Table 2

Demographics of sample groups

GenesInflammation ScorenAgeSexClinical Diagnosis
MeanS.E.MFHepCHepBOther
0546.64.241311
UGT2B4/2B711343.83.3112931
2B10/2B112–3449.55.331301
UGT1A1/1A3/1A40840.03.944710
1A6/1A9/2B15/2B1712141.33.31651272
CYP1A2/IL1b2–3548.44.741401
UGT1A all/2B all0840.03.944710
TGF-β2–3548.44.741401
GenesFibrosis ScorenAgeSexClinical Diagnosis
MeanS.E.MFHepCHepBOther
0639.23.351501
UGT2B4/2B71746.46.252412
2B10/2B112748.13.361430
UGT1A1/1A301034.93.364811
1A4/1A6/1A91939.35.254621
2B15/2B172947.82.972540
CYP1A2/IL1β3–4649.37.260411
UGT1A all/2B all0735.12.5143700
TGF-β3–4649.37.2060411

Samples were separated into three groups according to their inflammation score, and four groups according to their fibrosis score. Details of the patient's age, gender, and clinical diagnosis for each group are shown. Samples with an inflammation score of 2 or 3 or a fibrosis score of 3 or 4 were grouped together. Isoforms 2B4/2B7/2B10 and 2B11 were measured in 22 samples (inflammation) and 20 samples (fibrosis). All other isoforms were measured in 34 samples.

  • M, male; F, female; Hep, hepatitis.