DMD Noab BioDiscoveries

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


0090-9556/04/3202-212-221$20.00
DMD 32:212-221, 2004

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rurak, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rurak, D. W.

STEREOSELECTIVE PHARMACOKINETICS OF FLUOXETINE AND NORFLUOXETINE ENANTIOMERS IN PREGNANT SHEEP

John Kim1, K. Wayne Riggs2, and Dan W. Rurak

BC Research Institute of Children's & Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

(Received March 17, 2003; accepted October 1, 2003)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We examined the stereoselective disposition of fluoxetine (FX) and its metabolite norfluoxetine (NFX) in five pregnant sheep. Racemic FX was administered i.v. to the ewe (50 mg) and the fetus (10 mg) on separate occasions. Maternal and fetal blood, maternal urine, and fetal amniotic and tracheal fluid samples were collected for 72 h. FX and NFX isomers were quantified by gas chromatographymass spectrometry. They rapidly crossed the placenta [maternal to fetal area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) ratios 0.59 and 0.65, respectively]. There was significant FX stereoselectivity with S/R FX AUC ratios averaging 1.65 ± 0.33 and 1.73 ± 0.29 in ewe and fetus, respectively, after maternal dosing. The maternal clearance and volume of distribution were also higher for (R)-fluoxetine than for (S)-fluoxetine. FX, NFX, and their glucuronides were present in maternal urine but accounted for only 3.4% of maternal drug elimination. In contrast, NFX was not detected in the fetus after fetal FX administration, which is consistent with the absence of measurable fetal nonplacental clearance of the drug and the lack of NFX formation in fetal hepatic microsomal incubations. There was also no fetal production of FX and NFX glucuronides in vivo. Both FX and NFX were extensively and stereoselectively bound in maternal and fetal plasma, with the free fraction S/R FX ratio averaging 0.46 ± 0.06 and 0.58 ± 0.10 in ewe and fetus, respectively. Thus, FX exhibits extensive stereoselective disposition, which is likely due to differential plasma protein binding of the FX isomers, and there is no detectable fetal formation of NFX, FX, and NFX glucuronides.


Currently there are five serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs3) available worldwide with fluoxetine (Prozac; Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, IN) being the first SSRI introduced in the North American market in 1987 (Catterson and Preskorn, 1996Go; Hiemke and Härtter, 2000Go). More than a decade after its introduction, fluoxetine (FX) still remains one of the most frequently prescribed antidepressants of this class for the treatment of depressive, obsessive-compulsive, and eating disorders. FX is a racemate of two optical isomers, both exhibiting selective serotonin reuptake inhibition with about equal potencies in vitro and in vivo (Gram, 1994Go). However, the S-enantiomer of FX has a slightly longer duration of action than the R-enantiomer in vivo (Wong et al., 1990Go). In the human, the main metabolites of fluoxetine are norfluoxetine (NFX), FX, NFX conjugates, and hippuric acid, which together may account for up to 95% of the administered dose (DeVane, 1999Go). The plasma concentration of NFX is comparable with that of FX at steady state (Hwang et al., 1980Go). Although the metabolite of SFX, S-norfluoxetine (SNFX) is an equally effective serotonin reuptake inhibitor as SFX, R-norfluoxetine (RNFX) is a weak inhibitor (Fuller et al., 1992Go). Therefore, it appears that the longer duration of action of SFX in vivo is due in part to the liberation of its more potent metabolite, SNFX (Fuller et al., 1992Go).

FX and other SSRIs are not approved for use in human pregnancy. Despite this, they are in common use for the treatment of depression and other affective disorders during gestation (Newport et al., 2001Go). However, there is very limited information on the pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine in human/animal pregnancy. Case reports (Spencer, 1993Go; Mhanna et al., 1997Go) on fluoxetine and norfluoxetine exposure at birth and immediately postpartum indicate that both the parent drug and its active metabolite readily cross the placenta. Several prospective studies examining birth outcomes from SSRI-exposed pregnancies have reported no significant increase in morphological teratogenic risk associated with maternal FX therapy in the first trimester (Pastuszak et al., 1993Go; Goldstein, 1995Go; Chambers et al., 1996Go; Nulman et al., 1997Go). In contrast, third trimester exposure is associated with reduced birth weight and postnatal weight gain and an increased incidence of preterm delivery, admission to a special nursery, and poor neonatal adaptation (Chambers et al., 1996Go, 1999Go; Cohen et al., 2000Go; Nordeng et al., 2001Go). Recently, we and our collaborators have reported altered facial and heart rate responses to painful medical procedures in infants exposed to FX and other SSRIs in utero (Oberlander et al., 2002Go). However, there are no reported effects of the drug on infant/child global IQ and language development (Nulman et al., 1997Go; Kulin et al., 1998Go). On the other hand, prenatal exposure to fluoxetine in animal models does suggest long-term effects on endocrine and behavioral function (Di Pasquale et al., 1994Go; Vorhees et al., 1994Go; Cabrera-Vera and Battaglia, 1998Go). Studies of the placental transfer of fluoxetine in animals appear limited to a single study in rats, which assessed fetal exposure after administration of radiolabeled FX to the dam. Results of these autoradiographic studies suggest that FX and/or it metabolites readily cross the placenta to result in extensive fetal tissue distribution (Pohland et al., 1989Go).

To date there is very limited information on the extent of placental transfer and subsequent fetal exposure to fluoxetine and its pharmacologically active metabolite norfluoxetine. In addition, the stereoselective disposition of FX during pregnancy has not been studied, and there is no information on the ability of the fetus to metabolize the drug. The primary objective of the current study was to examine maternal and fetal stereoselective disposition of FX and NFX in the chronically instrumented ewe and fetus after both maternal and fetal administration of racemic FX. A further objective was to compare the rate of fluoxetine demethylation in maternal and fetal hepatic microsomes studies in vitro. It is very feasible to chronically implant catheters in the maternal and fetal vasculature and other fluid compartments of pregnant sheep, which permits serial sampling of blood and other fluids. In addition, the fetal lamb and human are similar in terms of physiologic functions (Harding and Bocking, 2001Go). Thus, pregnant sheep have been commonly used to study maternal-fetal drug disposition and effects (Rurak et al., 1991Go).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and Surgical Preparation. The study was approved by University of British Columbia Animal Care Committee, and the procedures performed on sheep conformed to the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. The detailed surgical procedures used have been described previously (Kwan et al., 1995Go). Briefly, five pregnant Dorset Suffolk cross-bred ewes, with a maternal body weight of 69.8 ± 16.4 kg (mean ± S.D.), were surgically prepared at 117 to 126 days of gestation (123 ± 3 days, term ~145 days). Surgery was performed aseptically under halothane (1–2%) and nitrous oxide (60%) in oxygen anesthesia after induction with intravenous sodium pentothal (1 g) and intubation of the ewe. Silicone rubber catheters (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) were implanted in fetal femoral arteries, fetal lateral tarsal veins, and a maternal femoral artery and vein. Catheters were also implanted in the fetal trachea and amniotic cavity. The catheters were tunneled subcutaneously and exteriorized via a small incision on the flank of the ewe and were stored in a denim pouch when not in use. All catheters were flushed daily with approximately 2 ml of sterile 0.9% sodium chloride containing heparin (12 unit/ml) to maintain patency. Intramuscular injections of ampicillin (500 mg) were given to the ewe on the day of surgery and for 3 days postoperatively. Ampicillin (500 mg) was also administered into the amniotic cavity immediately after surgery and daily thereafter. After surgery, animals were kept in holding pens with other sheep and were given free access to food and water. The sheep were allowed to recover for 4 to 8 days before experimentation. On the morning of the experiment a Foley bladder catheter (North American Latex Corp., Sullivan, IN) was inserted via the urethra of the ewe and attached to a sterile polyvinyl bag for cumulative maternal urine collection.

Experimental Protocol. All experiments were conducted between 124 and 137 days of gestation. Paired maternal and fetal experiments were carried out on all five pregnant sheep in a randomized manner. All doses of racemic fluoxetine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were prepared in sterile water for injection and were sterilized by filtering through a nylon syringe filter (0.22 µm; MSI, Westborough, MA) into a capped empty sterile injection vial. For maternal experiments, the drug (50-mg equivalent to base) was administered over 10 min using an infusion pump via the maternal femoral vein catheter. For fetal experiments, 10-mg equivalent of the drug was similarly administered via a fetal tarsal vein catheter. In all experiments, simultaneous serial blood samples were collected from the fetal (1.5 ml) and maternal (3.0 ml) femoral arterial catheters at -5, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h. Fetal femoral arterial samples (0.5 ml) were also collected at the same time intervals for blood gas analysis and measurement of glucose and lactate concentrations. All fetal blood removed for sampling during the experiment was replaced at intervals by an equal volume of blood obtained from the ewe before the start of the experiment or from another ewe on subsequent experimental days. Serial amniotic (~2 ml) and fetal tracheal (~2 ml) fluid samples were collected at -5, 30 min, 1 h, and at the subsequent blood sampling time points. Cumulative samples of maternal urine were also collected every hour for the first 4 h and along with each blood sample beyond 6 h. Maternal and fetal blood samples collected for drug and metabolite analysis were placed into heparinized Vacutainer tubes (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), gently mixed, and centrifuged at 2000g for 10 min to separate the plasma. The plasma supernatant was transferred into clean borosilicate test tubes with polytetrafluoroethylene-lined caps. Amniotic and fetal tracheal fluids and maternal urine samples were also placed into clean borosilicate test tubes. All samples were stored frozen at -20°C until the time of analysis.

Physiological Measurements. Fetal blood pH, pO2, and pCO2 were measured using an IL 1306 pH/blood gas analyzer (Allied Instrumentation Laboratory, Milan, Italy). Blood O2 saturation and hemoglobin concentration were determined using a hemoximeter (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). Glucose and lactate concentrations in fetal blood were determined with a 2300 STAT plus glucose/lactate analyzer (YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH).

Maternal and Fetal Plasma Protein Binding of Fluoxetine and Norfluoxetine. The plasma protein binding/unbound fraction of the FX and NFX enantiomers was measured in vitro and ex vivo using a modified procedure for equilibrium dialysis (Pacifici and Viani, 1992Go). Briefly, 100, 1000, and 10,000 ng/ml racemic FX or NFX was added to drug-free maternal plasma, and the solutions were incubated for 1 h at 39°C. After incubation, equilibrium dialysis was performed using a cellulose dialysis membrane (12-kDa cut-off; Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h at 39°C. Similarly, drug-free fetal plasma was spiked, incubated, and dialyzed at 39.5°C. Pooled experimental maternal and fetal plasma samples (ex vivo) were also dialyzed in a similar manner.

Study of Hepatic Microsomes in Vitro. Maternal and fetal hepatic microsomes were prepared from two pregnant ewes (135 and 139 days' gestation) after euthanasia with i.v. sodium pentobarbital (120 mg/kg). A single slice of the maternal liver and the whole fetal liver were rapidly obtained from the animals and thoroughly washed free of blood with ice-cold 0.05 M Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1.15% KCl. Microsomes were prepared using a standard differential ultracentrifugation technique at 4°C (Lu and Levin, 1972Go) and were stored at -70°C until use. For assessing fluoxetine demethylation by the microsomal preparations, 3 mg/ml of microsomal protein was incubated at 39°C in 0.15 M Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing 10 mM MgCl2 and 15 mM NADPH. After a 3-min incubation period, the reaction was started by adding 100 ng/ml of racemic fluoxetine, with the final incubation volume being 1 ml. After 30 min, the reaction was terminated by the addition of 100 µl of acetonitrile, and the incubation mixture was stored at -20°C until drug and metabolite assay.

Drug and Metabolite Analysis. The concentrations of FX and NFX enantiomers in all biological fluids were measured using a previously developed gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analytical method (Kim et al., 1995Go). The linear calibration range of the assay is 1.0 to 500.0 ng/ml, using 200 µl of biological fluid for each enantiomer. In some cases (e.g., sampling times >9 h), a larger sample volume was required (1–2 ml) to determine maternal FX and NFX concentrations after fetal dosing. The inter- and intraday coefficients of variation were <20% at the limit of quantitation (1.0 ng/ml) and <15% at all other concentrations. The dosing solution was also analyzed to confirm the fluoxetine concentration and enantiomer ratio. For the determination of glucuronide and sulfate conjugates, maternal urine and amniotic fluid samples were incubated with ß-glucuronidase (Sigma-Aldrich), sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) or sulfatase (Sigma-Aldrich), and Tris buffer (pH 7.5) at 37°C for 8 h. The reaction mixtures were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry along with nonincubated samples. The differences in the analyte concentrations were calculated and assigned as glucuronide or sulfate conjugates.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis. Maternal and fetal total body clearances (CL), mean residence time (MRT), and steady-state volumes of distribution of the parent drug (Vdss) were calculated by standard pharmacokinetic procedures:

(1)

(2)

(3)
where AUC0-{infty}, AUMC0-{infty}, and {tau} are the area under the curve, area under the first moment curve calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule, and the infusion duration, respectively. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2ß) of the parent drug and as the metabolite was obtained from a noncompartmental fitting of the data using the nonlinear least-squares regression software WinNonlin (Pharsight, Mountain View, CA). Renal clearance values for parent drug and metabolite in the ewe were calculated by dividing the total amount of the drug or metabolite excreted in urine by the respective maternal plasma AUC.

The maternal and fetal placental and nonplacental clearance values for the fluoxetine isomers were calculated using the method described for labetalol by Yeleswaram et al. (1993Go). Maternal placental clearance (CLmp) was estimated as:

(4)
where CLf is the fetal total body FX clearance determined in the fetal drug administration experiments, and FAUC/MAUC is the fetal/maternal AUC ratio obtained in the maternal drug infusion studies. Similarly, fetal placental clearance (CLfp) was calculated as:

(5)
where CLm is the maternal total body FX clearance estimated in the maternal drug injection studies, and MAUC/FAUC is the maternal/fetal AUC ratio determined in the fetal experiments. Maternal (CLmn) and fetal (CLfn) nonplacental clearances were determined as:

(6)

(7)

Statistical Analysis. Statistical analysis was performed on the pharmacokinetic parameters using paired and unpaired t tests and two-way analysis of variance for repeated measurements with an appropriate post hoc test, if necessary. Data were considered to be significantly different when p < 0.05. Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA), GraphPad Prism 3.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA), and Sigma Plot version 4.01 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) were used for statistical analysis and graphical presentation. Data values in the text and tables are presented as the mean ± S.D. Fetal weight in utero at the time of experimentation was estimated from the weight at birth and the time interval between the experiment and birth (Kwan et al., 1995Go).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The average maternal body weight was 69.8 ± 16.4 kg, and estimated fetal body weights on the day of maternal and fetal experiments were 2.87 ± 0.83 and 2.75 ± 0.68 kg, respectively. Average gestational age on the day of FX administration was 130.4 ± 2.6 and 129.4 ± 3.6 days for the maternal and fetal experiments, respectively. Mean gestational age and fetal weight at delivery were 141.4 ± 3.0 days and 3.73 ± 0.92 kg, respectively.

Maternal Fluoxetine Administration. Plasma pharmacokinetics. Figure 1 illustrates the maternal arterial plasma concentration versus time profiles obtained for the FX and NFX isomers after maternal racemic FX administration. Plasma concentrations of both FX isomers increased rapidly during the 10-min infusion period and then declined tri-exponentially. The plasma concentration of SFX was significantly higher than that of RFX throughout the experimental period, with the individual plasma S/R concentration ratios ranging from 1.42 to 2.24 (p < 0.05, two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures). Table 1 presents the calculated maternal pharmacokinetic parameters for the FX and NFX isomers after maternal drug administration. The mean S/R ratio of plasma AUC for FX was 1.65 ± 0.33, resulting in a higher total body clearance of RFX (50.7 ± 12.4 ml/min/kg) than SFX (30.7 ± 3.8 ml/min/kg) (p < 0.05, paired t test). The steady-state volume of distribution of RFX was ~50% higher than that of the S-isomer. However, no significant stereoselectivity was observed in the apparent terminal elimination half-life for the FX isomers. Maternal plasma concentrations of the NFX isomers increased over the first 2 h and then declined slowly (Fig. 1). Unlike the parent compound, there was no significant difference in the AUC of SNFX and RNFX with the S/R ratio averaging 0.94 ± 0.22. The maternal AUC ratios of the NFX to FX isomer were 0.63 ± 0.23 and 1.10 ± 0.39 for S- and R-isomers, respectively, and these are significantly different. The apparent maternal terminal half-life values for RNFX and SNFX were not significantly different. However, the half-life values (and other pharmacokinetic variables for NFX) after FX dosing likely reflect both elimination and continued metabolite formation and so may not provide totally accurate estimates.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Plasma concentrations of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine isomers in pregnant ewes after maternal i.v. administration of racemic fluoxetine (10-min short infusion, 50-mg free base equivalent).

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 5, except for the last data point where n = 2).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Maternal and fetal plasma pharmacokinetic variables after maternal administration of racemic fluoxetine (50 mg) in pregnant ewes (mean values ± S. D., n = 5)

 

Similar to the maternal profile, fetal plasma concentrations of FX isomers also increased rapidly during the infusion period and then declined exponentially (Fig. 2). The fetal plasma SFX levels remained consistently higher than the corresponding RFX concentrations throughout the experimental period. The calculated fetal pharmacokinetic parameters for FX and NFX are presented in Table 1. The fetal S/R FX AUC ratio averaged 1.73 ± 0.29, which was not significantly different from the corresponding maternal value. The fetal-to-maternal (F/M) AUC ratio was similar for the SFX (0.60 ± 0.15) and RFX (0.58 ± 0.19) isomers. Although the apparent fetal terminal elimination half-life of the FX isomers did not exhibit any significant stereoselectivity, the values measured were significantly longer than those calculated for the mother (9.3 ± 0.3 versus 6.7 ± 0.7 for SFX; 10.8 ± 1.3 versus 6.6 ± 2.5 h for RFX) (p < 0.001). The fetal AUC ratios of NFX to FX isomers were 0.72 ± 0.18 and 0.98 ± 0.15 for S- and R-isomers, respectively. These are similar to the maternal values and are significantly different. As observed in maternal plasma, there was no significant difference in the AUC values for SNFX and RNFX, with the S/R ratio averaging 1.25 ± 0.29. The F/M AUC ratios were 0.76 ± 0.33 for SNFX and 0.53 ± 0.13 for RNFX and were not significantly different. Although the mean F/M AUC ratio for NFX (0.65) was higher than the mean value for FX (0.59), this difference was also not statistically significant. The apparent fetal terminal elimination half-lives of the NFX isomers showed significant stereoselectivity (S/R ratio of 0.66 ± 0.05, p < 0.001); however, they were not significantly different from the maternal values.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Plasma concentrations of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine isomers in fetal lambs after maternal i.v. administration of racemic fluoxetine (10-min short infusion, 50-mg free base equivalent).

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 5, except for the last data point where n = 3).

 

Amniotic and tracheal fluids. The amniotic fluid concentration of the FX and NFX isomers increased over the first 12 to 18 h of the experiments and then decreased slowly (Fig. 3). These concentrations were similar to or slightly lower than their respective fetal plasma concentrations, and no significant accumulation of either the FX or NFX isomers was observed. Unlike the fetal plasma concentration profiles (which showed a higher concentration of SFX over RFX), there were no significant differences between the amniotic fluid concentrations of the FX or NFX isomers. Fetal tracheal fluid concentrations of the FX isomers were slightly higher than those measured in amniotic fluid (Fig. 4). Similar to the amniotic fluid, there were no significant differences in the concentrations of the FX or NFX isomers. Glucuronide or sulfate conjugates of FX or NFX were not detected in the amniotic fluid samples.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Amniotic fluid concentrations of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine isomers in fetal lambs after maternal i.v. administration of racemic fluoxetine (10-min short infusion, 50-mg free base equivalent).

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 5).

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Fetal tracheal fluid concentrations of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine isomers in fetal lambs after maternal i.v. administration of racemic fluoxetine (10-min short infusion, 50-mg free base equivalent).

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 5).

 

Maternal urinary pharmacokinetics. The renal clearance, cumulative amount excreted, and percentage of administered dose excreted as FX, NFX, and their corresponding glucuronides in maternal urine are provided in Table 2. Although both parent drug and metabolite as well as their conjugates were present in maternal urine, their total contribution to overall maternal drug elimination was minimal (3.4% of the administered dose). Representative cumulative urinary excretion plots of the FX and NFX isomers and their corresponding glucuronide conjugates are shown in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively. The FX and NFX isomers did not reach plateau levels by the end of the experimental period, resulting in some underestimation of their cumulative excretion. This was also the case with the FX and NFX isomer glucuronides. Neither the cumulative amount nor the renal clearance of the FX and NFX isomers and their glucuronide conjugates exhibited any significant stereoselectivity. Additional urine collection may have provided a more accurate estimate of urinary pharmacokinetic parameters; however, further urine collection was not performed due to ethical and practical concerns regarding prolonged use of a Foley catheter in the ewes. Sulfate conjugates could not be detected in these urine samples.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Maternal urinary pharmacokinetic variables after maternal administration of racemic fluoxetine (50 mg) in pregnant ewes (mean values ± S.D., n = 5)

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Representative urinary accumulation of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine isomers in maternal urine after maternal i.v. administration of racemic fluoxetine (10-min short infusion, 50-mg free base equivalent).

