hUCM emixustat deamination vs. hUCM BA deamination | 0.705 | <0.001 | 0.736 | 0.0018 |
hUCM emixustat deamination vs. hUCM VAP-1 levels | 0.827 | <0.001 | 0.886 | <0.0001 |
hUCM BA deamination vs. hUCM VAP-1 levels | 0.639 | <0.005 | 0.627 | <0.005 |
hAM emixustat deamination vs. hAM BA deamination | 0.794 | <0.00001 | 0.823 | <0.00001 |
hAM emixustat deamination vs. hAM VAP-1 levels | 0.789 | <0.00001 | 0.732 | 0.0002 |
hAM BA deamination vs. hAM VAP-1 levels | 0.543 | 0.013 | 0.568 | 0.009 |
hP emixustat deamination vs. hP BA deamination | 0.922 | <0.00001 | 0.821 | 0.0002 |
hP emixustat deamination vs. hP VAP-1 levels | 0.874 | <0.00001 | 0.764 | 0.0009 |
hP BA deamination vs. hP VAP-1 levels | 0.911 | <0.00001 | 0.913 | <0.00001 |
hAM emixustat deamination vs. hP emixustat deamination | 0.582 | 0.025 | 0.629 | 0.012 |
hAM emixustat deamination vs. hP BA deamination | 0.444 | 0.069 | 0.531 | 0.023 |
hAM emixustat deamination vs. hP VAP-1 | 0.486 | 0.041 | 0.477 | 0.045 |