![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
(Received August 14, 2007; Accepted December 4, 2007)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although rodent studies make a compelling case for the importance of P-gp at the BBB in the CNS distribution of drugs, their ability to predict the magnitude of P-gp-based drug interactions at the human BBB has not been investigated. Due to safety and ethical reasons, it has not been possible to measure in vivo human BBB P-gp activity. With the development by our laboratory of a noninvasive positron emission topography (PET) imaging method to measure P-gp-based drug interactions at the human BBB, a quantitative comparison of drug interactions at the brain P-gp barrier is now possible (Sasongko et al., 2005
; Hsiao et al., 2006
).
In our PET imaging study, the brain distribution of [11C]verapamil, a well established P-gp substrate, was quantitatively monitored in healthy subjects in the presence and absence of the P-gp inhibitor CsA. The results showed that P-gp at the human BBB limits the entry of [11C]verapamil into the brain. In the absence of CsA, 11C radioactivity AUCbrain/AUCblood ratio was 0.55 ± 0.03, and it increased to 1.02 ± 0.05 in the presence of CsA. CsA almost doubled the entry of 11C radioactivity into the brain by inhibiting P-gp (Sasongko et al., 2005
). Consistent with this result, in rats and at the same blood concentrations of CsA as those achieved in humans (
3 µM), P-gp inhibition at the rat BBB was modest with excellent quantitative correlation with that obtained in humans [75 versus 79% increase in total 3H radioactivity distribution into the brain for rats and humans, respectively (Hsiao et al., 2006
)].
Although the above correlation is excellent, it is a correlation of in vivo rodent data with in vivo human data. Therefore, we asked whether such interactions could be predicted from in vitro cell-based assay, which is high-throughput, simple, and cost-effective. In this communication, we report the inhibition of P-gp by CsA and several other inhibitors, in stable LLCPK1 cells expressing the recombinant MDR1 gene (LLCPK1-MDR1) (Woodahl et al., 2004
), using verapamil-bodipy as a substrate. We determined whether the EC50 of P-gp inhibition by CsA in this cell system was predictive of the EC50 previously observed by us at the rat BBB (Hsiao et al., 2006
). In addition, we asked whether the in vitro LLCPK1-MDR1 cells could quantitatively predict the inhibition of P-gp observed by us in vivo at the human BBB using PET and [11C]verapamil (Sasongko et al., 2005
).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture. Stable LLCPK1 cells expressing recombinant MDR1 (LLCPK1-MDR1) or control cells (no detectable P-gp expression) were grown in complete media consisting of RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum and 1% (v/v) antibiotic-antimycotic and grown at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2. The characteristics of these cells, including P-gp expression in the LLCPK1-MDR1 and the control cells, have been described elsewhere (Woodahl et al., 2004
).
Verapamil-Bodipy Accumulation Assay. Cells with passage numbers 12 to 40 were plated at a density of 1 x 105 cells/well (100 µl per well) on a 96-well plate (Corning Life Sciences, Acton, MA) and grown overnight. The cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline followed by incubation for 1 h at 37°C in serum-free media in the presence of 5% CO2 containing 0.3 µM verapamil-bodipy, 0.2% dimethyl sulfoxide, and varying concentrations of P-gp inhibitors (10 concentrations of each inhibitor with each concentration conducted in quadruplicate). After washing and replacing with phosphate-buffered saline, the verapamil-bodipy content of cells was measured by a fluorescence plate reader (ex/em: 485/535 nm).
Data Analysis. Using nonlinear regression (WinNonlin; Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA), the Hill equation was fit to the fold increase in intracellular fluorescence (relative to that observed in the absence of the inhibitor) as a function of increasing inhibitor concentration. The mean EC50 of each inhibitor was determined from at least 3 independent experiments. Unless otherwise stated, data are presented as mean ± S.D.
Comparison with Previously Published in Vivo Rat and Human PET Data. We have previously published studies (Sasongko et al., 2005
; Hsiao et al., 2006
) where we determined the inhibition of P-gp-mediated radiolabeled-verapamil efflux across the BBB by CsA. In the rat study, we determined the EC50 of CsA P-gp inhibition at increasing pseudo steady-state CsA blood concentrations, whereas in the human study we determined P-gp inhibition at the BBB at a single steady-state blood CsA concentration of 2.8 µM.
In the rat study, anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats were administered i.v. infusion of CsA to achieve increasing pseudo steady-state blood concentrations until maximal P-gp inhibition was achieved. An i.v. bolus dose of [3H]verapamil (
14 µCi) was administered when pseudo steady-state blood CsA concentration was achieved (n = 5 or greater per each concentration group). The animals were sacrificed 20 min after [3H]verapamil dose administration to determine blood, plasma, and brain 3H radioactivity by scintillation counting. Details of the sampling scheme, specimen processing techniques, and data analysis procedures are described thoroughly in our previously published study (Hsiao et al., 2006
).
