DMD Simcyp

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on August 8, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.016519


0090-9556/07/3511-2060-2066$20.00
DMD 35:2060-2066, 2007

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.107.016519v1
35/11/2060    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Catania, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Catania, V. A.

Beneficial Effect of Spironolactone Administration on Ethynylestradiol-Induced Cholestasis in the Rat: Involvement of Up-Regulation of Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2

María L. Ruiz, Silvina S.M. Villanueva, Marcelo G. Luquita, Shin-ichi Ikushiro, Aldo D. Mottino, and Viviana A. Catania

Instituto de Fisiología Experimental, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina (M.L.R., S.S.M.V., M.G.L., A.D.M., V.A.C.); and Toyama Prefectural University, Toyama, Japan (S.I.)

(Received May 8, 2007; Accepted August 6, 2007)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The effect of spironolactone (SL) administration on 17{alpha}-ethynylestradiol (EE)-induced cholestasis was studied, with emphasis on expression and activity of Mrps. Adult male Wistar rats were divided into the following groups: EE (5 mg/kg daily for 5 days, s.c.), SL (200 µmol/kg daily for 3 days, i.p.), EE+SL (same doses, SL administered the last 3 days of EE treatment), and controls. SL prevented the decrease in bile salt-independent fraction of bile flow induced by EE, in association with normalization of biliary excretion of glutathione. Western blot studies indicate that EE decreased the expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2) by 41% and increased that of Mrp3 by 200%, whereas SL only affected Mrp2 expression (+60%) with respect to controls. The EE+SL group showed increased levels of Mrp2 and Mrp3 to the same extent as that registered for the individual treatments. Real-time polymerase chain reaction studies indicated that up-regulation of Mrp2 and Mrp3 by SL and EE, respectively, was at the transcriptional level. To estimate Mrp2 and Mrp3 activities, apical and basolateral excretion of acetaminophen glucuronide (APAP-glu), a common substrate for both transporters, was measured in the recirculating isolated perfused liver model. Biliary/perfusate excretion ratio was decreased in EE (-88%) and increased in SL (+36%) with respect to controls. Coadministration of rats with SL partially prevented (-53%) impairment induced by EE in this ratio. In conclusion, SL administration to EE-induced cholestatic rats counteracted the decrease in bile flow and biliary excretion of glutathione and APAP-glu, a model Mrp substrate, findings associated with up-regulation of Mrp2 expression.


Bile flow formation is dependent upon concentrative efflux of osmotically active solutes from the hepatocyte to the canalicular space followed by passive water movement (Nathanson and Boyer, 1991Go). This step is facilitated by members of the ATP-binding cassette family of membrane transporters that mainly include the bile salt export pump (Bsep), which mediates the concentrative transport of monovalent bile salts into the canaliculus (Gerloff et al., 1998Go), generating the bile salt-dependent component of bile flow (BSDF), and the multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2), which transports lipophilic substances conjugated with glutathione, glucuronate or sulfate, and glutathione (oxidized and reduced) (Rebbeor et al., 2002Go), contributing to the formation of bile salt-independent flow (BSIF). In addition, an electroneutral chloride/bicarbonate exchanger, the anion exchanger 2 (AE2), is responsible for bicarbonate secretion into bile and also contributes to BSIF formation (Meier et al., 1985Go). Bile formation is affected by several drugs acting at different levels in the hepatocyte. Estrogens are involved in the pathogenesis of both oral contraceptive-induced cholestasis and cholestasis of pregnancy (Vore, 1987Go; Reyes and Simon, 1993Go). Ethynylestradiol (EE), a synthetic estrogen, is known to reduce bile flow formation in experimental animals, thus representing a useful model to study estrogen cholestasis (Crocenzi et al., 2001Go). In the rat, alterations in both BSIF and BSDF by EE have been associated with decreased expression and activity of Bsep and Mrp2 (Trauner et al., 1997Go; Lee et al., 2000Go), as well as increased expression and activity of basolateral Mrp3 (Ruiz et al., 2006Go). This finding would indicate altered disposition of compounds that are common substrates for Mrp2 and Mrp3 with a potential shift in their excretion from bile to bloodstream, as demonstrated for the therapeutic drug acetaminophen (APAP) (Ruiz et al., 2006Go).

The steroid spironolactone (SL) is a therapeutic drug used as a diuretic in patients with edema or ascites (Ochs et al., 1978Go) and shows inductive properties on biotransformation enzymes in humans and experimental animals (Ochs et al., 1978Go; Catania et al., 2004Go). SL also induces choleresis in the rat as a result of a substantial increase in BSIF, whereas BSDF is impaired by this steroid as a result of decreased bile salt pool size (Ruiz et al., 2005Go). Increased BSIF is in turn associated with increased biliary secretion of glutathione species and up-regulation of Mrp2, and with increased excretion rate of bicarbonate.

Several approaches have been considered to prevent or revert experimental estrogen-induced cholestasis, with emphasis on restoration of bile secretory function (Dumont et al., 2002Go; Sánchez Pozzi et al., 2003Go; Crocenzi et al., 2004Go, 2005Go; Gerk et al., 2007Go). However, none of them evaluated the potential benefit of using a classical inducer, known to increase Mrp2 expression and, concomitantly, its activity. Preserved normal Mrp2 function at the canalicular level is relevant not only to BSIF formation, but also to biliary elimination of endogenous compounds such as bilirubin glucuronides and a wide variety of xenobiotics (Catania et al., 2004Go). Thus, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate the ability of SL to normalize bile flow formation and Mrp2 function in EE intrahepatic cholestasis. The data indicate that SL was able to prevent the impairment in bile flow and glutathione biliary secretion, in association with an increased expression of Mrp2. In addition, SL partially restored the capability for biliary secretion of APAP glucuronide (APAP-glu), found to be substantially deteriorated in EE rats.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals. SL, EE, leupeptin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pepstatin A, glutathione (GSH), glutathione reductase, 3{alpha}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, β-NAD, NADPH, HEPES, palmitoyl lysophosphatidylcholine, d-saccharic acid 1,4 lactone, UDP-glucuronic acid, APAP, and APAP-glu were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals were of analytical-grade purity and used as supplied.

Animals and Treatment. Adult male Wistar rats (300-360 g) were used throughout. They were maintained ad libitum on a standard laboratory pellet diet and were allowed free access to water and saline during treatment. Animals were randomly divided into four experimental groups. 1) In the EE group, EE was dissolved in propylene glycol (33.7 mM) and administered at a daily dose of 5 mg/kg b.wt. s.c., for 5 consecutive days (Crocenzi et al., 2001Go; Ruiz et al., 2006Go). 2) In the SL group, rats were injected i.p. with SL dissolved in propylene glycol (60 mM), at a daily dose of 200 µmol/kg body weight (equivalent to 83.3 mg/kg body weight), for 3 consecutive days (Ruiz et al., 2005Go). 3) In the EE+SL group, rats were injected with EE, as in the EE group, for 5 days, and simultaneously with SL, as in the SL group, for the last 3 days of the EE protocol. 4) In the control group, rats were injected with vehicle (propylene glycol) either s.c. for 5 days (0.5 ml/kg b.wt.) or i.p. for 3 days (3.3 ml/kg b.wt.) or both simultaneously. Preliminary studies demonstrated no differences among these groups in functional studies performed either in vivo or in the isolated perfused liver (IPL) model, as well as in Western blot studies, so that only data from rats receiving propylene glycol both i.p and s.c. are presented under Results.

All procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (1996Go). Studies were performed 18 h after the last injection of vehicle or steroids, unless otherwise stated. Basal bile was collected for determination of bile flow and biliary excretion of bile acids, glutathione, and bicarbonate (Ruiz et al., 2005Go). At the end of the experiments, the animals were sacrificed by exsanguination, and serum aliquots were used in the determination of the cholestasis markers alkaline phosphatase and total bile acids, using commercial kits (Wiener Lab, Rosario, Argentina; and Randox Lab, Crumlin, UK, respectively). Livers were immediately rinsed in situ with cold saline and removed, and the liver weight/body weight ratio was calculated. Portions of hepatic tissue were used for assessment of total glutathione content (Ruiz et al., 2005Go) and preparation of microsomal membranes and mixed plasma membranes (MPMs) (Ruiz et al., 2006Go).

Evaluation of Mrp2, Mrp3, and Bsep mRNA levels in response to EE and/or SL treatments was performed at different times after administration of the corresponding protocols. Thus, different sets of animals were sacrificed at 3, 6, or 12 h after the last injection of these steroids. Parallel groups of animals were injected with solvent i.p. and/or s.c. and sacrificed at the times indicated. The livers were removed, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and preserved at -70°C until used for total RNA isolation.

Western Blotting Studies. Western blot analyses of Mrp2, Bsep, and AE2 were performed in MPM as described (Ruiz et al., 2005Go). Detection of Mrp3 was performed also in MPM using a rabbit polyclonal antibody to rat Mrp3 (Ogawa et al., 2000Go), as previously described (Ghanem et al., 2005Go). Detection of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) was performed in microsomal preparations using polyclonal anti-peptide antibodies that specifically recognize the 1A6 and 1A7 isoforms belonging to UGT family 1 (Ikushiro et al., 1995Go), as previously reported (Luquita et al., 2001Go). Immunoreactive bands in the different studies were quantified using the Gel-Pro Analyzer software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD).

Quantitative Real-Time PCR. Total RNA was isolated from liver samples using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), following the manufacturer's protocol. cDNA was produced by using the SuperScript Preamplification System for first-strand cDNA synthesis according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). Real-time quantitative PCR was performed on cDNA samples using the MiniOpticom System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Sequences of primer pairs and conditions for Mrp3 and Bsep were as described previously (Cao et al., 2002Go; Gao et al., 2004Go), and for Mrp2 and 18S, they were designed to optimally detect the respective mRNAs. All sequences and conditions are summarized in Table 1. The amplified product size by each pair of primers was 450, 573, 164, and 150 bp, for Mrp2, Mrp3, Bsep, and 18S, respectively. At the end of these experiments, PCR products were removed from tubes and analyzed by gel electrophoresis to confirm the product of interest. Quantification of the target cDNAs in all samples was normalized to 18S ribosomal RNA (Cttarget - Ct18S ={Delta}Ct) and the difference in expression for each target cDNA in the treated groups was expressed to the amount in the control group ({Delta}Cttreated -{Delta}Ctcontrol ={Delta}{Delta}Ct). -Fold changes in target gene expression were determined by taking 2 to the power of this number (2-{Delta}{Delta}Ct).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Nucleotide sequences of PCR primers

