DMD Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on November 18, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.105.007013


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.105.007013v1
34/2/311    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shibutani, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shibutani, S.


Received for publication August 25, 2005.
Revised November 14, 2005.
Accepted for publication November 15, 2005.

Inefficient Repair of Tamoxifen-DNA Adducts in Rats and Mice

Sung Yeon Kim 1, Naomi Suzuki 1, Y. R. Santosh Laxmi 1, Shinya Shibutani 1*

1 State University of New York at Stony Brook

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: shinya{at}pharm.stonybrook.edu

Abstract

A long-term treatment of tamoxifen (TAM) to women increases the risk of developing endometrial cancer. It may result from genotoxic damage induced by this drug. In fact, TAM-DNA adducts were detected in the liver of rats treated with TAM and initiated to develop hepatocellular carcinomas. To explore the distribution and repair rate of TAM-DNA adducts, the level of TAM-DNA adducts in all tissues of rats and mice was monitored for 28 days and 7 days, respectively, after the termination of TAM treatment, using 32P-postlabeling/polyacrylamide gel and 32P-postlabeling/HPLC analyses. TAM-DNA adducts were formed specifically in the liver of rodents. In rats, the level of hepatic TAM-DNA adducts was decreased only to 43% in 28 days, indicating that the half-life of adducts was approximately 25 days. Among trans- (fr-1 and fr-2) and cis- (fr-3 and fr-4) isoforms of TAM-DNA adducts, a trans-form (fr-1) was removed much slower than other adducts, indicating that the repair rate of TAM-DNA adducts varied depending on the structure of isoforms. The repair rate of TAM-DNA adducts was also compared between the nucleotide excision repair deficient (Xpc knockout) and the wild mice. Although the level of hepatic TAM-DNA adducts observed with Xpc knockout mice was slightly higher than that of the wild type, the removal of TAM-DNA adducts in both mice was only 20% in 7 days. Thus, TAM-DNA adducts are not efficiently repaired from the targeted tissue, leading to the development of cancer.


Key words: chemical carcinogenesis, distribution, DNA adducts, sulfotransferases





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.