DMD Large equally mixed donor pool

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on February 6, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.019034


0090-9556/08/3605-971-979$20.00
DMD 36:971-979, 2008

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.107.019034v1
dmd.107.019034v2
36/5/971    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dopp, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rettenmeier, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dopp, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rettenmeier, A. W.

Subcellular Distribution of Inorganic and Methylated Arsenic Compounds in Human Urothelial Cells and Human Hepatocytes

Elke Dopp, Ursula von Recklinghausen, Louise M. Hartmann, Inga Stueckradt, Ilona Pollok, Sasan Rabieh, Liping Hao, Andreas Nussler, Cindy Katier, Alfred V. Hirner, and Albert W. Rettenmeier

Institute of Hygiene and Occupational Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany (E.D., U.v.R., I.S., I.P., A.W.R.); Institute of Environmental Analysis, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany (L.M.H., S.R., A.V.H.); Chemical Research Department, Matís, Reykjavík, Iceland (S.R.); Department of Traumatology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (L.H., A.N.); Department of Toxicology, University of Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands (C.K.)

(Received October 12, 2007; accepted January 31, 2008)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Epidemiological studies have indicated that exposure of humans to inorganic arsenic in drinking water is associated with the occurrence of bladder cancer. The mechanisms by which arsenic induces this malignancy are still uncertain; however, arsenic metabolites are suspected to play a pivotal role. The aim of the present study was the investigation of uptake capabilities of human urothelial cells (UROtsa) compared with primary human hepatocytes (phH) as well as the intracellular distribution of the arsenic species. Additionally, we were interested in the cyto- and genotoxic potential (comet assay, radical generation) of the different arsenic compounds in these two cell types. Our results show that UROtsa cells accumulate higher amounts of the arsenic species than the phH. Differential centrifugation revealed that the arsenic compounds are preferentially distributed into nuclei and ribosomes. After 24-h exposure, arsenic is mainly found in the ribosomes of UROtsa cells and in the nuclei and mitochondria of phH. In contrast to the pentavalent arsenic species, the trivalent species induced a 4- to 5-fold increase of DNA damage in hepatocytes. Radical generation, measured by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, was more pronounced in hepatocytes than in urothelial cells. In summary, the uptake of arsenic compounds appears to be highly dependent upon cell type and arsenic species. The nonmethylating urothelial cells accumulate higher amounts of arsenic species than the methylating hepatocytes. However, cyto- and genotoxic effects are more distinct in hepatocytes. Further studies are needed to define the implications of the observed accumulation in cellular organelles for the carcinogenic activity of arsenic.


The association between arsenic exposure and urinary bladder cancer, typically transitional cell carcinomas, has been observed in the same endemic areas of the world in which skin cancer populations have been identified (Chiou et al., 1995Go). In addition to bladder and skin cancer, chronic arsenic exposure causes several malignant and nonmalignant human diseases [for review, see Tseng (2007Go)], including liver cancer. Inorganic arsenic [Asi(III), Asi(V)] from drinking water is the most common source of human exposure at high concentrations. At levels below the recommended arsenic concentration in drinking water (10 µg/l) (World Health Organization, 2001Go), the diet is considered the major source of inorganic arsenic.

Following uptake, inorganic arsenic undergoes biotransformation to mono- [MMA(III), MMA(V)], di- [DMA(III), DMA(V)], and trimethylated [TMA(III), TMAO(V)] metabolites. A proportion of the inorganic arsenicals together with mainly pentavalent (+5) methylated metabolites [mainly DMA(V)] are excreted in urine. Trivalent (+3) methylated metabolites are detected in urine to a much lesser extent than the +5 species and the inorganic arsenicals (Aposhian and Aposhian, 2006Go). The generally accepted pathway of arsenic biotransformation (Challenger, 1945Go) consists of a series of reductions and oxidative methylations. In the sequence of reactions, the +5 oxidative arsenic species are always formed before the analogous +3 arsenic species.

Recently, Hayakawa et al. (2005Go) proposed a new metabolic pathway for arsenic biotransformation in which the +3 arsenic species are formed before the respective +5 species. The trivalent metabolites are oxidized by hydrogen peroxide or other agents to the pentavalent species, which are considered end products of arsenic metabolism.

It is generally accepted that the +3 methylated arsenic species are more cyto- and genotoxic (e.g., Styblo et al., 2000Go; Mass et al., 2001Go; Aposhian et al., 2003Go; Kligerman et al., 2003Go; Dopp et al., 2004Go) and are more potent enzyme inhibitors (e.g., Styblo et al., 1997aGo, 2002Go; Schuliga et al., 2002Go; Chang et al., 2003Go) than the pentavalent counterparts and the inorganic arsenic species. Genotoxicity of arsenic species does not involve direct interaction with DNA. It has been suggested that indirect processes such as oxidative damage evoked by reactive oxygen species (Basu et al., 2001Go; Gebel, 2001Go; Kenyon and Hughes, 2001Go; Liu et al., 2001Go, 2005Go; Ahmad et al., 2002Go; Nesnow et al., 2002Go; Kitchin and Ahmad, 2003Go;) and the inhibition of DNA repair (Hughes, 2002Go; Rossman, 2003Go; Schwerdtle et al., 2003aGo) are implicated.

The kinetics of Asi methylation have been studied in vitro using recombinant rat As(+3 oxidation state)-methyltransferase (As3MT; previously designated cyt19) (Devesa et al., 2004Go; Waters et al., 2004Go). Human As3MT is encoded by a gene orthologous to rat As3MT (Lin et al., 2002Go) and is expressed in primary human hepatocytes (Drobná et al., 2004Go), cells which are efficient methylators of Asi(III) (Styblo et al., 1999Go; Drobná et al., 2004Go). In contrast, As3MT is not expressed in UROtsa cells, a SV-40-transformed normal human urinary bladder epithelial cell line that lacks the metabolic competence to methylate Asi(III) (Styblo et al., 2000Go; Lin et al., 2002Go).

As shown in former studies of our group, uptake of arsenic compounds is highly dependent upon the cell type. A comparison of the uptake capabilities of fibroblasts (CHO-9) and hepatic cells revealed that organic and inorganic arsenicals are taken up to a higher degree by the nonmethylating fibroblasts compared with the methylating hepatoma cells. We observed an increased resistance to intracellular accumulation of arsenic in the hepatic cells when compared with CHO-9 cells, which was either due to an increased resistance at the uptake level or to an enhanced efflux rate (Dopp et al., 2005Go). DMA(III) proved to be the most membrane-permeable arsenic species in all studies (up to 16% uptake from the external medium), probably because of its neutral charge, which allows it to diffuse easily into cells. In contrast, the pentavalent methylated arsenic species are negatively charged at physiological pH and were poorly taken up by all tested cell lines (0% to maximum 2%) (Dopp et al., 2005Go).

In the present study, human urothelial cells (UROtsa) and human primary hepatocytes were chosen for the investigations because of the marked difference in capacity to methylate Asi. We compared the intracellular accumulation and the subcellular distribution of arsenic compounds in dependence upon exposure time. The cell organelles (ribosomes, mitochondria, nuclei, etc.) were isolated by differential centrifugation, and the arsenic content of the different fractions was determined by ICP-MS. Also, we examined the cyto- and genotoxic potential of the different arsenic compounds in these two cell types and measured the generation of free radicals.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell Cultures. UROtsa cells were kindly provided by Dr. D. Sens and Dr. S. Garrett (Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND). This cell line had been generated by isolation from a primary human bladder epithelium and immortalization with the SV-40 large T antigen (Rossi et al., 2001Go). The UROtsa cells were cultivated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium enriched with 10% fetal bovine serum, glutamine (20 ml/l), and penicillin/streptomycin (100 µg/ml) at 37°C and 5% CO2.

Primary human hepatocytes were isolated from normal liver wedge resections by collagenase-P digestion (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany) in accordance with institutional guidelines as described by Nussler et al. (1992Go) and Dorko et al. (1994Go). Briefly, after enzymatic digestion, hepatocytes were separated from nonparenchymal cells by differential centrifugation at 50g and then passed over a 30% Percoll (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) gradient at a concentration of 106 cells/ml Percoll to obtain a highly purified cell population. Hepatocyte purity and viability assessed by microscopy was greater than 90%, and viability consistently exceeded 90% as determined by trypan blue exclusion. Freshly isolated human hepatocytes were plated onto gelatin-coated culture trays at a density of 5 x 104 cells/cm2. Medium consisted of Williams' medium E (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with added hydrocortisone (0.025%), insulin (0.08%), HEPES (1.5%), L-glutamine (1%), gentamicin (0.5%), and 10% low endotoxin calf serum.

Reagents. Sodium arsenite (AsNaO2) and sodium arsenate (AsHNa2O4·7H20) were purchased from Fluka (Seelze, Germany) and Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany), respectively. Dimethylarsinic acid (Me2AsOOH) was obtained from Strem (Kehl, Germany), and monomethylarsonic acid [MeAsO(OH)2] as well as trimethylarsine oxide (Me3AsO) from Tri-Chemical Laboratories, Inc. (Yamanashi, Japan). Both methyldiiodoarsine (MeAsI2) and dimethyliodoarsine (Me2AsI) were purchased from Argus Chemicals (Vernio, Italy). Preparation of dilute solutions of these iodide precursors results in the formation of the corresponding acids, monomethylarsonous acid [MeAs(OH)2] and dimethylarsinous acid (Me2AsOH) (Millar et al., 1960Go; Gong et al., 2001Go). All chemicals were of analytical grade or of the highest quality obtainable. Solutions of arsenicals were prepared in sterile McCoy's 5A medium and stored at -20°C until used. The stability of the arsenicals in the culture medium was tested by high-performance liquid chromatography–hydride generation–atomic fluorescence spectrometry (HPLC-HG-AFS) using the method of Le et al. (1996Go). Due to the high volatility and sensitivity to oxidation of dimethylarsinous acid, solutions of this arsenic compound were always prepared immediately before each experiment and were discarded if not fully used within a 2-day period. All other arsenicals tested, including the trivalent compounds sodium arsenite and monomethylarsonous acid, were found to be stable over a minimum period of 2 months. The arsenic reagents used in the experiments are listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Arsenical reagents used in the experiments

 

Differential Centrifugation for Exploration of Subcellular Distribution of Arsenic Compounds. Human urothelial cells and primary human hepatocytes were exposed to the different arsenic compounds for 1 and 24 h in subtoxic concentrations ranging from 5 µM to 5 mM. Culture flasks (75 cm2) were seeded with 106 cells in 10-ml culture medium and incubated 24 h for attachment. Then cells were exposed to the arsenicals in a subtoxic concentration. Following the exposure, cells were washed twice with PBS, harvested by trypsin treatment, and resuspended in PBS. After the cell number was counted, the cell suspension was centrifuged at 300g for 5 min, and the obtained pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of distilled water for 30 min to lyse the cells. Clumps of unbroken and ruptured cells were removed by centrifugation at 300g for 5 min. Aliquots (2 ml) of the supernatant were collected (sample F) for ICP-MS analysis. The subsequent fractionation procedure is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1.


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Method of differential centrifugation used in the experiments for separation of cell organelles

 
ICP-MS Analysis. For analysis of the total intracellular arsenic concentrations, 5 x 106 UROtsa cells or hepatocytes were exposed to the arsenic compounds in a concentration range of 0.1 µM to 10 mM for 1 h. Experiments were repeated twice. After incubation, cells were washed with PBS and subsequently resuspended in 10 ml of fresh culture medium. Following counting of cells, the cell suspension was centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 rpm, and the pellet was resuspended in 15 ml of distilled water/sample to crack the cells. The incubation period with distilled water lasted at least 30 min, and the suspension was controlled under microscope if any integer cell was left. From this cell solution two kinds of samples were prepared: whole-cell extract with membranes and proteins present and cell-free (membrane-removed) extract, obtained by osmotic lysis of the whole-cell extract with subsequent centrifugation (1,700g, 15 min) to remove the membranes. The samples were stored at -20°C until ICP-MS analysis.

Total arsenic concentrations in the cell extracts and fractions were determined by ICP-MS (Agilent 7500a; Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The ICP mass spectrometer was operated at 1260 W rf-power, with argon flows of 15 l min-1 (plasma gas), 0.98 l min-1 (carrier gas), and 0.9 l min-1 (auxiliary gas). Solutions (up to 1 in 100 dilutions) were delivered at 0.3 ml/min to a Babington nebulizer and routed through a double-pass Scott-type spray chamber maintained at 2°C. The signals 75As (1000 ms), 77Cl (500 ms), and 115In (1000 ms) were monitored. Apart from the signal obtained at m/z 75 for the analyte arsenic and from that at m/z 115 for the internal standard indium, the signal at m/z 77 was monitored in order to control chloride interference. Quantitation was performed by external calibration with an arsenate standard solution and validated by analyzing CRM SERO B2.

Cytotoxicity Test. UROtsa cells and primary human hepatocytes (state of confluence, maximum 70%) were exposed to the different arsenic compounds for 1 and 24 h. Cell viability was evaluated immediately after treatment. Exposed and unexposed cells were harvested by trypsin treatment (Sigma). Cell counting was performed following trypan blue staining. The cell suspension was mixed with an equivalent volume of 0.4% trypan blue solution (Sigma) and subsequently evaluated under the light microscope. The membrane of dead cells is permeable to trypan blue (blue-stained cells), whereas living cells remain unstained. Cell viability is expressed as percentage of surviving cells compared with the total number of cells. Significance was tested by using Student's t test.

Radical Formation. Radical measurement was evaluated by the thiobarbituric acid test. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were determined in the supernatant incubation solution after various incubation times; 106 cells were cultivated in 3 ml of culture medium for 24 h at 37°C. Then cells were exposed to the arsenic compounds for defined periods of time. Fe/8HQ (1.6 µl/ml) and the culture medium were added as a positive and a negative control, respectively. After the exposure for different time intervals, 1 ml of the sample was mixed with 200 µl of iced trichloracetic acid (30%) to precipitate the protein and thereafter centrifuged at 3000g for 5 min. Then 1 ml of the supernatant was incubated with 500 µl of thiobarbituric acid (1%) in a water bath at 95°C for 10 min. Thus, malondialdehyde (MDA) formed a colored stable connection with thiobarbituric acid. After centrifugation at 900g for 5 min, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured in a spectral photometer at 532 nm. The amount of the formed TBARS was expressed as MDA equivalents in the supernatant. The concentration of the TBARS (nmol/ml) was calculated by external calibration. The experiment was performed in duplicate.

Comet Assay. DNA double-strand breaks in individual nuclei of cells were measured by single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay). Primary human hepatocytes were cultivated for 24 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 in Williams' medium. Aliquots of 104 cells were suspended in 45 µl of low-melting point agarose (0.75% in PBS, prewarmed at 75°C and kept at 42°C; Metaphor; Biozym, Hamburg, Germany) and dispensed to the wells. After coagulation the frames were removed, and the gels on the film were soaked overnight at 4°C in buffer (2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, 1% n-laurylsarcosinate, 10% dimethyl sulfoxide, and 1% Triton X-100, pH 10) to lyse cell membranes. DNA was denatured by alkaline treatment (300 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, pH 12.7) for 15 min, and electrophoresis was run in the same buffer for 15 min at 250 mA. After neutralization in 400 mM Tris at pH 7.5 for 30 min, gels were dehydrated in absolute ethanol for 2 h and air-dried. Before the evaluation of comet formation, gel films were rehydrated, and the nuclear DNA was stained with SYBR-Green (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) (1:104 dilution in tris-acetate EDTA buffer with 30 mM Tris, 0.11% acetic acid, and 1 mM EDTA) for 20 min. Slides were analyzed for tail moment (product of the proportion of tail intensity and the displacement of tail center of mass relative to the center of the head) within 2 days using the Comet Assay IV Software, version 4.11 (Perspective Instruments Ltd., Suffolk, UK). Again, significance was tested by using Student's t test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cytotoxicity Studies. The cytotoxicity of arsenic compounds in UROtsa cells and human hepatocytes was analyzed at an exposure time of 1 or 24 h at concentrations ranging from 0.5 µM to 5 mM using the trypan blue test. The pentavalent arsenic compounds MMA(V), DMA(V), and TMAO(V) did not show any cytotoxicity in the tested concentration range (cell viability consistently higher than 90%) and, therefore, data are not presented in Table 2 and Fig. 2. DMA(III) was the most cytotoxic compound, followed by MMA(III). DMA(III) induced ≥50% cell death in UROtsa cells at a concentration of 15 µM and at a concentration of 13 µM in hepatocytes after 1 h of exposure time (Table 2). The inorganic trivalent form of arsenic [Asi(III)] was found to be cytotoxic (>50% cell death) in UROtsa cells at 170 µM and in hepatocytes at 130 µM (24-h exposure). After 24-h exposure, MMA(III) was cytotoxic in UROtsa cells at a concentration of 18 µM and in primary human hepatocytes at a concentration of 12.4 µM. We conclude from our results that cytotoxic effects are generally more pronounced in hepatocytes compared with urothelial cells and that the trivalent organic arsenic species exert a higher cytotoxicity than the pentavalent equivalents. After 24-h exposure the cytotoxicity of the trivalent arsenic compounds was higher than after 1-h exposure (Table 2; Fig. 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 LC 50 values (50% cell death) of arsenic compounds in UROtsa cells and in human hepatocytes after 1-h and 24-h exposure The pentavalent arsenic species MMA(V), DMA(V), and TMAO(V) were not cytotoxic in the tested concentration range up to 5 mM.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Cytotoxicity of arsenic compounds in UROtsa cells and human hepatocytes (exposure time: 1 h or 24 h).

 

Cellular Uptake and Subcellular Distribution of Arsenic Compounds. The uptake of the arsenic compounds by UROtsa cells and human hepatocytes was tested using concentrations from 0.1 µM to 5 mM at an exposure time of 1 h. In both cell lines a concentration-dependent uptake was observed for all compounds with a maximum at the highest applied concentration. Also in both cell lines, the trivalent arsenic compounds were better taken up than the pentavalent ones. The intracellular concentration was highest for DMA(III); 13.3% of the extracellularly applied arsenic concentration was found intracellularly in UROtsa cells (maximum uptake at 0.1 µM), and 4.2% was found in human hepatocytes (maximum uptake at 5 µM). MMA(III) and Asi(III) were taken up to a much lower extent: MMA(III) (maximum uptake at 5 µM) 0.18% by UROtsa cells, 1.2% by hepatocytes and Asi(III) (maximum uptake at 0.5 µM) (0.13% by UROtsa cells, 0.63% by hepatocytes). The cellular uptake of the pentavalent arsenic compounds by both cell types was in general very low (<0.01 ng/106 cells). The maximum uptake was found for Asi(V) and DMA(V) at a 0.5-µM extracellular arsenic concentration in hepatocytes (0.97 and 0.63%, respectively) (Table 3). No significant difference in the concentration of arsenic species was observed between whole-cell extract and cell-free (membrane removed) extract for both types of cell lines (data not shown). These results indicate that arsenic species were not bound to cell membranes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Concentration-dependent uptake of arsenic compounds by UROtsa cells and human hepatocytes after 1-h exposure

 

The relative uptake of the arsenic compounds was higher at lower concentrations, indicating an inhibition of uptake or an increased efflux rate at higher concentrations. The same effect was already observed in former studies (Dopp et al., 2004Go, 2005Go).

Arsenic concentrations in subcellular fractions were analyzed by differential centrifugation of cell membrane-free extract. The subcellular distribution of the arsenic compounds was different in both cell lines and varied with exposure time (Fig. 3, a and b).


Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. A, subcellular distribution of arsenic in UROtsa cells and primary human hepatocytes after 1-h and 24-h exposure to Asi(III), MMA(III), or DMA(III). Used concentrations in HuHep: Asi(III) 1 h: 500 µM, 24 h: 50 µM; MMA(III) 1 h + 24 h: 50 µM; DMA(III) 1 h + 24 h: 5 µM. Used concentrations in UROtsa: Asi(III) 1 h: 500 µM, 24 h: 50 µM; MMA(III) 1 h: 500 µM, 24 h: 5 µM; DMA(III) 1 h + 24 h: 5 µM. B, subcellular distribution of arsenic in UROtsa cells and primary human hepatocytes after 1-h and 24-h exposure to Asi(V), MMA(V), DMA(V), and TMAO(V). Used concentrations in HuHep: Asi(V) 1 h: 5 mM, 24 h: 500 µM; MMA(V) 1 h + 24 h: 5 mM; DMA(V) 1 h + 24 h: 5 mM, TMAO(V) 1 h + 24 h: 5 mM. Used concentrations in UROtsa: Asi(V) 1 h: 5 mM, 24 h: 500 µM; MMA(V) 1 h + 24 h: 5 mM; DMA(V) 1 h + 24 h: 5 mM, TMAO(V) 1 h + 24 h: 5 mM. N, nuclei; M, mitochondria, lysosomes, peroxisomes; P, plasma membrane, microsomal fraction (fragments of endoplasmatic reticulum, large polyribosomes); R, ribosomal subunits, small polyribosomes; C, cytosol (soluble portion of cytoplasm).

 
In UROtsa cells arsenic was predominantly accumulated in the ribosomes (fraction R) but also in the nuclear fraction (N) and in fraction P (large polyribosomes) after 1 h of exposure. Most of the DMA(III) was found in the nuclear fraction (10.3%); most of the MMA(III) was located at the intracellular membranes, the endoplasmic reticulum, and large polyribosomes (P) (13%); and most of the Asi(III) was found in the ribosomal fraction (ribosomal subunits and small polyribosomes) (9.1%). However, 70 to 90% of the trivalent arsenic compounds were present in the cytosol (fraction C) [Asi(III): 87.9%; MMA(III): 77.7%; DMA(III): 73.9%; Fig. 3a].

After 24-h exposure the intracellular concentrations of trivalent arsenicals were decreased in all cases (Fig. 3a). This was in contrast to the results obtained after exposure of UROtsa cells to pentavalent arsenic species (Fig. 3b). Here, an accumulation of MMA(V), DMA(V), and Asi(V) was observed after 24-h exposure. Especially, MMA(V) was accumulated in fractions P (3.7%) and R (4.6%) and in the cytosol (90.1%).