 

Mrp Transport Activity in Recirculating IPL. To evaluate to what extent the different treatments affect normal biliary secretion of a common substrate for both Mrp2 and Mrp3, the apical and basolateral transport rates for APAP-glu were measured. After a low, nontoxic dose of APAP is injected in vivo to rats or incorporated to the rat IPL system, it is efficiently converted to its glucuronide (Kessler et al., 2002Go). Subsequent APAP-glu excretion into bile and perfusate gives an estimation of its transport by Mrp2 (Xiong et al., 2000Go) and Mrp3 (Manautou et al., 2004Go), respectively. The livers were isolated and perfused for 60 min with oxygenated Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing APAP (2 µmol/ml) as described previously (Ruiz et al., 2006Go). Liver viability was controlled throughout by monitoring LDH leakage into the perfusate (with values <10 IU/l between the start and the end of the experiment). The content of APAP-glu in bile, perfusate, and liver homogenate was determined by HPLC (Ghanem et al., 2005Go).

UGT Activity. The conjugating activity of microsomal UGT toward APAP was evaluated as described previously (Ruiz et al., 2006Go). This study was performed to ascertain whether eventual changes in apical or basolateral excretion of APAP-glu in IPL could also result from differences among groups in endogenous synthesis of the common Mrp substrate.

Statistical Analysis. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Newman-Keuls test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Biliary Secretory Function. Individual treatment with EE or SL as well as the coadministration of both compounds caused an increase in the liver to body weight ratio with respect to controls (Table 2), mainly due to an increase in liver weight (data not shown). As expected from previous studies (Koopen et al., 1998Go; Crocenzi et al., 2001Go), basal bile flow and bile acid, bicarbonate, and glutathione excretion rates were reduced by EE. SL increased bile flow and bicarbonate and glutathione excretion rates, whereas bile salt output was decreased. Administration of SL to EE-treated rats for the last 3 days of the EE protocol normalized bile flow through selective induction of glutathione and bicarbonate biliary output. Normalization in bile flow formation occurred despite the fact that bile salt output remained impaired. The hepatic content of glutathione was not different among groups (Table 2), despite the significant changes detected in its biliary excretion in rats treated with EE or SL alone. This finding could be tentatively explained by adaptive changes in the same direction in its hepatic synthesis or, alternatively, by changes in the opposite direction in its basolateral efflux. Alkaline phosphatase was increased by EE as expected from a cholestatic model and returned to control values in the EE+SL group. Serum bile salt levels were significantly increased in EE-treated rats, probably as a consequence of decreased biliary secretion (Crocenzi et al., 2001Go) and hepatic uptake (Bossard et al., 1993Go). Increased basolateral efflux of bile salts via Mrp3 (Ruiz et al., 2006Go) may have also contributed to explain their increased serum levels. Experimental groups receiving SL showed no changes in serum bile salt levels with respect to controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 In vivo biliary secretory function

Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3-6).

 

Expression of Mrp2, Mrp3, Bsep, and AE2. Western blot studies (Fig. 1) indicate that Mrp2 protein expression was significantly reduced (-41%) after EE treatment and increased (+60%) after SL administration, as was previously reported (Trauner et al., 1997Go; Lee et al., 2000Go; Ruiz et al., 2005Go, 2006Go). Coadministration to animals of both steroids up-regulated Mrp2 levels by 50% over controls, consistent with the effect registered for SL alone. Figure 1 also shows that whereas EE produced a marked increase in Mrp3 protein expression (+200%), as we reported previously (Ruiz et al., 2006Go), SL did not show any effect. The conjoint treatment increased Mrp3 protein level by 260%, which was similar to the extent registered for EE alone. Thus, in the EE+SL group was observed a preferential induction of Mrp3 versus Mrp2 compared with controls. Bsep expression tended to decrease in response to EE, although it did not reach statistical significance. SL administration did not affect Bsep levels. Figure 1 shows that AE2 also remained unaffected in all groups.


Figure 1
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Immunodetection of Mrp2, Mrp3, Bsep, and AE2. These transporters were detected in mixed plasma membranes 18 h after the last dose of EE and/or SL. Equal amounts of total protein (15 µg for Mrp2 and Bsep and 30 µg for AE2 and Mrp3) were loaded in the gels. These amounts of protein gave a densitometric signal in the linear range of the response curve for both antibodies. Uniformity of loading and transfer from gel to nitrocellulose membrane was controlled with Ponceau S. Data on densitometric analysis represent means ± S.D. of three rats per group. aSignificantly different from controls, p < 0.05; bsignificantly different from EE, p < 0.05; csignificantly different from SL, p < 0.05.

 
It is expected that increased synthesis of mRNA precedes induction of protein synthesis under conditions of transcriptional regulation. To establish whether up-regulation of Mrp2 and Mrp3 as shown in Fig. 1 results from increased expression of their respective mRNAs, we assessed their levels by real-time PCR up to 12 h after the last injection of SL and/or EE. Because induction of mRNA levels may be transient, we selected 3, 6, and 12 h postinjection as time points. Data in Fig. 2 are presented as percentages and were referred to the respective control, considered as 100%. In the EE group, Mrp2 mRNA expression remained invariable, whereas Mrp3 mRNA increased at 6 and 12 h to a similar extent. In contrast, SL significantly increased Mrp2 mRNA expression at 12 h without affecting Mrp3 mRNA levels. Conjoint treatment resulted in increased levels for both mRNAs at both 6 and 12 h, as expected from their individual effects, although some differences in the magnitude of induction between individual and simultaneous treatment were noted. Although we only found a trend to decrease in Bsep protein in response to EE, other authors showed a moderate but significantly decrease with the same protocol (Trauner et al., 1997Go; Lee et al., 2000Go). We further decided to evaluate the potential changes in the corresponding mRNA in our groups. We found no variations in this measure at any time or group studied (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Mrp2 and Mrp3 mRNA expression. Changes in mRNA levels with time were detected by real-time PCR. Livers were removed at 3, 6, or 12 h after the last injection of EE and/or SL. Data are presented as percentages, are referred to the respective controls, considered as 100%, and are expressed as means ± S.D. of three rats per group. The 18S mRNA was used as an internal control. aSignificantly different from the respective controls, p < 0.05; bsignificantly different from livers removed at 3 h, p < 0.05.

 
Mrp2 and Mrp3 Transport Activity in IPL. In view of the selective induction of Mrp2 and Mrp3 produced by SL and EE, respectively, it was of interest to evaluate their impact on transport function. The influence of the relative contribution of Mrp2 versus Mrp3 to preferential biliary versus basolateral disposition of the common substrate APAP-glu was evaluated using the IPL model. Figure 3A shows that the content of APAP-glu in perfusate determined at 60 min, equivalent to the amount of the metabolite accumulated by this time, was increased by 60% in the EE group, by 77% in the SL group, and by 130% in the EE+SL group over controls. Cumulative biliary excretion of APAP-glu by this same period significantly decreased in response to EE (-80%), increased in response to SL (+110%), and was not affected in the EE+SL group, compared with controls (Fig. 3B). This latter result indicates that SL was able to restore EE-induced impairment in biliary secretory function associated with Mrp2. Figure 3C shows that hepatic content of APAP-glu, determined at the end of the experiment, was affected by SL only when administered alone, with an increase of 107% over controls. The total amount of APAP-glu produced by the liver throughout the experiment was estimated as a summation of cumulative biliary and perfusate excretions and liver content, and is shown in Fig. 3D. This measure was significantly increased in response to SL, when administered either alone (+90%) or together with EE (+78%). Clearly, SL stimulated the synthesis of APAP-glu, thus increasing availability of the common Mrp substrate for subsequent secretion via Mrp2 or Mrp3. In this model, transport activity is conditioned by the substrate availability in addition to transporter expression. Thus, it is not clear whether SL administration leads to an increase in intrinsic activity of Mrp2. To eliminate the influence of increased production of APAP-glu in SL and EE+SL groups, we referred the biliary and perfusate excretion, as well as the hepatic content, to the total amount of APAP-glu formed (see Table 3). Relative biliary excretion of this metabolite was impaired by EE and by EE+SL treatments by 83 and 44%, respectively, and slightly but significantly increased in SL group (+19%). Relative basolateral excretion was increased only by EE (+45%) and EE+SL (+25%) groups. Table 3 also shows that the relative hepatic content exhibited a decrease in EE (-42%) and EE+SL (-51%) groups, whereas this measure was not affected by SL alone. The biliary/perfusate elimination ratio was substantially decreased by EE (-88%) and only partially decreased by EE+SL (-53%), compared with controls. Administration of SL alone slightly but significantly increased (+36%) this same ratio.


Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. APAP-glu excretion in the isolated perfused liver. The hepatic disposition of APAP-glu, a common substrate for Mrp2 and Mrp3, was evaluated in the isolated perfused liver for a 60-min period. The panels represent the excretion of APAP-glu into perfusate (A) and bile (B), the APAP-glu hepatic content (C), and the total amount of this glucuronide in bile + perfusate + liver tissue (D), by the end of the experiment. Data are means ± S.D. of three to six rats per group. aSignificantly different from controls, p < 0.05; bsignificantly different from EE, p < 0.05; csignificantly different from SL, p < 0.05.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Biliary and perfusate excretion of APAP-glu relative to its total amount in the IPL system

Excretory rates and liver content of APAP-glu represent the amounts accumulated by the end of the experiment and refer to the total amount of this metabolite synthesized by IPL by that time. Results are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3-6).

 

UGT Expression and Activity. We have previously characterized SL as an inducer of selective phase II biotransformation enzymes, including UGT (Catania et al., 2004Go). To establish whether modifications in UGT activity mediate the induction of APAP-glu synthesis as detected in IPL, we further assessed its activity toward APAP. Figure 4A shows that UGT activity was increased by 100% in rats receiving SL, either when administered alone or conjointly with EE, consistent with the findings in IPL. EE itself did not affect this measure. The higher activity in SL and EE+SL groups is associated, at least in part, with induction of expression of isoform UGT1A7 (78% and 129%, respectively), whereas UGT1A6, another isoform involved in conjugation of APAP (Kessler et al., 2002Go), was not affected by the treatments (Fig. 4B).


Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. UGT activity and immunodetection of UGT isoforms. UGT activity was assessed using APAP as a substrate (A). Only major UGT isoforms belonging to family 1 and involved in APAP glucuronidation were assessed in microsomal membranes (B). Equal amounts of total protein (15 µg) were loaded in the gels. This amount of protein gave a densitometric signal in the linear range of the response curve for the different antibodies. Uniformity of loading and transfer from gel to nitrocellulose membrane was controlled with Ponceau S. Data on densitometric analysis represent means ± S.D. of three rats per group. aSignificantly different from controls, p < 0.05; bsignificantly different from EE, p < 0.05.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
EE administration to rats represents a well characterized model of drug-induced intrahepatic cholestasis, which has been largely tested to develop therapeutic approaches of potential applicability in humans. Decreased expression and function of canalicular Bsep and Mrp2 are a major factor of deteriorated bile flow formation in this model (Trauner et al., 1997Go; Lee et al., 2000Go; Crocenzi et al., 2001Go). Ursodeoxycholate is a bile salt commonly used in the treatment of cholestatic diseases (Paumgartner and Beuers, 2002Go), including cholestasis of pregnancy (Palma et al., 1997Go). Dumont et al. (2002Go) reported that ursodeoxycholic acid restored bile flow in EE-treated rats by increasing bile acid secretion, possibly as a result of normalization in Bsep expression. They also observed that this treatment did not improve glutathione output or bile acid-independent flow. More recently, Crocenzi et al. (2005Go) demonstrated that ursodeoxycholate did not prevent down-regulation of Mrp2 induced by EE but positively modulates its activity, as detected through assessment of biliary excretion of dinitrophenyl S-glutathione, a known Mrp2 substrate. This could result from a direct interaction of this therapeutic bile salt with Mrp2 (Gerk et al., 2007Go), thus leading to partial restoration of its transport function. The flavonoid silymarin was also effective in partially preventing EE-induced cholestasis in rats mainly by normalizing the diminished bile salt pool size and bicarbonate output (Crocenzi et al., 2001Go). Neither of these therapeutic agents was able to prevent the decrease in Mrp2 protein level and GSH biliary secretory rate. In the current study we explore for the first time the benefit of using a classical enzyme inducer to prevent deterioration of Mrp2 expression and function produced by EE. Indeed, SL is a well known phase I and II enzyme inducer (Ochs et al., 1978Go; Catania et al., 2004Go) with additional choleretic properties due to increased expression of Mrp2 and BSIF formation (Ruiz et al., 2005Go). This feature makes SL a good candidate to test its ability to prevent EE-induced cholestasis in the rat.

Our current in vivo studies on biliary secretory function confirmed previously reported cholestatic/choleretic activity of EE/SL and further demonstrate that coadministration of the inducer with EE, for the last 3 days of the EE protocol, completely prevented impairment in bile flow formation. This occurred despite the fact that bile salt secretion remained deteriorated, probably as a consequence of decreased hepatic synthesis of bile salts, which was demonstrated individually for both EE and SL (Koopen et al., 1999Go; Ruiz et al., 2005Go). This is the most suitable explanation since Bsep expression and the levels of serum bile salts were normal in the EE+SL group. Rather, restoration of bile flow formation was based on preserved biliary secretory rate for both GSH (associated to up-regulation of Mrp2) and bicarbonate. Despite the preserved levels of AE2, an activation of the exchanger by SL cannot be ruled out because of the dramatic increase in bicarbonate biliary excretion rate. Alternatively, the source of biliary bicarbonate could result from exacerbated ductular secretion. Confirmation that cholestasis was counteracted by SL comes from analysis of the data on the serum markers alkaline phosphatase and total bile acids, which were elevated in EE and completely normalized in the EE+SL group, compared with controls.

Consistent with restored biliary secretion of GSH described in in vivo experiments, administration of SL together with EE counteracted EE-induced impairment in biliary secretion of APAP-glu in IPL. This major APAP metabolite is a common substrate for both Mrp2 and Mrp3, although it presents higher affinity for Mrp3 (Manautou et al., 2004Go). Thus, partial restoration of its biliary secretion in the EE+SL group is of relevance, considering that these same rats exhibited significant up-regulation of Mrp3 and that this transporter efficiently delivers APAP-glu to the perfusate (Ruiz et al., 2006Go). Indeed, upregulation of Mrp3 was present in EE+SL and reached the same level as in the EE group. This could explain why the combined treatment did not lead to restoration in biliary excretion of APAP-glu to the same extent shown for SL alone. We also observed that SL administered alone or in combination with EE increased expression and activity of UGT involved in APAP conjugation, thus increasing the availability of APAP-glu generated endogenously in IPL for subsequent disposition. The partial restoration of biliary secretory function for APAP-glu is better illustrated in Table 3, where excretion rates and hepatic content were referred to total amount of this derivative. Irrespective of APAP-glu production, it is clearly shown that its preferential biliary versus basolateral disposition in normal rats was inverted in rats receiving EE, and that these same rats exhibited a more efficient capability for elimination of this metabolite from the cell, probably reflecting a higher affinity toward APAP-glu reported for Mrp3 versus Mrp2 (Manautou et al., 2004Go).