For the human study, experimental conditions similar to those in the rat study were used, except that the distribution of 11C radioactivity in the brain was measured at a single pseudo steady-state blood CsA concentration of 2.8 µM using PET. [11C]Verapamil (
0.2 mCi/kg) was administered to healthy volunteers (n = 12, 6 females and 6 males) as an i.v. infusion over
1 min before and after at least 1 h of infusion of CsA (2.5 mg/kg/h). Arterial blood samples and brain PET images were obtained at frequent intervals over 45 min. The brain uptake of 11C radioactivity (brain/blood at 45 min) was determined in the presence and absence of CsA. For additional details on the methods, the reader is referred to Sasongko et al. (2005
).
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The EC50 of each inhibitor was determined based on 3 or more independent experiments (Table 1). The Hill equation was fit to the fold increase in intracellular fluorescence as a function of increasing inhibitor concentration to estimate the Emax, the EC50, and the Hill coefficient (
). The observed EC50 values were specific to P-gp, as no or minimal change in intracellular fluorescence was observed in the control cells. Although the EC50 of many of these drugs has been previously determined, the reported values (Table 1) have a huge variability. This makes it impossible to use these values for in vitro-to-in vivo prediction of drug interactions. Hence, we determined the EC50 of these drugs in our own laboratory using a single methodology and a single transfected cell line.
|
|
The in vitro EC50 of CsA (0.6 ± 0.3 µM) (obtained using protein-free media) was remarkably consistent with the in vivo unbound EC50 of 0.47 ± 0.004 µM at the rat BBB (Table 1; Fig. 1) [the unbound EC50 value was computed using the reported CsA fraction unbound of 6% in the rat (Bernareggi and Rowland, 1991
; Hsiao et al., 2006
)]. In the presence of complete inhibition of P-gp, the maximal increase in verapamil accumulations in the LLCPK1-MDR1 cells is much less (
150% increase, Fig. 1) than the maximal increase in the brain distribution of [3H]verapamil observed in the rat (Endres et al., 2006
; Hsiao et al., 2006
). This difference is not surprising, as the in vitro system does not incorporate binding of verapamil to brain tissue. Therefore, the ratio of the Emax of the two systems can be used as a scaling factor to conduct in vitro-to-in vivo predictions of verapamil-CsA interaction at the human BBB. Such a scaling factor assumes that the Emax at the human BBB is similar to that observed at the rat BBB.
We then asked whether this in vitro data as well as the in vitro EC50 of CsA, adjusted by the scaling factor, would have predicted the magnitude of in vivo P-gp inhibition obtained in humans using PET. In our human PET study (Sasongko et al., 2005
), a steady-state CsA blood concentration of 2.8 µM (0.2 µM unbound) resulted in a 79% increase in the distribution of 11C radioactivity into the brain. At the same unbound CsA blood concentration, our in vitro studies predicted a similar increase of 129% in human brain/blood radioactivity (Fig. 2).
|
In conclusion, this is the first in vitro study to quantitatively predict the in vivo inhibition of P-gp transport activity at the human BBB. The remarkable agreement between the in vitro and the in vivo data suggests that our in vitro cell culture method has the potential to be an excellent model to predict the in vivo inhibition of P-gp at the human BBB. The utility of this high throughput in vitro assay, in conjunction with the rat, to predict P-gp-based drug interactions at the human BBB seems to be promising. As discussed above, additional in vitro and in vivo human studies with other inhibitors, such as quinine or quinidine, are needed to further validate this excellent in vitro-to-in vivo prediction.
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: P-gp, P-glycoprotein; BBB, blood-brain-barrier; CsA, cyclosporine A; PET, positron emission tomography; PSC833, valspodar; GF120918, elacridar, N-(4-[2-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6,7-dimethoxy-2-isoquinolinyl)ethyl]-phenyl)-9,10-dihydro-5-methoxy-9-oxo-4-acridine carboxamide; LY335979, zosuquidar; CNS, central nervous system.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Jashvant Unadkat, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Box 357610, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail: jash{at}u.washington.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Eyal, F. S. Chung, M. Muzi, J. M. Link, D. A. Mankoff, A. Kaddoumi, F. O'Sullivan, M. F. Hebert, and J. D. Unadkat Simultaneous PET Imaging of P-Glycoprotein Inhibition in Multiple Tissues in the Pregnant Nonhuman Primate J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 798 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||