DMD Large equally mixed donor pool

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on May 6, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.104.002774


0090-9556/05/3308-1101-1107$20.00
DMD 33:1101-1107, 2005

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.104.002774v1
33/8/1101    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laham, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sellke, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laham, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sellke, F. W.

TRANSENDOCARDIAL AND TRANSEPICARDIAL INTRAMYOCARDIAL FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR-2 ADMINISTRATION: MYOCARDIAL AND TISSUE DISTRIBUTION

Roger J. Laham, Mark Post, Mehrdad Rezaee, Laurel Donnell-Fink, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Seung U. Lee, Donald S. Baim, and Frank W. Sellke

The Cardiovascular Angiogenesis Center (R.J.L., M.P., M.R., L.D.-F., J.J.W., S.U.L., F.W.S.), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and Brigham and Women's Hospital (D.S.B.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

(Received October 27, 2004; Accepted May 4, 2005)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effective local delivery to the heart remains an obstacle to successful therapeutic application of a number of drugs and biological agents. This study was designed to study and optimize the delivery characteristics of transendocardial intramyocardial (IM) administration, determine myocardial deposition and retention over time, and compare it to transepicardial IM injection. Thirty-nine pigs were used for the study (15 for catheter optimization, 15 for transendocardial IM delivery, and 9 for transepicardial IM delivery). 125I-Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) (25 µCi) was used as the prototype molecule. Tissue and myocardial distribution was determined at 1 and 24 h and 7 days. Using 1-h 125I-FGF2 myocardial deposition as a parameter for delivery efficiency, the optimal needle length and delivery volume for transendocardial based delivery were determined to be 6 mm and 0.1 ml, respectively. Using these parameters for endocardial delivery, 125I-FGF2 cardiac activity was 18.01 ± 3.84% of delivered activity at 1 h, 11.65 ± 5.17% at 24 h, and 2.32 ± 0.87% at 7 days in ischemic animals. Studies in nonischemic animals produced similar results. For transepicardial delivery, 125I-FGF2 cardiac-specific activity was 23.14 ± 12.67% for the 6-mm needle, declining to 12.32 ± 8.50% at 24 h, and did not significantly differ from values obtained following transendocardial delivery. Thus, optimized transendocardial intramyocardial delivery using Biosense guidance results in efficient delivery of FGF2 to the target myocardium that is comparable with transepicardial delivery, both providing markedly higher myocardial deposition and retention and lower systemic recirculation of FGF2 than intracoronary, intrapericardial, or intravenous delivery. However, myocardial distribution is limited to injection sites.


Effective local delivery to the heart remains the major obstacle to successful therapeutic application of a number of drugs and biological agents, including angiogenic growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF or FGF2) (Laham et al., 1999aGo,bGo, 2000aGo; Simons and Laham, 1999Go). Although numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated the ability of these proteins to induce functionally significant angiogenesis in animal models of myocardial and limb ischemia (Harada et al., 1994Go; Hariawala et al., 1996Go; Lopez et al., 1998Go; Laham et al., 2000aGo), clinical studies to date have been substantially less promising (Laham et al., 1999cGo, 2000bGo; Simons et al., 2002Go; Henry et al., 2003Go). This, in part, stems from limitations of intracoronary, intravenous, and intrapericardial delivery (Aiello et al., 1994Go; Ferrara, 1995Go; Bagheri-Yarmand et al., 1998Go; Laham et al., 2003Go). We have previously reported that intracoronary and intravenous delivery are relatively ineffective, resulting in myocardial deposition and retention of 0.88% of total dose 1 h after single bolus intracoronary and 0.26% 1 h after intravenous delivery with most of the delivered agent ending up in the liver (Laham et al., 1999bGo). The myocardial retention decreased 24 h postdelivery to 0.05% of total dose for intracoronary and 0.04% for intravenous administration (Laham et al., 1999bGo). This underscores the need for a delivery strategy that would result in enhanced myocardial deposition and retention and reduced systemic recirculation of these growth factors.

Transepicardial intramyocardial delivery (open thoracotomy) has been used in several angiogenesis studies; however, its invasive nature limits its use in patients, and its myocardial distribution and retention has not been studied (Losordo et al., 1998Go; Laham et al., 1999cGo; Symes et al., 1999Go). The availability of various catheter-based intramyocardial endocardial injection systems, such as the Myostar catheter available for use with Biosense guidance (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA), provides a delivery modality that may circumvent the need for surgery (Kornowski et al., 2000Go). This study was designed to optimize the delivery characteristics of transendocardial intramyocardial administration, determine the myocardial deposition and retention of a prototype molecule (FGF2) in normal and ischemic myocardium, and compare it to transepicardial intramyocardial injection. Such data would help to ascertain the actual amounts of therapeutic agent delivered to the myocardium, provide information regarding their persistence and stability, and measure their systemic recirculation.



