CORRECTION TO “COMPARISON OF PREDICTION METHODS FOR IN VIVO CLEARANCE OF (S,S)-3-[3-(METHYLSULFONYL)PHENYL]-1-PROPYLPIPERIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE, A DOPAMINE D2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST, IN HUMANS”
===============================================================================================================================================================================================


In the above article [Yamazaki S, Toth LN, Black ML, and Duncan JN (2004) *Drug Metab Dispos* **32:**[398-404](http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/lookup/volpage/32/398)], the following errors should be corrected.

On [page 403](http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/lookup/volpage/32/398), the sentence “Using the CL × MLP method based on the exponent (0.910) of simple allometry, predicted CLblood value for PNU-96391 was over-predicted by approximately 7-fold despite a high regression coefficient (0.992) across animal species” should be corrected to: “Using the CL × MLP method based on the exponent (0.910) of simple allometry, predicted CLblood value for PNU-96391 was over-predicted by approximately 2-fold despite a high regression coefficient (0.996) across animal species”.

On [page 403](http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/lookup/volpage/32/398), the sentence “Alternatively the CL × BW method provided an under-prediction (0.4-fold) with a regression coefficient of 0.864” should be corrected to: “Alternatively the CL × BW method provided an over-prediction (1.4-fold) with a regression coefficient of 0.990”.

On [page 403](http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/lookup/volpage/32/398), the sentence “Thus the in vitro-in vivo correlation approach could predict CLblood value more accurately than the simple allometry or the modified allometric methods” should be corrected to: “Thus the in vitro-in vivo correlation approach could predict CLblood value more accurately than the simple allometry method”.

The authors apologize for any confusion and inconvenience caused by these errors.

*   The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics