![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discovery Analytical Chemistry, Chemical and Screening Sciences (K.A.K., O.M., Y.Z., L.M.); and Drug Safety and Metabolism (L.S., W.D., S.E., A.C.), Wyeth Research, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
(Received December 5, 2005; accepted May 5, 2006)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Because of the challenges in preparing sufficient quantities of M1, the strategy turned away from liver microsome preparations to synthesis. Comparison of NMR, LC/MS, and HPLC data between synthetic compounds and M1 isolated from microsomes facilitated the unambiguous regio- and stereochemical assignment of the metabolite.
The present study highlights the successful approach and powerful utility of extensive NMR analysis and the availability of synthetic metabolite standards in the unambiguous identification of this S-linked metabolite. The data are critical for the drug development of tanaproget, since it would allow for biological testing of its major metabolite.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Synthesis of N- and S-Glucuronic Acid Derivatives of Tanaproget. A 0.5-mmol solution of tanaproget in anhydrous dimethyl formamide (5 ml) was added dropwise under a nitrogen atmosphere to a solution of 1.1 mmol of sodium hydride in dimethyl formamide (25 ml) that was cooled to approximately 70°C (dry ice). After stirring for 10 min, a 0.5-mmol solution of acetobromo-
-D-glucuronic acid methyl ester in dimethyl formamide (5 ml) was added dropwise. The reaction solution was then warmed to room temperature and stirred for a total of 8 h. The reaction solution was partitioned between water (100 ml) and ethyl acetate (100 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted again with ethyl acetate (100 ml). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated sodium chloride solution (100 ml) and dried (magnesium sulfate), and solvent was removed in vacuo to yield 0.350 g of crude reaction material. To a portion of this material (0.210 g) was added a solution of methanol/Hunig's base ((iso-Pr)2NEt)/water (5 ml/2 ml/2 ml), and the solution was stirred for 8.5 h at room temperature. The reaction solution was then adjusted to pH 2.5 using HCl (conc., approximately 1.5 ml) and chromatographed by reversed-phase HPLC (YMC-Pack CN, 150 x 20 mm i.d., 5-µm particle size) using a gradient of 15 to 35% acetonitrile/10 mM (aqueous) ammonium acetate. From repeated injections, approximately 5 mg of 2, the N-glucuronic acid derivative (3% isolated yield from tanaproget), and 15 mg of 3, the S-glucuronic acid derivative (10% isolated yield from tanaproget), were purified to >98% purity based on NMR analysis.
Preparation of Tanaproget Glucuronide Conjugate from Rat Liver Microsomes for NMR. Liver microsomes from Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared in-house using a differential ultracentrifugation method (Lake, 1987
) with slight modifications. Microsomal protein and cytochrome P450 content were determined by previously published methods (Omura and Sato, 1964
; Bradford, 1976
). The protein concentration and cytochrome P450 content were 50.9 mg/ml and 0.42 nmol/mg protein, respectively. Incubations (100 ml) were performed with tanaproget (40 µM), UDPGA (5 mM), magnesium chloride (10 mM), and male rat liver microsomes (1.5 mg/ml), in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 at 37°C. The samples were preincubated for 1 min at 37°C, and the reactions were initiated by the addition of UDPGA. Incubation mixtures were placed on ice to stop the reaction after 3 h. Tanaproget was removed from the incubate by ether extraction (200 ml, twice). Tanaproget glucuronide and remaining tanaproget were extracted using C18 cartridges and elution with methanol. The eluate was dried by rotary evaporation at room temperature. The residues were extracted with 50% acetonitrile in water (5 ml). Aliquots of supernatants were analyzed on a Waters 2690 HPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA) with a semipreparative column. Separation was accomplished on a Luna column (C18, 250 x 10 mm i.d., 5 µm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) and metabolites were detected by UV absorbance at 310 nm. The autosampler temperature was 6°C, and the column was at room temperature. Ammonium acetate (10 mM, pH 4.5) and acetonitrile were used as mobile phase A and B, respectively. The following gradient (flow rate of 2 ml/min) was used: 0 to 1 min, 20% B,;10 min, 40% B; 20 min, 70% B; 25 to 28 min, 95% B; 30 min, 20% B. Fractions containing the glucuronide peak were collected and immediately frozen on dry ice. All glucuronide fractions were combined and acetonitrile was removed by rotary evaporation. The glucuronide was extracted from the aqueous eluates by solid phase extraction using C18 cartridges. Water was used to wash residual buffer, and 50% methanol in water was used to elute the glucuronide conjugate, M1. The methanol/water eluates were dried by rotary evaporation at room temperature followed by lyophilization.
LC/MS. LC/MS data for the synthetic compounds were acquired using a Waters Alliance 2695 HPLC apparatus coupled to a Waters ZQ mass spectrometer using an open-access LC/MS method described previously (Mallis et al., 2002
). The LC/MS system used for M1 analysis was a Waters Alliance model 2695 HPLC apparatus coupled to a Micromass Quattro Ultima triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters). Separations were accomplished on a Phenomenex Luna C18(2) column (150 x 2 mm i.d., 5 µm) with a Deltabond C18 guard column (10 x 2 mm) (Thermo Electron Corp., Bellefonte, PA). The flow rate was 0.3 ml/min. Mobile phase A was 10 mM ammonium acetate in water, pH 4.5, and mobile phase B was acetonitrile. The linear mobile phase gradient used was 0 to 1 min, 10% B; 10 min, 15% B; 35 min, 17.5% B; 36 min, 25% B; 50 min, 30% B; 55 min, 50% B; 60 to 62 min, 90% B; 65 min, 10% B; 75 min, 10% B. The mass spectrometer had an electrospray ionization interface and operated in both positive and negative ionization modes. Settings for the mass spectrometer were electrospray ionization spray, 2.5 kV; cone, 50 V; desolvation gas flow, 900 to 1000 l/h; source temperature, 80°C; and desolvation gas temperature, 250°C.
NMR Spectroscopy. DMSO-d6 was used for all NMR samples. NMR spectra were obtained on Bruker (Billerica, MA) instruments 300 MHz DPX and 600 MHz Avance, and Varian (Palo Alto, CA) instruments 400 and 500 MHz Inova. The bulk of the NMR work was done on the 500 MHz instrument equipped with a Varian 3-mm 1H observe indirect detection probe. Chemical shifts (
) are reported in ppm. 1H chemical shifts are referenced to residual protonated dimethyl sulfoxide at
2.49, and 13C chemical shifts are referenced to internal DMSO-d6 at
39.5. Chemical shifts for 15N are reported relative to liquid ammonia at
0.0 and referenced to external formamide (
112.0). General parameters for 1H NMR experiments were a 5000-Hz spectral width, 32K data points, 45° pulse width, 1-s relaxation delay, and acquisition of 32 to >1000 scans, depending on sample concentration. Line broadening (
0.5 Hz) or Gaussian processing routines were used to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. General parameters for a 13C NMR experiment were a 25,000 Hz spectral width, 64K data points, 45° pulse width, 1-s relaxation delay, and acquisition of at least 10,000 scans, with 2 Hz line broadening. All spectra were acquired at 25°C. Several types of gradient 2D NMR experiments were used to determine 1H-1H and 1H-13C connectivities. These included gradient correlation spectroscopy for the determination of three-bond 1H-1H connectivities, gHSQC and gHMBC for the determination of one-, two-, three-, and four-bond 1H-13C-connectivities, and nuclear Overhauser spectroscopy or rotational Overhauser spectroscopy for the determination of through-space connectivities.
HPLC. HPLC columns used to test retention times of M1 versus 2 and 3 were: Luna C8(2) (Polymeric) (150 x 3.0 mm, 5-µm; Phenomenex); Everest Monomeric C18 (250 x 4.6 mm, 5-µm; Grace Vydac, Hesperia, CA); YMC-Pack CN, (150 x 4.6 mm, 5-µm; Waters); XTerra RP C18-Hybrid, (150 x 4.6 mm, 5-µm; Waters); and YMC-Pack Phenyl (150 x 4.6 mm, 5-µm; Waters).
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-D-glucuronic acid methyl ester (Scheme 1). The purity was excellent (>98%), and a sufficient amount of each (at least 5 mg) was obtained, enabling complete NMR assignments of each. Table 1 summarizes the NMR results for 2 and 3.
|
The protonated and deprotonated LC/MS spectra (not shown) of the S-glucuronide 3 gave an [M + H]+ ion at 474 and an [M H] ion at m/z 472, respectively (as was also the case for 2; spectra not shown), indicating glucuronidation of tanaproget. Also observed for 3 in the positive and negative ionization mode, respectively, are the ions m/z 298 and m/z 296, assigned as tanaproget; that is, the loss of glucuronic acid. In addition, a fragment at m/z 175, assigned as glucuronic acid, was detected in the negative ionization spectrum.
Metabolite M1 LC/MS spectra (not shown) gave protonated and deprotonated molecular ions [M + H]+ and [M H], at m/z 474 and 472, respectively, which indicated a molecular mass of 473 Da. This was 176 Da larger than tanaproget. Loss of 176 Da from m/z 474 in the positive ionization mass spectrum and from m/z 472 in the negative ionization mass spectrum generated the fragment ions at m/z 298 and 296, respectively, which are assigned as tanaproget. A glucuronic acid ion fragment was observed at m/z 175 in negative ionization mode. These data were consistent with glucuronic acid conjugation of tanaproget.
A 1H NMR spectrum of M1 is shown in Fig. 1A, and a compilation of the results from NMR experiments on M1 is given in Table 1. Despite several attempts at using freshly isolated M1 samples, the purity and concentration of the samples were typically low (<70% pure and an estimated total amount of <20 µg of M1 in solution), which hampered acquisition of complete 2D NMR datasets. We note that during the process of the microsomal incubation and subsequent isolation steps, the glucuronide solution tended to readily undergo oxidative transformation to the carbamate analog of tanaproget (replacement of the sulfur with oxygen), rendering it difficult to obtain the glucuronide conjugate in a stable form. Nevertheless, sufficient chemical shift, coupling, and 2D NMR correlations were obtained to make nearly complete 1H and 13C assignments of M1. However, only one key 1H-13C heteronuclear correlation was observed in the gHMBC NMR spectrum of M1, that from H-1' to C-6. This same crosspeak was expected, however, whether the metabolite was an N- or an S-glucuronide (i.e., three-bond coupling in either case).
|
144.8), which had an HMBC crosspeak to H-10. Signals from N-15 were only observed in 1 (
155.0) and in 2 (
155.4) and, in each compound, had HMBC correlations to H-17, H-18, and H-19.
|
HPLC comparisons were made to confirm whether the major synthetic glucuronide of tanaproget, S-glucuronide 3, was identical to M1, now proposed to be the S-glucuronide from the NMR and mass spectral results described above. Five different types of reversed-phase HPLC columns, as described under Materials and Methods, were each used under two different mobile phase gradient conditions, as follows. One mobile phase was a gradient of 10 mM ammonium acetate in water/acetonitrile (90:10 to 10:90 in 20 min), and the other mobile phase was a gradient of 10 mM formic acid in water/acetonitrile (90:10 to 10:90 in 20 min). These 10 HPLC conditions covered a wide range of selectivity as evidenced by the change of elution order of the major and minor components in the samples. To compare and match the retention time of the major peaks in the two samples, spiking experiments were performed. The synthetic glucuronide 3 that was determined to be S-glucuronide was found to have retention times identical to that of metabolite M1 under all 10 HPLC conditions.
Literature reports of glucuronide conjugation through an S-linkage are rare (Jeffcoat et al., 1980
; Nakaoka et al., 1989
; Smith et al., 1992
; Ethell et al., 2003
; Martin et al., 2003
), with little data available on their structural characterization or the UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) catalyzing their formation. N- and O-glucuronides are more commonly observed (Green and Tephly, 1998
; Hawes, 1998
; Kuehl and Murphy, 2003
; Tricker, 2003
). We recently reported that UGT1A9 and 2B7 were the major isoforms involved in the formation of tanaproget S-glucuronide (Elmarakby et al., 2005
).
Direct NMR structure elucidation of the metabolite M1 generated from rat liver microsomal incubation was challenging because of the lack of protons proximal to the glucuronic acid group attached to the benzoxazine-2-thione moiety of tanaproget which, therefore, precluded homonuclear correlations to the attached sugar group. The lack of nuclear Overhauser effects from the sugar to the remainder of the molecule constituted only negative proof that M1 was an S-glucuronide and not an N-glucuronide. Furthermore, chemical shift arguments for the benzoxazine-2-thione carbonyl and the glucuronic acid group were also insufficient evidence for an unambiguous structure proof. Synthetic compounds turned out to be a more straightforward path to structure elucidation, since they could be made in relatively pure, concentrated amounts.
In summary, from extensive chromatographic and spectral comparison of the microsomally derived metabolite M1 and the synthetic compounds 2 and 3, the glucuronide metabolite of tanaproget has been determined to be the S-ß-(D)-glucuronide conjugate.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: LC/MS, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry; 1D, one-dimensional; 2D, two-dimensional; gHSQC, gradient heteronuclear single quantum coherence; gHMBC, gradient heteronuclear multiple bond correlation; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; UDPGA, uridine diphosphoglucuronic acid; DMSO-d6, deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide; UGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase.
Address correspondence to: Kelly A. Keating, Roy J. Carver Metabolomics Center, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 601 S. Goodwin Avenue M/C 110, Urbana, IL 61801. E-mail: kkeating{at}uiuc.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||