QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dmd.106.014225v1 35/4/602    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mano, Y. Articles by Kamimura, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mano, Y. Articles by Kamimura, H.

Comparison of Inhibition Potentials of Drugs against Zidovudine Glucuronidation in Rat Hepatocytes and Liver Microsomes

Drug Metabolism Research Laboratories, Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan.

(Received December 6, 2006; accepted January 25, 2007)

	Abstract

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Hepatocytes and liver microsomes are considered to be useful for investigating drug metabolism catalyzed mainly via glucuronidation. However, there have been few reports comparing the glucuronidation inhibition potentials of drug in hepatocytes to those in liver microsomes. 3'-Azido-3'-deoxythymidine (AZT, zidovudine) glucuronidation (AZTG) is the major metabolic pathway for AZT. In this study, the inhibition potentials of drugs against UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)-catalyzed AZTG in the hepatocytes and liver microsomes of rats are compared. The AZTG inhibition potentials of diclofenac, diflunisal, fluconazole, indomethacin, ketoprofen, mefenamic acid, naproxen, niflumic acid, and valproic acid in liver microsomes and hepatocytes were investigated using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Diflunisal (inhibition type: noncompetitive) inhibited AZTG most potently in rat liver microsomes (RLMs) with an IC₅₀ value of 34 µM. The IC₅₀ values of diclofenac, fluconazole, indomethacin, ketoprofen, mefenamic acid, naproxen, niflumic acid, and valproic acid against AZTG in RLMs ranged from 34 to 1791 µM. Diclofenac, diflunisal, indomethacin, ketoprofen, naproxen, and valproic acid inhibited AZTG in hepatocytes with IC₅₀ values of 58, 37, 88, 361, 486, and 281 µM, respectively. These values were similar to those obtained in RLMs. In conclusion, the AZT glucuronidation inhibition potentials of drugs in the hepatocytes and liver microsomes of rats were found to be similar, and liver microsomes can be useful for evaluating UGT isozyme inhibition potentials.

The majority of inhibition studies on metabolic enzymes such as cytochrome P450 (P450) and UGT have been performed using liver microsomes. Although the present popular opinion may be that hepatocytes yield the most reliable values for estimating the metabolizing enzyme inhibition potential for drugs, there has been no evidence presented to demonstrate that hepatocytes are the best predictors of inhibition potential (Jones et al., 2004). A recent report by Engtrakul et al. (2005) showed that the IC₅₀ value of ibuprofen against AZT glucuronidation in human hepatocytes (170 µM) was significantly lower than that in human liver microsomes (HLMs) (975 µM). In addition, the authors caution against relying on inhibition potentials extrapolated from data obtained using liver microsomes. However, their study was performed with only one substrate-inhibitor pair, which indicates that studies with more pairs are necessary to determine whether hepatocytes generally yield more potent inhibition values than do liver microsomes. Although few studies have been reported in terms of comparing inhibitory potential of drug against glucuronidation, a number of reports comparing P450 isozyme-mediated metabolism inhibition in liver microsomes and hepatocytes are available. Di Marco et al. (2003) reported that pyrilamine, propafenone, verapamil, ketoconazole, and terfenadine inhibited dextromethorphan demethylation in rat liver microsomes and rat hepatocytes with similar potency. Jones et al. (2004) demonstrated that omeprazole inhibited diazepam metabolism to 4'-hydroxydiazepam, 3-hydroxydiazepam, and nordiazepam with similar IC₅₀ values in rat liver microsomes (RLMs) and hepatocytes.

In this study, the AZTG inhibition potencies of nine drugs, diclofenac, diflunisal, fluconazole, indomethacin, ketoprofen, mefenamic acid, naproxen, niflumic acid, and valproic acid (Fig. 1), in RLMs and cryopreserved rat hepatocytes were investigated. The glucuronidation inhibition potential in both liver matrices was then compared. This study provides data on the issue of whether in vitro testing of inhibitory potentials of drugs against drug metabolism in liver microsomes is representative of hepatic metabolism exemplified by the use of hepatocytes.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. Chemical structures of drugs investigated. A, diclofenac; B, diflunisal; C, fluconazole; D, indomethacin; E, ketoprofen; F, mefenamic acid; G, naproxen; H, niflumic acid; and I, valproic acid.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Chemicals and Reagents. AZT, diclofenac, fluconazole, indomethacin, ketoprofen, mefenamic acid, naproxen, and niflumic acid were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Diflunisal and valproic acid were purchased from ICN Biomedicals (Aurora, OH) and Wako Pure Chemicals (Osaka, Japan), respectively. AZT glucuronide was obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals Inc. (Toronto, ON, Canada). RLMs and cryopreserved rat hepatocytes were purchased from Xenotech (Kansas City, KS). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.

Glucuronidation in RLMs. AZT (2 mM) was incubated with RLMs (0.1 mg protein/ml) for 20 min in a final volume of 0.25 ml of Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7.5) containing 8 mM MgCl₂, 25 µg/ml alamethicin, and 5 mM UDPGA in both the presence and absence of drugs (diclofenac, diflunisal, fluconazole, indomethacin, ketoprofen, mefenamic acid, naproxen, niflumic acid, and valproic acid). The AZT concentration (2 mM) was below its K_m value (9.1 mM; Cretton et al., 1990). In a separate study, AZT (0.2–10 mM) was incubated with RLMs under the same conditions described above in the presence and absence of diflunisal (40 µM) to evaluate the type of inhibition diflunisal exerted against AZTG. Kinetic studies done in RLMs using different buffers were performed as stated above. The buffers tested were 100 mM sodium carbonate and Williams' Medium E (containing 2 mM L-glutamine) (WME), both of which apparently altered AZTG in HLMs, compared with the effects of Tris-HCl (Engtrakul et al., 2005). All buffers were prepared at pH 7.5. After the reaction mixture had been preincubated at 37°C for 5 min, the reaction was started by adding UDPGA at a final concentration of 5 mM. After incubating for 20 min in RLMs, the reaction was terminated by adding 0.05 ml of acetonitrile to precipitate the protein. Formic acid (10%, 0.01 ml) and the internal standard [0.02 ml of the deuterium isotope of AZT glucuronide (5 µg/ml)] were then added. Next, the samples were centrifuged at 1870g for 10 min to obtain the supernatant, aliquots (20 µl) of which were injected into a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) system. The substrate and inhibitors were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide to make an incubation mixture with a final dimethyl sulfoxide concentration of 1% (v/v).

Glucuronidation in Hepatocytes. Cryopreserved rat hepatocytes were stored in liquid nitrogen until use. Thawing was done according to the instructions supplied by Xenotech, after which the hepatocytes were suspended in enough WME to make a concentration of 2 x 10⁶ cells/ml. The viability, determined using the trypan blue exclusion method, was found to be >68.5%. The time profile for AZTG was assessed first. The hepatocyte suspension (2.5 x 10⁵ cells in 125 µl) was preincubated at 37°C for 3 min, after which the reactions were initiated by adding 125 µl of WME containing AZT (2 mM). After incubation at 37°C for the designated time, the reaction was terminated by adding acetonitrile (50 µl), followed by 10% formic acid (10 µl) and the internal standard (100 ng). The reaction mixtures were centrifuged at 1870g for 10 min, and aliquots of the supernatant (20 µl) were injected into the LC-MS/MS apparatus to determine the levels of AZT glucuronide. The kinetic study for AZTG and the inhibition effects of drugs on AZTG in rat hepatocytes were then addressed. AZT (0.2–10 mM) was incubated with hepatocytes (2.5 x 10⁵ cells) for 30 min using the same procedures described above. The inhibitory potentials of drugs (diclofenac, diflunisal, indomethacin, ketoprofen, naproxen, and valproic acid) were then evaluated. AZT (1 mM) was incubated for 30 min with hepatocytes (2.5 x 10⁵ cells) spiked with varying concentrations of these drugs. As a separate study, the effect of UDPGA levels on AZTG in hepatocytes was investigated using externally added UDPGA with a final concentration of 5 mM. The kinetic study for AZTG was then performed as described above.