Expression of hepatobiliary transporters is regulated by nuclear receptors, as has been demonstrated for phase I and II biotransformation enzymes. Kast et al. (2002Go) have reported that MRP2/Mrp2 genes are modulated by pregnane X receptor (PXR), farnesoid X receptor, and constitutive androstane receptor in human and rodents. These three distinct nuclear receptor signaling pathways converge on a common response element in the 5'-flanking region of the gene. PXR activation is dependent upon the formation of the heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor. SL is a well known ligand of PXR, as was also demonstrated for the steroids pregnenolone 16{alpha}-carbonitrile, 5β-pregnane-3,20-dione, dexamethasone, and so on (Schuetz et al., 1998Go; Kliewer et al., 2002Go). Thus, our data on increased expression of Mrp2 at the transcriptional level is consistent with SL-PXR interaction followed by heterodimer formation. It is interesting to note that this protocol of administration with SL also leads to up-regulation of PXR mRNA and protein levels, either when administered alone or in combination with EE (M. L. Ruiz, S. S. M. Villanueva, M. G. Luquita, A. D. Mottino, and V. A. Catania, unpublished results), reinforcing a role for this nuclear receptor as a modulator of the action of SL. In contrast, down-regulation of Mrp2 by EE is likely at the post-transcriptional level since mRNA levels were not affected at any time studied. This is unlikely restricted to EE, since post-transcriptional regulation of Mrp2 has also been observed for other drugs (Gerk and Vore, 2002).

The regulation of MRP3/Mrp3 gene is still unclear and seems to be dependent on the species analyzed. CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins and specificity proteins 1/3 can also cooperatively regulate the basal and inducible promoter activity of rat Mrp3 gene as demonstrated by Tzeng et al. (2005Go). MRP3/Mrp3 mRNA levels were increased in human hepatoma cell lines HuH7 and HepG2 as well as in mice treated with PXR ligands different from SL (Teng et al., 2003Go). In the current study, we demonstrated transcriptional up-regulation of Mrp3 by EE as revealed by Western blot and real-time PCR studies. EE was previously shown to produce down-regulation of Mrp2 and Bsep in the rat model as a major factor contributing to cholestasis (Trauner et al., 1997Go; Lee et al., 2000Go). More recently, it was demonstrated in mice that the effect on Bsep was mediated by binding of EE to the estrogen receptor {alpha} (Yamamoto et al., 2006Go). Further studies are necessary to establish whether this same receptor mediates transcriptional up-regulation of Mrp3, as currently demonstrated.

Patients with liver disease, mostly cirrhosis, often receive SL as a diuretic. However, prolonged administration may lead to pharmacologic effects other than that of aldosterone antagonist. Miguet et al. (1980Go) demonstrated that the administration of SL to humans with alcoholic cirrhosis accelerates the clearance of coadministered drugs, basically as a result of its inducing properties on liver drug metabolism. We postulate that Mrp2 up-regulation by SL may represent an additional mechanism explaining drug-drug interaction when the steroid is administered as a therapeutic agent. Fehér et al. (1976Go) reported that SL administration to patients with cirrhosis or different forms of bile duct obstruction decreased plasma bile acid levels by more than 50%, which could be tentatively explained by an inhibitory action on bile salt synthesis (Ruiz et al., 2005Go). This action of SL, leading to the attenuation of deleterious effects of bile salts accumulated in cholestatic liver, together with the significant restoration of Mrp2 expression and activity, as currently demonstrated, suggest the potential clinical application of SL in intrahepatic cholestasis. Exploring the action of SL in human models, such as primary hepatocytes culture or liver cell lines, would represent a preliminary approach to validate this possibility.

In conclusion, SL counteracted the alterations in bile flow formation induced by EE through transcriptional up-regulation of Mrp2 and the associated increase in GSH biliary excretion. Restoration of Mrp2 expression coexisted with up-regulation of Mrp3, as induced by EE itself, and led to partial prevention in impairment of biliary secretion of a common Mrp substrate induced by this cholestatic estrogen.


    Acknowledgments
 
We express our gratitude to Dr. J. Elena Ochoa for valuable technical assistance and Dr. Enrique J. Sánchez Pozzi for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Drs. Y. Sugiyama and H. Suzuki (University of Tokyo, Japan) for kindly providing the anti-rat Mrp3 antibody.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by grants from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas and Universidad Nacional de Rosario.

doi:10.1124/dmd.107.016519.

ABBREVIATIONS: Bsep, bile salt export pump; BSDF, bile salt-dependent component of bile flow; BSIF, bile salt-independent flow; AE2, anion exchanger 2; APAP, acetaminophen; APAP-glu, acetaminophen glucuronide; EE, ethynylestradiol; GSH, glutathione; MPM, mixed plasma membrane; IPL, isolated perfused liver; Mrp2, multidrug resistance-associated protein 2; Mrp3, multidrug resistance-associated protein 3; SL, spironolactone; UGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PXR, pregnane X receptor.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Viviana A. Catania, Instituto de Fisiología Experimental (CONICET)-Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas (UNR), Suipacha 570 (2000) Rosario, Argentina. E-mail: vcatania{at}fbioyf.unr.edu.ar


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 


Bossard R, Stieger B, O'Neill B, Fricker G, and Meier PJ (1993) Ethinylestradiol treatment induces multiple canalicular membrane transport alterations in rat liver. J Clin Invest 91: 2714-2720.[Medline]

Cao J, Stieger B, Meier PJ, and Vore M (2002) Expression of rat hepatic multidrug resistance-associated proteins and organic anion transporter in pregnancy. Am J Physiol 283: G757-G766.

