![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication June 22, 2004.
Revised August 31, 2004.
Accepted for publication September 13, 2004.
Concentrative nucleoside transporters (Cnt) and equilibrative nucleoside transporters (Ent) have essential physiological functions and are important in disposition of anticancer and antiviral nucleoside analogs. Information on tissue distribution of Cnts and Ents in rodents is sparse. Thus, the present study aimed to determine distribution of Cnt1-3 and Ent1-3 transcripts in 19 tissues of Sprague-Dawley rats and C57BL/6 mice of both genders. These six transcripts were quantified using the branched DNA signal amplification assay. Cnt1 transcripts were highest in small intestine, followed by kidney and testes, with similar expression in both species. Cnt2 mRNA was expressed highest in the small intestine of both rats and mice, intermediate in liver of rats but not in mice, and lower in thymus and spleen of both species. Cnt3 mRNA has marked species difference, with highest expression in lung of rats but uterus of mice. Ent1 mRNA was most highly expressed in testes and lung of both species. Ent1 mRNA was highly expressed in liver and pituitary of mice, but not in rats. Ent2 mRNA was highly expressed in testes and brain of both species. Ent3 mRNA was highest in kidney, followed by testes, in both species. Significant gender differences were observed in kidney (mouse) and heart (rat). These studies demonstrate that in general, tissue distribution of Cnt and Ent is similar in rats and mice. However, a few important species and gender differences do exist, which could be responsible for related differences in efficacy and toxicity of substrates for these transporters.
Key words:
absorption, anticancer agents, distribution, gender differences, gene regulation, transporters
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. L. Hart, C. Much, D. Kohler, J. Schittenhelm, I. C. Gorzolla, G. L. Stahl, and H. K. Eltzschig Use of a hanging-weight system for liver ischemic preconditioning in mice Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): G1431 - G1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. F. Liao, M. J. Alman, E. S. Vanzant, E. D. Miles, D. L. Harmon, K. R. McLeod, J. A. Boling, and J. C. Matthews Basal Expression of Nucleoside Transporter mRNA Differs Among Small Intestinal Epithelia of Beef Steers and Is Differentially Altered by Ruminal or Abomasal Infusion of Starch Hydrolysate J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1570 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. B. Rose and I. R. Coe Physiology of Nucleoside Transporters: Back to the Future. . . . Physiology, February 1, 2008; 23(1): 41 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Cheng and C. D. Klaassen Regulation of mRNA Expression of Xenobiotic Transporters by the Pregnane X Receptor in Mouse Liver, Kidney, and Intestine Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2006; 34(11): 1863 - 1867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
