DMD Celsis microsomes mean better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on August 25, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.106.010975


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.106.010975v1
34/12/1945    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bihorel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Scherrmann, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bihorel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Scherrmann, J.-M.


Received for publication May 12, 2006.
Revised August 2, 2006.
Accepted for publication August 23, 2006.

Influence of hydroxyurea on imatinib mesylate transport at the mouse blood-brain barrier

Sebastien Bihorel 1, Gian Camenisch 2, Gerhard Gross 2, Michel Lemaire 3, Jean-Michel Scherrmann 4*

1 INSERM U705 / Novartis Pharma AG 2 Novartis Pharma AG 3 Novartis Pharmaceuticals AG 4 INSERM U 705 HOP Fernand Widal

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: jean-michel.scherrmann{at}fwidal.inserm.fr

Abstract

The combination of imatinib mesylate and hydroxyurea provides a therapeutic benefit in patients with glioblastoma, although each drug is not effective when used alone. The increase of brain delivery of one or both drugs has been suggested to be a potential cause of this therapeutic benefit. The cross-influence of hydroxyurea and imatinib on their respective brain distribution was examined in mice and rats. We used in situ brain perfusion in mice to determine whether these two drugs have an influence on their respective initial transport across the blood-brain barrier. The brain penetration of hydroxyurea, assessed by its brain uptake clearance Knet, was low in mice (~ 0.10 µL/g/s) and not modified by co-perfusion of imatinib (0.5-500 µM). Likewise, the brain penetration of imatinib was low (Knet, 1.39 ± 0.17 µL/g/s) and not modified by direct co-perfusion of hydroxyurea (0.2-1000 µM) or by intravenous pre-treatment with 15 or 1000 mg/kg hydroxyurea. We also examined a potential time-dependent influence of hydroxyurea on imatinib brain distribution after sustained subcutaneous administration in rats using an implantable osmotic pump. The brain penetration of imatinib in rats increased with time, ~1.6-fold (p < 0.01) following 7 and 14 days infusion of imatinib (3 mg/day) with or without hydroxyurea (15 mg/d), and was not influenced by hydroxyurea. The results of these two sets of experiments indicate that hydroxyurea has no significant influence on the brain distribution of imatinib in mice and rats.


Key words: ABC transporters, blood-brain barrier, drug distribution, p-glycoprotein, pharmacokinetics





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.