DMD

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Drug Metabolism and Disposition Fast Forward
First published on March 10, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/dmd.108.020545


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dmd.108.020545v1
36/6/1016    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauman, J. N
Right arrow Articles by Kalgutkar, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauman, J. N
Right arrow Articles by Kalgutkar, A. S.


Received for publication January 22, 2008.
Revised March 4, 2008.
Accepted for publication March 5, 2008.

Comparison of the Bioactivation Potential of the Antidepressant and Hepatotoxin Nefazodone with Aripiprazole, a Structural Analog and Marketed Drug

Jonathan N Bauman 1, Kosea Frederick 1, Aarti Sawant 1, Robert Walsky 1, Loretta Cox 1, Ronald Obach 1, Amit S. Kalgutkar 2*

1 Pfizer 2 Pfizer Global Research and Development

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: amit.kalgutkar{at}pfizer.com

Abstract

In vitro metabolism/bioactivation of structurally-related CNS agents nefazodone (hepatotoxin) and aripiprazole (non-hepatotoxin) were undertaken in human liver microsomes in an attempt to understand the differences in toxicological profile. NADPH-supplemented microsomal incubations of nefazodone and glutathione generated conjugates derived from addition of thiol to quinonoid intermediates. Inclusion of cyanide afforded cyano conjugates to iminium ions derived from {alpha}-carbon oxidation of the piperazine ring in nefazodone and downstream metabolites. While the arylpiperazine motif in aripiprazole did not succumb to bioactivation, the dihydoquinolinone group was bioactivated via an intermediate monohydroxy metabolite to a reactive species, which was trapped by glutathione. Studies with synthetic dehydroaripiprazole metabolite revealed an analogous glutathione conjugate with molecular weight 2 Da lower. Based on the proposed structure of the glutathione conjugate(s), a bioactivation sequence involving aromatic ortho- or para-hydroxylation on the quinolinone followed by oxidation to a quinone-imine was proposed. P4503A4 inactivation studies in microsomes indicated that unlike nefazodone, aripiprazole was not a time- and concentration-dependent inactivator of the enzyme. Overall, these studies reinforce the notion that not all drugs that are bioactivated in vitro elicit a toxicological response in vivo. A likely explanation for the markedly improved safety profile of aripiprazole (versus nefazodone) despite the accompanying bioactivation liability are the vastly improved pharmacokinetics (enhanced oral bioavailability, longer elimination half-life) due to reduced P4503A4-mediated metabolism/bioactivation, which result in a lower daily dose (5-20 mg/day) compared with nefazodone (200-400 mg/day). This attribute probably reduces the total body burden to reactive metabolite exposure and may not exceed a threshold needed for toxicity.


Key words: CYP3A, drug transport, drug-drug interactions, drug-induced hepatotoxicity, glutathione conjugates, hepatotoxicity, idiosyncratic drug reactions, liver microsomes, metabolite identification, toxicity





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.