UROtsa cells were able to accumulate higher amounts of arsenic compounds than primary hepatocytes. In particular, the arsenic concentrations in the cytosolic fraction (C) of UROtsa cells were increased in all cases compared with hepatocytes (Fig. 3, a and b).

In primary human hepatocytes, the trivalent arsenicals were mainly accumulated in the nucleus (N) and at the plasma membrane (P) after 1-h exposure. Most of the Asi(III) and MMA(III) was located in the nuclear fraction (N). DMA(III) was poorly located in the cell fractions after 1-h as well as after 24-h exposure. After 24-h exposure the trivalent arsenic compounds were mainly found in the nuclear fraction, the mitochondrial fraction, and at the plasma membrane (Fig. 3a).

Interestingly, MMA(V) was the only pentavalent arsenic compound that was accumulated in the nucleus, in mitochondria, and at the plasma membrane in human hepatocytes after 24-h exposure. All other pentavalent compounds were found at very low concentrations in the cell organelles of hepatocytes (Fig. 3b). An accumulation of MMA(V) and DMA(V) was detected in UROtsa cells after an extended exposure time (24 h; Fig. 3b).

The distribution of the arsenic species within the cell is shown in Table 4. Whereas ≥70% of the arsenic compounds were found in the cytosol of UROtsa cells after 1-h and 24-h exposure, there is a general trend of a greater percentage of arsenic compounds detected in the fractions derived from organelles and membranes in the hepatocytes than in the UROtsa cells (Tab. 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4 Percentage of total intracellular arsenic in fractions N, M, P, R, and C For concentrations, see Fig. 3.

 

Radical Formation. The release of TBARS after exposure to arsenic compounds was significantly different between the tested cell types. Following exposure to arsenic compounds human hepatocytes were more susceptible to this effect than human urothelial cells. TBARS release was time- and concentration-dependent with a maximum after 24-h exposure to MMA(III) (10 µM) in hepatocytes (Fig. 4). The trivalent arsenic compounds induced significantly higher amounts of TBARS than the pentavalent species (Fig. 4). After 48-h exposure the release of TBARS returned to control levels (data not shown).


Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Maximal formation of thiobarbituric acid reactive species after 24-h exposure to Asi(III) (10 µM), Asi(V) (1 mM), MMA(III) (10 µM), MMA(V) (1 mM), DMA(III) (5 µM), DMA(V) (1 mM), and TMAO(V) (1 mM) released by cultured human hepatocytes (phH) and human urothelial cells (UROtsa). Values shown represent the mean of two independent experiments. The time-dependence of TBARS release in phH after exposure to MMA(III) is shown in the upper graph.

 
Genomic Damage. Genotoxic effects of the arsenic compounds Asi(III), Asi(V), MMA(III), and MMA(V) were investigated in primary human hepatocytes (phH) by the alkaline comet assay. A significant induction of DNA breakage caused by MMA(III) and Asi(III) in dependence upon the applied concentration was observed (Fig. 5). MMA(III) induced DNA damage in phH at 10-fold lower concentrations than Asi(III). The effects caused by exposure of phH to the pentavalent arsenic species were statistically not significant (Fig. 5).


Figure 5
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Arsenic-induced DNA damage in human hepatocytes measured by comet assay in dependence upon arsenic concentration (0.1–500 µM) after an exposure time of 1 h. The experiments were repeated at least three times. Student's t test: *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Studies on the metabolism and toxic effects of arsenic in UROtsa cells by Styblo et al. (2000Go, 2002Go) have consistently shown that these cells do not methylate inorganic arsenic. The enzymatic methylation of inorganic arsenic is catalyzed by As(+3 oxidation state)-methyltransferase, which is expressed in rat liver and human hepatocytes but not in UROtsa cells (Drobná et al., 2005Go). The relationship between methylation capacity of the cell and toxic effects is still under discussion.

In the present study we have investigated the cellular uptake and the subcellular distribution of different arsenic species in UROtsa cells and hepatocytes and have compared the cyto- and genotoxic effects in both cell types. We observed cell type-specific differences in cytotoxic effects and in intracellular radical formation as well as in uptake, retention, and distribution of the arsenic compounds. The nonmethylating UROtsa cells were less susceptible to arsenic exposure regarding cytotoxic effects than the methylating hepatocytes. Intracellular radical formation was up to 5-fold increased in hepatocytes compared with urothelial cells. All arsenic compounds were accumulated to a higher extent in UROtsa cells and to a much lesser extent in hepatocytes. Interestingly, the intracellular concentration of pentavalent arsenic species increased with increasing exposure time, suggesting accumulation of pentavalent arsenic species. In contrast, the intracellular concentration of trivalent arsenic species fell. This may be a result of oxidative methylation of the trivalent arsenicals to the pentavalent species and/or suggests that the trivalent species are transported extracellularly, as is known to occur for Asi(III).

The highest percentage of all arsenic compounds was detected in the cytosol of UROtsa cells. The percentage of arsenic compounds in the cytosol of hepatocytes was comparably lower. In both cell types the arsenic species were not bound to the cell membrane but were able to enter the cytosol (no significant difference in arsenic concentration in whole-cell extract and in membrane-removed cell extract).

The arsenic content in the cytosol of the methylating hepatocytes seems to influence the metabolic turnover. Protein binding and enzyme modifications seem to be important factors in arsenic carcinogenesis. According to studies of Kitchin and Wallace (2007), some of the protein targets to which arsenite may bind include poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase, thioredoxin reductase, arsenic(+3)methyltransferase, and Keap-1. Cytosolic enzymes that may be influenced by arsenic include S-adenosylmethionine and monothiol (Takahashi et al., 1990Go). Zakharyan and Aposhian (1999Go) detected an S-adenosylmethionine-dependent enzyme in the cytosol of rabbit liver cells that methylates both arsenite and methylarsonous acid.

In contrast to primary human hepatocytes, the arsenic concentrations in the nuclei of UROtsa cells were not significantly elevated. Pentavalent arsenic compounds were less permeable to the nuclear membrane of human hepatocytes than the trivalent arsenic compounds. To the best of our knowledge, there are no data available on arsenic-induced DNA damage in primary human urothelial cells or in primary human hepatocytes. UROtsa cells are not a suitable cell model for genotoxicity studies because of a relatively high background effect in the unexposed controls. Therefore, we have used primary human hepatocytes for genotoxicity studies. Significant DNA damage in hepatocytes was detected at concentrations of 5 µM MMA(III) and 50 µM Asi(III) (1-h exposure). These concentrations are lower than those of the former experiments with CHO cells (Dopp et al., 2004Go). MMA(III) induced significant DNA damage in CHO cells at 10 µM after 1-h exposure, and Asi(III) did not induce significant damage up to a concentration of 500 µM. It seems that hepatocytes are more susceptible than CHO cells, which are fibroblasts, to arsenic-induced toxic effects; however, different methods were used in these studies (micronucleus assay in the former study and comet assay in the present study). The reason for choosing the comet assay in the present study is that primary hepatocytes do not proliferate in culture, and proliferation is a prerequisite for application of the micronucleus assay. The observed genotoxic effects in the present study are caused by the trivalent arsenic derivatives, which are present to a higher percentage in the nucleus of hepatocytes than the pentavalent species. Styblo and Thomas (1997bGo) suggested that the pentavalent arsenic species can be reduced to trivalency in in vitro assay systems. Based on this observation we also hypothesize that pentavalent arsenic species are reduced to trivalent species, which are detectable to a high percentage in the nucleus of hepatocytes.

Several studies have implicated oxidative stress and free radical formation as important factors in the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of arsenic compounds (Kitchin, 2001Go; Kessel et al., 2002Go; Nesnow et al., 2002Go; Kitchin and Ahmad, 2003Go; Schwerdtle et al., 2003bGo; Shi et al., 2004Go; Yamanaka et al., 2004Go). Disruption of tubulin polymerization by arsenicals is also discussed in the literature (Kligerman et al., 2005Go). The results of the present study confirm the involvement of free radicals in arsenic-induced cellular damage. The generation of free radicals increases with time (maximum at 24-h exposure) and decreases again after >24 h of exposure. In the present study DNA damage in phH caused by Asi(III) and MMA(III) is detectable already after 1-h exposure, although radical formation is still relatively low at this time point. Earlier studies have consistently shown that arsenic-induced DNA damage increases with longer exposure times (Dopp et al., 2004Go, 2005Go).

In addition to nucleic damage, mitochondria are also highly affected cell organelles after arsenic exposure. It might be that arsenic exposure leads to mitochondrial damage and this damage causes release of superoxide anions, which then react with nitric oxide to produce the highly reactive peroxynitrites (Liu et al., 2005Go). Partridge et al. (2007Go) observed a reduction in mtDNA copy number, an increased incidence of large heteroplasmic deletions, a reduction of cytochrome c oxidase activity, and an increase in citrate synthase activity, indications that mitochondrial replication and function were abnormal after arsenic treatment.

Our study has shown that ribosomes may also contain high levels of arsenic compounds. It might be possible that protein synthesis itself is influenced by arsenic. Andrews et al. (1987Go) suggested from their study with arsenite that protein synthesis is suppressed and that the observed increase in the level of c-fos mRNA is caused by an inhibition of protein synthesis. Arsenite impairs the function of many proteins by binding to sulfhydryl groups (Scott et al., 1993Go). The cumulative effects of this impairment are oxidative stress and kinase activation, including receptor type and non-receptor type tyrosine kinases, JNK, p38, p70S6 kinase (p70S6K), checkpoint kinases, and Akt. Both sustained oxidative stress and aberrant kinase activation have been linked to cell growth and malignant transformation.

In summary, the results of our study indicate that uptake, retention, accumulation, and extrusion of arsenic compounds are dependent upon cell type and arsenic species. The nonmethylating UROtsa cells accumulate higher amounts of arsenic species in the cytosol, whereas arsenic compounds are more distributed into the cell organelles in the methylating hepatocytes, where more pronounced cyto- and genotoxic effects can be observed.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Gabriele Zimmer and Ute Zimmermann for excellent technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This work was kindly supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant FOR 415).

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://dmd.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/dmd.107.019034.

ABBREVIATIONS: As3MT, As(+3 oxidation state)-methyltransferase; CHO-9, Chinese hamster ovary cells; HPLC-HG-AFS, high-performance liquid chromatography–hydride generation–atomic fluorescence spectrometry; ICP-MS, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry; MDA, malondialdehyde; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; UROtsa, SV-40–transformed normal human urinary bladder epithelial cell line; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; phH, primary human hepatocytes.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Elke Dopp, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Institut für Hygiene und Arbeitsmedizin, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany. E-mail: elke.dopp{at}uni-due.de


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 


Ahmad S, Kitchin KT, and Cullen WR (2002) Plasmid DNA damage caused by methylated arsenicals, ascorbic acid and human liver ferritin. Toxicol Lett 133: 47-57.[CrossRef][Medline]

Andrews GK, Harding MA, Calvet JP, and Adamson ED (1987) The heat shock response in HeLa cells is accompanied by elevated expression of the c-fos proto-oncogene. Mol Cell Biol 7: 3452-3458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Aposhian HV, Zakharyan RA, Avram MD, Kopplin MJ, and Wollenberg ML (2003) Oxidation and detoxification of trivalent arsenic species. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 193: 1-8.[CrossRef][Medline]

Aposhian HV and Aposhian MM (2006) Arsenic toxicology: five questions. Chem Res Toxicol 19: 1-15.[CrossRef][Medline]

Basu A, Mahata J, Gupta S, and Giri AK (2001) Genetic toxicology of a paradoxical human carcinogen, arsenic: a review. Mutat Res 488: 171-194.[CrossRef][Medline]

Challenger F (1945) Biological methylation. Chem Rev 36: 315-361.[CrossRef]

Chang KN, Lee TC, Tam MF, Chen YC, Lee LW, Lee SY, Lin PJ, and Huang RN (2003) Identification of galectin I and thioredoxin peroxidase II as two arsenic-binding proteins in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biochem J 371: 495-503.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chiou HY, Hsueh YM, Liaw KF, Horng SF, Chiang MH, Pu YS, Lin JS, Huang CH, and Chen CJ (1995) Incidence of internal cancers and ingested inorganic arsenic: a seven-year follow-up study in Taiwan. Cancer Res 55: 1296-1302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Devesa V, Del Razo LM, Adair B, Drobná Z, Waters SB, Hughes MF, Styblo M, and Thomas DJ (2004) Comprehensive analysis of arsenic metabolites by pH-specific hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom 19: 1460-1467.[CrossRef]

Dopp E, Hartmann LM, Florea AM, von Recklinghausen U, Pieper R, Shokouhi B, Rettenmeier AW, Hirner AV, and Obe G (2004) Uptake of inorganic and organic derivatives of arsenic associated with induced cytotoxic and genotoxic effect in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 201: 156-165.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dopp E, Hartmann LM, von Recklinghausen U, Florea AM, Rabieh S, Zimmermann U, Shokouhi B, Yadav S, Hirner AV, and Rettenmeier AW (2005) Forced uptake of trivalent and pentavalent methylated and inorganic arsenic and its cyto-/genotoxicity in fibroblasts and hepatoma cells. Toxicol Sci 87: 46-56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dorko K, Freeswick PD, Bartoli F, Cicalese L, Bardsley BA, Tzakis A, and Nussler AK (1994) A new technique for isolating and culturing human hepatocytes from whole or split livers not used for transplantation. Cell Transplant 3: 387-395.[Medline]

Drobná Z, Waters SB, Walton FS, LeCluyse EL, Thomas DJ, and Styblo M (2004) Interindividual variation in the metabolism of arsenic in cultured primary human hepatocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 201: 166-177.[CrossRef][Medline]

Drobná Z, Waters SB, Devesa V, Harmon AW, Thomas DJ, and Styblo M (2005) Metabolism and toxicity of arsenic in human urothelial cells expressing rat arsenic (+3 oxidation state)-methyltransferase. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207: 147-159.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gebel TW (2001) Genotoxicity of arsenical compounds. Int J Hyg Environ Health 203: 249-262.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gong Z, Lu X, Culler WR, Le XC (2001) Unstable trivalent arsenic metabolites, monomethylarsonous acid and dimethylarsinous acid. J Anal Atom Spectrom 16: 1409-1413.[CrossRef]

Hayakawa T, Kobayashi Y, Cui X, and Hirano S (2005) A new metabolic pathway of arsenite: arsenic-glutathione complexes are substrates for human arsenic methyltransferase Cyt 19. Arch Toxicol 79: 183-191.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hughes MF (2002) Arsenic toxicity and potential mechanisms of action. Toxicol Lett 133: 1-16.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kenyon EM and Hughes MF (2001) A concise review of the toxicity and carcinogenicity of dimethylarsinic acid. Toxicology 160: 227-236.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kessel M, Liu SX, Xu A, Santella R, and Hei TK (2002) Arsenic induces oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biochem 234-235: 301-308.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kitchin KT (2001) Recent advances in arsenic carcinogenesis: modes of action, animal model systems, and methylated arsenic metabolites. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 172: 249-261.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kitchin KT and Ahmad S (2003) Oxidative stress as a possible mode of action for arsenic carcinogenesis. Toxicol Lett 137: 3-13.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kitchin KT and Wallace K (2008) The role of protein binding of trivalent arsenicals in arsenic carcinogenesis and toxicity. J Inorg Biochem 102: 532-539.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kligerman AD, Doerr CL, Tennant AH, Harrington-Brock K, Allen JW, Winkfield E, Poorman-Allen P, Kundu B, Funasaka K, Roop BC, et al. (2003) Methylated trivalent arsenicals as candidate ultimate genotoxic forms of arsenic: induction of chromosomal mutations but not gene mutations. Environ Mol Mutagen 42: 192-205.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kligerman AD, Doerr CL, and Tennant AH (2005) Oxidation and methylation status determine the effects of arsenic on the mitotic apparatus. Mol Cell Biochem 279: 113-121.[CrossRef][Medline]

Le XC, Ma MS, and Wong NA (1996) Speciation of arsenic compounds using high-performance liquid chromatography at elevated temperature and selective hydride generation atomic fluorescence detection. Anal Chem 68: 4501-4506.

Lin S, Shi Q, Nix FB, Styblo M, Beck MA, Herbin-Davis KM, Simeonsson JB, and Thomas DJ (2002) A novel S-adenosyl-l-methionine: As(III) methyltransferase from rat liver cytosol. J Biol Chem 277: 10795-10803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu SX, Athar M, Lippai I, Waldren C, and Hei TK (2001) Induction of oxyradicals by arsenic: implication for mechanism of genotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 1643-1648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu SX, Davidson MM, Tang X, Walker WF, Athar M, Ivanov V, and Hei TK (2005) Mitochondrial damage mediates genotoxicity of arsenic in mammalian cells. Cancer Res 65: 3236-3242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mass MJ, Tennant A, Roop BC, Cullen WR, Styblo M, Thomas DJ, and Kligerman AD (2001) Methylated trivalent arsenic species are genotoxic. Chem Res Toxicol 14: 355-361.[CrossRef][Medline]

Millar IT, Heaney H, Heinecky DM and Fernelius C (1960) Methyldiiodoarsine. Inorganic Synthesis 6: 113-115.[CrossRef]

Nesnow S, Roop BC, Lambert G, Kadiiska M, Mason RP, Cullen WR, and Mass MJ (2002) DNA damage induced by methylated trivalent arsenicals is mediated by reactive oxygen species. Chem Res Toxicol 15: 1627-1634.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nussler AK, Di Silvio M, Billiar TR, Hoffman RA, Geller DA, Selby R, Madariaga J, and Simmons RL (1992) Stimulation of the nitric oxide synthase pathway in human hepatocytes by cytokines and endotoxin. J Exp Med 176: 261-264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Partridge MA, Huang SXL, Hernandez-Rosa E, Davidson MM, and Hei TK (2007) Arsenic induced mitochondrial DNA damage and altered mitochondrial oxidative function: implications for genotoxic mechanisms in mammalian cells. Cancer Res 67: 5239-5247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rossi MR, Masters JR, Park S, Todd JH, Garrett SH, Sens MA, Somji S, Nath J, and Sens DA (2001) The immortalized UROtsa cell line as a potential cell culture model of human urothelium. Environ Health Perspect 109: 801-808.[Medline]

Rossman TG (2003) Mechanism of arsenic carcinogenesis: an integrated approach. Mutat Res 533: 37-65.[Medline]

Schuliga M, Chouchane S, and Snow ET (2002) Upregulation of glutathione-related genes and enzyme activities in cultured human cells by sublethal concentrations of inorganic arsenic. Toxicol Sci 70: 183-192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schwerdtle T, Walter I, and Hartwig A (2003a) Arsenite and its biomethylated metabolites interfere with the formation and repair of stable BPDE-induced DNA adducts in human cells and impair XPAzf and Fpg. DNA Repair 2: 1449-1463.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schwerdtle T, Walter I, Mackiw I, and Hartwig A (2003b) Induction of oxidative DNA damage by arsenite and its trivalent and pentavalent methylated metabolites in cultured human cells and isolated DNA. Carcinogenesis 24: 967-974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Scott N, Hatlelid KM, MacKenzie NE, and Carter DE (1993) Reactions of arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) species with glutathione. Chem Res Toxicol 6: 102-106.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shi H, Hudson LG, Ding W, Wang S, Cooper KL, Liu S, Chen Y, Shi X, and Liu KJ (2004) Arsenite causes DNA damage in keratinocytes via generation of hydroxyl radicals. Chem Res Toxicol 17: 871-878.[CrossRef][Medline]

Styblo M, Serves SV, Cullen WR, and Thomas DJ (1997a) Comparative inhibition of yeast glutathione reductase by arsenicals and arsenothiols. Chem Res Toxicol 10: 27-33.[CrossRef][Medline]

Styblo M and Thomas DJ (1997b) Binding of arsenicals to proteins in an in vitro methylation system. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 147: 1-8.[CrossRef][Medline]

Styblo M, Del Razo LM, LeCluyse EL, Hamilton GA, Wang C, Cullen WR, and Thomas DJ (1999) Metabolism of As in primary cultures of human and rat hepatocytes. Chem Res Toxicol 12: 560-565.[CrossRef][Medline]

Styblo M, Del Razo LM, Vega L, Germolec DR, LeCluyse EL, Hamilton GA, Reed W, Wang C, Cullen WR, and Thomas DJ (2000) Comparative toxicity of trivalent and pentavalent inorganic and methylated arsenicals in rat and human cells. Arch Toxicol 74: 289-299.[CrossRef][Medline]

Styblo M, Drobna Z, Jaspers I, Lin S, and Thomas DJ (2002) The role of biomethylation in toxicity and carcinogenicity of arsenic: A research update. Environ Health Perspect 110: 767-777.[Medline]

Takahashi K, Yamauchi H, Mashiko M, and Yamamura Y (1990) The effect of S-adenosylmethionine on methylation of inorganic arsenic. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 45: 613-618.[Medline]

Tseng CH (2007) Arsenic methylation, urinary arsenic metabolites and human diseases: current perspective. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 25: 1-22.[Medline]

Waters SB, Devesa-Perez V, Del Razo LM, Styblo M, and Thomas DJ (2004) Endogenous reductants support catalytic function of recombinant rat cyt19, an As methyltransferase. Chem Res Toxicol 17: 404-409.[CrossRef][Medline]

World Health Organization (2001) Arsenic and arsenic compounds. International Programme on Chemical Safety. Environmental Health Criteria 224.

Yamanaka K, Kato K, Mizoi M, An Y, Takabayashi F, Nakano M, Hoshino M, and Okada S (2004) The role of active arsenic species produced by metabolic reduction of dimethylarsinic acid in genotoxicity and tumorigenesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 198: 385-393.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zakharyan RA and Aposhian HV (1999) Enzymatic reduction of arsenic compounds in mammalian systems: the rate-limiting enzyme of rabbit liver arsenic biotransformation is MMA(V) reductase. Chem Res Toxicol 12: 1278-1283.[CrossRef][Medline]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.107.019034v1
dmd.107.019034v2
36/5/971    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dopp, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rettenmeier, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dopp, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rettenmeier, A. W.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition