DMD

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on January 23, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.018358


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.107.018358v1
36/4/702    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richert, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richert, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, S.


Received for publication August 17, 2007.
Revised January 7, 2008.
Accepted for publication January 22, 2008.

Species differences in the response of liver drug metabolizing enzymes to EMD 392949 in vivo and in vitro

Lysiane Richert 1, Gregor Tuschl 2, Catherine Abadie 1, Nadege Blanchard 1, Alexandre Bonet 3, Bruno Heyd 4, Nermin Halkic 5, Elmar Wimmer 2, Hugues Dolgos 2, Stefan Mueller 2*

1 KaLy Cell 2 Merck Serono 3 UFR Besancon 4 Hopital Jean Minjoz 5 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: stefan.o.mueller{at}merck.de

Abstract

Induction of drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) is highly species-specific and can lead to drug-drug interaction and toxicities. In this series of studies we tested the species-specificity of the anti-diabetic drug development candidate and mixed peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR){alpha}/{gamma} agonist EMD 392949 (EMD) with regards to the induction of gene expression and activities of DMEs, their regulators and typical PPAR target genes. EMD clearly induced PPAR{alpha} target genes in rats in vivo and in rat hepatocytes but lacked significant induction of DMEs, except for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 4A. CYP2C and 3A were consistently induced in livers of EMD-treated monkeys. Interestingly, classic rodent peroxisomal proliferation markers were induced in monkeys after 17 but not after a 4-week treatment, a fact also observed in human hepatocytes after 72 h but not 24 h of EMD treatment. In human hepatocyte cultures, EMD showed similar gene expression profiles and induction of CYP activities as in monkeys, indicating that the monkey is predictive for human CYP induction by EMD. In addition, EMD induced a similar gene expression pattern as the PPAR{alpha} agonist fenofibrate in primary rat and human hepatocyte cultures. In conclusion, these data showed an excellent correlation of in vivo data on DME gene expression and activity levels with results generated in hepatocyte monolayer cultures, enabling a solid estimation of human CYP-induction. This study also clearly highlighted major differences between primates and rodents in the regulation of major inducible CYPs, with evidence of CYP3A and CYP2C inducibility by PPAR{alpha} agonists in monkey and humans.


Key words: Ah receptor, CAR, CYP expression, CYP induction, human CYP enzymes, in vitro-in vivo prediction, nuclear receptors, PXR





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.