![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology (C.W., Y.Ka., Y.Ku., T.S., A.T.) and Department of Histology and Embryology, Graduate School of Medical Science (T.W., S.I.), Kanazawa University, Kakuma, Kanazawa, Japan
(Received March 26, 2006; accepted August 2, 2006)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite their pharmacological importance, research on regulatory mechanisms that directly interact with these OCT/OCTN family members has just recently been started. One of the key issues regarding their regulatory proteins may be direct interaction of OCT/OCTN family members expressed on apical membranes of renal epithelial cells (OCTN1, OCTN2, and OCT3) with PDZ (PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1) domain-containing proteins. PDZ domains are modular protein interaction domains that bind in a sequence-specific fashion to short C-terminal peptides or internal peptides that fold in a ß-finger (Hillier et al., 1999
; Harris and Lim, 2001
; Karthikeyan et al., 2001
). We have recently reported a number of specific interactions between apically expressed OCT/OCTN family members and PDZ proteins including PDZK1, PDZK2 [also known as NaPi-Cap2 and intestinal and kidney-enriched PDZ protein (IKEPP)], Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor (NHERF) 1, and NHERF2 (Kato et al., 2004
, 2005
). Both PDZK1 and PDZK2 have four PDZ domains in their structure, whereas NHERF1 and NHERF2 have two. These PDZ proteins had been originally identified to directly interact with inorganic ion transporters such as Na+/H+ exchanger 3, Na+-dependent phosphate transporter 2a, multidrug resistance-associated protein 2, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) (Weinman et al., 1993
; Custer et al., 1997
; Yun et al., 1997
; Kocher et al., 1999
; Wang et al., 2000
; Gisler et al., 2001
; Russel et al., 2002
).
Several reports have suggested that these PDZ proteins play an essential role in intracellular signaling not only as protein-protein recognition scaffolding modules (Gisler et al., 2003
; Biber et al., 2004
; Brone and Eggermont, 2005
), but also as a functional regulator. For example, the activity of CFTR might be regulated by formation of CFTR dimmer through the interaction with PDZK1 (Wang et al., 2000
). The association of PDZK1 with urate-anion exchanger 1 (URAT1/SLC22A12) enhanced urate transport activity, possibly via the increase in the stability of URAT1 on cell surface (Anzai et al., 2004
). Our previous analysis also indicated PDZK1 as a functional regulator of OCTN2 via a direct interaction with the C terminus (Kato et al., 2005
). The increase in OCTN2-mediated carnitine transport activity in the presence of PDZK1 is accounted for by an approximately 6 times increase in transport capacity, but not by the change in cell surface expression level of OCTN2 (Kato et al., 2005
). The broad substrate specificity of OCTN2 and mouse homolog of URAT1 (Imaoka et al., 2004
) for organic cations and anions, respectively, may imply a significant role of the PDZ protein in the disposition of many types of therapeutic agents that are substrates of the transporters interacting with PDZK1. In fact, PDZK1 has also recently been demonstrated to be required for basolateral expression of hepatic organic anion transporter OATP1A1, and pdzk1 gene knockout hinders systemic elimination of an organic anion (Wang et al., 2005
). Thus, these PDZ proteins could play a role as a regulatory mechanism for at least certain types of membrane proteins. However, regarding OCT/OCTN family members, information on the functional regulation has been obtained only for PDZK1, but the pharmacological roles of other PDZ proteins that directly interact with the OCT/OCTN family are still unknown.