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. A, shallow left anterior oblique-cranial projection of Biosense NOGA unipolar (left) and linear local shortening map (right) shows reduced lateral wall linear local shortening in red (regional function) with preserved unipolar voltage indicating viable but underperfused myocardium. Ten intramyocardial injections were performed using Biosense-guidance (black dots) in the "ischemic" zone (red) of the lateral wall. B, Myostar injection catheter with a deflectable tip and a retractable needle with a tip sensor that allows localization within the left ventricle.

 

    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Supplies and Reagents. For delivery studies, 25 µCi of 125I-labeled FGF2 [specific activity 4050 kBq/µg (110 µCi/µg); New England Nuclear, Inc., Boston, MA] was combined with 30 µg of cold recombinant human FGF2 protein (Chiron Corp., Emeryville, CA) and 3 mg of heparin (Wyeth Laboratories, Marietta, PA). This represented the total dose used per animal and was divided equally among multiple injections and volumes. Over 95% of the label was precipitated with cold trichloroacetic acid and was bound to FGF2 at the time of administration as determined by thin-layer chromatography.

Catheter Optimization Study. The catheter optimization study was carried out in 15 normal Yorkshire pigs of either sex weighing 45 to 55 kg. Animals were anesthetized with intramuscular ketamine (10 mg/kg) and isoflurane inhalation anesthesia. A right femoral cut down was performed to introduce an 8-Fr arterial sheath. A Biosense NOGA map was performed using electromagnetic triangulation, which allows accurate on-line localization of the mapping catheter tip within the left ventricle (Ben-Haim et al., 1996Go; Kornowski et al., 1998Go) relative to three location pads positioned under the animal's back, emitting ultralow (10-6-10-5 Tesla) magnetic fields. The intensity of the three magnetic fields is detected by miniature antennae within the tip of the deflectable-tip mapping catheter, providing precise spatial localization after triangulation within a Silicon Graphics workstation (SGI, Mountain View, CA). As the catheter is placed sequentially against the left ventricular endocardial surface at a series of points, the local unipolar electrogram and tip motion during the cardiac cycle are recorded. This allows calculation of unipolar voltage and local wall shortening at each such point. A three-dimensional map of each parameter can be displayed and rotated freely in space to inspect all left ventricular walls (Fig. 1A) (Ben-Haim et al., 1996Go; Kornowski et al., 1998Go; Laham et al., 2002Go).

Following diagnostic mapping, a second catheter (Myostar; Biosense Webster; Fig. 1B) with the same tip sensor and a retractable 27-gauge needle was used for all endocardial intramyocardial injections. The catheter was advanced into the left ventricle using position tracking via the on-line Biosense navigation system. Perpendicular catheter position in relation to the left ventricular wall and contact with the wall were determined using Biosense guidance and confirmed using fluoroscopy. Catheter tip stability was suggested by a loop stability (catheter motion with cardiac cycle) of less than 2 mm. The needle was protruded, and penetration into the left ventricular wall was confirmed under fluoroscopy and by the occurrence of ventricular ectopy. Following this, a specified volume of 125I-FGF2-cold FGF2-heparin was injected over 10 s, and the location of the injection was recorded on the Biosense NOGA map (Fig. 1A). For the catheter optimization studies, the injectate was mixed with 10-µm fluorescent microspheres (Triton Technology, San Diego, CA; ~100,000 microspheres per injection) for post-mortem localization. Ten injections were performed and spaced more than 3 cm apart to enable individual assessment of each injection with no overlap. Different injectate volumes (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 ml) and needle lengths (3, 4.5, and 6 mm, adjusted via electronic calipers), were used to determine the effect of these parameters on myocardial retention of 125I-FGF2. Three animals were used for each experiment with 10 injections per animal, thus obtaining 30 injections for each needle length/volume variation.



View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Following the intramyocardial injection of bFGF combined with fluorescent microspheres, illumination with an ultraviolet light allows the localization and recovery of injection sites (arrows point to a single injection site) in the myocardium.

 
Animals were sacrificed under general anesthesia 1 h after intramyocardial injection. The heart was excised and washed with saline. The left ventricle was cut into slices along the short axis. An ultraviolet light source was used to identify the injection sites (Fig. 2); individual injection sites were reassembled along adjoining slices if they spanned more than one slice. The injection site, along with surrounding tissue (1 cm from injection site, adjoining sites), was collected. The samples were then weighed and counted in an LKB gamma counter (Freemont, CA). In addition, a duplicate sample equal to the amount injected per site was counted to measure total activity. The treatment of animals was done according to the National Institutes of Health guidelines and the protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Utilization Committee of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Tissue and Myocardial Distribution of Endocardial Intramyocardial 125I-FGF2. Tissue and myocardial distribution of 125I-FGF2 was determined in normal animals (n = 6) and in animals with chronic myocardial ischemia (n = 9). Chronic myocardial ischemia was achieved using the ameroid constrictor model described previously (Harada et al., 1994Go; Lopez et al., 1998Go; Laham et al., 2000aGo). Chronically ischemic animals (3 weeks after ameroid placement) and normal animals were anesthetized with intramuscular ketamine (10 mg/kg) and isoflurane inhalation anesthesia. A right femoral cut down was performed to introduce an 8-Fr arterial sheath. Coronary angiography was then performed in multiple views using a 7 French JR4 diagnostic catheter (Cordis, Lawrenceville, NJ) to confirm LCX occlusion in ischemic animals and to assess coronary anatomy. Biosense NOGA mapping was then performed as described above. Electromechanical maps were then analyzed for areas of reduced local unipolar voltage and reduced local shortening to assess scar and ischemic tissue (Ben-Haim et al., 1996Go; Kornowski et al., 1998Go). Then, 10 intramyocardial injections using Biosense and fluoroscopic guidance with the optimal parameters determined in the first set of experiments were performed in each animal. Fluorescent microspheres were not used to avoid their potential effect on myocardial retention of FGF2 due to nonspecific binding to the growth factor. Injections were localized to the lateral wall (LCX distribution), targeting the area of reduced linear local shortening, but preserved voltage in ischemic animals and lateral wall in normal animals (Fig. 1). Areas of reduced unipolar voltage (scar) were avoided. All injections were performed only after confirming catheter tip stability (loop stability less than 2 mm), perpendicular contact with left ventricular wall (using Biosense guidance and fluoroscopy), and ventricular ectopy with needle protrusion.

Animals were sacrificed 1 h (n = 6, three normal and three ischemic animals), 24 h (n = 6, three normal and three ischemic animals), and 7 days (n = 3, ischemic animals) after 125I-FGF2 administration. The heart, liver, right lung, and right kidneys were excised and weighed. Duplicate blood (10 ml), urine (spot samples of 10 ml), and tissue samples from the liver, lung, and kidney were obtained. Tissues were washed in saline to avoid contribution of radioactivity in blood. A thin (1-2 mm) mid left ventricular transverse slice was obtained for organ level autoradiography and was exposed in a PhosphorImager (Amersham Biosciences Inc., Piscataway, NJ) for 24 h. The remainder of the left ventricle was divided into lateral (LCX distribution) and anterior-inferior walls. 125I-FGF2 activity was determined in a gamma counter (LKB). Following background subtraction, the amount of 125I-FGF2 deposited within a specific sample was calculated as a percentage of the total activity administered (determined by counting an aliquot from each administered dose). Total solid organ (liver, lung, and kidney) deposition was calculated by multiplying the percentage of injected activity per gram of tissue by the weight of the organ. Trichloroacetic acid precipitation was performed on selected samples to determine bound activity. Myocardial counts from the lateral wall and nonlateral walls were summed to determine total cardiac deposition in the LCX (occluded in ischemic animals) and non-LCX territories.

Epicardial Intramyocardial Delivery of 125I-FGF2. Nine Yorkshire pigs weighing 45 to 55 kg were used to investigate transepicardial delivery. The animals were anesthetized as described previously. Left thoracotomy (5-cm incision) was performed through the 4th intercostal space during mechanical ventilation. The pericardium was opened, and the heart was exposed. Ten epicardial intramyocardial injections of 125I-FGF2-cold FGF2-heparin were performed under direct vision targeting the lateral wall (LCX distribution). The injectate volume was determined by the above described optimization (0.1 ml) study, and two needle lengths were used (3 and 6 mm, adjusted using electronic calipers). Injections were performed over 10 s, and the injection location was recorded. The pericardium and chest were closed. Animals were then sacrificed at 1 h (n = 6, 3- and 6-mm needle length) and 24 h (n = 3, 6-mm needle length). Heart and tissues were processed as described above to determine tissue and myocardial distribution of 125I-FGF2.

Statistical Analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Continuous variables were compared by unpaired Student's t test and ANOVA. All reported p values were two-tailed, and a p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Intramyocardial FGF2 Administration—Immediate Results. A total of 39 animals underwent transepicardial (n = 9) or transendocardial (n = 30) injections of 125I-FGF2-cold FGF2-heparin. All animals survived until sacrifice. Hemodynamic monitoring disclosed no acute hemodynamic effects, and injections did not produce sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The average duration of Biosense NOGA mapping was 28 ± 8 min, and the average duration of transendocardial injections was 11 ± 4 min. The average duration of thoracotomy was 18 ± 4 min and the duration of transepicardial injections was 6 ± 3 min. The average post-mortem wall thickness at the site of injections (lateral wall) was 8.9 ± 1.1 mm.

Catheter Optimization Studies. Fifteen normal Yorkshire pigs were used for catheter optimization studies assessing different injection volumes and needle lengths (five groups, three animals per group: 3 mm-0.1 ml, 4.5 mm-0.1 ml, 6 mm-0.1 ml, 6 mm-0.05 ml, and 6 mm-0.2 ml). A total of 30 injections (10 injection per animal) were done per group. The percentage of recovered injections sites defined by localized fluorescence (of 10 per animal and 30 per group), ranged from 73 to 90% and was similar for all groups, except for a slightly lower recovery in the 0.05-ml group (Table 1). The "missing" sites probably represent injections into the left ventricular cavity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Injection recovery (percentage) with differing volumes and needle lengths A total of 30 injections (10 injections per animal) were done per group.

 

Needle length optimization was performed first. The mean percentage of injected activity of 125I-FGF2 recovered from the injection site 1 h after injection was the highest in the 6-mm needle length group (Fig. 3A, 3 mm, 25.2 ± 16.9% of administered dose; 4.5 mm, 26.9 ± 21.8%; and 6 mm, 36.5 ± 11.4%; ANOVA, p = 0.048). With the 6-mm needle length providing the best myocardial 125I-FGF2 recovery, it was used to study the effect of varying injection volume. Injections using 0.05 and 0.1 ml resulted in significantly higher myocardial deposition of 125I-bFGF than injections using 0.2 ml (Fig. 3B, 0.05 ml, 37.6 ± 18.4%; 0.1 ml, 36.5 ± 11.4%; and 0.2 ml, 17.8 ± 13.5%; ANOVA, p < 0.001).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Percentage of injected activity (125I-bFGF activity in the sample indexed to the total 125I-bFGF administered per injection) of injections with varying needle lengths (A) and injection volumes (B). The optimal delivery parameters are 6-mm needle length (ANOVA, p = 0.048) and injection volumes of 0.05 or 0.1 ml (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Data are displayed as mean ± standard deviation.

 
To examine the intramyocardial diffusion of FGF2 following intramyocardial needle injection, we assayed 125I-FGF2 percentage of injected activity in adjoining sites (1 cm from injection site). Compared with the activity at the injection sites, activity at these sites was markedly reduced for all injection volumes (3 mm-0.1 ml, 0.2 ± 0.2% of administered dose of 125I-FGF2; 4.5 mm-0.1 ml, 0.2 ± 0.4%; 6 mm-0.1 ml, 0.1 ± 0.2%; 6 mm-0.05 ml, 0.2 ± 0.3%; and 6 mm-0.2 ml, 0.2 ± 0.3%).

Transendocardial Intramyocardial FGF2 Delivery. Using the optimal delivery modality developed in the first part of this study, we then set out to evaluate the tissue and myocardial distribution and retention of 125I-FGF2 administered into the lateral wall of the left ventricle in normal (n = 6) and ischemic animals (n = 9). Complete occlusion of the LCX coronary artery 3 weeks following ameroid surgery was demonstrated in all nine ischemic animals. Biosense NOGA electromechanical mapping showed an area of reduced linear local shortening and preserved voltage in all nine animals, and small areas of reduced unipolar voltage indicating infarction in two of nine animals. Biosense NOGA maps were normal in all 21 nonischemic animals (including the 15 animals in the catheter optimization study). Biosense-guided injections into the LCX region were successful in all animals.

The amount of 125I-FGF2 deposited within a specific sample and organ was indexed to the total activity administered. In ischemic animals, total 125I-FGF2 cardiac percentage of injected activity was 18.01 ± 3.84% at 1 h, 11.65 ± 5.17% at 24 h, and 2.32 ± 0.87% at 7 days (Fig. 4). Importantly, 125I-FGF2 was predominantly distributed in the target lateral wall (LCX distribution) with only 0.23 ± 0.31%, 0.06 ± 0.1%, and 0.01 ± 0.02% of the administered dose recovered from the anterior and inferior walls combined at 1 h, 24 h, and 7 days, respectively. Left ventricular autoradiography confirmed significant retention of 125I-FGF2 at the injection sites (Fig. 5). Studies in nonischemic animals were not statistically different (p = 0.34) from normal animals with total 125I-FGF2 cardiac percentage of injected activity of 18.96 ± 8.23% at 1 h and 9.97 ± 4.00% at 24 h in the target area (Fig. 4). 125I-FGF2 percentage of injected activity in the anterior and inferior walls was 0.9 ± 0.8% at 1 h and 0.21 ± 0.3% at 24 h.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Total cardiac percentage of injected activity (total 125I-bFGF activity in the heart indexed to the total 125I-bFGF administered) in ischemic (A) and normal (B) animals at different time points after endocardial intramyocardial delivery of bFGF. Total cardiac percentage of injected activity was similar for both normal and ischemic animals (p = 0.34). Data are displayed as mean ± standard deviation.

 


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Left ventricular autoradiography showing two injection sites (arrows) at 1 h with a mild reduction in signal intensity at 24 h. LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle.

 

Epicardial Intramyocardial FGF2 Delivery. The characteristics of Biosense-guided transendocardial intramyocardial FGF2 injections were then compared with open-chest direct vision transepicardial injections. As in the case of transendocardial injections, two needle lengths (6 and 3 mm) were used. Total 125I-FGF2 cardiac percentage of injected activity was 23.14 ± 12.67% for the 6-mm needle and 20.86 ± 11.06% for the 3-mm needle at 1 h, declining to 12.32 ± 8.50% for the 6-mm needle at 24 h (Fig. 6), and were not statistically different (p = 0.52) from values obtained following transendocardial delivery. Sampling of the pericardial space for 125I-FGF2 percentage of injected activity demonstrated that 1.23 ± 0.81% of the dose was present 1 h following injections with the 6-mm needle and 1.01 ± 0.92% with the 3-mm needle. Twenty-four hours later, 0.92 ± 0.77% of the dose (6-mm needle) was still present in the pericardial space.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Total cardiac percentage of injected activity (total 125I-bFGF activity in the heart indexed to the total 125I-bFGF administered) for epicardial delivery of bFGF at 1 and 24 h. Total cardiac percentage of injected activity was similar for both epicardial and endocardial delivery ischemic animals (p = 0.52). Data are displayed as mean ± standard deviation.

 
Extracardiac Deposition of 125I-FGF2. To assess systemic spill of 125I-FGF2 following intramyocardial injection, we sampled liver, kidney, and lung tissues as well as blood and urine at various time points (Tables 2 and 3). Liver samples had the highest 125I-FGF2 percentage of injected activity and were higher for transendocardial than transepicardial injections (3.22 ± 1.27% versus 0.89 ± 0.22% at 1 h and 2.95 ± 1.86% versus 0.08 ± 0.02% at 24 h, p < 0.05 for both time points). The same pattern was seen for other organs and tissues tested.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Solid organ deposition Percentage of injected activity is expressed as percentage of total 125I-FGF2 activity administered. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Blood and urine 125I-bFGF percentage of injected activity Percentage of injected activity per milliliter is expressed as percentage of total 125I-FGF2 activity administered. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Local delivery of drug and biological agents to the heart remains a challenging task. Recent experience with intracoronary administration of vascular endothelial growth factor and FGF2 in phase I and II trials highlighted the need for alternative routes of growth factor delivery (Laham et al., 1999bGo,cGo, 2000aGo,bGo, 2003Go; Ruel et al., 2002Go; Simons et al., 2002Go; Henry et al., 2003Go). Given the expected long time course of new collateral vessel formation, most preclinical attempts at therapeutic angiogenesis have used sustained or repeated growth factor delivery modalities, including sustained release polymers, continuous infusions, or repeat injections (Harada et al., 1994Go; Unger et al., 1994Go; Lopez et al., 1998Go; Laham et al., 2000aGo). However, with the exception of clinical studies using sustained release growth factors or gene transfer vectors via open surgical access to the myocardium, these options are not feasible or practical for catheter-based approaches (Losordo et al., 1998Go; Schumacher et al., 1998Go; Laham et al., 1999cGo; Rosengart et al., 1999Go).

The drawbacks of systemic or intracoronary administration include poor myocardial uptake, retention, and distribution, as well as significant systemic recirculation and bystander organ deposition. For intrapericardial delivery, poor myocardial penetration is a major limitation added to lack of pericardial space post-CABG and poor deposition and retention (Laham et al., 2003Go). Intramyocardial delivery has the potential to achieve higher myocardial distribution but is limited by the need for open thoracotomy (Losordo et al., 1998Go; Schumacher et al., 1998Go; Rosengart et al., 1999Go). The availability of several catheter-based transendocardial intramyocardial delivery systems may obviate the need for surgery but had not been adequately studied. One such system is the Biosense-guided Myostar catheter with an adjustable retractable needle. The theoretical advantages of this system include the ability to identify and map ischemic regions of the ventricle and ensure stable position of the needle prior to intramyocardial injection (Kornowski et al., 2000Go). However, the optimal delivery characteristics resulting in maximal myocardial uptake and retention of the delivered material have not been well defined, with different investigators using arbitrary injection volumes, infusion rates, and needle lengths.

This study, therefore, was carried out to systematically and comprehensively evaluate the delivery characteristics of transendocardial intramyocardial injections using the Biosense-guided Myostar catheter as a prototype catheter, to study the tissue and myocardial distribution and retention of 125I-FGF2 as a prototype molecule in normal and chronically ischemic animals, and to compare catheter-based to epicardial delivery. We chose FGF2 as a prototype delivery agent because of the extensive preclinical and clinical experience with this growth factor and its stability in tissues (Yanagisawa-Miwa et al., 1992Go; Harada et al., 1994Go; Unger et al., 1994Go; Laham et al., 1999cGo, 2000aGo). FGF2 is a heparin-binding growth factor and this property may play an important role in its tissue retention (Faham et al., 1996Go; Schaper, 1996Go). Because tissue expression of FGF2-binding high-affinity receptors and cell surface heparan sulfates increases in ischemic tissues, we evaluated its myocardial uptake and retention both in normal and chronically ischemic hearts (Gabra et al., 1994Go; Faham et al., 1996Go). Although retention and washout of FGF2 may differ significantly from those of other proteins that may be used for intramyocardial delivery, its initial tissue deposition is likely to be similar to that of any other agent and be primarily determined by physical characteristics of the delivery system and not the biological properties of the agent.

To optimize the transendocardial catheter delivery, we first evaluated the effect of varying the injection volume (0.05-0.2 ml) and needle length (3-6 mm). Using a shorter needle length would result in more misses with the cardiac motion and using a longer needle length would increased risk of perforation. Injection site recovery ranged from 73.3 to 90%, indicating that 10 to 27.7% of injections may have missed the myocardium (intracavitary injection) or, less likely, may have been localized in a large vascular structure leading to rapid washout from the myocardium. Using 1-h 125I-FGF2 myocardial deposition as a parameter for delivery efficiency, and testing the three needle lengths and three delivery volumes chosen, the optimal needle length in these animals with a wall thickness of 8.9 ± 1.1 mm was determined to be 6 mm and, using this needle length, the optimal injection volumes were determined to be 0.05 and 0.1 ml. In addition, these studies showed that the majority of delivered growth factor resides at the injection site with little lateral diffusion to adjoining sites, underscoring the potential need for spreading injections across the desired area.

Using these optimal parameters (6-mm needle length and 0.1-ml injection volume) for transendocardial intramyocardial delivery, we then evaluated distribution and retention of FGF2 in normal and ischemic myocardium. Transendocardial intramyocardial administration resulted in markedly enhanced efficiency (% of dose delivered) and myocardial retention compared with intravenous, intracoronary, and pericardial administration of the same amount of FGF2 previously reported by our laboratory at all studied time points (Laham et al., 1999bGo, 2003Go). In addition, the majority of myocardial distribution of FGF2 was localized to the targeted areas, emphasizing the accuracy of Biosense guidance, with myocardial levels in noninjected areas approaching the levels seen with intracoronary and intravenous delivery, likely resulting from systemic recirculation rather than intramyocardial diffusion. Finally, the presence of myocardial ischemia did not affect the efficiency of intramyocardial bFGF delivery or tissue retention at 1 and 24 h, as it did for intracoronary delivery, likely indicating saturation of the binding sites by high myocardial distribution (Laham et al., 1999bGo).

The amount of FGF2 successfully delivered to the myocardium using this transmyocardial approach was comparable with the amount delivered using direct vision open-chest transepicardial injection. Thus, the availability of transendocardial intramyocardial injection catheters may obviate the need for open-chest administration, except when accompanied by CABG in hybrid procedures.

With the few time points studied, endocardial delivery resulted in a slightly higher liver uptake than epicardial delivery, partially related to the 10 to 27% frequency of misses that presumably result in intracavitary injections. On the other hand, epicardial delivery resulted in significant distribution of the injected FGF2 to the pericardial sac, likely resulting from a combination of contamination at the time of injection and back-leak into the pericardial space. It should be noted, however, that this might represent an additional advantage for the transepicardial delivery, as pericardial administration has been shown to be an effective means of growth factor delivery (Laham et al., 2000aGo).

The time points studied may miss earlier events and are a limitation of this study, although the half-life of circulating FGF2 makes that rather unlikely (Edelman et al., 1993Go). The efficacy of intramyocardial injections for each agent needs to be studied, including optimizing the catheter to the agent, cells, or vectors used to maximize delivery to myocardium. Finally, the long-term effects of this mode of delivery are not well defined, with the potential of causing inflammation and fibrosis.

In conclusion, optimized transendocardial intramyocardial delivery using Biosense guidance results in a relatively efficient delivery of FGF2 to the target myocardium that is comparable with transepicardial delivery. Furthermore, intramyocardial delivery provides markedly higher myocardial deposition and retention and lower systemic recirculation of FGF2 than intracoronary, intravenous, or pericardial delivery. The practical relevance of this mode of growth factor delivery awaits testing in clinical trials of therapeutic angiogenesis.


    Footnotes
 
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants MO1-RR01032, HL60901 (R.J.L.), and HL42279 (F.W.S.).

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://dmd.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/dmd.104.002774.

ABBREVIATIONS: IM, intramyocardial; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; FGF2, fibroblast growth factor-2; LCX, left circumflex artery; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Roger J. Laham, BIDMC/Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail: rlaham{at}bidmc.harvard.edu


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 


Aiello LP, Avery RL, Arrigg PG, Keyt BA, Jampel HD, Shah ST, Pasquale LR, Thieme H, Iwamoto MA, Park JE, et al. (1994) Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders. N Engl J Med 331: 1480-1487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bagheri-Yarmand R, Kourbali Y, Mabilat C, Morere JF, Martin A, Lu H, Soria C, Jozefonvicz J, and Crepin M (1998) The suppression of fibroblast growth factor 2/fibroblast growth factor 4-dependent tumour angiogenesis and growth by the anti-growth factor activity of dextran derivative (CMDB7). Br J Cancer 78: 111-118.[Medline]

Ben-Haim SA, Osadchy D, Schuster I, Gepstein L, Hayam G, and Josephson ME (1996) Nonfluoroscopic, in vivo navigation and mapping technology. Nat Med 2: 1393-1395.[CrossRef][Medline]

Edelman ER, Nugent MA, and Karnovsky MJ (1993) Perivascular and intravenous administration of basic fibroblast growth factor: vascular and solid organ deposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 1513-1517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Faham S, Hileman RE, Fromm JR, Linhardt RJ, and Rees DC (1996) Heparin structure and interactions with basic fibroblast growth factor. Science (Wash DC) 271: 1116-1120.[Abstract]

Ferrara N (1995) The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in pathological angiogenesis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 36: 127-137.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gabra N, Khayat A, Calabresi P, and Khiat A (1994) Detection of elevated basic fibroblast growth factor during early hours of in vitro angiogenesis using a fast ELISA immunoassay [published erratum appears in Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995 May 16;210(2):638]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 205: 1423-1430.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harada K, Grossman W, Friedman M, Edelman ER, Prasad PV, Keighley CS, Manning WJ, Sellke FW, and Simons M (1994) Basic fibroblast growth factor improves myocardial function in chronically ischemic porcine hearts. J Clin Investig 94: 623-630.

Hariawala MD, Horowitz JJ, Esakof D, Sheriff DD, Walter DH, Keyt B, Isner JM, and Symes JF (1996) VEGF improves myocardial blood flow but produces EDRF-mediated hypotension in porcine hearts. J Surg Res 63: 77-82.[CrossRef][Medline]

Henry TD, Annex BH, McKendall GR, Azrin MA, Lopez JJ, Giordano FJ, Shah PK, Willerson JT, Benza RL, Berman DS, et al. (2003) The VIVA trial: Vascular endothelial growth factor in Ischemia for Vascular Angiogenesis. Circulation 107: 1359-1365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kornowski R, Hong MK, Haudenschild CC, and Leon MB (1998) Feasibility and safety of percutaneous laser revascularization using the Biosense system in porcine hearts. Coron Artery Dis 9: 535-540.[Medline]

Kornowski R, Leon MB, Fuchs S, Vodovotz Y, Flynn MA, Gordon DA, Pierre A, Kovesdi I, Keiser JA, and Epstein SE (2000) Electromagnetic guidance for catheter-based transendocardial injection: a platform for intramyocardial angiogenesis therapy. Results in normal and ischemic porcine models. J Am Coll Cardiol 35: 1031-1039.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Laham R, Hung D, and Simons M (1999a) Subxyphoid access of the normal pericardium: a novel drug delivery technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 47: 109-111.[CrossRef][Medline]

Laham R, Rezaee M, Post M, Novicki D, Sellke F, Pearlman J, Simons M, and Hung D (2000a) Intrapericardial delivery of fibroblast growth factor-2 induces neovascularization in a porcine model of chronic myocardial ischemia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 292: 795-802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Laham R, Rezaee M, Post M, Xu X, and Sellke F (2003) Intrapericardial administration of basic fibroblast growth factor: myocardial and tissue distribution and comparison with intracoronary and intravenous administration. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 58: 375-381.[CrossRef][Medline]

Laham RJ, Chronos NA, Pike M, Leimbach ME, Udelson JE, Pearlman JD, Pettigrew RI, Whitehouse MJ, Yoshizawa C, and Simons M (2000b) Intracoronary basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) in patients with severe ischemic heart disease: results of a phase I open-label dose escalation study. J Am Coll Cardiol 36: 2132-2139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Laham RJ, Rezaee M, Post M, Sellke FW, Braeckman RA, Hung D, and Simons M (1999b) Intracoronary and intravenous administration of basic fibroblast growth factor: myocardial and tissue distribution. Drug Metab Dispos 27: 821-826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Laham RJ, Sellke FW, Edelman ER, Pearlman JD, Ware JA, Brown DL, Gold JP, and Simons M (1999c) Local perivascular delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: results of a phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation 100: 1865-1871.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Laham RJ, Simons M, Pearlman JD, Ho KK, and Baim DS (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates improved regional systolic wall motion and thickening and myocardial perfusion of myocardial territories treated by laser myocardial revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 39: 1-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lopez JJ, Laham RJ, Stamler A, Pearlman JD, Bunting S, Kaplan A, Carrozza JP, Sellke FW, and Simons M (1998) VEGF administration in chronic myocardial ischemia in pigs. Cardiovasc Res 40: 272-281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Losordo DW, Vale PR, Symes JF, Dunnington CH, Esakof DD, Maysky M, Ashare AB, Lathi K, and Isner JM (1998) Gene therapy for myocardial angiogenesis: initial clinical results with direct myocardial injection of phVEGF165 as sole therapy for myocardial ischemia. Circulation 98: 2800-2804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rosengart TK, Lee LY, Patel SR, Sanborn TA, Parikh M, Bergman GW, Hachamovitch R, Szulc M, Kligfield PD, Okin PM, et al. (1999) Angiogenesis gene therapy: phase I assessment of direct intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing VEGF121 cDNA to individuals with clinically significant severe coronary artery disease. Circulation 100: 468-474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ruel M, Laham RJ, Parker JA, Post MJ, Ware JA, Simons M, and Sellke FW (2002) Long-term effects of surgical angiogenic therapy with fibroblast growth factor 2 protein. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124: 28-34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schaper W (1996) Collateral vessel growth in the human heart. Role of fibroblast growth factor-2. Circulation 94: 600-601.[Free Full Text]

Schumacher B, Pecher P, von Specht B, and Stegmann T (1998) Induction of neoangiogenesis in ischemic myocardium by human growth factors. Circulation 97: 645-650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Simons M, Annex BH, Laham RJ, Kleiman N, Henry T, Dauerman H, Udelson JE, Gervino EV, Pike M, Whitehouse MJ, et al. (2002) Pharmacological treatment of coronary artery disease with recombinant fibroblast growth factor-2: double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Circulation 105: 788-793.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Simons M and Laham RJ (1999) Therapeutic angiogenesis in myocardial ischemia, in Angiogenesis and Cardiovascular Disease (Ware J and Simons M eds), pp 289-320, Oxford University Press, New York.

Symes JF, Losordo DW, Vale PR, Lathi KG, Esakof DD, Mayskiy M, and Isner JM (1999) Gene therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor for inoperable coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 830-836; discussion 836-837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Unger EF, Banai S, Shou M, Lazarous DF, Jaklitsch MT, Scheinowitz M, Correa R, Klingbeil C, and Epstein SE (1994) Basic fibroblast growth factor enhances myocardial collateral flow in a canine model. Am J Physiol 266: H1588-H1595.

Yanagisawa-Miwa A, Uchida Y, Nakamura F, Tomaru T, Kido H, Kamijo T, Sugimoto T, Kaji K, Utsuyama M, and Kurashima C (1992) Salvage of infarcted myocardium by angiogenic action of basic fibroblast growth factor. Science (Wash DC) 257: 1401-1403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. J. Chambers
Editorial comment
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 651 - 652.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. Voisine, A. Rosinberg, J. J. Wykrzykowska, Y. Shamis, G. F. Wu, E. Appelbaum, J. Li, F. W. Sellke, D. Pinto, C. M. Gibson, et al.
Skin-derived microorgan autotransplantation as a novel approach for therapeutic angiogenesis
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H213 - H219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.104.002774v1
33/8/1101    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laham, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sellke, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laham, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sellke, F. W.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition