TABLE 5

Relationship of UGT1A1 inhibition and occurrence of hyperbilirubinemia by HIV protease inhibitors


HIV Inhibitor

Dose

Fu2

CmaxCmin2

Cmax,uCmin,u2

Ki

Cmax/KiCmin/Kid

Cmax,u/Ki — Cmin,u/Kid

Observed Hyperbilirubinemiae
mg μM μM μM
Atazanavir 400 q.i.d. 0.135 6.28-0.312 0.847-0.042 1.9 3.31-0.16 0.45-0.02 Yes, some patients
Indinavir 800 t.i.d. 0.40 12.6-0.293 5.04-0.117 47.9 0.26-0.06 0.11-0.002 Yes, some patients
Saquinavir 600 t.i.d. <0.02 0.29-0.060 0.006-0.001 6.52c 0.04-0.01 0-0 No
Lopinavira 400 b.i.d. <0.02 15.3-8.75 0.306-0.175 4.3c 3.56-2.03 0.07-0.04 No
Ritonavir 600 t.i.d. <0.02 15.6-5.15 0.312-0.103 9.5c 1.64-0.54 0.03-0.01 No
Nelfinavir
750 t.i.d.
<0.02
6.70-2.44
0.134-0.049
5.5c
1.22-0.44
0.02-0.01
No
  • b Plasma protein unbound drug fraction Fu, maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), and plasma drug concentration at trough (Cmin) values were from literature reports (Flexner, 2000; de Maat et al., 2003; Goldsmith and Perry, 2003). Free drug concentrations were calculated by multiplying drug concentrations by Fu.

  • a The combination of lopinavir and ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg) was approved for clinical use (Hurst and Faulds, 2000).

  • c Ki was estimated based on Ki = 1/2 × IC50 when [S] = Km, assuming a competitive inhibition.

  • d AUCi/AUC = 1 + [I]/Ki (Ito et al., 1998); [I] = Cmax, Cmin, Cmax,u, or Cmin,u for prediction.

  • e Elevated unconjugated bilirubin was associated with administration of atazanavir and indinavir in some patients (Flexner, 2000; Goldsmith and Perry, 2003).