DMD Simcyp

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on March 17, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.017335


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.107.017335v1
36/6/1166    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harmsen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Meijerman, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harmsen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Meijerman, I.


Received for publication June 25, 2007.
Revised March 14, 2008.
Accepted for publication March 14, 2008.

COMPARISON OF TWO IMMORTALIZED HUMAN CELL LINES TO STUDY NUCLEAR RECEPTOR MEDIATED CYP3A4 INDUCTION

Stefan Harmsen 1*, Andries Koster 1, J.H. Beijnen 2, J.H.M. Schellens 3, Irma Meijerman 1

1 Utrecht University 2 Utrecht University / Slotervaart Hospital 3 Utrecht University / Netherlands Cancer Institute

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: s.harmsen{at}uu.nl

Abstract

Since cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is responsible for the biotransformation of over 50% of all clinically used drugs, induction results in an increased clearance of many concomitantly administered drugs, thereby decreasing treatment efficacy or, in the case of pro-drugs, lead to severe intoxications. CYP3A4 induction is regulated by the pregnane X receptor, constitutive androstane receptor, and vitamin D receptor. Since these nuclear receptors show large interspecies differences, accurate prediction of nuclear receptor mediated CYP3A4 induction in humans requires the use of human systems. As primary cultures of human hepatocytes or enterocytes have major drawbacks like poor availability and poor reproducibility, human cell lines are a good alternative. In this study, the widely used HepG2 cell line was compared the LS180 cell line to serve as a model to study CYP3A4 induction. There was a clear difference between the cell lines with respect to CYP3A enzyme expression and induction. In LS180 CYP3A4 was expressed and was found to be induced by prototypical nuclear receptor agonists, while in HepG2 CYP3A4 was non-responsive to treatment with rifampicin, CITCO or calcitriol. We subsequently evaluated if these host-cell differences also have an effect on CYP3A4 reporter gene activity. We clearly show that there are differences in CYP3A4 reporter activity between the cell lines, and based on these results and those found on mRNA and protein level, we conclude that LS180 is a more suitable cell line to study CYP3A4 induction than the widely used HepG2.


Key words: anticancer agents, bioavailability, CAR, CYP3A, cytochrome P450 regulation, drug-drug interactions, first-pass metabolism, induction, nuclear receptors, PXR


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
V. Chu, H. J. Einolf, R. Evers, G. Kumar, D. Moore, S. Ripp, J. Silva, V. Sinha, M. Sinz, and A. Skerjanec
In Vitro and in Vivo Induction of Cytochrome P450: A Survey of the Current Practices and Recommendations: A Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Perspective
Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2009; 37(7): 1339 - 1354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.