DMD Noab BioDiscoveries - Shaping Drug Discovery

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on October 1, 2004; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.104.001149


0090-9556/05/3301-1-9$20.00
DMD 33:1-9, 2005

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.104.001149v1
33/1/1    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pang, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pang, K. S.
COMMENTARY

THE ROLES OF TRANSPORTERS AND ENZYMES IN HEPATIC DRUG PROCESSING

Lichuan Liu, and K. Sandy Pang

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy (L.L., K.S.P.), and Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine (K.S.P.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

(Received June 21, 2004; accepted September 28, 2004)

Abstract

A simple, physiological model was used to illustrate the competing nature of transporters and metabolic enzymes in hepatic drug processing. Enalapril, a drug whose basolateral influx and canalicular efflux are mediated by rat organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1 (Oatp1) and rat multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2), respectively, and metabolism by the carboxylesterases, was enlisted as the example to illustrate how the transport and intrinsic clearances are inter-related in the estimation of the hepatic and metabolic, and excretion clearances. Moreover, simulations were performed to explore the effects of inhibitors or inducers of transporters/enzymes to unravel the compensatory changes of alternate pathways. Generally speaking, inhibition of one pathway led to an apparent increase in the alternate (competing) pathway and total hepatic clearance was decreased; induction would lead to an apparent decrease in the alternate pathway and an increase in total hepatic clearance. A reduction in influx clearance brought about parallel decreases in the biliary and metabolic clearances, whereas a reduction in efflux basolateral clearance evoked similar increases in biliary and metabolic clearances. However, the steady-state tissue concentration (CL,ss) or area under the tissue concentration-time curve (AUCL) was reliant only on the unbound fraction in liver, and the secretory and metabolic intrinsic clearances and not the influx and efflux clearances. Variations in the influx and efflux intrinsic clearances evoked temporal changes in the tissue concentration-time profile but not the AUCL or CL,ss. The pharmacokinetic theory developed offers data interpretation from literature reports on P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 substrates with mdr1a/1b knockout versus wild-type mice, and rat liver perfusion studies, with and without the use of inhibitors. In some cases, critiques on data interpretation were made.


Kinetic principles have historically been applied to appraise kinetic constants of competing enzymes. A natural observation is that the metabolic reaction rate of a given pathway will be underscored by the presence of alternate, competing metabolic pathways (Morris and Pang, 1987Go; Pang and Chiba, 1994Go). The enzymatic activities of the enzymes will be underestimated unless all competing reaction rates are considered in unison, since competing pathways diminish the intracellular substrate concentration, thereby reducing rates of reaction (Morris and Pang, 1987Go). An analogy may be drawn for the competing pathways of metabolism and transport. With the recognition that transporters mediate biliary excretion and basolateral efflux, transporters compete with enzymes for drug within the cell.

However, there are some issues surrounding the role of transporters and enzymes in drug removal within eliminating organs. The controversy first appeared for the simple Caco2 cell system and suggests that intestinal apical secretion prolongs the mean residence time and increases metabolism (Benet and Cummins, 2001Go; Johnson et al., 2001Go). For these considerations, total metabolite formation in the Caco2 cell system (total amount in donor, cell, and receiver compartments) has been normalized to the amount of drug in the receiver compartment (Fisher et al., 1999Go) or the amounts of drug in the receiver and cell compartments, namely, the extraction ratio (Cummins et al., 2002Go). For the Caco2 system, in which the apical, cellular, and basolateral compartments are dynamically in equilibrium, other investigators considered that total aggregate metabolism should be normalized to dose, since drug secreted into the apical compartment is subject to reabsorption back into the cell compartment and to be available for metabolism (Tam et al., 2003Go). Hence, secretion removes the cellular substrate from enzymes and reduces the rates of metabolism, although the extent of metabolism ultimately will not be altered (Tam et al., 2003Go). This view complies with those of others who state that a competing pathway detracts from other pathways due to reduction of the substrate concentration (Morris and Pang, 1987Go; Sirianni and Pang, 1997Go; Ito et al., 1999Go; Schuetz and Schinkel, 1999Go).

The liver is known for its drug-metabolizing activities and is endowed with ATP-binding cassette proteins to mediate biliary excretion at the apical membrane. Several basolateral transporters are present to conduct transport of organic anions, cations, and bile acids into the liver. In the past, our laboratory has utilized pharmacokinetic principles to stress the importance of competing metabolic reactions (Morris and Pang, 1987Go; Pang and Chiba, 1994Go). The physiologically based models developed include consideration of influx/efflux transporters and enzymes in the liver and kidney (Sirianni and Pang, 1997Go). Although enalapril was chosen as an example because of the existence of in vitro data on transport and metabolism (Pang et al., 1998Go; Abu-Zahra et al., 2000Go), the developed concepts are pertinent to all drugs. The analytical solutions may be used to predict the biliary, metabolic, and total hepatic clearances from in vitro estimates. The theory predictions serve to explain trends in the observed data, regardless of whether the well stirred model or parallel tube model assumptions apply. The concepts developed should allow us to quantitatively explain altered changes in transport or metabolism for most drugs upon addition of inhibitors or inducers and assess their impact on the concentration in liver.

We wish to illustrate this theory with existing data sets for enalapril, a drug that is metabolized by the carboxylesterases to enalaprilat (Pang et al., 1984Go; de Lannoy et al., 1989Go; Pang et al., 1991Go, 1993), excreted by Mrp2 (Pang et al., 2002Go), and transported into the liver cell at the basolateral membrane by the rat organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1 (Oatp1a1) (Pang et al., 1998Go) (Fig. 1). We predict that decreased biliary excretion results in an increase in the metabolic clearance but a reduction in the total hepatic clearance, whereas increases in biliary excretion would lead to reduction in metabolic clearance and increased total hepatic clearance. The corollary holds for decreased/increased metabolism. We utilize this theoretical treatise to show the usefulness of this approach to explain the possible mechanism for sets of observations. Any inconsistency between theory and data suggests that the proposed mechanism alone cannot explain the set of observed changes.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. The biological fates of enalapril and its metabolite, enalaprilat, in the rat hepatocyte. Enalapril but not its diacid metabolite enalaprilat is taken up by Oatp1 in rat liver, and both compounds are excreted via Mrp2 into bile (Pang et al., 2002Go). Enalapril is metabolized by the carboxylesterases to enalaprilat. The involvement of transporters and enzymes in the hepatic disposition of enalaparil renders the compound an ideal model substrate for the study of the changes in transporter or enzyme function in liver.

 

Theory

Sirianni and Pang (1997Go) had used a physiological model that describes drug removal from the liver, based on the simplified view of a recirculating liver perfusion system (Fig. 2), and had solved for the determinants of clearance. There remains, however, some confusion surrounding the definition of the (metabolic or excretion) intrinsic clearance, both in the absence or presence of basolateral influx and efflux transporters. The term intrinsic clearance (CLint) is used to define the activity pertaining to transport or metabolism; multiplication of the intrinsic clearance to the (unbound) substrate concentration [S] provides the rate. As shown in eq. 1 below, the rate also relates to the Vmax and Km, the maximum velocity and the Michaelis-Menten constant of the saturable process for basolateral transport, excretion, or metabolism.

(1)



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. A schematic depiction of the liver in a physiological model. The liver is divided into three compartments: the reservoir (R, or blood compartment), liver plasma (PL), and tissue (L); excretion occurs with drug and metabolite appearing in the bile compartment. Q, C, and V represent flow, concentration, and volume, respectively, and are further qualified by the subscripts for the various compartments, whereas the unbound fractions in plasma and liver are denoted by subscripts P and L, respectively. The transport clearances across the sinusoidal membrane for drug from hepatic plasma to tissue and from tissue to hepatic plasma are characterized by influx (CLinflux) and efflux (CLefflux) clearances, respectively. Drug within tissue is metabolized by enzymes of intrinsic clearance, CLint,met (Vmax/Km for first-order conditions). Biliary excretion of drug is a function of the biliary intrinsic clearance, CLint,sec, across the canalicular membrane.

 

[S] denotes the unbound substrate concentration in the cell for the efflux, excretion, or metabolic process, or the unbound substrate concentration in blood for the influx process. Hence, the intrinsic clearance is

(2)

and, under first-order conditions, CLint is Vmax/Km and has the unit, ml/min. Accordingly, the intrinsic clearance is the volume of biological fluid that is cleared of drug (in cell water for metabolism and excretion, and basolateral efflux, or the unbound concentration in plasma/blood for basolateral influx) per unit time. This definition is invariant and must be applied to describe the abilities of transporters or enzymes in mediating transport or metabolism.

We use a model that is inclusive and encompasses both transporters and enzymes and their associated intrinsic clearances (CLinflux and CLefflux for influx and efflux at the basolateral membrane, respectively, and CLint,sec and CLint,met for excretion at the canalicular membrane and metabolism within the cell, respectively) (Fig. 2) for solving the clearance terms -biliary (CLliver,ex), metabolic (CLliver,met), and total hepatic clearance (CLliver,tot). The strategy adopted was proposed by Sirianni and Pang (1997Go), who considered the hepatic flow rate (QL) and protein binding (denoted by fP for unbound fraction in plasma and fL for unbound fraction in tissue). This was achieved by writing mass balance equations for the reservoir, liver plasma, liver tissue, and bile compartment. Upon inversion of the 3 x 3 square matrix, AUC and CL were obtained (Table 1). As shown, the steady-state clearances are complex equations relating flow (QL) to both the metabolic (CLint,met) and secretory (CLint,sec) intrinsic clearances, the influx (CLinflux) and efflux (CLefflux) clearances at the basolateral membrane, and the unbound fraction in plasma (fP). The unbound fraction in tissue (fL) was absent, showing that tissue binding is unimportant in the consideration under first-order conditions. As shown, the overall removal rate of drug in the liver at steady state is the product of the total clearance and the arterial concentration, CA.

(3)


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Solved equations on the biliary excretion clearance, metabolic clearance, and total hepatic clearance by Sirianni and Pang (1997Go)

These equations are reduced in complexity when CLinflux = CLefflux >> QL and CLint,met and CLint,sec. QL is the plasma flow rate to the liver.

 

From this equation, the overall removal rate normalized by the arterial concentration (overall removal rate/CA) is the total hepatic clearance, CLliver,tot, which is related to all the transport and metabolic intrinsic clearance terms as well as QL and fP. The hepatic clearance is defined relative to the volume of perfusion fluid that is cleared of its contained drug (CA) per unit time. It is evident that the ratio of metabolic/excretion clearances is the same as the ratio of the metabolic/secretion intrinsic clearances (Table 1).

When CLinflux = CLefflux and greatly exceeds the total elimination intrinsic clearance (CLint,met + CLint,sec), the equations for clearances (Table 1, middle column) become much more simplified (Table 1, right column). Under this condition, when permeability is large and venous equilibration exists, the unbound liver concentration is approximated by fPCOut, where COut is the venous outflow concentration of the drug. For this special condition, where drug removal is solely by hepatic metabolism, the ratio of overall removal rate/(fPCOut) at steady state estimates the metabolic intrinsic clearance (shown in eq. 2). Under first-order conditions, this is the ratio of Vmax/Km parameters for the metabolic enzyme(s). Hence, the simplified or shorter formats are only special cases and apply to drugs that lack membrane limitation in transport. Otherwise, the transporter terms must be considered in the definition of clearance (the longer formats) and rate/(fPCOut) at steady state no longer yields the (total or metabolic) intrinsic clearance.

Sirianni and Pang (1997Go) had utilized the long forms of the equations (left column, Table 1) and used the influx clearance (2.13 ml/min/g) obtained from preliminary multiple indicator dilution, liver perfusion experiments (A. J. Schwab and K. S. Pang, unpublished data) for influx. By assigning an equal value for efflux (CLefflux = 2.13 ml/min/g), they solved for the metabolic and secretory intrinsic clearances of enalapril so as to reflect the binding and liver data of de Lannoy et al. (1989Go, 1993Go). They came up with 2.72 ml/min/g for CLint,met and 0.135 ml/min/g for CLint,sec values consistent with the observed clearances (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Estimation of the influx (CLinflux), efflux (CLefflux), metabolic intrinsic clearance (CLint,met), and excretory intrinsic clearance (CLint,sec) consistent with the clearances observed for the single-pass perfused rat liver preparationa

 

Improved CLefflux, CLint,sec, and CLint,met Estimates for Physiological Modeling

Since 1997, we have obtained additional in vitro estimates on transport and metabolic activities toward enalapril in isolated hepatocytes (Table 3) (Abu-Zahra et al., 2000Go; Abu-Zahra and Pang, 2000Go). With these improved parameters to render improved estimates of the transport and metabolic intrinsic clearances, we re-examined the roles of transport and metabolism on the clearances. The in vitro data showed that transport was much faster than metabolism (6.56 times); metabolism and excretion, but not transport, are rate-limiting in the overall removal of enalapril.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Kinetic parameters for metabolism of enalarpil by S9 enzymes derived from homogeneous hepatocytes, and the transport constants derived from initial uptake velocities by homogeneous isolated rat hepatocytes (data of Abu-Zahra et al., 2000Go; Abu-Zahra and Pang, 2000Go)

 

The values observed for homogeneous hepatocytes on transport and metabolism in vitro (Abu-Zahra et al., 2000Go) would serve as the building blocks for our improved estimation within the physiological model. Using the same strategy of Sirianni and Pang (1997Go), we updated the estimates of transport and metabolism (as well as secretion) intrinsic clearances in the physiologically based model. The ratio of the biliary (CLliver,ex) and metabolic (CLliver,met) clearances (same as CLint,sec/CLint,met), when multiplied to the metabolic intrinsic clearance, yields the secretory intrinsic clearance. According to the observations of de Lannoy et al. (1993Go), the ratio of metabolic/excretion clearances should be 15.7. With 0.61 ml/min/g as CLint,met, CLint,sec was estimated as 1/15.7 x CLint,met or 0.0388 ml/min/g. Upon assignment of 4 ml/min/g, the initial uptake velocity in hepatocytes as CLinflux, the CLefflux that would match the observations on total, metabolic, and biliary clearances of enalapril, could be calculated from the equations shown in Table 1, with fP = 0.55 and QL = 0.8 ml/min/g (de Lannoy et al., 1989Go, 1993Go). This efflux clearance was 1.46 ml/min/g. The choices would yield consistent values: 15.7 as the ratio of CLint,met/CLint,sec, and 6.56 for CLinflux/CLint,met. These outcomes are more congruent with the transport and metabolic data of Abu-Zahra et al. (2000Go) and Abu-Zahra and Pang (2000Go). By contrast, re-examination of the values proposed by Sirianni and Pang (1997Go) showed that the ratio (CLinflux/CLint,met) was 0.78 and not 6.56, and CLliver,met/CLliver,ex was 20 and not 15.7, despite the fact that the set of parameters is consistent with the data.

Another parameter that may be considered is the ratio of the observed concentrations of tissue to plasma (CL,ss/CP,ss), which may be calculated from fPCLinflux/[fL(CLefflux + CLint,sec+ CLint,met)] and varied from 1.5 to 19 (Pang et al., 1991Go). The estimated value of CLinflux/(CLefflux + CLint,sec+ CLint,met) was 1.9 and greater than unity. Although fP was experimentally determined as 0.55, fL is unknown. If fL is assumed to be equal to fP, then the ratio (CL,ss/CP,ss) may serve as another check for the estimated CLinflux/(CLefflux + CLint,sec+ CLint,met).

Dynamics of Secretory and Metabolic Intrinsic Clearances and Basolateral Influx and Efflux Clearances on Hepatic Metabolic and Excretory Clearances

Using the improved parameters, we proceeded to examine the effect of secretion on metabolism, and vice versa. Upon setting the CLint,sec as zero, we mimicked the condition of the EHBR livers that lack Mrp2, the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 that excretes enalapril (Pang et al., 2002Go). Only small but insignificant changes in metabolic and total clearances were observed even though the excretion clearance was dramatically reduced to almost zero (Pang et al., 2002Go). This was also predictable: reduction of the biliary clearance, a small component of clearance, to zero yielded an almost imperceptible increase of the metabolic clearance from 0.345 to 0.358 ml/min/g (Table 4). However, when the CLint,met was set as zero, the newly predicted biliary clearance was 2 1/2 times that seen before (Table 4). It should be mentioned that, in the absence of any other removal pathway, the estimated clearance reflects the "true" basal clearance. Upon reduction of the efflux clearance by 50% while maintaining the CLinflux, CLint,met, and CLint,sec constant, the biliary, metabolic, and total clearances are all predicted to be increased. Alternately, when the influx clearance was reduced while maintaining the CLefflux, CLint,met, and CLint,sec constant, the biliary, metabolic, and total clearances all decreased. The ratio of the metabolic/excretion or metabolic intrinsic/secretory intrinsic clearances remained constant under these conditions (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4 Simulations of hepatic metabolic, biliary, and total clearances, based on changes in secretion and metabolism intrinsic clearances, and the efflux and influx clearances

 

The next questions are, what are the expectations for the metabolic and total hepatic clearances when the biliary (secretory) intrinsic clearance is increased or decreased, and, what are the associated changes of the metabolic and total hepatic clearances? Table 5 summarizes these results. A decrease in intrinsic clearance of one pathway leads to an observed increased clearance of the alternate pathway because of compensatory mechanism (a see-saw phenomenon), due to an increase in intracellular substrate concentration. However, the total clearance is decreased. Decreased secretion would bring about increased metabolic clearance but decreased total hepatic clearance (example 5, Table 5). By contrast, an increase in the intrinsic clearance of one pathway leads to a decrease in the observed clearance of the alternate pathway, but the total clearance is increased. When influx is decreased, all observed biliary, metabolic, and total clearances are decreased. When efflux is inhibited, however, all clearances: excretion, metabolic and total hepatic clearances, are increased. If secretion is inhibited and efflux is reduced only slightly, the biliary and total clearances will both be diminished and metabolic clearance is elevated, as expected (see example 5, Table 5). However, when efflux is inhibited to larger extents (example 6, Table 5), the biliary and total clearances, in addition to metabolic clearance, may all show increases. We highly recommend use of an Excel Worksheet by setting various values for fP, QL, CLint,sec, CLint,met, CLinflux, and CLefflux into the equations shown in Table 1 to examine the resultant changes in biliary (CLliver,ex), metabolic (CLliver,met), and total hepatic (CLliver,tot) clearances under these first-order conditions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5 Simulations of hepatic metabolic, biliary, and total clearances with changes in the secretion and metabolism intrinsic clearances and the efflux and influx clearancesa

The values are given by the product of the shown percentage and the corresponding CLinflux, CLefflux, CLint,met, and CLint,sec; the bold arrows denote the change in the hepatic metabolic, biliary, or total clearances.

 

Liver Tissue Concentration Profiles

With linear transport and metabolism, changes in the tissue concentration were also examined. The steady-state concentration of drug in liver tissue, CL,ss, was found as the ratio of infusion rate (Ro) divided by the product of the unbound fraction in liver (fL) and the sum of the intrinsic clearances.

(4)

The value of CL,ss, corrected per unit of infusion rate (Ro), equals the area under the liver tissue concentration-time curve, AUCL, per unit of dose.

(5)

However, for any given AUCL, the concentrations of drug in tissue changed with time. This was demonstrated in a simulation for first-order conditions; the volume and flow parameter values were similar to those of de Lannoy et al. (1993Go), as summarized in Table 6. The CLint,sec was 0.1 ml/min/g, and the CLint,met was 0.25 ml/min/g; the CLinflux and CLefflux were 4 and 2 ml/min/g, respectively. Only one parameter was changed at a time; the CLint,sec was varied to either 0.05 or 0.2 ml/min/g; the CLint,met was changed to 0.125 or 0.5 ml/min/g. Also, CLinflux was altered from 4 to 8 or 2 ml/min/g, or CLefflux was changed from 2 to 4 or 1 ml/min/g. Upon changes in secretory and metabolic intrinsic clearances, the tissue concentrations of drug were shown to change with time (Fig. 3A). According to eqs. 4 and 5, the liver concentrations and AUCL were decreased with increases in CLint,sec and/or CLint,met but were increased with decreasing CLint,sec and/or CLint,met. These trends were consistently observed (Fig. 3A). However, although temporal changes were observed upon changes in CLinflux and CLefflux in comparison to those of the control, the AUCL was unchanged (Fig. 3B). The same relationships were obtained for averaged tissue concentration in liver or AUCL (eqs. 4 and 5) for the case when the liver is viewed as three zonal regions of equal transport and metabolic activities (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6 Parameter values used for simulation of decay profiles of a hypothetic drug with the physiologically based liver model shown in Fig. 3

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Simulations of changes of the liver tissue concentration after bolus intravenous dosing under linear conditions. The control condition was assigned values of 0.1 ml/min/g as the CLint,sec, 0.25 ml/min/g for CLint,met, and 4 and 2 ml/min/g, respectively, for CLinflux and CLefflux. Only one parameter was changed at a time; the CLint,sec was varied to either 0.05 or 0.2 ml/min/g, and the CLint,met was changed to 0.125 or 0.5 ml/min/g (A). Upon decreasing the secretory and/or metabolic intrinsic clearances, CLint,sec and/or CLint,met, the tissue concentrations of drug were increased with time; alternately, upon increasing CLint,sec and/or CLint,met, the tissue concentrations of drug were decreased with time (A). Also, CLinflux was altered to 8 or 2 ml/min/g, and CLefflux was changed to 4 or 1 ml/min/g (B). However, although temporal changes were observed upon changes in CLinflux and CLefflux in comparison to those of the control, the AUCL was unchanged, which was consistent with eq. 5.

 

Effects of the Secretion, the Influx and Efflux Clearances, and Saturable Metabolism on Hepatic Clearance and Metabolite Formation

Although the effects of transporters on metabolism under first-order conditions were well predicted by the equations shown in Table 1, modulation of the apparent activity of metabolic enzymes under nonlinear conditions was virtually unknown. For appraisal of these effects, additional simulations were performed under the nonlinear metabolic condition [the metabolic intrinsic clearance is Vmax/(fLCL + Km), where Vmax and Km were assigned values of 5 nmol/min/g liver and 20 µM, respectively, as listed in Table 6, with other parameter values] at two different input concentration levels (50 and 500 µM). The mass balance rate equations utilized for simulation are shown in the Appendix. Figure 4 summarizes the resultant concentration-time profiles at the low dose (Fig. 4, left panel) versus high dose (Fig. 4, right panel); the integral provides the area under the curves (Table 7). The summarized complementary results on metabolism and excretion (Table 7) showed trends similar to those observed under first-order conditions. It may be seen that with increases of the CLint,sec, the apparent total clearance, which bore an inverse relationship to AUC of reservoir (or blood), increased (Fig. 4, A and D) and biliary excretion increased, whereas metabolite formation decreased (Table 7). With increases in the CLinflux, the apparent total hepatic clearance increased (Fig. 4, B and E) when the drug was entering the cell more readily; formation of metabolite would be reduced due to a greater degree of saturation of metabolism because of the faster rate of drug entry that results in higher cellular concentrations. The consequence is an increase in biliary excretion (Table 7). An increase in CLefflux reduces the hepatic clearance (Fig. 4, C and F), since drug in the intracellular compartment is readily extruded out of the cell; the lessened cellular concentration decreased the extent of excretion into bile but increased the extent of metabolism due to desaturation of the metabolic system (Table 7). Upon comparison of the extents of metabolism at the two doses (Table 7), we found that more metabolite was formed (percentage of dose) at the lower dose than that at the higher dose. On the contrary, the excreted amount (percentage of dose) was higher at the higher dose. The above trends could be deduced because of saturable metabolism at the higher dose (Table 7).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Simulations for nonlinear metabolic conditions at two different input concentration levels (50 and 500µ M). The CLint,sec was varied from 0.1 to 0.5, 0.25, and 0.05 ml/min/g, and CLinflux was altered from 4 to 8, 1, and 0.5 ml/min/g, whereas the CLefflux ranged from 2 to 4, 1, and 0.5 ml/min/g. With increases of the CLint,sec, the apparent total clearance, which bears an inverse relationship to AUC, increased (A and D). With increases in the CLinflux, the apparent total hepatic clearance increased when the drug was entering the cell more readily (B and E). With increases in CLefflux, the apparent total hepatic clearance decreased (C and F) since the drug in the intracellular compartment is readily extruded out of the cell.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 7 Simulations based on assigned parameters shown in Table 6 (cumulative metabolite formation and excretion were estimated to asymptotic values, then normalized to the dose)

 

Literature Reports

It is well recognized that the pregnane X receptor (PXR) transcriptionally up-regulates both cytochrome P450 3A4 and Pgp of MDR1 (Goodwin et al., 2000Go; Geick et al., 2001Go), and we may find both 3A4 and Pgp being coordinately induced by PXR ligands (Wacher et al., 1998Go). How do these findings translate to observations on competition between transporters and enzymes in vivo? For vinblastine, a P-glycoprotein substrate (Takanaga et al., 2000Go), and paclitaxel, digoxin, and FK506 (tacrolimus), substrates of both P-glycoprotein and the cytochrome P450 3A enzymes (Desai et al., 1998Go; Kawahara et al., 1999Go; Dai et al., 2001Go; Christians et al., 2002Go), the absence of P-glycoprotein in knockout mice [KO; mdr1a(-/-)] increased the area under the curve (AUC) and decreased the total body clearance (CL) (van Asperen et al., 1996Go; Spareboom et al., 1997Go; Kawahara et al., 1999Go; Yokogawa et al., 1999Go) (see Table 8) in single [mdr1a(-/-)] and double [mdr1a/1b(-/-)] KO mice in which the Cyp3a activities remained similar to that of control [mdr1a(+/+)]. However, because of reduced excretion in the KOs, the production of CO2 from erythromycin increased (Lan et al., 2000Go). These findings were consistent with the predictions on decreased excretion clearance (Table 5). Induction of P-glycoprotein with dexamethasone (a PXR ligand) increased the total body clearance of rhodamine, whereas cyclosporine, an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, resulted in reduced total body clearance of rhodamine (Yumoto et al., 2001Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 8 Literature values of area under the curve (AUC) and clearances (CL) after intravenous administrations to wild-type [mdr1a(+/+)] and Pgp-knockout [mdr1a(-/-)] mice

 

There have been recent studies on rat liver perfusions with the use of inhibitors of P-glycoprotein, cytochrome P450 3a, or both with FK506 (Wu and Benet, 2003Go). With troleandomycin (Cyp3a inhibitor) or cyclosporine (Cyp3a and P-glycoprotein inhibitor), the AUC was increased, whereas CL was decreased (Table 9), as predicted by Table 5. However, with GG918, a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, the AUC was decreased, leading to an increased CL. The result was unexpected, and the data could be explained only when efflux of FK506 was inhibited (example 6, Table 5). Yet in another recirculating liver perfusion study, there existed data on digoxin, a substrate that enters the liver via Oatp2 (or Oatp1a4) (Noé et al., 1997Go). Rifampin, an Oatp2 inhibitor (Fattinger et al., 2000Go), and quinidine, a P-glycoprotein inhibitor (Makhey et al., 1998Go), were used (Lau et al., 2004Go). With rifampin, digoxin transformation to its bis-digitoxoside was impaired, and the AUC was increased, as expected (Lau et al., 2004Go). However, significantly decreased liver digoxin concentrations occurred at 60 min after the commencement of perfusion. The change in liver digoxin concentration with rifampin at one single time point would not afford sound predictions, since the liver tissue concentrations could be initially lower than those of control. But the curve eventually crossed over and concentrations became higher than those of control; the AUCL remains unchanged if changes only in transport exist (see Fig. 3B). With quinidine acting as a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, digoxin metabolism was increased, as expected. However, the quinidine-treated group resulted in significantly lower reservoir digoxin concentrations in comparison to those of controls. The trend for AUCperfusate, although not measured to time infinity, implied an increase in total hepatic clearance CLliver,tot at reduced Pgp activity and decreased CLint,sec (Fig. 3A). According to theory, the observation of increased CLliver,tot is more consistent with inhibition of efflux or an enhancement in metabolism (Table 5). The unexplained findings suggest that there may be actions exerted by inhibitors other than inhibition of the intended pathway.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 9 Pharmacokinetics of FK506 and digoxin in perfused rat liver preparation with and without inhibitors

 

Concluding Remarks

Pharmacokinetic analyses of this kind are quantitative tools that provide undisputed evidence on the dynamic interactions between enzyme and enzyme, and transporter and enzymes. The suggested strategy is to apply intrinsic clearance terms for basolateral transport clearances for influx and efflux, and for the metabolic (first-order and nonlinear metabolic conditions) and secretory pathways. The timely examination provides a clear picture of the compensatory trends of alternate pathways, the expected changes in tissue concentrations, and how the biliary, metabolic, and total clearances change according to inhibition (total clearance will be decreased) or induction (total clearance will be increased) of one of the elimination pathways. The analysis further shows the scenarios when one considers changes in influx and efflux clearances, revealing that these will not affect the ratio for metabolism/excretion, although the absolute values of the clearances are changed. The above analysis clarifies that inhibitors that are used to demonstrate principles of drug-drug interactions are prone to scrutiny when the inhibitor is not specific in its intended use (Wu and Benet, 2003Go; Lau et al., 2004Go).

Appendix

Mass balance equations were written for the rate of change of drug in reservoir, liver plasma, liver tissue, and bile compartments (see Fig. 2 for definition of terms).

For the rate of change of drug in reservoir,

(A1)

For the rate of change of drug in liver plasma

(A2)

For the rate of change of drug in liver tissue

(A3)

For the rate of change of drug in bile

(A4)

For cumulative amount excreted into bile

(A5)

For cumulative amount metabolized

(A6)

Footnotes

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, MOP65417

doi:10.1124/dmd.104.001149.

ABBREVIATIONS: Oatp, rat organic anion-transporting polypeptide; Mrp2, rat multidrug resistance-associated protein 2; Cyp3a, rat cytochrome P450 3a subfamily; AUC, area under the blood concentration-time curve; AUCL, area under the liver tissue concentration-time curve; CLint,sec, secretory intrinsic clearance; CLint,met, metabolic intrinsic clearance; CLliver,tot, total hepatic clearance; CLliver,ex, biliary clearance; CLliver,met, hepatic metabolic clearance; PXR, pregnane X receptor; Pgp, P-glycoprotein; FK506, tacrolimus; KO, knockout mouse; GG918, N-{4-[2-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6,7-dimethoxy-2-isoquinolinyl)-ethyl]-phenyl}-9,10-dihydro-5-methoxy-9-oxo-4-acridine carboxamine.

Address correspondence to: Dr. K. S. Pang, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 19 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G2. E-mail: ks.pang{at}utoronto.ca

References



Abu-Zahra TN and Pang KS (2000) Effect of zonal transport and metabolism on hepatic removal: enalapril hydrolysis in zonal, isolated rat hepatocytes in vitro and correlation with perfusion data. Drug Metab Dispos 28: 807-813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Abu-Zahra TN, Wolkoff AW, Kim RB, and Pang KS (2000) Uptake of enalapril and expression of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1 in zonal, isolated rat hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 28: 801-806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Benet LZ and Cummins CL (2001) The drug efflux-metabolism alliance: biochemical aspects. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 50 (Suppl 1): S3-S11.

Christians U, Jacobsen W, Benet LZ, and Lampen A (2002) Mechanisms of clinically relevant drug interactions associated with tacrolimus. Clin Pharmacokinet 41: 813-851.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cummins CL, Jacobson W, and Benet LZ (2002) Unmasking the dynamic interplay between intestinal P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 300: 1036-1045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dai D, Zeldin DC, Blaisdell JA, Chanas B, Coulter SJ, Ghanayem BI, and Goldstein JA (2001) Polymorphisms in human CYP2C8 decrease metabolism of the anticancer drug paclitaxel and arachidonic acid. Pharmacogenetics 11: 597-607.[CrossRef][Medline]

de Lannoy IA, Barker F III, and Pang KS (1993) Formed and preformed metabolite excretion clearances in liver, a metabolite formation: studies on enalapril and enalaprilat in the single pass and recirculating perfused rat liver. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 21: 395-421.[CrossRef][Medline]

de Lannoy IA, Nespeca R, and Pang KS (1989) Renal handling of enalapril and enalaprilat: studies in the isolated red blood cell-perfused rat kidney. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 251: 1211-1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Desai PB, Duan JZ, Zhu YW, and Kouzi S (1998) Human liver microsomal metabolism of paclitaxel and drug interactions. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 23: 417-424.[Medline]

Fattinger K, Cattori V, Hagenbuch B, Meier PJ, and Stieger B (2000) Rifamycin SV and rifampicin exhibit differential inhibition of the hepatic rat organic anion transporting polypeptides, Oatp1 and Oatp2. Hepatology 32: 82-86.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fisher JM, Wrighton SA, Watkins PB, Schmiedlin-Ren P, Calamia JC, Shen DD, Kunze KL, and Thummel KE (1999) First-pass midazolam metabolism catalyzed by 1{alpha},25-dihydroxy vitamin D3-modified Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289: 1134-1142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ito K, Kusuhara H, and Sugiyama Y (1999) Effects of intestinal CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein on oral drug absorption—theoretical approach. Pharm Res (NY) 16: 225-231.

Johnson BM, Charman WN, and Porter CJH (2001) The impact of P-glycoprotein efflux on enterocyte residence time and enterocyte-based metabolism of verapamil. J Pharm Pharmacol 53: 1611-1619.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kawahara M, Sakata A, Miyashita T, Tamai I, and Tsuji A (1999) Physiologically based pharmacokinetics of digoxin in mdr1a knockout mice. J Pharm Sci 88: 1281-1287.[CrossRef][Medline]

Geick A, Eichelbaum M, and Burk O (2001) Nuclear receptor response elements mediate induction of intestinal MDR1 by rifampin. J Biol Chem 276: 14581-14587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goodwin B, Redinbo MR, and Kliewer SA (2000) Regulation of cyp3a gene transcription by the pregnane X receptor. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 42: 1-23.

Lan LB, Dalton JT, and Schuetz EG (2000) Mdr1 limits CYP3A metabolism in vivo. Mol Pharmacol 58: 863-869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lau YY, Wu CY, Okochi H, and Benet LZ (2004) Ex situ inhibition of hepatic uptake and efflux significantly changes metabolism: hepatic enzyme-transporter interplay. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 308: 1040-1045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Makhey VD, Guo A, Norris DA, Hu P, Yan J, and Sinko PJ (1998) Characterization of the regional intestinal kinetics of drug efflux in rat and human intestine and in Caco-2 cells. Pharm Res (NY) 15: 1160-1167.

Morris ME and Pang KS (1987) Competition between two enzymes for substrate removal in liver: modulating effects of competitive pathways. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 15: 473-496.[CrossRef][Medline]

Noé B, Hagenbuch B, Stieger B, and Meier PJ (1997) Isolation of a multispecific organic anion and cardiac glycoside transporter from rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 10346-10350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pang KS, Cherry WF, Barker F III, and Goresky CA (1991) Esterases for enalapril hydrolysis are concentrated in the perihepatic venous region of the rat liver. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 257: 294-301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pang KS, Cherry WF, Terrell JA, and Ulm EH (1984) Disposition of enalapril and its diacid metabolite, enalaprilat, in a perfused rat liver preparation. Presence of a diffusional barrier for enalaprilat into hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 12: 309-313.[Abstract]

Pang KS and Chiba M (1994) Chapter 5: Metabolism: scaling up from in vitro to organ and whole body, in Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology (Welling PG and Balant LP eds) pp 101-187, Springer-Verlag, Stuttgart.

Pang KS, Chung A, Cui Y, and Keppler D (2002) Abolition of biliary excretion of enalapril and enalaprilat in EHBR perfused livers and enalapril is transported by OATP-2 and OATP-8. AAPS Annual Meeting, Nov 12-14, 2002. AAPS Pharm Sci 4: W4284. Toronto.

Pang KS, Wang PJ, Chung AY, and Wolkoff AW (1998) The modified dipeptide, enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, is transported by the rat liver organic anion transport protein. Hepatology 28: 1341-1346.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schuetz EG and Schinkel AH (1999) Drug disposition as determined by the interplay between drug-transporting and drug-metabolizing systems. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 13: 219-222.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sirianni GL and Pang KS (1997) Organ clearance concepts: new perspectives on old principles. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 25: 457-478.

Spareboom A, van Asperen J, Mayer U, Schinkel AH, Smit JW, Meijer DK, Borst P, Nooijen WJ, Beijnen JH, and van Tellingen O (1997) Limited oral bioavailability and active epithelial excretion of paclitaxel (Taxol) caused by P-glycoprotein in the intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 2031-2035.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takanaga H, Ohnishi A, Yamada S, Matsuo H, Morimoto S, Shoyama Y, Ohtani H, and Sawada Y (2000) Polymethoxylated flavones in orange juice are inhibitors of P-glycoprotein but not cytochrome P450 3A4. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 293: 230-236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tam D, Sun H, and Pang KS (2003) Influence of P-glycoprotein, transfer clearances and drug binding on intestinal metabolism in Caco-2 cell monolayers or membrane preparations: a theoretical analysis. Drug Metab Dispos 31: 1214-1226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

van Asperen J, Schinkel AH, Beijnen JH, Nooijen WJ, Borst P, and van Tellingen O (1996) Altered pharmacokinetics of vinblastine in Mdr1a P-glycoprotein-deficient mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 994-999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wacher VJ, Silverman JA, Zhang Y, and Benet LZ (1998) Role of P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A in limiting oral absorption of peptides and peptidomimetics. J Pharm Sci 87: 1322-1330.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wu CY and Benet LZ (2003) Disposition of tacrolimus in isolated perfused rat liver: influence of troleandomycin, cyclosporine and GG918. Drug Metab Dispos 31: 1292-1295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yokogawa K, Takahashi M, Tamai I, Konishi H, Nomura M, Moritani S, Miyamoto K, and Tsuji A (1999) P-glycoprotein-dependent disposition kinetics of tacrolimus: studies in mdr1a knockout mice. Pharm Res (NY) 16: 1213-1218.

Yumoto R, Murakami T, Sanemasa M, Nasu R, Nagai J, and Takano M (2001) Pharmacokinetic interaction of cytochrome P-450 3a-related compounds with rhodamine 123, a P-glycoprotein substrate, in rats pretreated with dexamethasone. Drug Metab Dispos 29: 145-151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zahlten RN and Stratman FW (1974) The isolation of hormone sensitive rat hepatocytes by a modified enzymatic technique. Arch Biochem Biophys 163: 606-608.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Sousa, A. Pozniak, and M. Boffito
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drug interactions involving rifampicin, rifabutin and antimalarial drugs
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(5): 872 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. W. Paine, A. J. Parker, P. Gardiner, P. J. H. Webborn, and R. J. Riley
Prediction of the Pharmacokinetics of Atorvastatin, Cerivastatin, and Indomethacin Using Kinetic Models Applied to Isolated Rat Hepatocytes
Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2008; 36(7): 1365 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
R. Z. Turncliff, K. A. Hoffmaster, J. C. Kalvass, G. M. Pollack, and K. L. R. Brouwer
Hepatobiliary Disposition of a Drug/Metabolite Pair: Comprehensive Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Sandwich-Cultured Rat Hepatocytes
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2006; 318(2): 881 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Liu, E. Mak, R. G. Tirona, E. Tan, P. M. Novikoff, P. Wang, A. W. Wolkoff, and K. S. Pang
Vascular Binding, Blood Flow, Transporter, and Enzyme Interactions on the Processing of Digoxin in Rat Liver
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2005; 315(1): 433 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
R. J. Riley, D. F. McGinnity, and R. P. Austin
A UNIFIED MODEL FOR PREDICTING HUMAN HEPATIC, METABOLIC CLEARANCE FROM IN VITRO INTRINSIC CLEARANCE DATA IN HEPATOCYTES AND MICROSOMES
Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2005; 33(9): 1304 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.104.001149v1
33/1/1    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pang, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pang, K. S.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition