QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dmd.105.004333v1 33/6/812    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Di Marco, A. Articles by Laufer, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Di Marco, A. Articles by Laufer, R.

DETERMINATION OF DRUG GLUCURONIDATION AND UDP-GLUCURONOSYLTRANSFERASE SELECTIVITY USING A 96-WELL RADIOMETRIC ASSAY

Department of Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche di Biologia Molecolare (IRBM) P. Angeletti, Merck Research Laboratories, Rome, Italy

(Received February 17, 2005; accepted March 18, 2005)

	Abstract

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
A rapid and sensitive radiometric assay for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) is described. UGT substrates are incubated in 96-well plates with microsomes in the presence of [¹⁴C]UDP-glucuronic acid, and ¹⁴C-labeled glucuronidation products are separated from the unreacted nucleotide sugar by solid-phase extraction using 96-well extraction plates. The assay was validated with 15 structurally diverse UGT substrates containing acidic, phenolic, and hydroxyl reacting groups. Glucuronidation velocities for these compounds were determined using human, rat, and dog liver microsomes, and reaction kinetics were studied with 1-naphthol and 4-methylumbelliferone. Results obtained with the new assay confirmed the previously reported rank order of glucuronidation velocity of several typical UGT substrates and the finding that the glucuronidation of most of these compounds is significantly faster in dog than in human liver microsomes. UGT specificity of five compounds was determined using recombinant human UGTs. The major UGT isoforms identified were UGT1A6, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 for 4-methylumbelliferone; UGT1A6 and UGT1A8 for 1-naphthol; UGT2B7 for naloxone; UGT1A3 and UGT2B7 for ketoprofen; and UGT1A4 for trifluoperazine. Identical results were obtained with a conventional high-performance liquid chromatography method coupled to mass spectrometric detection. The new assay should prove valuable for rapidly benchmarking recombinant UGTs and microsomal preparations from different species and tissues, identifying high-turnover compounds during drug discovery, and reaction phenotyping studies.

Because of the great number of different enzyme isoforms, their wide tissue distribution, and the multiplicity of substrates, the availability of robust, simple, and sensitive assay methods is crucial for studies of the biochemistry, function, and regulation of this enzyme family. As a consequence of the major role of glucuronidation in drug elimination, rapid UGT assays are also needed during the drug discovery process to identify metabolic liabilities, define the UGT specificity and reaction kinetics, and predict human pharmacokinetics of new chemical entities (Lin and Wong, 2002; Miners et al., 2004). All currently used techniques for the determination of UGT activity involve separation of glucuronide conjugation products from the parent aglycone, followed by product quantification using ultraviolet, mass spectrometric, or radiochemical detection. Two important advantages of radiometric methods based on the use of [¹⁴C]UDPGA is that they are sensitive and do not require synthetic glucuronide standards for product quantification. However, most of the current methods for product separation, such as thin-layer chromatography (Bansal and Gessner, 1980), HPLC (Ethell et al., 1998), or organic solvent extraction (Matern et al., 1994), are relatively laborious and not ideally suited for processing large number of samples in a short time. A radiometric SPE method using C18 cartridges for the determination of acyl glucuronide formation has been described (Pritchard et al., 1993). This method is much faster than alternative separation methods, but it has not been investigated whether it could be applied to determine glucuronidation of drugs other than carboxylic acids. In the present report, we describe a 96-well radiometric assay for the determination of UGT activity toward compounds containing carboxyl, phenol, and hydroxyl moieties based on conjugation with [¹⁴C]-UDPGA and separation of reaction products on 96-well SPE plates. The assay was validated with 15 structurally diverse substrates and used to compare reaction velocities in microsomes from three different species and determine the reaction kinetics and UGT specificity of typical substrates.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Reagents. [¹⁴C]UDPGA (418.3 mCi/mmol) was purchased from PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences (Monza, Italy). Other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy) and were of the highest purity available. HLM (pooled from 22 donors) and RLM (pooled from 60 male Sprague-Dawley rats) were obtained from BD Gentest (Woburn, MA), and DLM (pooled from 9 male Beagle dogs) were obtained from Xenotech (Lenexa, KA). All microsomal stocks contained 20 mg of protein per milliliter. Recombinant human UGTs expressed in baculovirus-infected cells (Supersomes) were purchased from BD Gentest with the exception of UGT1A7, which was obtained from PanVera Corp. (Madison, WI).

Assay Procedure. Assays were carried out in polystyrene 96-well plates (Costar 96-well round bottom plate; Corning Life Sciences, Acton, MA) containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 4 mM MgCl₂, 10 or 50 µg of microsomal protein, 2 mM UDPGA, 50 to 100 nCi of [¹⁴C]UDPGA, 5 mM D-saccharic acid 1,4 lactone, 1 mM adenosine-5'-monophosphate, 1 mM ethylene glycol-bis(ß-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid, and 50 µg/mg protein of alamethicin in a final volume of 100 µl. Adenosine-5'-monophosphate and ethylene glycol-bis(ß-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid were added to inhibit nucleotide pyrophosphatases (Torp-Pedersen et al., 1979; Faltynek et al., 1981; Matern et al., 1994). All substrates were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide resulting in a final solvent concentration of 1% (v/v). Blank controls for each batch of microsomes were incubated in the presence of vehicle only. Plates were incubated at 37°C for up to 40 min, and reactions were terminated by the addition of 100 µl of 0.2 N HCl. For zero time controls, HCl was added to the reaction mixture prior to the addition of UDPGA. Proteins were removed by centrifugation at 1750g for 30 min using a microplate rotor.

Separation of Glucuronide Products. Oasis HLB 30-mg solid-phase 96-well extraction plates (Waters, Milford, MA) were used for the SPE process on a 96-well vacuum manifold. Prior to loading the assay supernatant, plates were washed with MeOH (2 x 1.5-ml washes) and water (2 x 1.5-ml washes), and the solvent was drawn through the column by applying vacuum. Deproteinized assay mixtures (180 µl) were loaded onto the plate, and vacuum was applied again. The plates were then washed twice with 0.5 ml of water followed by three additional washes with 1 ml of water to remove UDPGA and [¹⁴C]UDPGA. The waste tray in the vacuum manifold was replaced with a 2-ml, deep-format 96-well plate, and the radioactive glucuronide was eluted with 2 x 0.5 ml of MeOH. The MeOH eluate was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen (Micro DS96 sample concentrator; Porvair Sciences Ltd., Shepperton, Middlesex, UK) and resuspended in 120 µl of acetonitrile/water (50:50 v/v), and 100 µl of this solution was transferred to 24-well Packard scintillation plates (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences). Scintillation fluid (1.5 ml of Microscint 20; PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences) was added to each well before sealing, mixing, and counting for 2 min per well using a Topcount NXT1 microplate scintillation counter (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences).

Validation of the SPE Procedure. To assess whether glucuronide conjugates were selectively retained on the SPE plate and eluted only in the MeOH elution step, a second extraction was carried out. Briefly, MeOH eluates collected from the first extraction (which contained the glucuronide product) were dried under nitrogen and reconstituted in a 220-µl mixture of 0.2 N HCl and 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 2 mM unlabeled UDPGA (in a 1:1 ratio). Thirty microliters of this mixture were counted to determine the total radioactivity, whereas 180 µl were loaded onto a second extraction plate, which was washed and eluted as described for the standard procedure. Product recovery was calculated from the ratio of counts recovered in the MeOH eluate of the second extraction relative to the total input radioactivity.

Determination of Substrate Glucuronidation by Recombinant UGTs. Compounds were incubated with recombinant UGT preparations containing 10 or 50 µg of microsomal protein for 30 min except for trifluoperazine, which was incubated for 120 min. Following the addition of stopping solution and centrifugation, 150-µl aliquots of deproteinized supernatants were subjected to SPE and processed as described above. Aliquots of 30 µl were diluted with an equal volume of acetonitrile and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS using an Agilent HP1100 liquid chromatograph equipped with a CTC Analytics PAL Autosampler. Chromatography was performed on an XTERRA MS C₁₈ column (4.6 mm x 5 cm; 5 µm; Waters) at a flow rate of 2 ml/min, using a linear gradient from water/0.1% formic acid (A) to 20% A, 80% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid. The eluate was diverted to a Sciex API-3000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with a Turbo Ionspray ionization source operated in the positive ion mode (glucuronides of ketoprofen, naloxone, and trifluoperazine) or negative ion mode (glucuronides of 1NP and 4MU).

