DMD

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on August 10, 2004; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.104.000752


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.104.000752v1
32/11/1293    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kunta, J. R
Right arrow Articles by Sinko, P. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kunta, J. R
Right arrow Articles by Sinko, P. J


Received for publication June 2, 2004.
Revised August 4, 2004.
Accepted for publication August 5, 2004.

Differentiation of Gut and Hepatic First-Pass Loss of Verapamil in Intestinal and Vascular Access Ported (IVAP) Rabbits

Jeevan R Kunta 1, Sung-Hack Lee 2, Barbara A Perry 3, Yong-Hee Lee 4, Patrick J Sinko 2*

1 GlaxoSmithKline 2 Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey 3 UMDNJ 4 Ligand Pharmaceuticals

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: sinko{at}rci.rutgers.edu

Abstract

Low and varied oral bioavailability (BA) of some drugs has been attributed to extraction by the intestine and liver. However, the role of the intestine is difficult to directly assess. We recently developed an in vivo IVAP rabbit model that allows for a direct assessment of the contributions of the gut and the liver to the first pass loss of drugs. The current studies validate the utility of the IVAP rabbit model using verapamil (VL). VL pharmacokinetics (PK) were determined after intravenous (IV), portal venous (PV), and upper small intestinal (USI) administration. In the IV dose range studied, VL exhibited linear PK. The PV concentration of VL was significantly lower than systemic concentrations after IV administration suggesting significant intestinal second pass extraction. The intestinal and hepatic extraction of VL, calculated directly from area under the curve (AUC) measurements, were 79% and 92%, respectively, and are in contrast to our previous dog results that showed VL intestinal extraction to be negligible. Assessing the role of intestinal extraction using an "indirect" method was not predictive further showing the utility of this direct measurement model. The BA of VL after USI administration was 1.65%, much lower than that reported for rats, dogs or humans. However, humans and rabbits behave similarly in that the contribution of intestinal extraction for VL is high. In conclusion, the current results demonstrate the utility of the rabbit IVAP model in studying the first- and second-pass intestinal and hepatic loss of drugs and other xenobiotics.


Key words: absorption, bioavailability, drug secretion, first-pass metabolism, gastrointestinal cytochrome P450, hepatic elimination, intestinal bioavailability, intestinal transport, oral absorption, pharmacokinetics





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.