DMD Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on April 4, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.015271


0090-9556/07/3507-1050-1056$20.00
DMD 35:1050-1056, 2007

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.107.015271v1
35/7/1050    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, W.
Right arrow Articles by Uetrecht, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, W.
Right arrow Articles by Uetrecht, J. P.

Possible Bioactivation Pathways of LamotrigineFormula

Wei Lu, and Jack P. Uetrecht

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

The anticonvulsant lamotrigine is associated with idiosyncratic drug reactions, especially skin rashes. Most idiosyncratic reactions are believed to be caused by reactive metabolites. Previous studies have found evidence that an arene oxide is formed in rats; however, when we incubated radiolabeled lamotrigine with rat liver microsomes virtually no covalent binding was detected, and the expected downstream phenolic metabolites are not observed in humans. Rare cases of agranulocytosis have been associated with lamotrigine therapy, and we found that lamotrigine is oxidized to two different N-chloro products by HOCl. The more reactive N-chloro metabolite forms an adduct with N-acetylhistidine, and covalent binding was observed when radiolabeled lamotrigine was incubated with myeloperoxidase/H2O2/Cl. Another lamotrigine metabolite is an N-oxide. If this N-oxide were sulfated, it might be sufficiently reactive to bind to protein. The synthetic N-sulfate reacted with N-acetylserine; however, no covalent binding was detected when the radiolabeled N-oxide was incubated with sulfotransferase. We also investigated the possibility that lamotrigine might be oxidized to a free radical by other peroxidases or oxidized by other enzymes such as prostaglandin H synthase or tyrosinase, but no evidence of oxidation was found, and lamotrigine did not cause any detectable increase in lipid peroxidation in vivo. In view of the virtual lack of covalent binding to hepatic microsomes and the lack of any other likely pathway leading to metabolic activation in the skin, it is possible that the parent drug rather than a reactive metabolite causes lamotrigine-induced skin rashes.


Address correspondence to: Jack Uetrecht, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3M2. E-mail: jack.uetrecht{at}utoronto.ca







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.