The slopes were small and, within experimental error, the same for the reaction mixture as for the control mixture. This indicates that the Pt7-thionein is saturated with Pt and unable to react with additional CDDP, and that no unreacted thionein was present. On the time scale of our experiments, the Pt is thus irreversibly bound.
We adapt the mBBr labeling method to detect MT in Leu-AS
(Fig. 7); mBBr rapidly reacts
with biologic thiols (Souid et al.,
2001
; Tacka et al.,
2002
). The resulting bimane (thioether) derivatives are highly
fluorescent and can be detected with great sensitivity. The cellular
concentration of MT in human leukocytes is estimated here to be
1.0 mM,
which is similar to the values reported for human liver (0.0172.5
µmol/g wet weight) and mononuclear blood cells (0.022 fmol/cell)
(Vasak, 1991
). Our estimation
is based on the capacity of Leu-AS to accumulate Cd
(Fig. 8). Nevertheless, since
MT can be induced, cells may increase their MT content substantially.
It seems clear that the HPLC-AAS measurements on the 3 <
tR < 7 min eluate are detecting the initial reaction of
MT with CDDP. This reaction cannot be seen in our UV time studies because it
does not lead to a change in the extinction coefficient. It is followed by
other reactions in which Pt-S bonds form, increasing the extinction
coefficient. The first reaction has been reported
(Pattanaik et al., 1992
;
Zhang and Tang, 1994
) to be
zero-order in CDDP and first-order in MT, but this is probably because the
studies were done with millimolar CDDP concentrations and micromolar MT
concentrations. We analyzed the HPLC-AAS measurements according to mixed
second-order kinetics.
The value of the second-order rate constant k was essentially the
same for all the MT we measured, 0.63 ± 0.08
M1 s1
(Table 2). It was much lower,
0.14 M1 s1, for
unmetallated apo-thionein, probably because the formation of disulfide bonds
makes some of the sulfhydryls unsuitable for Pt binding
(Ejnik et al., 2002
). The
average value of k for MT of 0.63 M1
s1 is
50-fold higher than that for CDDP
reaction with GSH, k = 0.013 M1
s1 (Dabrowiak
et al., 2002
). Thus, since the concentrations of GSH and MT are
both in the millimolar range, the contribution of MT to trapping CDDP can be
more than that of GSH.
An estimate of the rate at which CDDP binds to MT in the cytosol can be
obtained from our estimated concentration of MT (
1.0 mM), clinical
concentration of CDDP (
10 µM), and measured k value for CDDP
binding to MT (0.63 M1
s1). The result is
6.3 x
106 mol of CDDP per cm3 per s. Using
the estimate of
0.022 fmol of MT per cell, the estimated rate is
8.3
x 106 fmol per min per cell.
The rate constant reported here for the reaction of CDDP with MT is
important for accurate modeling of cellular DNA platination by CDDP
(Sadowitz et al., 2002
). We
have constructed a simple model (describing complex processes with simple rate
laws) that involves several undetermined kinetic parameters. With values for
more parameters fixed by measurement, the model should lead to more reliable
values for the others. This would enable a test of the model as a guide to
clinical practice.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Abbreviations used are: CDDP, cisplatin; MT, metallothionein; GSH,
glutathione; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; AAS, atomic
absorption spectroscopy; mBBr, monobromobimane; tR,
retention time; k, second-order rate constant; dH2O,
distilled deionized water; DTT, dithiothreitol; Leu-AS, leukocyte acid-soluble
supernatant; t1/2, half-life. ![]()
Address correspondence to: Dr. Abdul-Kader Souid, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210. E-mail: souida{at}upstate.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Ragunathan, J. Dairou, B. Pluvinage, M. Martins, E. Petit, N. Janel, J.-M. Dupret, and F. Rodrigues-Lima Identification of the Xenobiotic-Metabolizing Enzyme Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase 1 as a New Target of Cisplatin in Breast Cancer Cells: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Inhibition Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2008; 73(6): 1761 - 1768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Uehara, T. Miyoshi, N. Tsuchiya, K. Masuno, M. Okada, S. Inoue, M. Torii, J. Yamate, and T. Maruyama Comparative analysis of gene expression between renal cortex and papilla in nedaplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats Human and Experimental Toxicology, October 1, 2007; 26(10): 767 - 780. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kasparkova, O. Novakova, O. Vrana, F. Intini, G. Natile, and V. Brabec Molecular Aspects of Antitumor Effects of a New Platinum(IV) Drug Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2006; 70(5): 1708 - 1719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Hasinoff, X. Wu, O. V. Krokhin, W. Ens, K. G. Standing, J. L. Nitiss, T. Sivaram, A. Giorgianni, S. Yang, Y. Jiang, et al. Biochemical and Proteomics Approaches to Characterize Topoisomerase II{alpha} Cysteines and DNA as Targets Responsible for Cisplatin-Induced Inhibition of Topoisomerase II{alpha} Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2005; 67(3): 937 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E.M. Vickers, K. Rose, R. Fisher, M. Saulnier, P. Sahota, and P. Bentley Kidney Slices of Human and Rat to Characterize Cisplatin-Induced Injury on Cellular Pathways and Morphology Toxicol Pathol, August 1, 2004; 32(5): 577 - 590. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Wilson, H. Yamamoto, and G. Singh Role of the transcription factor Ets-1 in cisplatin resistance Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2004; 3(7): 823 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hagrman, J. Goodisman, and A.-K. Souid Kinetic Study on the Reactions of Platinum Drugs with Glutathione J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2004; 308(2): 658 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||