![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication April 25, 2005.
Revised September 21, 2005.
Accepted for publication September 21, 2005.
The study was conducted to assess a possible in vivo effect of propiverine, an anticholinergic drug to treat urinary incontinence and related disorders, on the activity of intestinal 3A4 and of hepatic CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP1A2. The activity of the respective CYPs was measured using the following metrics of selective substrates given as a tailored low-dose phenotyping cocktail: intestinal availability of midazolam (2 mg orally), clearance of midazolam (1 mg i.v.), apparent clearance of tolbutamide (125 mg orally), urinary excretion of 4'-hydroxymephenytoin 0 - 8 hours postdose (50 mg mephenytoin orally), and the paraxanthine/caffeine plasma ratio 6 hours postdose (150 mg caffeine orally). These metrics were determined in 16 healthy young men at the end of 7 days treatment with 15 mg of propiverine (Test) or placebo (Reference) twice daily. All phenotyping drugs were quantified by LC-MS/MS. Chronic propiverine treatment reduced hepatic and intestinal CYP3A4 activity slightly to 0.89-fold and 0.80-fold, respectively (90% CI for Test/Reference ratios 0.85 - 0.93 and 0.72 - 0.89), with the combined effect resulting in a 1.46-fold increase in AUC of oral midazolam (90% CI 1.36 - 1.57). Propiverine had no relevant effect on CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP1A2 (90% CI for Test/Reference ratios 0.93-1.00 , 0.84-0.96 and 0.97-1.07, respectively). All study drugs were well tolerated. In conclusion, propiverine has a minor potential to cause drug-drug interactions.
Key words:
cytochrome P450, drug-drug interactions
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Chu, H. J. Einolf, R. Evers, G. Kumar, D. Moore, S. Ripp, J. Silva, V. Sinha, M. Sinz, and A. Skerjanec In Vitro and in Vivo Induction of Cytochrome P450: A Survey of the Current Practices and Recommendations: A Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Perspective Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2009; 37(7): 1339 - 1354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||