![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication July 20, 2004.
Revised December 16, 2004.
Accepted for publication December 17, 2004.
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the first enzyme in the sequential metabolism of pyrimidine, regulates blood concentrations of 5-fluorouracil, and is deeply involved in its toxicity. This study was designed to examine the effects of a DPD inhibitor on blood concentrations of [2-13C]uracil (13C-uracil) and 13CO2 concentration (
13C) expired in breath after oral or intravenous administration of 13C-uracil to DPD-suppressed dogs prepared by pretreatment with 5-(trans-2-bromovinyl)uracil (BVU), a DPD inhibitor. Area under the curve (AUCt) of 13C-uracil after oral administration at 20 µmol/kg to dogs pretreated with BVU at 2, 5, and 40 µmol/kg were 37-, 88- and 120-fold higher than those of the control dogs, respectively. In contrast, breath AUCt of
13C were reduced to 0.88-, 0.47- and 0.13-fold the control values, respectively. On intravenous administration of 13C-uracil at 20 µmol/kg to dogs pretreated with BVU at 0.5, 2, and 40 µmol/kg, blood AUCtvalues of 13C-uracil were 1.4-, 4.2- and 13-fold higher than those of the control group, respectively, while breath AUCt were reduced to 1.0-, 0.83-, and 0.07-fold the respective control values. DPD activities in the liver cytosol of dogs pretreated with BVU at 0.5, 2, 5, and 40 µmol/kg were decreased to 0.71-, 0.12-, 0.06- and 0.04-fold those of the control dogs, respectively. These findings demonstrate that breath output (
13C) is a good marker of hepatic DPD activity in vivo.
Key words:
drug clearance, drug interactions, enzyme inhibitors, kinetics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. K. Mattison, J. Fourie, Y. Hirao, T. Koga, R. A. Desmond, J. R. King, T. Shimizu, and R. B. Diasio The Uracil Breath Test in the Assessment of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity: Pharmacokinetic Relationship between Expired 13CO2 and Plasma [2-13C]Dihydrouracil Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 12(2): 549 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||