Data are presented for ewe ID F6220.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Representative urinary accumulation of the glucuronide conjugates of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine isomers in maternal urine after maternal i.v. administration of racemic fluoxetine (10-min short infusion, 50-mg free base equivalent).

Data are presented for ewe ID F6220.

 

Blood gas and glucose/lactate status. During the maternal experiments, the control period fetal femoral arterial pH, pCO2, pO2, O2 saturation, and hemoglobin, lactate, and glucose concentrations were 7.362 ± 0.014, 49.3 ± 5.7 mm Hg, 22.5 ± 2.1 mm Hg, 50.7 ± 2.9%, 10.6 ± 0.5 g/dl, 1.14 ± 0.04, and 0.46 ± 0.04 mM, respectively. There were no significant changes in pH, pCO2, and glucose concentration during the experimental period. However, fetal pO2 decreased significantly from 22.5 ± 2.1 mm Hg to a minimum of 17.0 ± 1.41 mm Hg at 10 min into the infusion and thereafter returned to control levels at 6 h (20.7 ± 1.15). Similarly, fetal O2 saturation decreased significantly from 50.7 ± 2.9% to a minimum value of 36.1 ± 6.0% by 15 min after initiating the infusion and then returned to normal values at 9 h (51.0 ± 8.0.%). Fetal arterial blood lactate concentration increased significantly from 1.14 ± 0.04 mM (predose) to a maximum of 1.27 ± 0.30 mM and subsequently returned to control values at 9 h (1.18 ± 0.08 mM).

Fetal Fluoxetine Administration. Plasma pharmacokinetics. The fetal femoral arterial plasma concentration versus time profiles for FX and NFX isomers after fetal racemic FX administration are depicted in Fig. 7. Similar to the maternal profiles observed after maternal FX dosing, plasma concentrations of both FX isomers increased rapidly during the infusion period and then declined tri-exponentially, with SFX concentrations being significantly higher than those of RFX throughout the experimental period. Unlike with maternal FX administration, the NFX isomers were not detected in any of the fetal plasma samples. Table 3 presents the calculated fetal pharmacokinetic parameters for the FX isomers after fetal drug administration. The S/R ratio of plasma AUC for FX was 2.20 ± 0.11, resulting in a significantly higher total body clearance (based on estimated fetal weight) of RFX (167.3 ± 45.8 ml/min/kg) than that of SFX (76.7 ± 21.7 ml/min/kg). These fetal values are significantly higher (p < 0.01) than the corresponding estimates of maternal RFX and SFX total body clearances obtained in the maternal dosing experiments (50.7 ± 12.4 and 30.7 ± 3.8 ml/min/kg, respectively; Table 1). The Vdss for RFX (38.7 ± 17.6 l/kg) was significantly higher than that of SFX (17.4 ± 8.4 l/kg), resulting in an S/R ratio of 0.45 ± 0.06, and again, these values are higher than the corresponding maternal Vdss estimates (9.3 ± 1.3 and 6.3 ± 1.1 l/kg; Table 1). However, no significant stereoselectivity was observed in the apparent terminal elimination half-life for the FX isomers.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Plasma concentrations of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine isomers in fetal lambs after fetal i.v. administration of racemic fluoxetine (10-min short infusion, 10-mg free base equivalent).

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 5)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Fetal and maternal plasma pharmacokinetic variables after fetal administration of racemic fluoxetine (10 mg) in pregnant ewes (mean values ± S.D., n = 5)

 

Similar to maternal FX administration, maternal plasma concentrations of the FX isomers after fetal infusion increased rapidly initially and then declined exponentially (Fig. 8). Maternal SFX concentrations were also observed to be significantly higher than those of RFX after fetal FX dosing. Unlike maternal FX administration, measurable levels of the NFX isomers were only observed in two of the five ewes. Table 3 presents the calculated maternal pharmacokinetic parameters for FX and NFX. The maternal S/R FX AUC ratio was 1.73 ± 0.29, which is similar to the maternal S/R AUC ratio calculated after maternal dosing (1.65 ± 0.33; Table 1) but is significantly lower than the fetal S/R ratio (2.20 ± 0.11). No significant differences were observed for either FX- or NFX-isomer apparent elimination half-lives.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Plasma concentrations of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine isomers in pregnant ewes after fetal i.v. administration of racemic fluoxetine (10-min short infusion, 10-mg free base equivalent).

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. for fluoxetine (n = 5). Quantifiable concentrations of the norfluoxetine isomers were only observed in two of the five pregnant ewes.

 

Amniotic and tracheal fluid excretion. Similar to the fetal plasma drug concentration profiles, NFX isomers were not detected in either amniotic or tracheal fluid. The amniotic fluid concentrations of the FX isomers increased over the first hour and decreased slowly thereafter, reaching the assay limit of quantitation at 36 h. Postinfusion amniotic fluid FX concentrations were about 5- to 10-fold lower than fetal plasma levels, and no significant accumulation was observed. Unlike the fetal plasma concentration profiles (which show higher concentrations of SFX over RFX), there was no significant difference between the levels of the FX isomers in amniotic fluid. As observed with maternal FX dosing, glucuronide or sulfate conjugates were also not detectable in amniotic fluid samples after fetal drug administration. FX isomer concentrations in tracheal fluid were ~10-fold higher than those observed in amniotic fluid. Tracheal fluid FX isomer concentrations were very similar to those measured in the fetal plasma; however, unlike plasma, no significant stereoselectivity was observed.

Maternal urinary pharmacokinetics. Similar to maternal FX dosing, the total urinary excretion of FX, NFX, and their glucuronides was low and accounted for only 0.75% of maternal drug elimination (data not shown). However, unlike maternal FX dosing, the cumulative amount of the FX isomers exhibited significant stereoselectivity (S>R), with the S/R ratio averaging 1.63 ± 0.23. There was, however, no difference in either the renal clearance of the FX isomers (S/R ratio of 0.98 ± 0.27), which was normalized to maternal AUC or the cumulative amount of the NFX isomers (S/R ratio of 1.09 ± 0.57). As in the maternal dosing experiments, sulfate conjugates could not be detected.

Blood gas and glucose/lactate status. During the fetal experiments, the control period fetal femoral arterial pH, pCO2, pO2, O2 saturation, and hemoglobin, lactate, and glucose concentrations were 7.369 ± 0.001, 49.0 ± 1.1 mm Hg, 23.0 ± 2.0 mm Hg, 56.9 ± 6.8%, 10.9 ± 0.5 g/dl, 1.03 ± 0.21, and 0.46 ± 0.11 mM, respectively. There were no significant changes in pH and pCO2 during the experimental period. However, as with maternal drug administration, fetal pO2 decreased significantly from the control value to 14.5 ± 1.5 mm Hg at 1 h and then returned to control levels at 9 h (22.0 ± 2.9). Similarly, fetal O2 saturation decreased from 56.9 ± 6.8% to 32.7 ± 3.0% at 15 min, and returned to normal values at 9 h (52.0 ± 6.7%). Fetal arterial blood lactate concentration increased from 1.03 ± 0.21 mM to reach a maximum of 2.33 ± 1.56 mM at 30 min and subsequently returned to the control value at 9 h (1.39 ± 0.81 mM). Blood glucose concentration also increased from 0.46 ± 0.11 mM to a maximum of 0.75 ± 0.16 mM at 1 h and thereafter returned to control levels at 24 h (0.54 ± 0.18 mM).

Plasma protein binding. Table 4 shows a summary of in vitro and ex vivo plasma protein binding of the FX and NFX isomers. FX and NFX are both highly bound by ovine plasma proteins (i.e., bound fraction ~95%). The FX free fraction in maternal plasma exhibited significant stereoselectivity both in vitro and ex vivo, with the S/R ratio averaging 0.46 ± 0.09 and 0.46 ± 0.06, respectively. In vitro, the free fractions of RNFX tended to be higher than those for SNFX, but this difference was not statistically significant. In the in vitro fetal determinations, the free fractions of both FX and NFX isomers were significantly higher than in the ewes, i.e., the binding was less. Similar to maternal plasma, there was a significant difference in the free fraction of FX isomers with the levels of R-isomer being ~2-fold higher than the S-isomer. There was also a tendency for the RNFX free fraction to be higher than that for SNFX in vitro, but this difference was not statistically significant. Fetal NFX binding could not be determined ex vivo because of the lack of this metabolite in fetal plasma during fetal drug administration. There was no significant concentration dependence for the free fraction of any of the isomers over the observed maternal plasma concentration range, and this was also the case in the fetus.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4 In vitro and ex vivo plasma protein binding of FX and NFX isomers in ovine maternal and fetal plasma

 

Maternal and fetal placental and nonplacental clearances of RFX and SFX. The mean values for placental and nonplacental clearance of the FX isomers in the ewe and fetus, which were calculated using eqs. 4 through 7, are given in Table 5. The table gives values based upon total plasma drug concentrations, which were calculated for each animal and also for unbound drug levels. These latter values were determined using the average values based on total drug concentration and the maternal and fetal plasma protein drug binding data in Table 4. In terms of the clearances based on total drug concentrations, fetal total clearance of both RFX (167.3 ± 45.8 ml/min · kg) and SFX (76.3 ± 21.7 ml/min · kg) were significantly higher than the corresponding maternal values (51.1 ± 12.7 and 30.9 ± 7.4 ml/min · kg). However, in the fetus, placental clearance comprised 89.4 ± 36.9 and 94.0 ± 37.3% of total clearance for RFX and SFX, respectively, whereas in the ewe it was nonplacental clearance that accounted for the bulk of total clearance, averaging 92.2 ± 3.8 and 93.5 ± 4.0% for RFX and SFX, respectively. The fetal nonplacental clearance values (RFX, 17.2 ± 56.1 and SFX, 4.9 ± 28.4 ml/min · kg) were not significantly different from zero, and in some cases, the values were <0. Table 5 also gives the S/R ratios for all the clearance values except CLfn, and in every case, the ratio based on total drug concentration was significantly <1, suggesting stereoselective differences in the placental transfer of the FX isomers and also in nonplacental clearance of the drug in the ewe. However, when the clearance values were estimated on the basis of unbound drug concentration, these stereoselective differences largely disappeared, and this was also the case for the CLf - CLm difference.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5 Mean values for total and unbound clearance of fluoxetine enantiomers after maternal and fetal administration of racemic fluoxetine (n = 5)

 

Fluoxetine demethylation by maternal and fetal hepatic microsomes. In the maternal hepatic microsomal preparations from the two ewes, the norfluoxetine formation rates were 26.8 and 21.3 pmol/mg protein/30 min for SFNX and 28.4 and 23.5 pmol/mg protein/30 min for RNFX. The S/R ratios were 0.94 and 0.91. In contrast, with the fetal microsomes, no norfluoxetine formation was detected with either preparation.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Placental Transfer of Fluoxetine and Norfluoxetine. There was rapid maternal to fetal placental transfer of both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine after maternal administration, with the F/M AUC ratios averaging ~0.59 and 0.65, respectively. Placental drug transfer after acute maternal administration seems largely dependent upon the drug's lipophilicity (Rurak et al., 1991Go). FX is highly lipophilic (log octanol/water partition coefficient = 4.05). However, its F/M AUC ratio is lower than the values for diphenhydramine (0.85) and metoclopramide (0.82), both of which have substantially lower partition coefficient values of 3.1 and 1.1, respectively (Yoo et al., 1986Go; Riggs et al., 1988Go). The reduced fetal exposure to fluoxetine, compared with these two drugs, is likely due to the high plasma protein binding of the drug, which can also reduce maternal-fetal drug transfer (Rurak et al., 1991Go). The FX F/M AUC ratio in sheep is also lower than the F/M drug concentration ratio of ~1 that we have recently determined at delivery in pregnant women treated with the drug for clinical depression (Kim et al., 1999Go). This difference is unlikely to be solely due to the structural and functional differences between the sheep and human placenta, since a lower placental permeability in the former species is largely restricted to hydrophilic compounds (Faber and Thornburg, 1983Go). Rather it may be due to long-term drug administration in humans, compared with acute administration in the current study. In the former situation, fetal drug elimination becomes important in determining fetal exposure (Rurak et al., 1991Go). If the human fetus has a limited ability to metabolize FX, as appears to be the case with the fetal lamb (see below), this could explain the high fetal-maternal plasma drug concentration ratio. In line with this is our study involving 8-day i.v. FX infusion in pregnant sheep (Chien et al., 1999Go); the fetal/maternal drug concentration ratio of 0.75 is higher than the F/M AUC ratio in the current study. It is still lower than the corresponding value in the human (~1), and this could be due to a lesser degree of difference between maternal and fetal plasma protein binding of FX in the latter species compared with sheep. However, plasma protein binding of FX does not yet appear to have been determined in the human fetus.

Fluoxetine Pharmacokinetics in the Ewe and Fetus. The average maternal CL of racemic FX averaged 41.5 ml/min · kg. In the human, FX clearance differs in poor and extensive metabolizers of model substrates for cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) (Hamelin et al., 1996Go; Fjordside et al., 1999Go). However, in both cases, the CL values of ~2.5 ml/min · kg in poor metabolizers and ~10 ml/min · kg in extensive metabolizers) are considerably lower than the sheep value. Likewise, the human t1/2 values for FX (~1–4 days) and NFX (~7–15 days) (Hiemke and Härtter, 2000Go) are much longer than the values of 6.7 and 23 h in pregnant sheep. In contrast, the maternal Vdss of FX in sheep (~7.8 l/kg) is below the range (14–100 l/kg) reported in the human (Hiemke and Härtter, 2000Go). These differences could in part be due to variations in drug administration regimens. FX clearance decreases and t1/2 increases in humans with chronic drug dosing (Catterson and Preskorn, 1996Go; Hiemke and Härtter, 2000Go), and this appears due to FX-induced inhibition of CYP2D6 (Alfaro et al., 2000Go). We have observed a similar decrease in FX clearance in sheep during an 8-day i.v. infusion protocol (Chien et al., 1999Go). However, the differences in the sheep and human data could also be due to pregnancy, since the values determined in the current study of pregnant sheep for CL (41.5 ml/min · kg), t1/2 (6.7 h), and Vdss (7.8 l/kg) are different from estimates we have made in nonpregnant ewes (CL, 28.3 ml/min · kg; t1/2, 18.0 h; Vdss, 15.1 l/kg) (Kim et al., 1996Go). The nonpregnant values are closer to those obtained in human subjects. Similar changes may occur in human pregnancy, since there is an induction of CYP2D6 and increased dose requirements of antidepressants (Wisner et al., 1993Go; Wadelius et al., 1997Go).

Racemic fluoxetine CL (122 ml/min · kg) and Vdss (28.1 l/kg) in the fetus are significantly higher than in the ewe. As shown in Table 5, this total CL is largely contributed by fetal to maternal placental clearance (CLfp), which comprises ~92% of CLf, whereas CLmn was the major contributor (93.8%) to CLm. Thus, fetal FX elimination is largely the result of transplacental transfer to the ewe and elimination via maternal processes, which is consistent with the similarity in fetal (7.4 h) and maternal (6.5 h) t1/2 values for the drug.

The fetal placental clearance value for FX (122 ml/min · kg) is intermediate in terms of similar estimates for other drugs in pregnant sheep, which range from 10 ml/min · kg for indomethacin (Krishna et al., 2002Go) to 214 ml/min · kg for diphenhydramine (Kumar et al., 1997Go). Fetal placental clearance of FX is lower than the value for diphenhydramine, but similar to the estimate for metoclopramide (103 ml/min · kg) (Rurak et al., 1991Go), even though, as discussed previously, FX is more lipophilic than the other two compounds.

Amphiphilic amine drugs such as diphenhydramine, metoclopramide, ritodrine, and labetalol accumulate in fetal lung and amniotic fluid; with metoclopramide there are also high drug concentrations in fetal lung tissue (Riggs et al., 1991Go; Rurak et al., 1991Go). This suggests that the fetal lung absorbs these amine drugs, as is also the case in the adult, but that some of the drug in the fetal lung is transferred into the fluid secreted into the airways. However, there was no accumulation of FX and NFX in fetal lung and amniotic fluids; the drug levels were lower than or equal to those in fetal plasma. A similar finding for amniotic fluid has been reported in pregnant rats by Pohland et al. (1989Go). FX and other basic lipophilic psychotropic drugs accumulate extensively in rat lung via lysosomal trapping and phospholipid binding (Daniel and Wöjcikowski, 1997Go). The former process involves diffusion of the nonionized form of the drug into the acidic interior of lysosome where protonation of the drug occurs, preventing efflux from the lysosome. As noted above, fluoxetine is more lipophilic than the other basic drugs that we have studied. Thus, lysosomal trapping may be more important for FX, and if this process also occurs in the fetus, lung accumulation of the drug may occur with limited efflux into lung fluid.

Fluoxetine Effects on Fetal Blood Gas and Acid-Base Status. With both maternal and fetal FX administration, there were transient decreases in fetal oxygenation and blood pH and increases in blood lactate level. We have recently observed similar transient changes over the first ~6 h of an 8-day maternal i.v. FX infusion protocol, and these were associated with a decrease in uterine blood flow (Morrison et al., 2002Go). We have also found FX administration results in an initial transient increase in plasma serotonin levels (J. Morrison, C. Chien, K. W. Riggs, and D. W. Rurak, unpublished data). Serotonin is a potent uterine vasoconstrictor (Clark et al., 1980Go); thus, it is likely that FX-elicited inhibition of serotonin reuptake by platelets increased plasma serotonin levels, leading to decreased uterine blood flow and fetal oxygen delivery. The impact on the fetus is likely minimal, since similar changes in fetal oxygenation regularly occur as a consequence of antepartum uterine contractions and fetal somatic activity (Harding et al., 1983Go).

Fluoxetine Metabolism in the Ewe and Fetus. In humans, urinary excretion of fluoxetine, fluoxetine glucuronide, norfluoxetine, norfluoxetine glucuronide, and hippuric acid account for ~50% of a single dose of 14C-fluoxetine (Lemberger et al., 1985Go; Bergstrom et al., 1988Go). In addition, there is urinary excretion of p-trifluoromethylphenol, a dealkylated metabolite in rat and human (Urichuk et al., 1997Go). In the current study, maternal urinary excretion of FX, NFX, and their glucuronides accounted for only 3.4% of the dose. The maternal renal clearance values for FX and NFX were correspondingly low (Table 2), which is similar to the situation in humans (Lemberger et al., 1985Go). As the cumulative urinary excretion curves of these compounds did not reach a plateau level, we may have slightly underestimated their role in FX elimination. Nonetheless, the data strongly suggest that the renal excretion of these compounds contributes much less to overall FX elimination in sheep than in the human. Urinary hippuric acid excretion was not determined, since estimation of the amount resulting from FX metabolism would require a labeled form of the drug. Recently, we detected trifluoromethylphenol in urine from adult sheep after FX administration but have not yet assessed its quantitative importance (C. Chien, D. W. Rurak, K. W. Riggs, unpublished data). Thus, the metabolic profile of FX in adult sheep appears qualitatively, but perhaps not quantitatively, similar to that in the human. However, the specific cytochromes P450 responsible for FX metabolism in the sheep remain to be determined. Although CYP2B and 3A have been identified in sheep liver (Galtier and Alvinerie, 1996Go), information on other P450 isozymes is lacking.

In contrast to the ewe, there appears to be little or no metabolism of FX in the fetus. Thus, in the fetal FX administration experiments, NFX was present in the ewe but not the fetus. Moreover, CLfn for RFX and SFX (Table 5) are not significantly different from zero, indicating no measurable nonplacental elimination of the drug in the fetus. In the in vitro hepatic microsomal incubations, there was no NFX production by fetal microsomes. Thus, the NFX in the fetus during maternal FX administration (Fig. 2) was likely formed in the ewe and diffused across the placenta. There is virtually no information available in the literature for the types of cytochrome P450 present in the ovine fetus. However, CYP2C9, 2C19, and 2D6, which appear to be involved in the N-demethylation of FX (Stevens et al., 1993; Hamelin et al., 1996Go; von Moltke et al., 1997Go; Fjordside et al., 1999Go), are minimally expressed in the human fetal liver and develop in the early neonatal period (Ring et al., 1999Go). Our data suggest that this may also be the case in sheep.

The fetal lamb also appears to lack the phase II metabolic pathways for FX, since glucuronide and sulfate conjugates of FX and NFX were not detected in amniotic fluid. However, glucuronide conjugates of other drugs are produced by the sheep fetus, including acetaminophen (Wang et al., 1985Go), morphine (Olsen et al., 1988Go), ritodrine (Wright et al., 1991Go), labetalol (Yeleswaram et al., 1993Go), valproic acid (Kumar et al., 2000Go), and indomethacin (Krishna et al., 2002Go). Since the glucuronide conjugates are hydrophilic, they do not readily cross the sheep placenta and, if formed in the fetus, accumulate in amniotic and allantoic fluids (Rurak et al., 1991Go). Consequently, the absence of FX and NFX glucuronides in amniotic fluid provides strong evidence against significant glucuronidation in the fetus. The reason for this deficiency is not yet apparent. However, the glucuronide conjugates of the drugs listed above involve ether linkages, whereas FX glucuronidation involves an amine linkage. In addition, although morphine-3-glucuronide is formed in the fetal lamb, morphine-6-glucuronide is not (Olsen et al., 1988Go), whereas both conjugates are synthesized in adult sheep (Milne et al., 1993Go). These findings suggest that although some UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms are present in fetal lamb, others including those used by FX and NFX are not.

Stereoselective Pharmacokinetics. The present study provides the first evidence for stereoselective FX disposition during pregnancy. In both the ewe and fetus, the R-isomer had a lower AUC and higher plasma free fraction, CL, and Vdss compared with (S)-fluoxetine. The presence of these stereoselective differences in the fetus with fetal FX administration indicates that the stereoselective processes are operative in fetal as well as in adult sheep. FX elimination occurs mainly by the hepatic route, with limited renal clearance (Table 2). Moreover, total FX clearance is low, and for such a drug, hepatic clearance depends mainly upon hepatic intrinsic clearance of the free (unbound) drug and the free drug fraction (Wilkinson and Shand, 1975Go). As shown in Table 4, the free fraction for RFX in both the ewe and fetus is significantly higher than the values for SFX. However, with both isomers and with NFX, plasma protein binding in the ewe is higher than in the fetus and similar to that reported for the human (Lemberger et al., 1985Go). The significantly lower binding in the fetus is likely due to the lower concentrations of albumin and other plasma proteins (Kwan et al., 1995Go). When the ex vivo free fraction values in Table 4 are used with the total drug RFX and SFX CL values in Tables 1 and 4, the resulting free drug CL values in the ewe (53.3 versus 70.7 l/h/kg) and fetus (96.2 versus 70.5 l/h/kg) are much closer compared with the total drug CL estimates. This is also the case for the estimates of maternal and fetal placental and nonplacental clearance based on free drug concentrations, compared with those based on total drug levels (Table 5). In addition, as illustrated in Figs. 1, 2, and 7, the difference in FX isomer concentrations was present immediately after drug injection, and the initial S/R ratio did not change appreciably throughout the rest of the sampling period. Moreover, the Vdss values are different between the FX isomers. Overall, these findings suggest that differential plasma protein binding of FX isomers could contribute to the stereoselective disposition of the FX isomers after acute drug administration in pregnant sheep.

Fjordside et al. (1999Go) have reported stereoselective FX disposition in humans after a single oral dose but only in poor metabolizers of sparteine, i.e., with a deficiency in CYP2D6. Also, there are differences in racemic fluoxetine pharmacokinetics between extensive and poor metabolizers of debrisoquin (Hamelin et al., 1996Go). Recently, we have found stereoselective disposition of FX in maternal, fetal, and infant plasma during chronic fluoxetine therapy in pregnant and postpartum women (Kim et al., 1999Go). Moreover, the magnitude of the S/R plasma concentration ratio increases with the duration of therapy and is inversely related to maternal FX CL. Furthermore, FX inhibits CYP2D6 over an 8-day drug administration period (Alfaro et al., 2000Go), and the drug is a substrate for this enzyme. Thus, in the human, stereoselective FX distribution appears to occur only in subjects with low or absent CYP2D6 activity, when other presumably stereoselective metabolic pathways come into play. This is different from the current results in pregnant sheep. However, as was discussed above, we have recently observed a decrease in maternal FX clearance in pregnant sheep during an 8-day drug infusion protocol (Chien et al., 1999Go), and this is associated with a progressive rise in the maternal plasma S/R FX concentration ratio. These findings suggest that stereoselective metabolic factors may come into play in sheep with chronic FX dosing, similar to the apparent situation in the human. In contrast, with acute drug administration, it is the differential protein binding of the FX isomers that is more important. Whether this factor is also important in the human has not yet been determined.

In summary, these studies demonstrate that there is rapid placental transfer of both FX and NFX to the fetal lamb after maternal drug (racemic FX) administration resulting in significant fetal exposure. FX undergoes extensive stereoselective disposition resulting in higher levels of the SFX isomer in both maternal and fetal plasma; this appears to be largely due to differential plasma protein binding of the FX isomers. In contrast, stereoselective disposition was not observed for NFX. It also appears that both phase I and II metabolic pathways for FX are lacking in the fetus.


    Footnotes
 
Funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research supported this study. D.W.R. is the recipient of an Investigatorship Award from the BC Research Institute for Children's & Women's Health.

1 Present address: LG Chem Investment Limited, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Back

2 Present address: Division of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia., Vancouver, BC, Canada. Back

3 Abbreviations used are: SSRI, serotonin reuptake inhibitor; FX, fluoxetine; NFX, norfluoxetine; SFX, (S)-fluoxetine; SNFX, (S)-norfluoxetine; RNFX, (R)-norfluoxetine; CL, total body or systemic clearance; AUC, area under the plasma concentration versus time curve; MRT, mean residence time;Vdss, volume of distribution at steady-state; AUC, area under the drug concentration versus time curve; t1/2ß, apparent terminal elimination half-life; CLmp, maternal placental clearance; CLf, total fetal clearance; CLfp, fetal placental clearance; CLm, total maternal clearance; CLmn, maternal nonplacental clearance; CLfn, fetal nonplacental clearance; RFX, (R)-fluoxetine; F/M, fetal-maternal; P450, cytochrome P450; {Sigma} amount, cumulative amount excreted; CLR, renal clearance. Back

Address correspondence to: Dr. Dan W. Rurak, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BC Research Institute for Children's & Women's Health, University of British Columbia, 950 West 28th Ave., Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4H4. E-mail: drurak{at}cw.bc.ca


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 


Alfaro CL, Lam YWF, Simpson J, and Ereshefsky L (2000) CYP2D6 inhibition by fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine in a crossover study: intraindividual variability and plasma concentration correlations. J Clin Pharmacol 40: 58-66.[Abstract]

Bergstrom RF, Lemberger L, Farid NA, and Wolen RL (1988) Clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine: a review. Br J Psychiatry Suppl (3): 47-50.

Cabrera-Vera TM and Battaglia G (1998) Prenatal exposure to fluoxetine (Prozac) produces site-specific and age-dependent alterations in brain serotonin transporters in rat progeny: evidence from autoradiographic studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286: 1474-1481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Catterson ML and Preskorn SH (1996) Pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: clinical relevance. Pharmacol Toxicol 78: 203-208.[Medline]

Chambers CD, Anderson PO, Thomas RG, Dick LM, Felix RJ, Johnson KA, and Jones KL (1999) Weight gain in infants breastfed by mothers who take fluoxetine. Pediatrics 104: e61.

Chambers CD, Johnson KA, Dick LM, Felix RJ, and Jones KL (1996) Birth outcomes in pregnant women taking fluoxetine. N Engl J Med 335: 1010-1015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chien C, Morrison J, Gruber N, Rurak D, and Riggs W (1999) Chronic exposure and pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine enantiomers in the pregnant ewe and fetus. AAPS Pharm Sci 1: S224.

Clark KE, Mills EG, Otte TE, and Stys SJ (1980) Effect of serotonin on uterine blood flow in pregnant and nonpregnant sheep. Life Sci 27: 2655-2661.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cohen LS, Heller VL, Bailey JW, Grush L, Ablon JS, and Bouffard SM (2000) Birth outcomes following prenatal exposure to fluoxetine. Biol Psychiatry 48: 996-1000.[CrossRef][Medline]

Daniel WA and Wöjcikowski J (1997) Interactions between promazine and antidepressants at the level of cellular distribution. Pharmacol Toxicol 81: 259-264.[Medline]

DeVane CL (1999) Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Cell Mol Neurobiol 19: 443-466.[CrossRef][Medline]

Di Pasquale E, Monteau R, and Hilaire G (1994) Endogenous serotonin modulates the fetal respiratory rhythm: an in vitro study in the rat. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 80: 222-232.[CrossRef][Medline]

Faber JJ and Thornburg KL (1983) Placental Physiology, pp 79-89, Raven Press, New York.

Fjordside L, Jeppesen U, Eap CB, Powell K, Baumann P, and Brosen K (1999) The stereoselective metabolism of fluoxetine in poor and extensive metabolizers of sparteine. Pharmacogenetics 9: 55-60.[Medline]

Fuller RW, Snoddy HD, Krushinski JH, and Robertson DW (1992) Comparison of norfluoxetine enantiomers as serotonin uptake inhibitors in vivo. Neuropharmacology 31: 997-1000.[CrossRef][Medline]

Galtier P and Alvinerie M (1996) Pharmacological basis for hepatic drug metabolism in sheep. Vet Res 27: 363-372.[Medline]

Goldstein DJ (1995) Effect of third trimester fluoxetine exposure on the newborn. J Clin Psychopharmacol 15: 417-420.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gram L (1994) Fluoxetine. N Engl J Med 331: 1354-1361.[Free Full Text]

Hamelin BA, Turgeon J, Vallee F, Belanger PM, Paquet F, and LeBel M (1996) The disposition of fluoxetine but not sertraline is altered in poor metabolizers of debrisoquin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 60: 512-521.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harding R and Bocking AD, editors (2001) Fetal Growth and Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Harding R, Sigger JN, and Wickham PJ (1983) Fetal and maternal influences on arterial oxygen levels in the sheep fetus. J Dev Physiol (Oxf) 5: 267-276.

Hiemke C and Härtter S (2000) Pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Pharmacol Ther 85: 11-28.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hwang EC, Magnussen I, and Van Woert MH (1980) Effects of chronic fluoxetine administration on serotonin metabolism. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 29: 79-98.[Medline]

Kim J, Axelson JE, Kearns GL, Yin W, and Rurak DW (1995) Stereoselective determination of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine by gas chromatography with mass selective detection. Pharm Res (NY) 12: S22.

Kim J, Riggs KW, Axelson JE, and Rurak DW (1996) Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in the sheep. Pharm Res (NY) 13: S494.

Kim J, Misri S, Kent N, Oberlander T, Rurak DW, and Riggs KW (1999) Comparison of fetal and neonatal fluoxetine and paroxetine exposure during the perinatal period in humans. AAPS Pharm Sci 1: S96.

Krishna R, Riggs KW, Kwan E, Wong H, Szeitz A, Walker MPR, and Rurak DW (2002) Clearance and disposition of indomethacin in chronically instrumented fetal lambs following a 3-day continuous intravenous infusion. J Pharm Pharmacol 54: 801-808.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kulin NA, Pastuszak A, Sage SR, Schick-Boschetto B, Spivey G, Feldkamp M, Ormond K, Matsui D, Stein-Schechman AK, Cook L, et al. (1998) Pregnancy outcome following maternal use of the new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. JAMA (J Am Med Assoc) 279: 609-610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kumar S, Tonn GR, Kwan E, Hall C, Riggs KW, Axelson JE, and Rurak DW (1997) Estimation of trans-placental and non-placental diphenhydramine clearances in the fetal lamb: the impact of fetal first-pass hepatic uptake. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282: 617-632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kumar S, Wong H, Yeung SA, Riggs KW, Abbott FS, and Rurak DW (2000) Disposition of valproic acid in maternal, fetal, and newborn sheep. II: metabolism and renal elimination. Drug Metab Dispos 28: 857-864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kwan E, Rurak DW, and Taylor SM (1995) Blood volume restitution and growth in fetal lambs after acute hemorrhage. Am J Physiol 269: R749-R757.

Lemberger L, Bergstrom RF, Wolen RL, Farid NA, Enas GG, and Aronoff GR (1985) Fluoxetine: clinical pharmacology and physiologic disposition. J Clin Psychiatry 46: 14-19.[Medline]

Lu AYH and Levin W (1972) Partial purification of cytochrome P-450 and P-448 from rat liver microsomes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 46: 1334-1339.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mhanna MJ, Bennet JB, and Izatt SD (1997) Potential fluoxetine chloride (Prozac) toxicity in a newborn. Pediatrics 100: 158-159.[Free Full Text]

Milne RW, Sloan PA, McLean CF, Mather LE, Nation RL, Runciman WB, Rutten AJ, and Somogyi AA (1993) Disposition of morphine and its 3- and 6-glucuronide metabolites during morphine infusion in sheep. Drug Metab Dispos 21: 1151-1156.[Abstract]

Morrison JL, Chien C, Riggs KW, Gruber N, and Rurak D (2002) Effect of maternal fluoxetine administration on uterine blood flow, fetal blood gas status, and growth. Pediatr Res 51: 433-442.[Medline]

Newport DJ, Wilcox MN, and Stowe ZN (2001) Antidepressants during pregnancy and lactation: defining exposure and treatment issues. Semin Perinatol 25: 177-190.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nordeng H, Lindeman R, Perminov KV, and Reikvam A (2001) Neonatal withdrawal syndrome after in utero exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Acta Paediatr 90: 288-291.[Medline]

Nulman I, Rovet J, Stewart DE, Wolpin J, Gardner HA, Theis JGW, Kulin N, and Koren G (1997) Neurodevelopment of children exposed in utero to antidepressant drugs. N Engl J Med 336: 258-262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oberlander TF, Grunau RE, Fitzgerald C, Ellwood E-L, Misri S, Rurak D, and Riggs W (2002) Prolonged prenatal psychotropic medication exposure alters neonatal acute pain response. Pediatr Res 51: 443-453.[CrossRef][Medline]

Olsen GD, Sommer KM, Wheeler PL, Boyea SR, Michelson SP, and Cheek DBC (1988) Accumulation and clearance of morphine-3-ß-D-glucuronide in fetal lambs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 247: 576-584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pacifici GM and Viani A (1992) Methods of determining plasma and tissue binding of drugs. Pharmacokinetic consequences. Clin Pharmacokinet 23: 449-468.[Medline]

Pastuszak A, Schick-Boschetto B, Zuber C, Feldkamp L, Pinelli M, Sihn S, Donnenfeld A, McCormack M, Leen-Mitchell M, Woodland C, et al. (1993) Pregnancy outcome following first-trimester exposure to fluoxetine (Prozac). JAMA (J Am Med Assoc) 269: 2246-2248.[Abstract]

Pohland RC, Byrd TK, Hamilton M, and Koons JR (1989) Placental transfer and fetal distribution of fluoxetine in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 98: 198-205.[Cr