![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication June 11, 2007.
Revised August 2, 2007.
Accepted for publication August 24, 2007.
Abstract Predicting drug-drug interactions (DDIs) requires an assessment of the drug concentration available to the enzyme active site, both in vivo, and within an in vitro incubation. These predictions are confounded when the inhibitor accumulates within the liver, either as a result of active transport processes or intracellular binding (including lysosomal trapping). In theory, hepatocytes should provide a more accurate estimation of inhibitory potency compared to microsomes for those compounds that undergo hepatic accumulation. However they are not routinely used for Ki determination and there is limited comparative information available. Therefore the aims of this study were to compare Ki values determined in rat microsomes and freshly isolated hepatocytes using six P450 inhibitors (miconazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole, quinine, fluoxetine and fluvoxamine) with a range of uptake properties (cell-to-medium concentration ratios 4.2 - 6000). Inhibition studies were performed using four probe substrates for CYP2C, CYP2D and CYP3A enzymes (tolbutamide and phenytoin, dextromethorphan and midazolam, respectively). Comparison of unbound Ki values (range 0.05-30µM) showed good agreement between microsomes and hepatocytes, for inhibition of 18 pathways of metabolism. In addition to this, there was no relationship between the cell-to-medium concentration ratios (covering over three orders of magnitude) and the microsomal to hepatocyte Ki ratio of these inhibitors. These data suggest that the hepatic accumulation of these inhibitors results from intracellular binding rather than the involvement of uptake transporters, and indicate that microsomes and hepatocytes appear to be equivalent for determining the inhibitory potency of the six inhibitors investigated in the present study.
Key words:
CYP inhibition, drug clearance, drug-drug interactions, hepatic transport, hepatic uptake, hepatocytes, in vitro-in vivo prediction, in vitro-in vivo scaling, microsomes
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. T. Snider, J. A. Nast, L. A. Tesmer, and P. F. Hollenberg A Cytochrome P450-Derived Epoxygenated Metabolite of Anandamide Is a Potent Cannabinoid Receptor 2-Selective Agonist Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2009; 75(4): 965 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Grime, P. J. H. Webborn, and R. J. Riley Functional Consequences of Active Hepatic Uptake on Cytochrome P450 Inhibition in Rat and Human Hepatocytes Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1670 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Kilford, M. Gertz, J. B. Houston, and A. Galetin Hepatocellular Binding of Drugs: Correction for Unbound Fraction in Hepatocyte Incubations Using Microsomal Binding or Drug Lipophilicity Data Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2008; 36(7): 1194 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. McGinnity, N. J. Waters, J. Tucker, and R. J. Riley Integrated in Vitro Analysis for the in Vivo Prediction of Cytochrome P450-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1126 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||