QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dmd.107.015354v1 35/8/1292    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shen, H. Articles by Li, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shen, H. Articles by Li, C.

Comparative Metabolic Capabilities and Inhibitory Profiles of CYP2D6.1, CYP2D6.10, and CYP2D6.17

Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica (H.S., H.L., L.W., B.G., C.L.) and Graduate School (H.S., C.L.), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; and Department of Drug Disposition, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.H., S.A.W.)

Polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) gene are a major cause of pharmacokinetic variability in human. Although the poor metabolizer phenotype is known to be caused by two null alleles leading to absence of functional CYP2D6 protein, the large variability among individuals with functional alleles remains mostly unexplained. Thus, the goal of this study was to examine the intrinsic enzymatic differences that exist among the several active CYP2D6 allelic variants. The relative catalytic activities (enzyme kinetics) of three functionally active human CYP2D6 allelic variants, CYP2D6.1, CYP2D6.10, and CYP2D6.17, were systematically investigated for their ability to metabolize a structurally diverse set of clinically important CYP2D6-metabolized drugs [atomoxetine, bufuralol, codeine, debrisoquine, dextromethorphan, (S)-fluoxetine, nortriptyline, and tramadol] and the effects of various CYP2D6-inhibitors [cocaine, (S)-fluoxetine, (S)-norfluoxetine, imipramine, quinidine, and thioridazine] on these three variants. The most significant difference observed was a consistent but substrate-dependent decease in the catalytic efficiencies of cDNA-expressed CYP2D6.10 and CYP2D6.17 compared with CYP2D6.1, yielding 1.32 to 27.9 and 7.33 to 80.4% of the efficiency of CYP2D6.1, respectively. The most important finding from this study is that there are mixed effects on the functionally reduced allelic variants in enzyme-substrate affinity or enzyme-inhibitor affinity, which is lower, higher, or comparable to that for CYP2D6.1. Considering the rather high frequencies of CYP2D6*10 and CYP2D6*17 alleles for Asians and African Americans, respectively, these data provide further insight into ethnic differences in CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism. However, as with all in vitro to in vivo extrapolations, caution should be applied to the clinical consequences.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W.-Y. Zhang, Y.-B. Tu, R. L. Haining, and A.-M. Yu Expression and Functional Analysis of CYP2D6.24, CYP2D6.26, CYP2D6.27, and CYP2D7 Isozymes Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2009; 37(1): 1 - 4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Sakuyama, T. Sasaki, S. Ujiie, K. Obata, M. Mizugaki, M. Ishikawa, and M. Hiratsuka Functional Characterization of 17 CYP2D6 Allelic Variants (CYP2D6.2, 10, 14A-B, 18, 27, 36, 39, 47-51, 53-55, and 57) Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2008; 36(12): 2460 - 2467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kotsuma, H. Hanzawa, Y. Iwata, K. Takahashi, and T. Tokui Novel Binding Mode of the Acidic CYP2D6 Substrates Pactimibe and Its Metabolite R-125528 Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1938 - 1943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]