Assay. The peak areas of AZT glucuronide and its internal standard were analyzed using LC-MS/MS (Mano et al., 2007). A TSQ7000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with an atmospheric pressure ionization source (Thermo Electron, Waltham, MA) was used. The atmospheric pressure ionization source was fitted with an electrospray ionization inlet for ionizing the analytes. Nitrogen was used as both the sheath and auxiliary gas with pressures of 80 psi and 40 units, respectively. Electron spray voltage was set at 4.5 kV and the heated capillary temperature was maintained at 350°C. AZT glucuronide and its internal standard were monitored in the negative ion mode using selected reaction monitoring by transmitting the molecular ions at m/z 442 and 445, respectively. These ions were subjected to collision-activated dissociation using argon (2.0 mtorr) at 20 eV, and then, the product ions were monitored at m/z 442 and 445 for AZT glucuronide and the internal standard, respectively. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a Capcellpak UG80 column (4.6 mm x 150 mm, 5 µm; Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The mobile phase was composed of 0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile (7:3, v/v). The standard curve for the AZT glucuronide was linear from 0.1 to 10 µM, and the correlation coefficient was >0.99. The relative errors of the back-calculated values at each concentration were less than 15%.

Data Analysis. The IC₅₀ value of each inhibitor was estimated from the inhibition against AZTG in the presence of inhibitors with varying concentrations by fitting the data to eq. 1, where I is the inhibitor concentration.

(1)

The K_i value of diflunisal was determined using eq. 2.

(2)

where CL_int' and CL_int represent the intrinsic clearance of AZTG in RLMs in the presence and absence of diflunisal, respectively. Prism Ver. 3.02 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) was used for the calculations.

	Results

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Glucuronidation in RLMs. The effect on AZTG inhibition caused by diclofenac, diflunisal, fluconazole, indomethacin, ketoprofen, mefenamic acid, naproxen, niflumic acid, and valproic acid in RLMs was investigated. Diflunisal had the most potent inhibitory effect with an IC₅₀ value of 34 ± 7.1 µM (mean ± computer-calculated S.E.). The IC₅₀ values of diclofenac, fluconazole, indomethacin, ketoprofen, naproxen, mefenamic acid, niflumic acid, and valproic acid were 40 ± 1.8, 1791 ± 226, 178 ± 37, 103 ± 3.9, 276 ± 7.7, 332 ± 9.5, 37 ± 0.9, 102 ± 5.8, and 538 ± 35 µM (Table 1), respectively.

The type of inhibition diflunisal exerts against AZTG was investigated in RLMs. In the absence of diflunisal, AZTG exhibited Michaelis-Menten kinetics with K_m and V_max values of 10 ± 1.8 mM and 1345 ± 152 pmol/min/mg protein, respectively (Fig. 2). In the presence of 40 µM diflunisal, the V_max value was reduced to 666 ± 75 pmol/min/mg protein, whereas the K_m value (8.2 ± 1.6 mM) was similar to that without diflunisal. The inset in Fig. 2, an Eadie-Hofstee plot, suggests that one or more isozymes with similar K_m values are involved in AZTG, and that diflunisal inhibits AZTG in a noncompetitive manner with a K_i value of 61 µM.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2. Inhibitory effects of diflunisal on AZT glucuronidation in RLMs. AZT (0.2–10 mM) was incubated in the presence () and absence () of diflunisal (40 µM) in RLMs (0.1 mg protein/ml) for 20 min. The x and y axes represent the substrate concentration and AZT glucuronidation velocity, respectively. The Eadie-Hofstee plot is presented as an inset. Each incubation was performed in duplicate, and the data represent the mean.

Glucuronidation in Hepatocytes. The time profile for the formation of AZT glucuronide was investigated in cryopreserved rat hepatocytes. The data showed that the glucuronidation velocity was linear for at least 60 min during incubation (Fig. 3A). The kinetics of AZTG was next evaluated using varying concentrations of AZT as a substrate for glucuronidation. The AZT concentration-velocity curve adheres to typical Michaelis-Menten kinetics, and the Eadie-Hofstee plot implies that more than one UGT isozyme is involved in AZTG. The K_m value for the high-affinity isozyme was estimated to be 1.0 ± 0.4 mM, and the V_max and CL_ns (clearance for low-affinity isozymes) values were 64 ± 15 pmol/min/10⁶ cells and 4.4 ± 1.3 nl/min/10⁶ cells, respectively (Fig. 3B). The impact of UDPGA levels on AZTG was also assessed in cryopreserved hepatocytes. When hepatocytes were incubated with externally added UDPGA (5 mM), the resulting Eadie-Hofstee plot suggested that one or more isozymes with similar K_m values were involved in AZTG as they were in RLMs, with K_m and V_max values of 3.2 ± 0.4 mM and 275 ± 12 pmol/min/10⁶ cells, respectively.

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3. AZT glucuronidation in cryopreserved rat hepatocytes. Time profiles for the formation of AZT glucuronide (A) and kinetics for AZT glucuronidation (B) are presented. The Eadie-Hofstee plot is presented as an inset (B). AZT (2 mM) was incubated with rat hepatocytes (2.5 x 105 cells) for the times designated (A), and AZT (0.2–10 mM) was incubated with rat hepatocytes (2.5 x 105 cells) for 30 min (B). Each incubation was performed in triplicate, and the data represent the mean ± S.D.

The inhibitory effects of diclofenac, diflunisal, indomethacin, ketoprofen, naproxen, and valproic acid on AZTG were then assessed in rat hepatocytes. Diclofenac, diflunisal, indomethacin, ketoprofen, naproxen, and valproic acid inhibited AZTG with IC₅₀ values of 58 ± 2.2, 37 ± 2.2, 88 ± 16, 361 ± 34, 486 ± 52, and 281 ± 52 µM, respectively (Table 1). The IC₅₀ values for these drugs against AZTG in hepatocytes were compared with those in RLMs. Representative AZTG inhibition profiles (indomethacin) in RLMs and hepatocytes are presented in Fig. 4. The AZTG inhibition potentials of the drugs investigated were found to be similar in both types of matrices (Fig. 5).

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4. Inhibition of AZT glucuronidation by indomethacin in the liver microsomes (A) and cryopreserved hepatocytes (B) of rats. AZT (2 mM) was incubated with liver microsomes (0.1 mg protein/ml) for 20 min (A), and AZT (1 mM) was incubated with hepatocytes (2.5 x 105 cells) for 30 min (B), with varying concentrations of indomethacin. Each incubation was performed in duplicate, and data represent the mean.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5. Comparison of the AZT glucuronidation inhibition potentials of drugs in RLMs and cryopreserved rat hepatocytes. AZT (2 or 1 mM) was incubated separately with RLMs (0.1 mg protein/ml) and hepatocytes (2.5 x 105 cells) for 20 and 30 min, respectively, in the presence or absence of inhibitors. The x and y axes represent the IC50 values in RLMs and hepatocytes, respectively, and the solid and dashed lines represent the line of unity and 2-fold differences, respectively. Dic, diclofenac; Dif, diflunisal; In, indomethacin; K, ketoprofen; Na, naproxen; V, valproic acid.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Although AZTG is catalyzed mainly by UGT2B7 in humans, the UGT isozyme responsible for catalysis in rats remains to be investigated. Despite this deficit, the Eadie-Hofstee plot in Fig. 2 suggests that one or more isozymes with similar K_m values are involved in AZTG. The K_m value for AZT in RLMs (10 mM) is consistent with that in the previous report (9.1 mM; Cretton et al., 1990). It should be noted that the solubility of AZT is less than that necessary to obtain accurate kinetic parameters in RLMs; however, the K_m value obtained is similar to the one reported. The K_m value for AZTG in rat hepatocytes (1.0 mM; Fig. 3B) was lower than that in RLMs (10 mM). This is a phenomenon similar to one that occurred in the previous study; the K_m value for AZTG in human hepatocytes was much lower than that in HLMs (87 versus 760 µM; Engtrakul et al., 2005). The reason for this discrepancy remains to be determined, although the active transport systems involved in AZT uptake in the hepatocytes might be responsible. It has also been reported that AZT is a substrate for rat organic anion transporter 2, which is abundantly expressed in the liver (Morita et al., 2001). Buffer systems in HLMs (Engtrakul et al., 2005) and differences in the environment surrounding the UGT isozymes might contribute to the differences in the K_m values. The levels of UDPGA, a glucuronidation cofactor, might also be behind the differences between the two matrices. In RLMs, enough UDPGA was added to the reaction mixtures to make a concentration of 5 mM, but no cofactor was added to the rat hepatocytes. Therefore, the UDPGA levels in the hepatocytes might have been insufficient, given the high concentration of AZT. To find potential factors that may contribute, at least partially, to the differences in the kinetic parameters of AZTG between hepatocytes and liver microsomes, the impact of UDPGA levels and buffer incubation conditions on AZTG in hepatocytes and RLMs was determined. Externally added 5 mM UDPGA significantly increased the K_m value to 3.2 mM, which is closer to that in RLMs, compared with that in hepatocytes that did not have UDPGA added (K_m 1.0 mM). In addition, the Eadie-Hofstee plot suggests that one or more isozymes with similar K_m values are involved in AZTG in hepatocytes, as was observed in RLMs (data not shown). Next, the effects of incubation buffers on AZTG were assessed in RLMs. Incubation in sodium carbonate buffer and WME resulted in a K_m value that decreased to 5.6 and 6.6 mM in RLMs, which is closer to that in hepatocytes incubated with 5 mM UDPGA (K_m 3.2 mM). A decrease in the K_m value for AZTG in sodium carbonate buffer was also observed in HLMs (Engtrakul et al., 2005). These findings suggest that buffer systems and UDPGA levels are at least partially involved in the differences in the K_m values for AZTG between RLMs and hepatocytes.

To compare the AZTG inhibition potentials of drugs in liver microsomes with those in hepatocytes, the IC₅₀ values were also determined in rat hepatocytes. Representative AZTG inhibition profiles (indomethacin) in RLMs and hepatocytes are presented in Fig. 4. The IC₅₀ values of diclofenac, diflunisal, indomethacin, ketoprofen, naproxen, and valproic acid in hepatocytes were similar to those in RLMs (Fig. 5). This finding differs from the previous report in that the IC₅₀ value of ibuprofen against AZTG in human hepatocytes was significantly lower than that in HLMs (170 versus 975 µM; Engtrakul et al., 2005). However, the study in human hepatocytes was carried out using only one substrate-inhibitor pair; thus, studies with more pairs are necessary to determine whether hepatocytes generally yield more potent inhibition values than liver microsomes. In addition, the inhibition potentials of drugs against various UGT isozymes should also be investigated using probe substrates for each isozyme. This could yield insight into whether care should be taken when liver microsomes are used to assess metabolizing enzyme inhibition potentials for drugs.

When the inhibitory potentials of the drugs are estimated, the nonspecific binding of the inhibitors to the incubation matrix should be taken into account. McGinnity et al. (2004) reported that the unbound fraction is a major contributing factor in the differences in apparent IC₅₀ values for recombinant CYP2C9 and hepatocytes in the incubation matrix. However, acidic drugs such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs tend to exhibit low nonspecific binding to the matrix (Austin et al., 2002; McGinnity et al., 2004). Thus, the nonspecific binding of inhibitors is considered to have only a slight effect on the apparent IC₅₀ value.

The previous report that similar IC₅₀ values of drugs are obtained between liver microsomes and hepatocytes against P450 isozyme-mediated metabolism (Di Marco et al., 2003; Jones et al., 2004) and the current study findings suggest that liver microsomes could be used as an in vitro system for assessing the metabolizing enzyme inhibition potentials of drugs.

In summary, the AZTG inhibition potentials of several drugs were investigated in RLMs and cryopreserved rat hepatocytes. The IC₅₀ values in liver microsomes and hepatocytes were found to be similar. These findings show that liver microsomes can be used to quantitatively determine the glucuronidation inhibition potentials of drugs.

	Footnotes

 
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://dmd.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/dmd.106.014225.

ABBREVIATIONS: UGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase; AZT, 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine; AZTG, AZT glucuronidation; P450, cytochrome P450; HLM, human liver microsome; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry; RLM, rat liver microsome; UDPGA, UDP-glucuronic acid; WME, Williams' Medium E.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Yuji Mano, Drug Metabolism Research Laboratories, Astellas Pharma Inc., 1-8, Azusawa 1-Chome, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 174-8511, Japan. E-mail: yuuji.mano{at}jp.astellas.com

	References

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 


Austin RP, Barton P, Cockroft SL, Wenlock MC, and Riley RJ (2002) The influence of nonspecific microsomal binding on apparent intrinsic clearance, and its prediction from physicochemical properties. Drug Metab Dispos 30: 1497–1503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Court MH, Krishnaswamy S, Hao Q, Duan SX, Patten CJ, Von Moltke LL, and Greenblatt DJ (2003) Evaluation of 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine, morphine, and codeine as probe substrates for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7) in human liver microsomes: specificity and influence of the UGT2B7*2 polymorphism. Drug Metab Dispos 31: 1125–1133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cretton EM, Waterhous DV, Bevan R, and Sommadossi JP (1990) Glucuronidation of 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine by rat and human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 18: 369–372.[Abstract]

Di Marco A, Yao D, and Laufer R (2003) Demethylation of radiolabelled dextromethorphan in rat microsomes and intact hepatocytes. Eur J Biochem 270: 3768–3777.[Medline]

Engtrakul JJ, Foti RS, Strelevitz TJ, and Fisher MB (2005) Altered AZT (3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine) glucuronidation kinetics in liver microsomes as an explanation for underprediction of in vivo clearance: comparison to hepatocytes and effect of incubation environment. Drug Metab Dispos 33: 1621–1627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jones HM, Hallifax D, and Houston JB (2004) Quantitative prediction of the in vivo inhibition of diazepam metabolism by omeprazole using rat liver microsomes and hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 32: 572–580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lertora JJ, Rege AB, Greenspan DL, Akula S, George WJ, Hyslop NE Jr, and Agrawal KC (1994) Pharmacokinetic interaction between zidovudine and valproic acid in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Pharmacol Ther 56: 272–278.[Medline]

Mano Y, Usui T, and Kamimura H (2007) Inhibitory potential of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 in human liver microsomes. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 63: 211–216.[CrossRef][Medline]

McGinnity DF, Soars MG, Urbanowicz RA, and Riley RJ (2004) Evaluation of fresh and cryopreserved hepatocytes as in vitro drug metabolism tools for the prediction of metabolic clearance. Drug Metab Dispos 32: 1247–1253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Morita N, Kusuhara H, Sekine T, Endou H, and Sugiyama Y (2001) Functional characterization of rat organic anion transporter 2 in LLC-PK1 cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298: 1179–1184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sahai J, Gallicano K, Pakuts A, and Cameron DW (1994) Effect of fluconazole on zidovudine pharmacokinetics in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis 169: 1103–1107.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Grime, P. J. H. Webborn, and R. J. Riley Functional Consequences of Active Hepatic Uptake on Cytochrome P450 Inhibition in Rat and Human Hepatocytes Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1670 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. S. Brown, A. Chadwick, and J. B. Houston Use of Isolated Hepatocyte Preparations for Cytochrome P450 Inhibition Studies: Comparison with Microsomes for Ki Determination Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2007; 35(11): 2119 - 2126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dmd.106.014225v1 35/4/602    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mano, Y. Articles by Kamimura, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mano, Y. Articles by Kamimura, H.