Among those PDZ proteins, PDZK2 is homologous to PDZK1 and is expressed in kidney and intestines (Scott et al., 2002
). PDZK2 was first identified as a protein that interacts with the C terminus of Na+-dependent phosphate transporter 2a, and is predominantly localized in the subapical compartment in mouse renal proximal tubules (Gisler et al., 2001
). PDZK2 is also localized on apical membranes of small intestinal epithelial cells in humans (Scott et al., 2002
). Our previous yeast two-hybrid screening has revealed that not only PDZK1, but also PDZK2, can interact with the C terminus of OCTN1 and OCTN2 (Kato et al., 2004
). In addition, PDZK2, but not PDZK1, was specified to interact with the C terminus of OCT3 (Kato et al., 2004
, 2005
). Despite such available information on physical interaction with the OCT/OCTN family, little is known about possible functional modulation of the transporters with PDZK2. In addition, details regarding the characteristics of the interaction between PDZK2 and the OCT/OCTN family, i.e., domains and regions within each protein essential for the interaction, have not yet been examined. Therefore, in the present study, we attempted to clarify the modulation of transporting properties and cell surface expression of the OCT/OCTN family exerted by PDZK2. In addition, to understand the physiological relevance of such protein-protein interaction, colocalization of PDZK2 and OCTN2 was examined in mouse kidney.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transport Studies in HEK293 Cells Stably Expressing PDZK2. HEK293 cells were transfected with myc-tagged full-length human PDZK2, and stably transfected cells were selected by adding G418 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to the culture medium to obtain HEK293/PDZK2 cells. The cDNA encoding human OCTN1, YFP fusion protein with human OCTN2, or rat OCT3 was then transiently transfected according to the calcium phosphate precipitation method (Tamai et al., 2000
). At 48 h after transfection, cells were harvested and suspended in a transport medium (125 mM NaCl, 4.8 mM KCl, 5.6 mM D-glucose, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgSO4, and 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4). The uptake experiment was then performed according to the procedures of the silicone-oil layer method as described previously (Tamai et al., 2000
). In the present study, to routinely confirm transfection efficiency in each cell line in each experiment, we used the YFP-OCTN2 fusion construct. The observed intensity of fluorescence derived from YFP in HEK293 and HEK293/PDZK2 cells was almost the same level.
Western Blot Analysis for YFP-OCTN2 Expressed on Cell Surface. At 48 h after transfection of YFP-OCTN2, the cells were incubated with sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and the biotinylated fraction was captured by immobilized streptavidin, followed by Western blot analysis using anti-OCTN2 antibody as described previously (Kato et al., 2005
).
Immunocytochemical Analysis. Frozen sections of mouse kidney were prepared as described previously (Kato et al., 2005
). The sections were first heated to 92°C in RETRIEVE-ALL (Signet Pathology Systems Inc., Dedham, MA) buffer. They were then incubated with a mixture of antibodies overnight at 4°C and subsequently incubated with secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rat and anti-mouse IgG conjugates or Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit and anti-rat IgG conjugates; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, they were mounted in VECTASHIELD mounting medium with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) to fix the sample. The specimens were examined with an Axiovert S 100 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
Yeast Two-Hybrid Analysis. Yeast two-hybrid analysis was performed as described previously (Kato et al., 2004
). In brief, yeast cells (AH109 strain) were cotransformed with pGBKT7 (TRP) encoding GAL4bd fused to the C terminus of transporters, and pGADT7(LEU2) vector encoding GAL4ad fused to different PDZ domain constructs. Cotransformed cells were further cultured on plates lacking leucine and tryptophan, with or without histidine.
Pull-Down Assays. GST C terminus fusion proteins (50 µg) were incubated with purified His6-PDZK2 and glutathione-Sepharose 4B at 4°C for 3 h in phosphate-buffered saline (1 ml) supplemented with 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, protease inhibitors (Complete EDTA-free; Roche Diagnostics), and 1% Triton X-100. The suspension was then washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. Samples were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibody to the His5 tag (GE Healthcare) using polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon; Millipore, Bedford, MA). It was then reacted with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (GE Healthcare). The protein was detected with the ECL-plus Western-blotting detection system (Amersham Biosciences).
Immunoprecipitation Assay. Immunoprecipitation using anti-c-myc antibody was performed as described previously (Kato et al., 2004
). Samples were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with anti-GFP antibodies.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4) (Fig. 1B). Conversely, the uptake of L-[3H]carnitine by OCTN2 in HEK293/PDZK2 cells was higher than that in HEK293 cells (Fig. 1C), whereas the uptake by OCTN2
4 was almost identical between each of the cell lines (Fig. 1D). Uptake of [3H]MPP by OCT3 was comparable between HEK293/PDZK2 and HEK293 cells (Fig. 1E).
|
|
Effect of PDZK2 on Substrate Recognition Specificity of OCTN2. We next examined the effect of various compounds on OCTN2-mediated L-[3H]carnitine uptake in HEK293/PDZK2 and HEK293 cells (Fig. 3) with an aim to examine an effect of PDZK2 on substrate recognition specificity of OCTN2. Although our previous analysis revealed functional stimulation of OCTN2 by PDZK1, the change in substrate recognition specificity of OCTN2 by PDZK1 has not yet been clarified (Kato et al., 2005
), Therefore, similar experiments were also performed in HEK293/PDZK1 cells in the present study. Quinidine, valproic acid, and pyrilamine inhibited OCTN2-mediated uptake of L-[3H]carnitine in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3). Such an inhibition curve was almost similar between each of these cell lines (Fig. 3). Unlabeled L-carnitine, TEA, verapamil, procainamide, and N-methylnicotinamide also inhibited L-[3H]carnitine uptake, and such an inhibitory effect was almost similar between each cell line (Table 1).
|
|
Partial Colocalization of OCTN2 with PDZK2 in Mouse Kidney. To support the physiological significance of the interaction between PDZK2 and OCTN2, both were stained in immunohistochemical analysis, and their colocalization in mouse kidney was examined (Fig. 4). Immunostaining with antibody that was raised against full-length mouse PDZK2 revealed reactive proteins in proximal and distal tubules where distinct staining was observed with antibody against Na+/K+-ATPase (Fig. 4, AC). Moreover PDZK2 was localized at apical membrane in proximal and distal tubules, and even in the cytoplasmic region of the proximal tubules. Both immunoreactive proteins for PDZK2 (Fig. 4, D and G) and OCTN2 (Fig. 4, E and H) antibodies were detected in apical membranes, and were only partially colocalized (Fig. 4, F and I). Such colocalization was observed in the region that was close to, but not the same as, the surface of apical membranes where OCTN2 alone was observed (Fig. 4, F and I).
|
Characterization of the Interaction of PDZK2 with the C Terminus of the OCT/OCTN Family. Our previous analysis, with both yeast two-hybrid and pull-down methods, revealed specific interaction of PDZK1 with OCTN1 and OCTN2, and PDZK2 with OCTN1, OCTN2, and OCT3 (Kato et al., 2004
, 2005
), although details of the characteristics of the interaction have not yet been examined for PDZK2. We first purified His6-tagged PDZK2 and performed pull-down studies with GST fusion of the OCT/OCTN family (Fig. 5A) in the present study. PDZK2 was pulled down with GST fusion of OCTN1, OCTN2, and OCT3 (Fig. 5A). This result was compatible with the previous finding (Kato et al., 2005
). Neither OCT1, OCT2, nor GST alone could interact with PDZK2 (Fig. 5A). Deletion of the last four amino acids in OCTN1 and OCTN2 decreased the interaction potential with PDZK2, although the weak interaction was still observed for OCTN1
4 and OCTN2
4 (Fig. 5A).
|
The interaction between PDZK2 and the C terminus of OCTN1, OCTN2, and OCT3 was confirmed in yeast two-hybrid analysis in which the deletion of the last four amino acids again reduced the interaction with PDZK2 (Fig. 5B). Both OCTN1 and OCTN2 interacted with a single PDZ domain, PDZ1 and PDZ3 (Fig. 5B), the interaction being decreased for OCTN1 and OCTN2 with the last four amino acids of the C terminus deleted (Fig. 5B). All of the two-sequential PDZ domains (PDZ1-2, PDZ2-3, PDZ3-4) examined interacted with OCTN1 and OCTN2 (Fig. 5B). In contrast, only PDZ1 and PDZ1-2 could bind to the C terminus of OCT3 (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that both PDZ1 and PDZ3 in PDZK2 are responsible for the interaction with OCTN1 and OCTN2, whereas PDZ1 is involved in the interaction with OCT3. We also performed an immunoprecipitation assay in HEK293/PDZK2 cells transiently transfected with YFP-OCTN2 to confirm the interaction between PDZK2 and OCTN2 as full-length proteins. A band immunoreactive with anti-GFP antibody was observed after immunoprecipitation with anti-c-myc antibody in HEK293/PDZK1 and HEK293/PDZK2 cells, but not in HEK293 cells, demonstrating physical interaction of OCTN2 with PDZK1 and PDZK2 (Fig. 5C).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4 (Fig. 1D). Direct interaction potential between PDZK2 and OCTN2 was confirmed both in pull-down studies using purified recombinant proteins and a yeast two-hybrid system (Fig. 5), in which the last four amino acids in the C terminus of OCTN2 was important for the interaction. Thus, the present study has suggested that PDZK2 can affect the transport activity of OCTN2. In the present study, to confirm the transfection efficiency in each experiment, we used YFP-OCTN2 fusion construct, instead of native OCTN2. Transport studies were always performed after we confirmed similar intensity of fluorescence of YFP-OCTN2 between each HEK293 and HEK293/PDZK2 cell. Although we cannot ignore the possible influence of YFP on the expression and/or function of OCTN2, this YFP-OCTN2 construct exhibited a transport activity of carnitine (Figs. 2 and 3) similar to that exerted by native OCTN2 (Tamai et al., 1998
The increase in OCTN2-mediated uptake of L-[3H]carnitine by PDZK2 can be accounted for by the 2 times increase in Vmax according to the present kinetic analysis (Fig. 2A). Because the Km for the L-[3H]carnitine transport was almost identical between HEK293/PDZK2 and HEK293 cells (Fig. 2A), PDZK2 does not affect the affinity of L-[3H]carnitine transport, but increases its transport capacity. Western blot analysis for the biotinylated fraction in both cell lines revealed higher OCTN2 expression on the surface of HEK293/PDZK2 cells than that of HEK293 cells (Fig. 2B). Thus, PDZK2 increases cell surface expression of OCTN2, leading to an increase in the Vmax of L-[3H]carnitine transport. Such a molecular mechanism for PDZK2 is in contrast to that for PDZK1 since PDZK1 does not affect cell surface OCTN2 expression, but increases the Vmax of L-[3H]carnitine transport without an effect on Km (Kato et al., 2005
). Therefore, transport function of OCTN2 is regulated by multiple mechanisms, i.e., cell surface stabilization by PDZK2 and direct functional modulation by PDZK1. Considering that OCTN2 plays a predominant role in renal reabsorption of carnitine and secretion of TEA, and that its genetic variation causes systemic carnitine deficiency (Nezu et al., 1999
; Ohashi et al., 1999
, 2001
), it might be reasonable that cell surface expression and function of OCTN2 are tightly regulated by such multiple PDZ proteins.
Although we have demonstrated that PDZK2 minimally affected transport activity of OCTN1 and OCT3 in HEK293 cells (Fig. 1), the present studies for elucidation of the functional regulation by interactions between PDZK2 and OCTN1 or OCT3 might include some insufficient points. First, there might be a slight effect of PDZK2 that cannot be detected by the silicone-oil layer method used in the present studies. Second, other factors essential for stimulatory effects of PDZK2 are insufficient and/or not expressed in HEK293 cells, but are expressed in vivo. Third, endogenous proteins expressed in HEK293 cells are enough to appropriately regulate the activity of OCTN1 and OCT3. Because of these possibilities, the in vitro cell line systems have limitations for assessing functional modulation of transporters by adaptor proteins, and further studies are required to understand the effect of PDZK2 on these transporters.
Gisler et al. (2001
) have revealed that PDZK1 is strictly associated with the microvilli in the apical membranes of the proximal tubules in mouse kidney, whereas PDZK2 is predominantly located in the subapical compartment but was not detected in the microvilli, the faint immunostaining for PDZK2 being also observed throughout the cytoplasm. Tamai et al. (2001
, 2004
) have demonstrated that both OCTN1 and OCTN2 are expressed on apical membranes of proximal tubules in mouse kidney. These previous reports could be compatible with the finding that PDZK1 is colocalized with OCTN2 on apical membranes (Kato et al., 2005
), whereas PDZK2 is only partially colocalized with PDZK2 (Fig. 4). However, in the present confocal microscopy analysis, it is noteworthy that such colocalization was predominantly observed in the region that was close to, but not the same as, the surface of apical membranes, where OCTN2 alone was observed. This finding suggests that OCTN2 has at least two distinct compartments; one is localized on the apical surface of the plasma membranes, whereas the other is in close proximity to the cell surface, most likely in the subapical region, and colocalized with PDZK2. The present analysis of colocalization with PDZK2 has thus proposed an "intracellular pool" for OCTN2, which could be relevant to the regulatory mechanism exerted by PDZK2. Although it is unlikely that such intracellular transporters are directly involved in drug disposition, the intracellular pool for the transporter may be involved in homeostatic regulation as a reservoir of transporter systems.
Previous findings have suggested important roles of OCTN1 and OCTN2 in renal reabsorption of carnitine and secretion of organic cations (Tamai et al., 1997
, 1998
; Nezu et al., 1999
; Ohashi et al., 2001
). Therefore, interaction of therapeutic agents with these transporters may affect such renal handling of endogenous and/or exogenous compounds. For example, inhibition of OCTN2-mediated L-[3H]carnitine transport by several drugs including an antiepileptic, valproate, may be related to drug-induced carnitine deficiency (Ohashi et al., 1999
). In this sense, it would be important to construct experimental systems by which the effect of test compounds on the OCTN family can precisely be estimated. From a practical point of view, cotransfection of OCTN2 with PDZK1 or PDZK2 may have several advantages compared with transfection of OCTN2 alone, since coexpression of PDZK1 and PDZK2 leads to higher transport activity and/or cell surface expression of OCTN2 (Figs. 1 and 2; Kato et al., 2005
). It can be speculated that such a cotransfection system may exhibit more physiological functions of the OCTN family if we consider that both PDZ proteins are colocalized in kidney with OCTN2 (Fig. 4; Kato et al., 2005
). In contrast, since the inhibitory effect of various cationic and zwitterionic drugs on OCTN2 was almost similar among HEK293/PDZK2, HEK293, and HEK293/PDZK1 cells (Fig. 3, Table 1), the effect of PDZK2 and PDZK1 on recognition specificity of OCTN2 seems to be minimal in the present study, although further studies should be performed to examine the details in substrate recognition specificity of OCTN2 in the presence or absence of PDZ adaptors and its relevance to that in physiological condition.
It should also be noted that the interaction potential with PDZK2 was much lower for OCTN1
4 and OCTN2
4, compared with OCTN1 and OCTN2, respectively (Fig. 5). This result suggests that the last four amino acids both in OCTN1 and OCTN2 are important for the interaction with PDZK2. However, the C terminus of OCTN1
4 and OCTN2
4 exhibited weak interaction with PDZK2, whereas no obvious interaction was found with PDZK1 (Fig. 5; Kato et al., 2005
). In addition, the C terminus of OCTN2 can interact much more potently with PDZK1 than with PDZK2 (Fig. 5; Kato et al., 2005
). The first and third PDZ domains in PDZK2 are involved in the interaction with OCTN1 and OCTN2 (Fig. 5), whereas the second and fourth PDZ domains in PDZK1 are important for the interaction (Kato et al., 2005
). Thus, the structural requirement for the specific interaction with the OCTN family seems to be different between PDZK2 and PDZK1. This may be compatible with the low, at the most, 28%, homology between the two clones, although both are categorized as simple adaptors due to the presence of just four PDZ domains, without any other significant structural domain, in their structure (Bezprozvanny and Maximov, 2001
). The difference between PDZK2 and PDZK1 was also observed in their tissue expression and localization. Both human and mouse mRNA expression of PDZK2 was almost exclusively observed in kidney and, at a lesser level, in intestines, whereas that of PDZK1 was also found in liver and testis of mouse (Gisler et al., 2001
; Scott et al., 2002
). The mRNA copy number of PDZK2 was found to be much lower than those of PDZK1 and OCTN2 in mouse kidney (see Results). All these findings are compatible with a hypothesis that the physiological significance of PDZK2 in the function regulation of OCTN2 is, at least partially, different from that of PDZK1. The exact physiological roles of these PDZ proteins should be further examined in experimental terms closer to the physiological condition since all the present findings regarding function of PDZK2 have been obtained in vitro. In the present study, we performed these in vitro experiments. To understand the pharmacological roles of PDZK1 and PDZK2, further in vivo work will be needed.
In conclusion, the present findings revealed that PDZK2 regulates the function of OCTN2 through a direct interaction at its C terminus, and the regulatory mechanism includes increase in cell surface expression level of OCTN2. OCTN2 expressed in renal proximal tubules has at least two distinct compartments, and colocalization with PDZK2 occurs in the subapical region. Thus, expression of OCTN2 and its carnitine transporting activity might be regulated by multiple mechanisms exerted by PDZK1 and PDZK2.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://dmd.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: TEA, tetraethylammonium; OCT, organic cation transporter; OCTN, organic cation/carnitine transporter; NHERF, Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor; CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; URAT, urate-anion exchanger; SLC, solute carrier; GFP, green fluorescent protein; MPP, 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium; GST, glutathione S-transferase.
Address correspondence to: Prof. Akira Tsuji, Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan. E-mail: tsuji{at}kenroku.kanazawau.ac.jp
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||