Catania VA, Sánchez Pozzi EJ, Luquita MG, Ruiz ML, Villanueva SSM, Jones B, and Mottino AD (2004) Co-regulation of expression of phase II metabolizing enzymes and multidrug resistance-associated protein. Ann Hepatol 3: 11-17.[Medline]

Crocenzi FA, D'Andrea V, Catania VA, Luquita MG, Pellegrino JM, Ochoa JE, Mottino AD, and Sánchez Pozzi EJ (2005) Prevention of Mrp2 activity impairment in ethinylestradiol-induced cholestasis by ursodeoxycholate in the rat. Drug Metab Dispos 33: 888-891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Crocenzi FA, Mottino AD, and Roma MG (2004) Regulation of synthesis and trafficking of canalicular transporters and its alteration in acquired hepatocellular cholestasis. Experimental therapeutic strategies for its prevention. Curr Med Chem 11: 501-524.[CrossRef][Medline]

Crocenzi FA, Sánchez Pozzi EJ, Pellegrino JM, Favre CO, Rodríguez Garay EA, Mottino AD, Coleman R, and Roma MG (2001) Beneficial effects of silymarin on estrogen-induced cholestasis in the rat: a study in vivo and in isolated hepatocyte couplets. Hepatology 34: 329-339.[CrossRef]

Dumont M, Jacquemin E, and Erlinger S (2002) Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on the expression of the hepatocellular bile acid transporters (Ntcp and Bsep) in rats with estrogen-induced cholestasis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 35: 185-191.[CrossRef][Medline]

Feher T, Váradi A, and Tankó (1976) A Letter: Effect of spironolactone on blood bile-acid levels. Lancet 2: 51.[Medline]

Gao B, St Pierre MV, Stieger B, and Meier PJ (2004) Differential expression of bile salt and organic anion transporters in developing rat liver. J Hepatol 41: 201-208.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gerk P, Li W, Megaraj V, and Vore M (2007) Human multidrug resistance protein 2 transports the therapeutic bile salt tauroursodeoxycholate. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 320: 893-899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gerloff T, Stieger B, Hagenbuch B, Madon J, Landmann L, Roth J, Hofmann AF, and Meier PJ (1998) The sister of P-glycoprotein represents the canalicular bile salt export pump of mammalian liver. J Biol Chem 273: 10046-10050.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ghanem CI, Ruiz ML, Villanueva SSM, Luquita MG, Catania VA, Jones B, Bengochea LA, Vore M, and Mottino AD (2005) Shift from biliary to urinary elimination of acetaminophen-glucuronide in acetaminophen-pretreated rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 315: 987-995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ikushiro S, Emi Y, and Iyanagi T (1995) Identification and analysis of drug responsive expression of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase family 1 (UGT1) isozyme in rat hepatic microsomes using anti-peptide antibodies. Arch Biochem Biophys 324: 267-272.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kast HR, Goodwin B, Tarr PT, Jones SA, Anisfeld AM, Stoltz CM, Tontonoz P, Kliewer S, Willson TM, and Edwards PA (2002) Regulation of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (ABCC2) by the nuclear receptors pregnane X receptor, farnesoid X-activated receptor, and constitutive androstane receptor. J Biol Chem 277: 2908-2915.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kessler FK, Kessler MR, Auyeung DJ, and Ritter JK (2002) Glucuronidation of acetaminophen catalyzed by multiple rat phenol UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Metab Dispos 30: 324-330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kliewer SA, Goodwin B, and Willson TM (2002) The nuclear pregnane X receptor: a key regulator of xenobiotic metabolism. Endocr Rev 23: 687-702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Koopen NR, Post SM, Wolters H, Havinga R, Stellaard F, Boverhof R, Kuipers F, and Princen HMG (1999) Differential effects of 17{alpha}-ethinylestradiol on the neutral and acidic pathway of bile salt synthesis in the rat. J Lipid Res 40: 100-108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Koopen NR, Wolters H, Havinga R, Vonk RJ, Jansen PLM, Müller M, and Kuipers F (1998) Impaired activity of the bile canalicular organic anion transporter (Mrp2/cmoat) is not the main cause of ethinylestradiol-induced cholestasis in the rat. Hepatology 27: 537-545.[CrossRef]

Lee JM, Trauner M, Soroka CJ, Stieger B, Meier PJ, and Boyer JL (2000) Expression of the bile salt export pump is maintained after chronic cholestasis in the rat. Gastroenterology 118: 163-172.[CrossRef][Medline]

Luquita MG, Catania VA, Sánchez Pozzi EJ, Veggi LM, Hoffman T, Pellegrino JM, Ikushiro S, Emi Y, Iyanagi T, Vore M, et al. (2001) Molecular basis of perinatal changes in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity in maternal rat liver. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298: 49-56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Manautou JE, De Waart DR, Kunne C, Zelcer N, Goedken M, Borst P, and Oude Elferink RPJ (2004) Altered disposition of acetaminophen in mice with a disruption of the Mrp3 gene. Hepatology 42: 1091-1098.[CrossRef]

