DMD

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on February 12, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.106.013474


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.106.013474v1
35/5/822    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vibet, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chourpa, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vibet, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chourpa, I.


Received for publication October 26, 2006.
Revised February 8, 2007.
Accepted for publication February 9, 2007.

Differential subcellular distribution of mitoxantrone in relation to chemosensitization in two human breast cancer cell lines

Sophie Vibet 1, Karine Maheo 1, Jacques Gore 1, Pierre Dubois 1, Philippe Bougnoux 1, Igor Chourpa 1*

1 Universite de Tours, F-37000 France

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: chourpa{at}univ-tours.fr

Abstract

The present work investigates the relation between cancer cell chemosensitivity and subcellular distribution, molecular interaction and metabolism of an anticancer drug. To get insights into this relation, we took advantage of the differential sensitivity of two breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 to anthracyclins, along with the property of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3), to differentially enhance their cytotoxic activity. The fluorescent drug mitoxantrone (MTX) was utilized because of the possibility to study its subcellular accumulation by confocal spectral imaging (CSI). CSI allowed us to obtain semi-quantitative maps of four intracellular species: nuclear MTX bound to DNA, MTX oxidative metabolite in endoplasmic reticulum, cytosolic MTX and finally, MTX in a low polarity environment characteristic of membranes. MDA-MB-231 were found to be more sensitive to MTX (IC50 = 18 nM) than MCF-7 (IC50 =196 nM). According to fluorescence levels, the nuclear and cytosolic MTX content was higher in MCF-7 than in MDA-MB-231, indicating that mechanisms other than nuclear MTX accumulation account for chemosensitivity. In the cytosol, the relative proportion of oxidized MTX was higher in MDA-MB-231 (60%) than in MCF-7 (7%). DHA sensitized MDA-MB-231 (about 4 fold) but not MCF-7 cells to MTX and increased MTX accumulation by 1.5 fold in MDA-MB-231 only. The DHA-stimulated accumulation of MTX was mainly attributed to the oxidative metabolite. Antioxydant N-acetyl-cystein inhibited the DHA effect on both metabolite accumulation and cell sensitization to MTX. We conclude that drug metabolism and compartimentalization are associated with cell chemosensitization and the related cytotoxicity mechanisms may involve oxidative stress.


Key words: analytical chemistry, anticancer agents, drug efficacy, drug interactions, fatty acid metabolism, metabolite identification, oxidative stress





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.