	Results

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Separation of Glucuronide Conjugates from Unreacted UDPGA. To generate glucuronide conjugates of a series of typical UGT substrates, compounds were incubated for 2 h at 37° with alamethicin-treated DLM in the presence of a trace amount (1.5-2 x 10⁵ dpm) of [¹⁴C]UDPGA and 2 mM unlabeled UDPGA. Reaction mixtures were deproteinized and loaded on 96-well SPE plates containing Oasis polymeric sorbent. Radioactivity was eluted from the plates by stepwise washes with 1-ml fractions of water followed by MeOH. Over 99% of [¹⁴C]UDPGA eluted in the combined void volume and aqueous fractions, with less than 0.15% of the radioactivity eluting in the organic solvent fractions. Similarly, over 99% and <1% of the radioactivity in control microsomal reaction mixtures incubated in the absence of aglycone eluted in the aqueous and organic fractions, respectively (Table 1 and Fig. 1A). In contrast, when incubation mixtures contained the UGT substrate 1NP, radioactivity eluting in the aqueous fraction was significantly reduced, indicating that part of the [¹⁴C]UDPGA had been consumed in the reaction. Significant amounts of radioactivity eluted in the MeOH fraction (Table 1 and Fig. 1B). Since radioactivity was detected in the organic fraction only when both 1NP and microsomes were present in the incubation, this radioactivity must correspond to the reaction product of 1NP with [¹⁴C]UDPGA, namely 1NP-O-glucuronide. These results indicate that the glucuronide conjugate of 1NP, by virtue of being more hydrophobic than UDPGA, can be separated from the labeled substrate by retention on Oasis SPE resin and subsequently eluted and recovered by washing the resin with organic solvent.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. Separation of the 14C-labeled glucuronide conjugate of 1NP from [14C]-UDPGA by SPE. DLM were incubated for 120 min with 0.1 µCi of [14C]-UDPGA/2 mM UDPGA in the absence (empty bars) or presence (solid bars) of 1 mM 1NP. Incubation mixtures were deproteinized and loaded on Oasis SPE plates. Plates were eluted with 2 x 0.5 ml of water (pooled eluates water 1), followed by four additional washes with 1 ml of water (eluate fractions water 2-5), 2 x 0.5 ml of MeOH (pooled eluate fraction MeOH 1), and 2 x 1 ml of MeOH (fractions MeOH 2-3). Radioactivity in the eluates was expressed as a percentage of the total radioactivity in each incubation mixture and represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).

To assess whether this is also true for other UGT substrates, several structurally diverse compounds were incubated with [¹⁴C]UDPGA and DLM, and reaction mixtures were fractionated on SPE plates as described above. The compounds tested included drugs containing carboxylic acid moieties that are conjugated with UDPGA to form acyl glucuronides, such as naproxen, ketoprofen, furosemide, gemfibrozil, and valproic acid, and endogenous compounds, chemicals, or drugs containing hydroxyl or phenolic groups, such as the coumarin 4MU, the phenols 1NP and octyl gallate, the steroids 5-androstane-3,17-diol, 5-androstane-3,17ß-diol, ß-estradiol, and 17-ethynylestradiol, the bile acid hyodeoxycholic acid, and the drugs naloxone and propofol. As shown in Table 1, all of these compounds formed reaction products that eluted in the MeOH fraction.

One possible concern with the SPE extraction method is that not all of the glucuronide conjugates formed are retained on the SPE resin and/or that glucuronide conjugates are not quantitatively recovered in the MeOH eluate. To address this issue, the MeOH fractions containing glucuronide conjugates of the drugs described above were collected, evaporated to dryness, reconstituted in water, and loaded on a second SPE plate. If glucuronide conjugates are not completely adsorbed to the resin, part of the radioactivity would be expected to elute in the water fraction of the second extraction, with a corresponding decrease of radioactivity in the MeOH fraction. The amount of radioactivity recovered in the MeOH fraction also provides an estimate for eventual losses due to compound remaining associated with the resin. For all tested compounds, radioactivity in the water fraction of the second extraction was not significantly higher than background (data not shown), indicating that all of the glucuronide conjugates quantitatively bound to the extraction resin. As shown in Table 1, ¹⁴C-labeled glucuronide conjugates were recovered in good yield in the MeOH fraction, with recoveries of 70 to 100% for all compounds.

Assay Sensitivity. Assay sensitivity is limited by the specific radioactivity of the [¹⁴C]UDPGA substrate and the signal-to-noise ratio. The specific radioactivity of [¹⁴C]UDPGA can be increased either by increasing the amount of tracer radioactivity (which obviously has an impact on the cost of the assay) or by decreasing the concentration of unlabeled substrate. The concentration of UDPGA must remain sufficiently high to provide conjugating equivalents to aglycones, which are typically assayed at concentrations in the 0.1 to 1 mM range. Moreover, UDPGA is unstable in microsomal systems (Puhakainen and Hanninen, 1976), and preliminary experiments indicated that reactions were not linear for more than 10 min when total UDPGA concentrations <0.5 mM were used. Most published UGT assays contain UDPGA at concentrations of 1 to 10 mM, and we used 2 mM in the present study. Under these conditions, with 2 x 10⁵ dpm of [¹⁴C]UDPGA, the specific radioactivity of the nucleotide sugar is 1000 dpm/nmol. For low turnover substrates, the UDPGA concentration can be decreased to 0.5 mM, resulting in a specific radioactivity of 4000 dpm/nmol.

Background radioactivity (noise) in the present assay had two distinct origins. First, as shown for the zero time control in Table 1, a small amount (0.1% of total radioactivity) of [¹⁴C]UDPGA eluted in the product (MeOH) fraction from the SPE plates. Second, there was a significant time- and microsome-dependent increase of counts eluting in the MeOH fraction in the absence of added aglycone (see blank controls in Table 1). The origin of this background activity, which was highest in DLM, is not known. One possibility is that it represents glucuronidation of a contaminant present in the assay reagents or in microsomes. Blank values were 0.27 ± 0.03, 0.66 ± 0.13, and 0.34 ± 0.04% of total radioactivity (average ± S.E.M., n = 9-14) after a 40-min incubation with 0.5 mg/ml of rat, dog, and human liver microsomes, respectively. The limit of detection of the assay (product counts 2-fold above blank values) was 0.3 nmol/min/mg of microsomal protein for RLM and HLM and approximately 2-fold higher for DLM.

Reaction Kinetics. The formation rates of glucuronide conjugates for a series of typical UGT substrates were determined in rat, human, and dog liver microsomes at two different protein concentrations: 0.1 and 0.5 mg/ml. Results for 1NP and 4MU are depicted in Fig. 2. At a microsome concentration of 0.1 mg/ml, 1NP glucuronidation was linear with incubation time up to 40 min in all species. Deviation from linearity was observed in RLM and DLM at the higher microsome concentration, likely due to substrate depletion (Fig. 2A). Similar results were obtained for 4MU (Fig. 2B). The concentration dependence of 1NP and 4MU glucuronidation is shown in Fig. 3, A and B, respectively. 1NP glucuronidation did not follow Michaelis-Menten kinetics in microsomes from any of the species tested. Bell-shaped curves consistent with substrate inhibition were observed. To exclude that the decreased velocity at high (>1 mM) substrate concentrations was due to depletion of the cosubstrate UDPGA or to overloading of the SPE resin, incubations were also performed at a 5-fold higher UDPGA concentration (10 mM). Even though reaction velocities slightly increased at 10 mM UDPGA, similar bell-shaped curves were observed (Fig. 3A). Substrate inhibition kinetics has been described for several human UGT substrates (Court et al., 2002; Watanabe et al., 2002), including 1NP (Uchaipichat et al., 2004). The number of data points at high substrate concentration was insufficient for reliable curve fitting to a substrate inhibition model, and kinetic parameters could not be calculated. The glucuronidation of 4MU followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics in RLM and DLM, with K_m and V_max values of 1.1 mM and 160 nmol/min/mg and 0.3 mM and 220 nmol/min/mg, respectively (Fig. 3B). In HLM, velocity increased linearly with substrate concentration, and no saturation was observed at concentrations up to 2 mM.

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2. Effect of incubation time and microsome concentration on [14C]glucuronide formation from 1NP and 4MU. A, incubations with 1 mM 1NP; B, incubations with 0.5 mM 4MU. Compounds were incubated for the indicated times with RLM (top panels), DLM (middle panels), or HLM (bottom panels). Microsome concentrations were 0.1 mg/ml (filled symbols) and 0.5 mg/ml (empty symbols). Each point is the mean ± half-range from duplicate determinations.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3. Concentration dependence of 1NP- and 4MU-[14C]glucuronide formation rates. A, reaction with 1NP; B, reaction with 4MU. Compounds were incubated for 30 min with RLM (top panels), DLM (middle panels), or HLM (bottom panels). Incubations contained a total UDPGA concentration of 2 mM (empty symbols) or 10 mM (filled symbols). Each point is the mean ± half-range from duplicate determinations.

For all other compounds tested, glucuronide formation was linear for up to 40 min at one or both of the microsome concentrations used. Reaction rates are summarized in Table 2. Kinetic constants for glucuronidation in RLM, DLM, and HLM of several of these substrates, namely furosemide, gemfibrozil, hyodeoxycholic acid, naloxone, 1NP, naproxen, valproic acid, ethynylestradiol, and propofol, have been published (Soars et al., 2001a,b). Reaction velocities observed in the present study were on average 5-fold higher than those extrapolated from the V_max and K_m values determined by these authors using a radiometric HPLC method (data not shown). This could be due to a number of reasons, such as potential formation of multiple metabolites with some substrates, use of different microsome preparations, and different incubation conditions (assay buffer, use of alamethicin versus sonication for activation of microsomes), which can affect glucuronidation velocity (Soars et al., 2003). When enzymatic activity was expressed relative to that of naloxone, a good agreement was observed between the results obtained with the present method and those calculated from the data of Soars et al. (2001a,b), as summarized in Table 3 for relative activities in HLM. A greater than 2-fold difference with the published data was observed only for hyodeoxycholic acid. The reason for this discrepancy is not known; possible explanations include different incubation conditions and enzyme source, as pointed out above. Our results also confirm the previous finding that glucuronidation velocities for most of these drugs are significantly higher in dog than in human liver microsomes (Soars et al., 2001b).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 3 Comparison of relative reaction rates with literature data Reaction velocities are expressed relative to that of naloxone (relative activity = 100). The concentration of compounds in microsomal incubations was 1 mM except for propofol (0.5 mM) and 17-ethynylestradiol (0.25 mM).

Reaction Phenotyping. We next assessed whether the assay can be used for reaction phenotyping, i.e., the determination of which UGT isoforms metabolize a particular substrate. The activity of commercial recombinant human UGT preparations was determined using the nonselective substrate HFC (100 µM), whose glucuronidation is catalyzed by all isoforms tested with the exception of UGT1A4. As shown in Table 4, HFC glucuronidation activities were between 0.6 and 10 nmol/min/mg of microsomal protein. The activity of UGT1A4, determined using 200 µM of the specific substrate trifluoperazine, was 0.7 nmol/min/mg. These results are in agreement with published data (Ghosal et al., 2004).

Glucuronidation of five different substrates by recombinant human UGTs was determined, and results were compared with those of a conventional separation method using HPLC coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometric analysis for the detection of glucuronide conjugates. Since synthetic glucuronide standards were not available, results were expressed as the amount of glucuronide conjugate (dpm or peak area) formed with each UGT isoform relative to that obtained in incubations with HLM. As shown in Fig. 4, relative activities determined with the radiometric assay were similar to those of the LC-MS/MS method. In particular, the two methods identified the same major metabolizing enzymes for the different substrates tested, namely UGT1A6, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 for 4MU; UGT1A6 and UGT1A8 for 1NP; UGT2B7 for naloxone; UGT1A3 and UGT2B7 for ketoprofen; and UGT1A4 for trifluoperazine.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4. Glucuronidation by individual UGTs. Recombinant UGTs and HLM were incubated with 1 mM 1NP (A), 0.5 mM 4MU (B), 1 mM ketoprofen (C), 0.2 mM trifluoperazine (D), and 1 mM naloxone (E). Aliquots of the reaction mixtures were analyzed by LC-MS/MS (empty bars) or SPE and scintillation counting (solid bars). For each UGT, glucuronide peak areas from MS analysis and radioactive product counts from SPE were expressed as a percentage of the corresponding signals from incubations with HLM. Results are mean values ± half-range from duplicate determinations.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

The limit of detection of the new assay (0.3 nmol/min/mg in HLM) is identical to that of a previously described SPE method for the determination of acyl glucuronide formation (Pritchard et al., 1993). If reactions are carried out at substrate concentrations of 100 µM, and assuming that first-order kinetics apply, this corresponds to a detection limit for intrinsic clearance of 3 µl/min/mg, which is similar to that of commonly used substrate depletion methods. The reported sensitivity of an HPLC-based radiometric glucuronidation assay (Ethell et al., 1998) is significantly higher (8 pmol/min/mg of HLM), but this value was obtained at a 6-fold higher microsome concentration than that used in the present work (3 mg/ml versus 0.5 mg/ml) and represents product counts of approximately 100 dpm, which may not be easily quantifiable with many commonly used online radiochemical detectors. Normalizing for the different microsome concentrations, the present assay seems to be less sensitive than the HPLC-based method by approximately 6-fold. Despite its somewhat decreased sensitivity, which limits its use with very low turnover substrates, the radiometric SPE method offers the advantage of greatly increased speed and throughput, since the entire procedure, namely incubation and product separation, is carried out in 96-well plates and does not require specialized equipment, such as HPLC and online radiochemical, mass spectrometric, or fluorimetric detectors. It should be noted that assay sensitivity can be increased at least 4-fold by decreasing the concentration of unlabeled UDPGA to 0.5 mM and/or using higher amounts of radiolabeled substrate or microsomes.

The results of reaction phenotyping studies with the present method are in general agreement with previous studies, in particular for the known UGT specificity of ketoprofen (Sakaguchi et al., 2004), naloxone (Coffman et al., 1998), and trifluoperazine (Ghosal et al., 2004), although some differences were observed with the reported ranking of the activities of different UGTs toward 4MU and 1NP (Uchaipichat et al., 2004). Thus, in our hands, the activity of UGT2B7 toward 4MU and 1NP and that of UGT1A6 toward 1NP were significantly (>20-fold) higher than reported by Uchaipichat et al. (2004), whereas that of UGT1A10-mediated 4MU glucuronidation was significantly (14-fold) lower. Uchaipichat et al. (2004) noted a similar difference between their data and the high UGT1A6 activity toward 1NP observed by Soars et al. (2003). Consistent with the present data, relatively high activity of UGT1A6 and UGT2B7 with 1NP (Gschaidmeier et al., 1995; Kurkela et al., 2003) and low activity of UGT1A10 with 4MU (Strassburg et al., 1998; Cheng et al., 1999) has been reported. It should be noted that Uchaipichat et al. (2004) used cell lysates from a mammalian UGT-expressing cell line, whereas baculovirus-expressed enzymes were used in the present study. The amount of UGT protein in different recombinant preparations is generally not known, which precludes accurate normalization of enzymatic activities. Sequence variability (Uchaipichat et al., 2004), different membrane composition or environment (Nakajima et al., 2002), or different methods for microsome permeabilization (Soars et al., 2003) may be additional factors that contribute to interlaboratory differences in enzyme activity. For commercial UGT preparations, enzymatic activities reported by different suppliers are frequently obtained using different expression systems, substrates, incubation conditions, and analytical methods. On the basis of these considerations, it seems advisable to determine the activity of recombinant UGT preparations with several well characterized reference compounds and a standard assay method before using them for reaction phenotyping studies.

In conclusion, we developed a 96-well non-HPLC assay method that allows rapid determination of UGT activities with a variety of substrates. At the present time, we cannot claim that the method can be universally applied to all UGT substrates, since a limited number of compounds were tested. It cannot be excluded that some very hydrophilic glucuronide conjugates would not be retained by the SPE resin, although this was not observed with the compounds analyzed so far. More extensive studies with a large number of UGT substrates will be carried out to clarify this point. A significant difference with HPLC methods is that if a substrate contains several glucuronidation sites (such as ß-estradiol and androstanediol, which form 3- and 17ß-glucuronides), the different conjugation products are not resolved and only total glucuronidation is measured. Despite these potential limitations, the new assay has several important applications. First, it can be used for benchmarking, i.e., for easily and rapidly determining the quality of microsome preparations from several species or organs and of recombinant UGT batches using reference compounds. Second, in a drug discovery setting, the assay should prove valuable to screen chemical series with known glucuronidation properties to identify and flag high turnover compounds. Finally, the method offers a convenient and simple alternative to existing technologies for carrying out reaction phenotyping studies with new chemical entities, comparison of UGT activities with those of reference compounds, and determination of enzyme kinetics.

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank Marina Taliani for HPLC-MS/MS analysis and Brian Ethell for helpful discussions.

	Footnotes

 
This work was supported in part by a grant from the Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://dmd.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/dmd.105.004333.

ABBREVIATIONS: UGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase; UDPGA, UDP-glucuronic acid; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; SPE, solid-phase extraction; HLM, human liver microsomes; RLM, rat liver microsomes; DLM, dog liver microsomes; MS, mass spectometry; MS/MS, tandem mass spectometry; 1NP, 1-naphthol; 4MU, 4-methylumbelliferone; HFC, 7-hydroxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin; LC, liquid chromatography.

¹ Current address: Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

² Current address: CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, Napoli, Italy.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Ralph Laufer, Istituto di Ricerche di Biologia Molecolare P. Angeletti, Merck Research Laboratories, Via Pontina km 30,600, 00040 Pomezia (Roma), Italy. Email: ralph_laufer{at}merck.com

	References

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 


Bansal SK and Gessner T (1980) A unified method for the assay of uridine diphosphoglucuronyltransferase activities toward various aglycones using uridine diphospho[U-¹⁴C]glucuronic acid. Anal Biochem 109: 321-329.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bock KW (2003) Vertebrate UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: functional and evolutionary aspects. Biochem Pharmacol 66: 691-696.[CrossRef][Medline]

Burchell B, Brierley CH, and Rance D (1995) Specificity of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and xenobiotic glucuronidation. Life Sci 57: 1819-1831.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cheng Z, Radominska-Pandya A, and Tephly TR (1999) Studies on the substrate specificity of human intestinal UDP-glucuronosyltransferases 1A8 and 1A10. Drug Metab Dispos 27: 1165-1170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Coffman BL, King CD, Rios GR, and Tephly TR (1998) The glucuronidation of opioids, other xenobiotics and androgens by human UGT2B7Y(268) and UGT2B7H(268). Drug Metab Dispos 26: 73-77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Court MH, Duan SX, Guillemette C, Journault K, Krishnaswamy S, Von Moltke LL, and Greenblatt DJ (2002) Stereoselective conjugation of oxazepam by human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs): S-oxazepam is glucuronidated by UGT2B15, while R-oxazepam is glucuronidated by UGT2B7 and UGT1A9. Drug Metab Dispos 30: 1257-1265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ethell BT, Anderson GD, Beaumont K, Rance DJ, and Burchell B (1998) A universal radiochemical high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity. Anal Biochem 255: 142-147.[CrossRef][Medline]

Faltynek CR, Silbert JE, and Hof L (1981) Inhibition of the action of pyrophosphatase and phosphatase on sugar nucleotides. J Biol Chem 256: 7139-7141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ghosal A, Hapangama N, Yuan Y, Achanfuo-Yeboah J, Iannucci R, Chowdhury S, Alton K, Patrick JE, and Zbaida S (2004) Identification of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzyme(s) responsible for the glucuronidation of posaconazole (Noxafil). Drug Metab Dispos 32: 267-271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gschaidmeier H, Seidel A, Burchell B, and Bock KW (1995) Formation of mono- and diglucuronides and other glycosides of benzo(a)pyrene-3,6-quinol by V79 cell-expressed human phenol UDP-glucuronosyltransferases of the UGT1 gene complex. Biochem Pharmacol 49: 1601-1606.[CrossRef][Medline]

King CD, Rios GR, Green MD, and Tephly TR (2000) UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Curr Drug Metab 1: 143-161.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kurkela M, Garcia-Horsman JA, Luukkanen L, Morsky S, Taskinen J, Baumann M, Kostiainen R, Hirvonen J, and Finel M (2003) Expression and characterization of recombinant human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs). UGT1A9 is more resistant to detergent inhibition than other UGTs and was purified as an active dimeric enzyme. J Biol Chem 278: 3536-3544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lin JH and Wong BK (2002) Complexities of glucuronidation affecting in vitro in vivo extrapolation. Curr Drug Metab 3: 623-646.[CrossRef][Medline]

Matern H, Heinemann H, and Matern S (1994) Radioassay of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activities toward endogenous substrates using labeled UDP-glucuronic acid and an organic solvent extraction procedure. Anal Biochem 219: 182-188.[CrossRef][Medline]

Miners JO, Smith PA, Sorich MJ, McKinnon RA, and Mackenzie PI (2004) Predicting human drug glucuronidation parameters: application of in vitro and in silico modeling approaches. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 44: 1-25.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nakajima M, Tanaka E, Kobayashi T, Ohashi N, Kume T, and Yokoi T (2002) Imipramine N-glucuronidation in human liver microsomes: biphasic kinetics and characterization of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms. Drug Metab Dispos 30: 636-642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pritchard M, Fournel-Gigleux S, Siest G, and Magdalou J (1993) A method for the determination of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity toward arylcarboxylic acids. Anal Biochem 212: 487-497.[CrossRef][Medline]

Puhakainen E and Hanninen O (1976) Pyrophosphatase and glucuronosyltransferase in microsomal UDPglucuronic-acid metabolism in the rat liver. Eur J Biochem 61: 165-169.[Medline]

Sakaguchi K, Green M, Stock N, Reger TS, Zunic J, and King C (2004) Glucuronidation of carboxylic acid containing compounds by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms. Arch Biochem Biophys 424: 219-225.[CrossRef][Medline]

Soars MG, Riley RJ, and Burchell B (2001a) Evaluation of the marmoset as a model species for drug glucuronidation. Xenobiotica 31: 849-860.[CrossRef][Medline]

Soars MG, Riley RJ, Findlay KA, Coffey MJ, and Burchell B (2001b) Evidence for significant differences in microsomal drug glucuronidation by canine and human liver and kidney. Drug Metab Dispos 29: 121-126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Soars MG, Ring BJ, and Wrighton SA (2003) The effect of incubation conditions on the enzyme kinetics of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Metab Dispos 31: 762-767.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Strassburg CP, Manns MP, and Tukey RH (1998) Expression of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A locus in human colon. Identification and characterization of the novel extrahepatic UGT1A8. J Biol Chem 273: 8719-8726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Torp-Pedersen C, Flodgaard H, and Saermark T (1979) Studies on a Ca²⁺-dependent nucleoside triphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase in rat liver plasma membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 571: 94-104.[Medline]

Tukey RH and Strassburg CP (2000) Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolism, expression and disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40: 581-616.[CrossRef][Medline]

Uchaipichat V, Mackenzie PI, Guo XH, Gardner-Stephen D, Galetin A, Houston JB, and Miners JO (2004) Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: isoform selectivity and kinetics of 4-methylumbelliferone and 1-naphthol glucuronidation, effects of organic solvents and inhibition by diclofenac and probenecid. Drug Metab Dispos 32: 413-423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Watanabe Y, Nakajima M, and Yokoi T (2002) Troglitazone glucuronidation in human liver and intestine microsomes: high catalytic activity of UGT1A8 and UGT1A10. Drug Metab Dispos 30: 1462-1469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wells PG, Mackenzie PI, Chowdhury JR, Guillemette C, Gregory PA, Ishii Y, Hansen AJ, Kessler FK, Kim PM, Chowdhury NR, et al. (2004) Glucuronidation and the UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in health and disease. Drug Metab Dispos 32: 281-290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H.-X. Liu, Y. Liu, J.-W. Zhang, W. Li, H.-T. Liu, and L. Yang UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A6 Is the Major Isozyme Responsible for Protocatechuic Aldehyde Glucuronidation in Human Liver Microsomes Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1562 - 1569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. P. Kanebratt and T. B. Andersson Evaluation of HepaRG Cells as an in Vitro Model for Human Drug Metabolism Studies Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2008; 36(7): 1444 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Uchaipichat, P. I. Mackenzie, D. J. Elliot, and J. O. Miners SELECTIVITY OF SUBSTRATE (TRIFLUOPERAZINE) AND INHIBITOR (AMITRIPTYLINE, ANDROSTERONE, CANRENOIC ACID, HECOGENIN, PHENYLBUTAZONE, QUINIDINE, QUININE, AND SULFINPYRAZONE) "PROBES" FOR HUMAN UDP-GLUCURONOSYLTRANSFERASES Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2006; 34(3): 449 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dmd.105.004333v1 33/6/812    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Di Marco, A. Articles by Laufer, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Di Marco, A. Articles by Laufer, R.