Meier PJ, Knickelbein R, Moseley RH, Dobbins JW, and Boyer JL (1985) Evidence for carrier-mediated chloride/bicarbonate exchange in canalicular rat liver plasma membrane vesicles. J Clin Invest 75: 1256-1263.[Medline]

Miguet JP, Vuitton D, Thebault-Lucas A, Joanne C, and Dhumeaux D (1980) Spironolactone and enzyme induction in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 78: 996-1000.[Medline]

Nathanson MH and Boyer JL (1991) Mechanisms and regulation of bile secretion. Hepatology 14: 551-566.[CrossRef][Medline]

National Institutes of Health (1996) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, pp 25-28. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.

Ochs HR, Greenblat DJ, Bodem G, and Smith TW (1978) Spironolactone.Am Heart J 96: 389-400.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ogawa K, Suzuki H, Hirohashi T, Ishikawa T, Meier PJ, Hirose K, Akizawa T, Yoshioka M, and Sugiyama Y (2000) Characterization of inducible nature of MRP3 in rat liver. Am J Physiol 278: G438-G446.

Palma J, Reyes H, Ribalta J, Hernández I, Sandoval L, Almuna R, Liepins J, Lira F, Sedano M, Silva O, et al. (1997) Ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of cholestasis of pregnancy: a randomized, double-blind study controlled with placebo. J Hepatol 27: 1022-1028.[CrossRef][Medline]

Paumgartner G and Beuers U (2002) Ursodeoxycholic acid in cholestatic liver disease: mechanisms of action and therapeutic use revisited. Hepatology 36: 525-531.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rebbeor JF, Connolly GC, and Ballatori N (2002) Inhibition of Mrp2- and Ycf1p-mediated transport by reducing agents: evidence for GSH transport on rat Mrp2. Biochim Biophys Acta 1559: 171-178.[Medline]

Reyes H and Simon FR (1993) Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: an estrogen-related disease. Semin Liver Dis 13: 289-301.[Medline]

Ruiz ML, Villanueva SSM, Luquita MG, Sánchez Pozzi EJ, Crocenzi FA, Pellegrino JM, Ochoa JE, Vore M, Mottino AD, and Catania VA (2005) Mechanisms involved in spironolactone-induced choleresis in the rat. Role of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2. Biochem Pharmacol 69: 531-539.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ruiz ML, Villanueva SSM, Luquita MG, Vore M, Mottino AD, and Catania VA (2006) Ethynylestradiol increases expression and activity of rat liver Mrp3. Drug Metab Dispos 34: 1030-1034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sánchez Pozzi EJ, Crocenzi FA, Pellegrino JM, Catania VA, Luquita MG, Roma MG, Rodríguez Garay EA, and Mottino AD (2003) Ursodeoxycholate reduces ethinylestradiol glucuronidation in the rat: role in prevention of estrogen-induced cholestasis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 306: 279-286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schuetz EG, Brimer C, and Schuetz JD (1998) Environmental xenobiotics and the antihormone cyproterone acetate and spironolactone use the nuclear hormone pregnenolone X receptor to activate the Cyp3A23 hormone response element. Mol Pharmacol 54: 1113-1117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Teng S, Jekerle V, and Piquette-Miller M (2003) Induction of ABCC3 (MRP3) by pregnane X receptor activators. Drug Metab Dispos 31: 1296-1299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Trauner M, Arrese M, Soroka CJ, Ananthanarayanan M, Koeppel TA, Schlosser SF, Suchy FJ, Keppler D, and Boyer JL (1997) The rat canalicular conjugate export pump (mrp2) is down-regulated in intrahepatic and obstructive cholestasis. Gastroenterology 113: 255-264.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tzeng SJ, Chang WC, and Huang JD (2005) Transcriptional regulation of the rat Mrp3 gene promoter by the specificity protein (Sp) family members and CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins. J Biomed Sci 12: 741-761.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vore M (1987) Estrogen cholestasis. Membranes, metabolites, or receptors? Gastroenterology 93: 643-649.[Medline]

Xiong H, Turner KC, Ward ES, Jansen PL, and Brouwer KL (2000) Altered hepatobiliary disposition of acetaminophen glucuronide in isolated perfused livers from multidrug resistance-associated protein 2-deficient TR(-) rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295: 512-518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamamoto Y, Moore R, Hess HA, Guo GL, González FJ, Korach KS, Marconpot RR, and Negishi M (2006) Estrogen receptor alpha mediates 17 alpha-ethynylestradiol causing hepatotoxicity. J Biol Chem 281: 16625-16631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
A. Arias, S. S. M. Villanueva, M. L. Ruiz, M. G. Luquita, L. M. Veggi, J. M. Pellegrino, M. Vore, V. A. Catania, and A. D. Mottino
Regulation of Expression and Activity of Rat Intestinal Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2 by Cholestatic Estrogens
Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2009; 37(6): 1277 - 1285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.107.016519v1
35/11/2060    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Catania, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Catania, V. A.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition